:00:00. > :00:00.Labour joins the Lib Dems in calling for an extra penny
:00:00. > :00:24.on Scottish income tax. Will you vote for that?
:00:25. > :00:32.Scottish taxpayers would pay a penny more than the rest of the UK under
:00:33. > :00:39.Fresh from the Calais jungle, a French aid worker on conditions
:00:40. > :00:50.And we visit Erskine, the town that has being redesigned...
:00:51. > :00:58.Labour boldly threw down the gauntlet to the Scottish
:00:59. > :01:01.Government today, urging them to add a penny to everyone's income tax
:01:02. > :01:04.to protect education and public services.
:01:05. > :01:08.Those on less than ?20,000 a year would get an annual
:01:09. > :01:15.With the Scottish rate of income tax due to come into effect in April,
:01:16. > :01:18.the Scottish Deputy First Minister has pledged to keep payments in line
:01:19. > :01:32.Kezia Dugdale says a penny across all abundance of income tax would
:01:33. > :01:38.raise almost half ?1 billion and help avoid cuts to education and
:01:39. > :01:42.other local services. If we really want a different society and if we
:01:43. > :01:48.really want a different economy, we have to pay for it. The Scottish
:01:49. > :01:50.Labour leader said the tax increase is a radical alternative to
:01:51. > :01:56.austerity and she says the lowest paid will be protected with a rebate
:01:57. > :02:02.of ?100 a year for workers and pensioners an annual incomes of less
:02:03. > :02:07.than ?20,000. With a Scottish rate of income tax to to come in on April
:02:08. > :02:12.the sickness, the Conservatives are criticised any increase, so to have
:02:13. > :02:17.the SNP who've described the plan is a tax grab and questioned the
:02:18. > :02:20.legality of the scheme. The first time tight control comes to
:02:21. > :02:25.Holyrood, the Labour Party tries to whack people for tax. It wants to
:02:26. > :02:28.take the hard earned money away. Scottish Conservatives will protect
:02:29. > :02:33.paycheques, we do not want people here to be any more tax than they
:02:34. > :02:37.would anywhere else in the UK. It is unworkable and unfair and
:02:38. > :02:43.progressive. It will hammer people on low incomes in contrast to what
:02:44. > :02:47.the SNP Government is doing. The Greens said they do not support a
:02:48. > :02:51.penny across all bands because it is not progressive. The Lib Dems are
:02:52. > :02:55.the only ported to welcome the proposal. They announced a similar
:02:56. > :02:58.policy last week. It is great there is a growing consensus that there is
:02:59. > :03:05.an urgent need for investment in public services. We want to invest
:03:06. > :03:09.1p on income tax for education. So income tax is shaping up to be a
:03:10. > :03:13.real dividing issue for the forthcoming election campaign. Can
:03:14. > :03:14.Labour and the Lib Dems convince people a penny for Scotland is
:03:15. > :03:15.voting for? Earlier tonight, Kezia Dugdale
:03:16. > :03:26.came in to the studio. That other lenders, teacher,
:03:27. > :03:31.policeman or council worker in Scotland who will not be paying this
:03:32. > :03:35.tax increase. That is Gordon Brown said when the SNP wanted to
:03:36. > :03:41.introduce a penny for Scotland. If it is chewed then it is true now.
