:00:08. > :00:09.Hello, I'm Ros Atkins, this is Outside Source.
:00:10. > :00:11.Donald Trump Junior has defended his meeting
:00:12. > :00:13.with a Russian lawyer las year, who he believed had incriminating
:00:14. > :00:29.Again, this is before the Russian mania, before they built it up in
:00:30. > :00:31.the press. For me, it was opposition research. They had something.
:00:32. > :00:33.The President is calling the greatest witch hunt
:00:34. > :00:36.But here's his nominee for FBI Director in his
:00:37. > :00:47.Is the future FBI director, do you consider this endeavour a witchhunt?
:00:48. > :00:49.I do not consider direct A Mullen to be on a witchhunt.
:00:50. > :00:51.Brazil's former president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has been
:00:52. > :00:53.sentenced to nine-and-a-half years in jail for corruption
:00:54. > :00:59.In an interview with the BBC, President Erdogan of Turkey has
:01:00. > :01:07.denied claims that his country has jailed over 150 journalists.
:01:08. > :01:15.TRANSLATION: Those people inside jail are not titled as journalists.
:01:16. > :01:16.Some corroborated with terrorist organisations.
:01:17. > :01:19.And some of the world's biggest tech companies are staging a day
:01:20. > :01:21.of protest in support of net neutrality.
:01:22. > :01:36.We'll explain what it is - and why it affects all of us.
:01:37. > :01:38.Donald Trump Jr has a lot of explaining to do -
:01:39. > :01:43.Yesterday he released emails which show him setting up a meeting
:01:44. > :01:45.on the promise of damaging information on Hillary
:01:46. > :01:51.Clinton that the Russian government wanted to supply.
:01:52. > :01:53.Now Donald Trump Jr has spoken to Fox News.
:01:54. > :02:00.Here he is on what his father knew about the meeting.
:02:01. > :02:08.A lot of people will want to know this about your father. Did you tell
:02:09. > :02:11.your father anything about this? It was such a nothing, there was
:02:12. > :02:16.nothing to tell. I wouldn't have even remembered it until you started
:02:17. > :02:20.scouring through the stuff, it was literally a wasted 20 minutes, which
:02:21. > :02:22.was a shame. It is hard to imagine how the interview could have been
:02:23. > :02:23.more gentle. We'll see more of that
:02:24. > :02:25.interview in a moment. On the 3rd of June 2016
:02:26. > :02:29.Donald Trump Junior received an email from this man,
:02:30. > :02:30.Rob Goldstone. He's a music publicist and
:02:31. > :02:33.acquaintance of Donald Trump Junior. In it, he explains a former Russian
:02:34. > :02:36.business partner of Donald Trump had been contacted by a Russian
:02:37. > :02:38.government official - and the offer was of "information
:02:39. > :02:41.that would incriminate Hillary To which the reply is,
:02:42. > :02:49."If it's what you say, I love it". Four days later, Rob
:02:50. > :02:51.Goldstone emails again - asking Donald Trump Junior
:02:52. > :02:54.if he would meet with a woman called She was described in the email
:02:55. > :03:05.as a Russian government attorney. The meeting took place two days
:03:06. > :03:09.later at Trump Tower in New York. We know as much because here's
:03:10. > :03:11.Rob Goldstone, on Facebook, checking in at Trump Tower
:03:12. > :03:17.and announcing that he's there. Donald Trump Jr says no useful
:03:18. > :03:25.info was handed over. That was much, much later in
:03:26. > :03:27.proceedings. Here's more of his
:03:28. > :03:36.interview on Fox News. In retrospect, I probably would have
:03:37. > :03:41.done things a little differently. Again, this is before Russia mania,
:03:42. > :03:45.before they built it in the press. For me, it was opposition research,
:03:46. > :03:49.they may had concrete evidence to the stories that I heard about which
:03:50. > :03:53.were probably underreported the years, not just during the campaign,
:03:54. > :03:56.I wanted to hear it out but it went nowhere and it was apparent that was
:03:57. > :04:01.not what the meeting was actually about.
