:00:00. > :00:18.Egypt's. Now it is time for Newswatch.
:00:19. > :00:21.Welcome to Newswatch. Violence in Thailand shown on the
:00:22. > :00:29.lunchtime news/ two match for many viewers.
:00:30. > :00:36.Others have had enough of what they see as celebrity worship I BBC
:00:37. > :00:44.reporters. And coming up are some of the iconic
:00:45. > :00:53.words and phrases you hate broadcasters to use.
:00:54. > :00:57.The current outbreaks of filings in Ukraine and Thailand have dominated
:00:58. > :01:02.the news with editors having to decide how much violence they should
:01:03. > :01:11.show as on the bulletins. Those judgements can prove controversial.
:01:12. > :01:21.This was demonstrated in a report showed on Tuesday. Be warned we will
:01:22. > :01:27.be describing the images after this. Firing repeatedly with rubber
:01:28. > :01:32.alerts. I grenade thrown into the police lines.
:01:33. > :02:03.One officer realised the danger. What followed was described,
:02:04. > :02:10.same point. I joined by one of them.
:02:11. > :02:19.What was your reaction to seeing that?
:02:20. > :02:22.I was horrified. Had that been a British policeman on a British
:02:23. > :02:33.street the world would have gone in at draw. -- at draw. I wonder what
:02:34. > :02:39.part of that was acceptable for a lunchtime report. Would a warning
:02:40. > :02:48.have made the difference? It would not. It should not have been shown
:02:49. > :02:54.at all. The moral filter at the BBC has let as down. That policeman has
:02:55. > :03:03.had a life changing currents and it should not be shown so graphically.
:03:04. > :03:07.Is there a lack of sensitivity when it is a foreign news story, when
:03:08. > :03:12.perhaps they would never have thought about showing footage like
:03:13. > :03:17.that of a British police officer? You would not have shown footage
:03:18. > :03:26.like that of a British police officer. Our foreign police officer,
:03:27. > :03:32.are does that make it all day? I do not think so. It should never be
:03:33. > :03:36.shown. It is important to show the reality
:03:37. > :03:43.of the violence? How do we avoid over sanitising? I do not believe
:03:44. > :03:50.that showing violence in such manner is except devolve. You can show the
:03:51. > :03:54.lead up. You can speak about the violence, but please do not sure
:03:55. > :04:00.images like that again. It was horrific.
:04:01. > :04:06.Some viewers said we should not even have shown the grenade landing. It
:04:07. > :04:16.is to reveal. The news is not Hollywood. To put images like that
:04:17. > :04:24.out on the news is portraying real life events as though it is
:04:25. > :04:29.Hollywood. We do not need to see the reality of it. We did not need to
:04:30. > :04:30.see that man named. Let me read BBC statement in
:04:31. > :05:08.response. grateful for the apology. I still
:05:09. > :05:15.think that should never have been shown at all. The moral filter of
:05:16. > :05:23.the BBC let us down. It should not have been shown.
:05:24. > :05:31.Thank you. We are interested in all of your
:05:32. > :05:35.views regarding BBC outputs. More of the comments we received
:05:36. > :05:41.this week. We are into the entertainment awards
:05:42. > :05:50.season. Last Sunday sought the BAFTAs.
:05:51. > :05:55.A sea of super celebrities roll out the red-carpet. Stopping for a
:05:56. > :06:00.photo. Twirling for the TV. Heading off for the BAFTAs.
:06:01. > :06:05.Whoever winds tonight, it will be a good evening for the British film
:06:06. > :06:11.industry. But as actors and directors are in high demand.
:06:12. > :06:17.Technicians and studios are a magnet for Hollywood blockbusters.
:06:18. > :07:40.There was a variety of responses. Last weekend Sunday Politics Saul
:07:41. > :07:43.Andrew Neill interview Bob Crow. -- last weekend Sunday Politics had
:07:44. > :07:53.Andrew Neill interviewing Bob Crow of the RMT.
:07:54. > :07:59.I do not see what peoples holidays have got to do with it. Why do they
:08:00. > :08:11.not all Boris Johnson when he is on holiday? Why do they not view the
:08:12. > :08:36.editors of the newspapers? Brian Lawson 's response was:
:08:37. > :08:42.plan to fire sub-atomic particles through 800 miles of rock to get
:08:43. > :08:51.further clues as to how you the universe was created.
:08:52. > :09:02.Researchers plan to artificially create an bean of. -- beam. They
:09:03. > :09:03.plan to finally been 100 miles across the country to a gigantic
:09:04. > :09:31.detector are. We asked you last week for the words
:09:32. > :09:36.and phrases used by broadcasters which cause annoyance. Many of you
:09:37. > :10:27.took the opportunity to get frustrations of your chest.
:10:28. > :10:31.should he said. But there was a clear winner. The single most
:10:32. > :10:50.loathed word. contributions. We cannot guarantee
:10:51. > :10:56.that you will not hear any of them ever again. You can share your
:10:57. > :11:05.opinions on BBC News by contacting us.