:03:42. > :03:46.Yes, people earning up to ?27,000 will pay a bit more tax. If you
:03:47. > :03:50.break down to a weekly basis, teach you who earns 25,000 the year will
:03:51. > :03:58.pay ?4 extra a week. I would that that teacher has seen consecutive
:03:59. > :04:01.budgets slash education, classroom at disappearing, 4000 fewer
:04:02. > :04:04.teachers, the gap between the richest and poorest kids is wider
:04:05. > :04:08.than it has ever been, I think there can as there is a legitimate choice
:04:09. > :04:13.to be made here. You want to invest in education but your taking money
:04:14. > :04:15.away from teachers however helping? This is a substantial investment
:04:16. > :04:19.into the next generation of young people. If we choose to use the
:04:20. > :04:23.powers of the Scottish Parliament to chart a different course from Tory
:04:24. > :04:30.star rating, this tax would raise ?480 million, that is directly from
:04:31. > :04:35.-- Interpublic services that can make a material difference to
:04:36. > :04:41.Scotland's future. But you do not deny that low and middle earners
:04:42. > :04:45.will be bearing the brunt? I refute that low earners will be paying a
:04:46. > :04:52.penny more tax. ?20,000 is a high wage. That is the point, anyone who
:04:53. > :04:56.earns a less than that for not only only pay a penny of additional tax,
:04:57. > :05:00.they will be better off as a consequence of this policy. That is
:05:01. > :05:04.a profoundly good thing. There is a debate to be had about tax, some
:05:05. > :05:08.people may not want to pay more. If we seriously want to chart a
:05:09. > :05:13.different course from Tory as critic, we now have the power in
:05:14. > :05:18.Scotland to do that. Why not just raise council tax if this is about
:05:19. > :05:22.local services? Because income tax is fundamentally more progressive.
:05:23. > :05:26.The more you earn, the more you pay. But this is a bit of a blunt
:05:27. > :05:33.instrument, not as progressive as the new tax powers. The more you
:05:34. > :05:40.earn, the more you pay. So I will pay ?481 more a year, the First
:05:41. > :05:43.Minister, ?447 more. That is amazing progressive and fair. If we want to
:05:44. > :05:48.chart a different course from austerity that we have to do this,
:05:49. > :05:52.otherwise we are choosing to accept Tory austerity. We have been told
:05:53. > :05:57.for decades and more powers means fewer cuts, if the SNP refused to
:05:58. > :06:02.match this policy, then these SNP cuts, because they are a choice of
:06:03. > :06:06.the SNP will have made in their budgets tomorrow. John Swinney says
:06:07. > :06:10.he will not increase tax for low and middle income earners. He will
:06:11. > :06:15.operate the living wage, but not increase tax the people and ?20,000.
:06:16. > :06:20.He also said he wanted a fairer and more progressive system of tax. As
:06:21. > :06:25.would I. Hopefully be me get this: Bill Powers we will be able to do
:06:26. > :06:31.that. But that will not come in and all 2017. If we wait until then,
:06:32. > :06:36.that is another two years of cuts, totalling ?1 billion of additional
:06:37. > :06:41.cuts. These are still to come. What I am saying is that we cannot afford
:06:42. > :06:44.to put education, we cannot afford to cut into the future of our
:06:45. > :06:49.children. It is a clear choice we can make, by paying a little more
:06:50. > :06:52.tax, we can invest in the future of our children and public services and
:06:53. > :06:57.that the latter is a profoundly good social policy and the great economic
:06:58. > :07:02.one as well. How this rebate work? Councils would administer it and
:07:03. > :07:07.presumably it is means tested? We have said councils of the best bits
:07:08. > :07:12.of this. Various SNP ministers have lined up to Sage is not possible.
:07:13. > :07:16.That is nonsense. It happens already. The best example is a
:07:17. > :07:21.discretionary housing payment, we make sure no one in Scotland pays a
:07:22. > :07:26.bedroom tax. But you had to bust legislation for that. But it shows
:07:27. > :07:31.the power is absolutely there. What is lacking is political will from
:07:32. > :07:37.the SNP. Have you cost and how much this will take in terms of admin the
:07:38. > :07:43.councils? It is ?1 million. That is a reasonable cost. We can already do
:07:44. > :07:47.this with discretionary housing payments, when the SNP but both 's
:07:48. > :07:51.and admin costs were 1.8 million. I'm suggesting tonight that you
:07:52. > :07:56.wouldn't need a brand-new system. The mechanism is there, so the admin
:07:57. > :08:01.would be lower. Do not lose sight of the wider picture. This is a direct
:08:02. > :08:05.choice we have two invest in public services. I say let's invest in
:08:06. > :08:10.public services and chart a different course. This is an easy
:08:11. > :08:16.promise to make when the polls say you have no chance of winning. Isn't
:08:17. > :08:21.this trying to be blue water between you and the SNP? I fundamentally
:08:22. > :08:26.reject that. I am doing this because it is the right thing to do. I have
:08:27. > :08:31.other journalists ask me today if this is a big gamble. I refute all
:08:32. > :08:35.of that, I am doing this because I cannot any longer accept a situation
:08:36. > :08:38.where the price of austerity is paid by the next generation of children.