:04:02. > :04:04.Let me ask you a hypothetical, maybe you have thought about it since now
:04:05. > :04:09.that it has become Russia collusion etc. Did you ever meet with any
:04:10. > :04:13.other person from Russia but you know? I don't know, I have probably
:04:14. > :04:18.met with the people from Russia but not in the context of a formalised
:04:19. > :04:22.meeting or anything. Why would I? In the grand scheme of how busy we
:04:23. > :04:25.were, it was much more important... This was a courtesy to an
:04:26. > :04:31.acquaintance. Some people ask... Hear him asking
:04:32. > :04:34.why would I, they look at an e-mail exchange during which he is offered
:04:35. > :04:37.information about Hillary Clinton from the Russian government and
:04:38. > :04:38.think, why wouldn't you? Here's the President's
:04:39. > :04:40.verdict on that interview. "My son Donald did
:04:41. > :04:42.a good job last night. He was open, transparent
:04:43. > :04:43.and innocent. This is the greatest Witch Hunt
:04:44. > :04:51.in political history. Let's see how Anthony Zurcher
:04:52. > :05:02.describes it. He is live from Washington, DC. Sad as one word, bad
:05:03. > :05:04.might be another? Absolutely. Donald Trump, Vice President Mike Pence,
:05:05. > :05:07.everybody in the administration spent months saying there was no
:05:08. > :05:12.corroboration or contact between Russian officials and members of the
:05:13. > :05:16.Trump campaign, now we have actual e-mail correspondence that has
:05:17. > :05:20.Donald Trump Jr not only meeting with someone that he thought was a
:05:21. > :05:24.representative of the Russian Government but welcoming and
:05:25. > :05:27.celebrating that fact, hoping he would be provided information that
:05:28. > :05:31.was incriminating to Hillary Clinton. He says nothing came of
:05:32. > :05:34.that meeting but the simple fact that there was an openness to such a
:05:35. > :05:39.meeting, that Donald Trump Jr was able to get the chair of the
:05:40. > :05:42.campaign, Paul Manafort, to sit on the meeting, as well as his
:05:43. > :05:45.brother-in-law Jared Kushner, that undermines much of what we have
:05:46. > :05:50.heard from the Trump White House over the past few months and shows a
:05:51. > :05:55.little bit about how members of the Trump campaign were being so
:05:56. > :05:57.defensive about Russian contacts. People like Jeff Sessions said he
:05:58. > :06:02.had never met with Russian officials, only to have to
:06:03. > :06:06.contradict that later. Michael Flynn said he did not talk with Russians
:06:07. > :06:10.about sanctions, only to have to recant that and ended being fired
:06:11. > :06:15.about it. It plays into perceptions about a lot of smoke circling the
:06:16. > :06:20.Trump administration when Russia is the topic of discussion. There are
:06:21. > :06:23.difficult perceptions, but in terms of the practical politics, has
:06:24. > :06:29.anything changed for the White House? The White House has dug in,
:06:30. > :06:34.formed battle lines again. It used to be there was no contact, no
:06:35. > :06:39.interest in coordination with Russia, now it is a little
:06:40. > :06:44.different, the contact was meaningless, nothing came of it, it
:06:45. > :06:48.was before Russia became the big story. They have changed a bit, but
:06:49. > :06:53.then you see stories in the New York Times and the Washington post about
:06:54. > :06:58.the chaos going on within the White House. They don't know where these
:06:59. > :07:01.leaks came from, these e-mails got out, the stories about Donald Trump
:07:02. > :07:05.Jr all came out into the press and there is a lot of finger-pointing
:07:06. > :07:08.within the West Wing of the White House, trying to figure out who is
:07:09. > :07:13.trying to get Hugh, who will benefit and who needs to protect themselves.
:07:14. > :07:14.That is the main story in Washington, but stay with us,
:07:15. > :07:14.Anthony. Let's also talk about
:07:15. > :07:16.Christopher Wray - this is Donald Trump's pick
:07:17. > :07:19.to become the next FBI Director. His senate confirmation
:07:20. > :07:20.hearing has begun. No surprises, there have
:07:21. > :07:22.been a lot of questions And this one was specifically
:07:23. > :07:26.about Donald Trump Jnr and the meeting we've just been
:07:27. > :07:38.discussing. Let's see how that went. Here is
:07:39. > :07:42.what I tell every politician, if you get a call from somebody suggesting
:07:43. > :07:46.that a foreign Government wants to help you, by disparaging your
:07:47. > :07:53.opponents, tell us all to call the FBI. To the members of this
:07:54. > :07:58.committee, any threat or is it to interfere with our elections from
:07:59. > :08:02.any nation state or any non-state actor is the kind of thing the FBI
:08:03. > :08:05.would want to know. Google do you believe that in light of the double
:08:06. > :08:11.junior e-mail and other allegations that this whole thing about the
:08:12. > :08:15.Trump campaigning in Russia is a witchhunt? -- in light of the Donald
:08:16. > :08:22.Trump Jr e-mail? I can't speak to the basis for those
:08:23. > :08:27.comments... I am asking you. As the future FBI director, do you consider
:08:28. > :08:31.this endeavour a witchhunt? I do not consider the former director to be
:08:32. > :08:36.an witchhunt. In a normal situation the
:08:37. > :08:38.President's nominee for director of the FBI directly contradicting the
:08:39. > :08:44.president might be a story in itself, but it feels a little
:08:45. > :08:50.overshadowed? This was a fairly routine confirmation hearing for a
:08:51. > :08:54.nominee who was not all that controversial, but a huge shadow was
:08:55. > :09:01.being cast over this based on James Comey's firing by Donald Trump, the
:09:02. > :09:05.ongoing Russia investigation, Wray was asked time and time again would
:09:06. > :09:09.you pledge loyalty to President Trump the wake only said he was
:09:10. > :09:14.asked to, and cellar Christopher Wray said that my loyalty is only to
:09:15. > :09:17.the rule of law and the Constitution. He said he was a
:09:18. > :09:23.straight shooter, he said he was not going to pull any punches. All other
:09:24. > :09:29.questions, at least from Democrats in particular, to be to try to make
:09:30. > :09:32.sure that Wray was independent from Donald Trump that would be a strong
:09:33. > :09:39.and standing up to pressure from Trump is James Comey was, maybe even
:09:40. > :09:43.stronger. If anything happens in the next 50 minutes, Anthony, you know
:09:44. > :09:45.where we are! Let's move a lot further south from Anthony.
:09:46. > :09:49.He used to be President of Brazil - and he's just been sentenced
:09:50. > :09:54.to nine-and-a-half years in prison for corruption.
:09:55. > :10:03.Let's bring in Katy Watson, the BBC's correspondent in Brazil, she
:10:04. > :10:11.is live from Rio. Could you start by telling us what his crimes? He has
:10:12. > :10:15.been accused... Sorry, sentence for nine and a half years the corruption
:10:16. > :10:24.and money laundering, it refers to a beach-front property that he
:10:25. > :10:30.received in return for the construction company to be able to
:10:31. > :10:35.get some contracts from a state-run oil company, Petrobras. This is part
:10:36. > :10:40.of the country's biggest ever corruption operation, Operation Car
:10:41. > :10:46.Wash, which started in March 20 14. It is a sentence for one of five
:10:47. > :10:53.cases against him. Earlier you told me he will appeal this, he denies
:10:54. > :10:57.his guilt? He says this is a primitive -- politically motivated
:10:58. > :11:04.case, he denies wrongdoing and he will not be going to prison, he has
:11:05. > :11:08.the right to appeal. In the past he has hinted perhaps wanting to run
:11:09. > :11:13.for presidency again, so this sentence we have heard today does
:11:14. > :11:20.not stop him from potentially running for presidency. If he is
:11:21. > :11:24.convicted, if the sentence is upheld in the Appeal Court, he would not be
:11:25. > :11:28.able to run, but in the meantime nothing much changes in terms of
:11:29. > :11:34.that. If you look at the polls, he is the frontrunner for next year's
:11:35. > :11:36.presidential elections. Even if he can run legally, it seems
:11:37. > :11:40.astonishing he might have a chance given he has been found guilty of
:11:41. > :11:49.these crimes? But you tell me he does? This case really divides
:11:50. > :11:53.Brazilians. Millions of Brazilians see him as the country's saviour. He
:11:54. > :11:59.was the most well-respected politician in recent history. When
:12:00. > :12:05.he left power at the end of 2010 he had approval ratings of 80%. Buy a
:12:06. > :12:09.big part of Brazilian society he is very much still supported, but the
:12:10. > :12:13.other half feels he has become a symbol of the problems of corruption
:12:14. > :12:18.in the country. There is still a lot of support if he decided to run for
:12:19. > :12:24.president. I feel that every time we talk about the trouble of
:12:25. > :12:27.politicians in Brazil, the accusation that the judiciary is
:12:28. > :12:36.political comes up time and time again. Is there any evidence that
:12:37. > :12:47.that is true? I mean... All of this, whether it's is Lula, Dilma, it
:12:48. > :12:51.divides everybody. When you look at the judge who has brought the
:12:52. > :12:55.sentence against Lula he is seen as a symbol of exactly that, some
:12:56. > :12:58.people serious too politically motivated, others see him as a
:12:59. > :13:04.symbol of cracking down on corruption. Operation Car Wash has
:13:05. > :13:10.implicated so many politicians and people in power. A third of the
:13:11. > :13:14.current Cabinet is linked to the corruption investigation. It is very
:13:15. > :13:19.hard to separate politically and be able to remove it and say that these
:13:20. > :13:23.judges have their views, people here all have views on whether the judges
:13:24. > :13:27.are doing this to serve a political purpose or not.