:08:39. > :08:43.It does nothing to do with election prospects, it is the right and
:08:44. > :08:48.decent thing to do. A quick question on Europe. Now we have seen
:08:49. > :08:53.Cameron's proposal, would you be happy with a June referendum? I
:08:54. > :08:57.would we have a June or September. We need a decent amount of time to
:08:58. > :09:00.make a case for why Europe is a force for good in our lives.
:09:01. > :09:01.Kezia Dugdale speaking with me earlier.
:09:02. > :09:05.now the long-awaited draft deal on EU reform is written,
:09:06. > :09:07.David Cameron will embark on a whirlwind charm offensive
:09:08. > :09:10.to try to get the signatures of the 27 other EU leaders.
:09:11. > :09:13.Here, campaigners to leave and to remain in the EU each claim
:09:14. > :09:14.Cameron's piece of paper backs their case.
:09:15. > :09:16.Joining me now is our Westminster Correspondent,
:09:17. > :09:31.Good evening. We heard Kezia Dugdale said she would be happy with the
:09:32. > :09:37.June referendum. The SNP not so happy? I think there is a bit of
:09:38. > :09:42.around brewing. What says -- today but I could deal means is that David
:09:43. > :09:46.Cameron can speak to the European leaders, broker a deal in February
:09:47. > :09:49.and bring that June referendum. The date a lot of people in Westminster
:09:50. > :09:55.are preparing for is the 23rd of June. That is seven weeks after the
:09:56. > :09:59.Scottish Parliament election. Recently, we have heard some figures
:10:00. > :10:01.in the SNP say a six-week period would be a minimum after the
:10:02. > :10:07.Scottish Parliamentary election they would be happy with a referendum.
:10:08. > :10:11.What started to happen is the message is hardening. Angus
:10:12. > :10:17.Robertson said today they would be happy with any referendum in June at
:10:18. > :10:22.all. That is backed by some of the Welsh part is, by the DUP and the
:10:23. > :10:26.SDLP in Northern Ireland. They also say it is too close to local
:10:27. > :10:33.elections there. What is likely to happen in the next few weeks is that
:10:34. > :10:35.if David Cameron does opt for an EU referendum in June, I think you will
:10:36. > :10:40.pass through Parliament, but there will be a row with constituent parts
:10:41. > :10:44.of the UK. Now as for the draft proposals themselves, do you think
:10:45. > :10:49.Cameron's set out what he wanted to do? Will they be enough to win over
:10:50. > :10:52.any Eurosceptics? It depends what your views were before David Cameron
:10:53. > :10:58.went into renegotiation. Some will be happy with what he has achieved
:10:59. > :11:05.today, someone will say it does not go far enough. If you take the issue
:11:06. > :11:09.of the emergency brake on in work benefits for EU migrants, that is an
:11:10. > :11:12.issue camera brought up in the Conservative manifesto. He said he
:11:13. > :11:16.wanted a banner, that is on the deal today. But the devil is in the
:11:17. > :11:21.detail there, there are shortcomings Eurosceptics will bring up time and
:11:22. > :11:26.time again in the weeks to come. It is not actually a banner on EU
:11:27. > :11:31.migrants receiving in work benefits, it is a cuts. So over the first
:11:32. > :11:35.four-year period they are in the UK, the benefits they receive will
:11:36. > :11:39.gradually increase, we do know the percentages of the formula, but it
:11:40. > :11:43.is not an overall banner. This idea of a red card that would allow
:11:44. > :11:47.national parliaments to veto European legislation again, it is in
:11:48. > :11:52.the deal today, David Cameron can point to that and say I have
:11:53. > :11:56.achieved what I wanted. Eurosceptics also the threshold is too high. It
:11:57. > :12:00.is not significantly different from the yellow card system that is
:12:01. > :12:05.currently in place. There were rabbits out of a hat today, David
:12:06. > :12:09.Cameron got some unexpected advances on curbs on terror suspects within
:12:10. > :12:14.the EU .com on things like Sham marriages. They will be able to
:12:15. > :12:17.point these things and say they are significant renegotiations and a
:12:18. > :12:20.good deal for Britain. But there are other things Eurosceptics can get
:12:21. > :12:27.their teeth stuck into a state is not enough. You. -- thank you.