:13:28. > :13:32.Thank you for explaining it, Katy Watson, live from Rio.
:13:33. > :13:37.An iceberg four times the size of London and thought to weigh
:13:38. > :13:39.a trillion tonnes has broken away from Antarctica.
:13:40. > :13:56.Fire Service advice to residents to stay put inside flats in Grenfell
:13:57. > :14:00.Tower during the fire lasted nearly two I was, the BBC has learned. A
:14:01. > :14:04.change in policy recommending residents tried to leave was made
:14:05. > :14:08.one hour and 53 minutes after the emergency call. Tonight, survivors
:14:09. > :14:14.confronted the senior investigating police officer looking into the
:14:15. > :14:21.fire. Some others cannot sleep, because
:14:22. > :14:31.when we sleep we dream of it! (INAUDIBLE)
:14:32. > :14:35.. SHOUTING. The test of an investigation is whether it is done
:14:36. > :14:38.properly, not quickly. An investigation of the skill will not
:14:39. > :14:43.be quick, but it will be thorough. It will get to the bottom of what
:14:44. > :14:47.ever happened and hope those two accounts, whether it be an
:14:48. > :14:53.individual or an organisation -- and hold those two accounts.
:14:54. > :14:55.This is Outside Source live from the BBC newsroom.
:14:56. > :14:59.President Trump's eldest son has said he didn't tell his father
:15:00. > :15:01.about a meeting last year with a Russian lawyer,
:15:02. > :15:03.who was apparently offering documents that would damage
:15:04. > :15:15.The main news from BBC World Service.
:15:16. > :15:17.Scientists are demanding new rules to protect
:15:18. > :15:21.A report prepared for the UN says nearly two-thirds of open sea falls
:15:22. > :15:24.outside the jurisdiction of any one country - and that that leaves
:15:25. > :15:30.ecosystems at risk as natural resources are exploited.
:15:31. > :15:32.A boost for the Brazilian President Michel Temer -
:15:33. > :15:35.the senate has approved labour reforms aimed at giving companies
:15:36. > :15:38.more freedom in employee contract negotiations.
:15:39. > :15:39.Perhaps only respite for the President -
:15:40. > :15:47.Police in Berlin have raided homes after a huge solid gold coin
:15:48. > :15:52.It weighs 100 kilograms, and the suspected robbers
:15:53. > :15:54.are believed to have used a ladder and a wheelbarrow to
:15:55. > :16:06.The suspicion is that it's since been melted down and sold.
:16:07. > :16:09.If you're in the US and you've been to sites like Google,
:16:10. > :16:18.Facebook and Amazon today, you may have seen pages like this.
:16:19. > :16:21.Titled this is a battle for the future of the Internet.
:16:22. > :16:23.The sites are running slowly - and it's on purpose.
:16:24. > :16:26.It's a protests to changes being made to rules which govern
:16:27. > :16:29.what's called net neutrality, this is the idea that all internet
:16:30. > :16:42.Right now all Internet traffic is treated the same, no matter where it
:16:43. > :16:47.has come from, where it is going or what it is doing. We call that net
:16:48. > :16:50.neutrality. Without it, campaigners worry that Internet service
:16:51. > :16:54.providers might be able to intentionally slow down your
:16:55. > :16:57.Internet connection unless you pay more for things like video
:16:58. > :17:02.streaming, or they warned there could be some kind of Internet fast
:17:03. > :17:06.lane where big, rich companies could pay to make sure their site load
:17:07. > :17:22.quickly but other, smaller sites macro would be stuck in touch with
:17:23. > :17:26.their politicians to pressure them into supporting net neutrality. Over
:17:27. > :17:31.70,000 websites will push people towards the NCC to make their voices
:17:32. > :17:36.heard, we will push people towards the members of Congress. We want the
:17:37. > :17:42.FCC to hear that net neutrality is widely popular, which it is. But net
:17:43. > :17:48.neutrality has some very powerful opponents, including companies like
:17:49. > :17:52.Verizon, AT, IBM, Cisco, Nokia and, crucially, the new head of the
:17:53. > :17:56.US Federal Communications commission has spoken out against net
:17:57. > :18:01.neutrality. Those against it say it adds unnecessary new regulation to
:18:02. > :18:05.the Internet. They say it makes it harder for Internet service
:18:06. > :18:07.providers to make back the money they invested in building the
:18:08. > :18:12.infrastructure that gives people high-speed Internet. I have had
:18:13. > :18:13.plenty of questions on this story. Technology analyst
:18:14. > :18:18.Tim Mulligan explains. There was research last year which
:18:19. > :18:25.showed that 35% of all download traffic on
:18:26. > :18:32.the US Internet systems last year was because of Netflix.
:18:33. > :18:42.And Netflix is not contributing to that? Yes, and this gets to the hub
:18:43. > :18:47.of the issue. We are transitioning from an ownership culture to access
:18:48. > :18:52.to ownership, effectively streaming. Netflix is the leading provider of
:18:53. > :18:58.video on demand streaming services. In music you have Spotify with music
:18:59. > :19:02.streaming services. What we are looking at is an increased
:19:03. > :19:06.significant increase in demand upon existing infrastructure to provide
:19:07. > :19:10.what the public wants, which is instant access to entertainment. Why
:19:11. > :19:14.is the discussion not about who should bear the cost of the
:19:15. > :19:17.infrastructure, rather than at the point where the consumer gets the
:19:18. > :19:24.experience, whether that should be neutral? The reality, and this is a
:19:25. > :19:29.painful reality for the streaming services, they are on very tight
:19:30. > :19:33.margins. Especially if you are an entertainment -based streaming
:19:34. > :19:38.business. Most of your revenue goes on providing the entertainment,
:19:39. > :19:44.getting licences, paying for the content. I mentioned Netflix, they
:19:45. > :19:49.have 6 billion... Is 6 billion content expenditure this year, only
:19:50. > :19:52.20% of that is going on original content, the rest is to place the
:19:53. > :19:59.content to serve the expectations of the general public, and that is for
:20:00. > :20:04.very low competitive pricing compared to traditional pay-TV. What
:20:05. > :20:10.changes are being proposed in the US that Amazon and Google etc are upset
:20:11. > :20:17.about? We have already seen attempts to try to test net neutrality. So
:20:18. > :20:23.look at T Mobile, they have launched a binge on viewing service which
:20:24. > :20:28.includes major streaming services, so if T Mobile customers pay for a
:20:29. > :20:34.premium tier of data access they get zero rating on access to streaming
:20:35. > :20:39.services like Spotify, Netflix. AT have tried a different thing with
:20:40. > :20:44.preferred advertising partners and they have been chastised by the FCC
:20:45. > :20:47.because of this. Right now we are in a grey zone where people are testing
:20:48. > :20:50.the boundaries, there is a recognition that change needs to
:20:51. > :20:58.become but it is difficult to know where to turn to. Are we likely to
:20:59. > :21:02.underpin a situation where different regions will have different
:21:03. > :21:06.approaches to this? Inevitably, yes. If you look at the distinction
:21:07. > :21:10.between the approach that the EU takes versus the approach that the
:21:11. > :21:17.US regulators take, there are significant differences of, for want
:21:18. > :21:21.of a better word, worldviews. The EU is primarily focused on providing a
:21:22. > :21:28.good consumer level playing field. The US is more of a laissez faire
:21:29. > :21:32.business friendly environment, which inevitably creates a contrast and
:21:33. > :21:34.how this will play out going forward. We will keep an eye on that
:21:35. > :21:35.story. The Royal Bank of Scotland is one
:21:36. > :21:38.of Britain's biggest banks - and it's agreed to pay a US
:21:39. > :21:41.regulator $4.7 billion dollars. It's to settle claims that it
:21:42. > :21:46.mis-sold mortgage-backed securities. Many of these products proved
:21:47. > :21:48.to be almost worthless, and were a significant factor
:21:49. > :21:50.in triggering the global The bank still faces action
:21:51. > :21:57.from the US Department of Justice. Here's what one banking
:21:58. > :22:11.expert has to say. It's likely that there will be
:22:12. > :22:16.billions more in fines to come. They'd really like to get it done
:22:17. > :22:20.quickly, but it has been overhanging the shares. The UK Government
:22:21. > :22:27.ownership position, for a long time. RBS says they are not sure when such
:22:28. > :22:32.a settlement etc might occur. It is not a horrible products, the product
:22:33. > :22:38.was abused and got out of hand. The wrong people got mortgage credits,
:22:39. > :22:40.the banks did it for all kinds of awful financial incentives, they
:22:41. > :22:46.were distributed to investors for all the wrong reasons, the wrong
:22:47. > :22:48.incentives, but the concept but some people's financial records might not
:22:49. > :22:53.be perfect and they should be banned from getting a mortgage is wrong. It
:22:54. > :22:57.should be a market open to everyone. To my knowledge the only major
:22:58. > :23:03.institution that still has to come to terms with this or is fighting it
:23:04. > :23:09.is Barclays, another big UK bank. Staying with the US, this is Janet
:23:10. > :23:09.Yellen, the head of the US central bank.