:12:28. > :12:29.Now to a European problem without resolution.
:12:30. > :12:31.In September last year, Medecins Sans Frontieres,
:12:32. > :12:33.an organisation usually associated with some of the world's most
:12:34. > :12:35.dangerous and intractable conflicts, launched relief activities
:12:36. > :12:40.The influx of refugees and migrants there has left local authorities
:12:41. > :12:42.Tonight, straight from a talk at Glasgow University,
:12:43. > :12:45.I am joined by Michael Neuman, an adviser for Medecins Sans
:12:46. > :12:49.Frontiere on operations with migrants.
:12:50. > :13:00.Good evening. We usually think of Medecins Sans Frontieres working
:13:01. > :13:05.with famines, in armed conflicts. What brought you to Calais? The
:13:06. > :13:11.situation is despairing. We know most of the places the migrants have
:13:12. > :13:17.come from. We know some of the reasons why they have come up. We
:13:18. > :13:23.can only witness the total desperation of the situation. Bubba
:13:24. > :13:29.the state is overwhelmed, but it is totally unwilling to act on that
:13:30. > :13:34.situation. You think there is more they can do? Certainly. We are
:13:35. > :13:40.talking about population of about a few thousand. We look at the influx
:13:41. > :13:44.of refugees who came to Europe last year, it is about a million people.
:13:45. > :13:59.Eight and a thousand came to Germany. -- 800,000. Tell me about
:14:00. > :14:08.the conditions you found there. You have people living on the sand, in
:14:09. > :14:14.very basic tenants. Inadequate water supply, very little food. We have
:14:15. > :14:18.been tried to provide health care to these people, together with our
:14:19. > :14:24.organisation, but most of the work that has been done in the past few
:14:25. > :14:38.months has been the work of volunteers, local groups and our
:14:39. > :14:46.association. Many of these people have come from the United Kingdom.
:14:47. > :14:55.The French government needs to address the needs of some women,
:14:56. > :15:00.children, adults, in these dire conditions for up to six to nine
:15:01. > :15:09.months. How do you as a Frenchman feel about this happening in your
:15:10. > :15:13.country? I have had experience before with the organisation for the
:15:14. > :15:24.past 16 years in very different places. In other places, I phoned
:15:25. > :15:29.that the Russian authorities were taking better care of the citizens
:15:30. > :15:40.in the lakes of Chechnya. It says a lot about my reaction and feelings
:15:41. > :15:47.about how my state allows these people to be left in the situation.
:15:48. > :15:53.What sort of help is your organisation being able to offer? We
:15:54. > :15:59.have been able to provide an adequate level of to these people.