:23:10. > :23:12.The boss of the US central bank has told Congress that the US economy
:23:13. > :23:15.is healthy enough to sustain more gradual rises in interest rates.
:23:16. > :23:17.Janet Yellen was reporting to members of Congress about bank
:23:18. > :23:26.Let's bring in Michelle Fleury in New York. I feel like if I had a
:23:27. > :23:29.dollar for every time we considered the possibility rates could go up
:23:30. > :23:35.but then they don't in the end, I would be a rich man. What has
:23:36. > :23:41.changed? I think the key thing is she is saying about the economy is
:23:42. > :23:45.growing, albeit slowly, it continues to add jobs. Much as you point out,
:23:46. > :23:49.that we have heard from her in recent months. The difference here
:23:50. > :23:56.is that she said interest rates would not have to go much further to
:23:57. > :23:59.reach a neutral level. What did she mean? A neutral level does not
:24:00. > :24:04.encourage or discourage economic activity. The market interpreted
:24:05. > :24:08.that as a sign that maybe we will see one more rate increase this
:24:09. > :24:13.year, but generally speaking the pace of rate rises will be slow. As
:24:14. > :24:21.a result, that boosted stocks, we have seen the Dow hit another record
:24:22. > :24:25.close, up just over .5%. Why this analysis lead her to think that a
:24:26. > :24:32.higher point than the one we are rat serves American people better? After
:24:33. > :24:37.the financial crisis, to try and spur activity in the economy, to get
:24:38. > :24:42.the economy going and kick-started, interest rates were brought to very
:24:43. > :24:47.low levels. The question became when would we return to normal and what
:24:48. > :24:51.with the new normal look like? That is the part, if you like, of the
:24:52. > :24:56.journey we are on, the return to what the Fed describes as a new
:24:57. > :25:00.normal, in other words rates are starting to climb back up that they
:25:01. > :25:04.will not settle at the levels they were at before, in other words they
:25:05. > :25:08.will be slightly below where they were before. So that period of when
:25:09. > :25:15.we were used to seeing interest rates of around 5%, 4%, forget that,
:25:16. > :25:20.we will be much, much lower. I only have 30 seconds, when might we get a
:25:21. > :25:25.definitive decision from Janet Yellen? This is an evolving process
:25:26. > :25:30.and monetary policy continues to develop. They have always said they
:25:31. > :25:34.are watching the data. We have seen American jobs market improves, the
:25:35. > :25:39.inflation picture remains weak. The other unknown is what happens to
:25:40. > :25:44.fiscal policy, which is controlled by Congress and the White House.
:25:45. > :25:50.Thank you for taking as too large, Michelle Fleury, live from New York.
:25:51. > :25:55.We have been talking about net neutrality with the help of Dave Lee
:25:56. > :26:02.and other guests, they have been discussing that in the US. We had a
:26:03. > :26:03.tweet saying somebody needed more information, we will get that for
:26:04. > :26:11.you later. Before we talk you to, Piazon
:26:12. > :26:14.monsoons, let's bring an update on the winter storm battering New
:26:15. > :26:17.Zealand. It looks very