:16:00. > :16:05.We have been providing shelter, as shelter, as well as legal
:16:06. > :16:10.counselling who are looking for a solution. The do not want to stay
:16:11. > :16:15.there. They see the situation as transient. Most of them want to
:16:16. > :16:20.reach the United Kingdom, so they are looking for a means of legal
:16:21. > :16:30.advice and counsel, so we help with that. And we have been working with
:16:31. > :16:40.the local municipality to move about 2500 migrants from the small place
:16:41. > :16:46.the 11 to a better camp. But all that is insufficient and will not be
:16:47. > :16:55.enough. There needs to be, of course, with any humanitarian
:16:56. > :17:03.situation, a political solution. It needs to be resolved, both from
:17:04. > :17:05.London and from Paris. Thank you very much for joining us.
:17:06. > :17:11.In the 1970s, as the age of the New Town had changed many
:17:12. > :17:11.parts of Scotland, Erskine on the River Clyde was transformed
:17:12. > :17:13.from a 100-year-old hamlet to a larger, modern town.
:17:14. > :17:16.And many say that is really the last time it changed at all.
:17:17. > :17:18.Now, Renfrewshire Council is trying to engage people
:17:19. > :17:40.In 1971, the Erskine Bridge was in which they shape the development
:17:41. > :17:50.In 1971, the Erskine Bridge was officially opened by Princess.
:17:51. > :17:51.In 1971, the Erskine Bridge was an exciting moment for the region 's
:17:52. > :17:57.history and help pave the way for the local tone of this evening. And
:17:58. > :18:03.it decade since it was established, not up huge that has changed about
:18:04. > :18:09.Erskine. People want to still live here, but are there fewer reasons to
:18:10. > :18:17.stay question mark. That is something the local council want
:18:18. > :18:18.stay question mark. That is address. Renfrewshire Council wants
:18:19. > :18:22.to regenerate it... Giving local residents are big sea. That has not
:18:23. > :18:27.always been the approach in the past. I used to work for the Council
:18:28. > :18:36.many years ago. I was involved in planning. We would do plans and
:18:37. > :18:41.nothing would ever happen. Urban planner Nick says he has been
:18:42. > :18:43.surprised by their reaction. It has been great and very surprising. I
:18:44. > :18:51.rather been great and very surprising. I
:18:52. > :18:57.Erskine, being a new tone, they may not be much community spirit here.
:18:58. > :19:01.But I was completely wrong. All these people in the room sure
:19:02. > :19:05.there's a lot of community spirit. Residents working to get involved,
:19:06. > :19:13.even though that is a degree of scepticism. We have been advised by
:19:14. > :19:18.Renfrewshire Council that visitors from Erskine health to all the
:19:19. > :19:23.expectations, but we want to see justice for the tone. There has been
:19:24. > :19:33.a lot of projects which field. I would just like
:19:34. > :19:33.a lot of projects which field. I fantastic massive one. Do you
:19:34. > :19:38.a lot of projects which field. I they can deal of? It depends. We can
:19:39. > :19:56.have our dreams, they can deal of? It depends. We can
:19:57. > :20:00.that projects like the one in a Erskine could turn into a big public
:20:01. > :20:06.relations exercise? That is what we are trying to avoid. We are talking
:20:07. > :20:10.to the community and getting their ideas. The deputy leader of the
:20:11. > :20:15.council says he can understand why some locals are pessimistic. I
:20:16. > :20:24.understand the cynicism about politicians and politics. The
:20:25. > :20:30.reality is that I think working alongside communities, shaving
:20:31. > :20:35.problems and being honest about not immediately having resources
:20:36. > :20:41.available, it is an honest place to start. It is clear residents of the
:20:42. > :20:44.Erskine of ambition for the tone. By asking them to get involved, the
:20:45. > :20:48.expect the local council to deliver. Our reporter Ian Hamilton headed
:20:49. > :20:52.down to London recently. Given it was the first
:20:53. > :20:54.time his guide dog Renton had travelled on a plane and Renton
:20:55. > :20:58.is not what you would call petite, they decided to capture
:20:59. > :21:00.the journey on a phone. The resulting film was uploaded
:21:01. > :21:02.to Facebook this morning and, if you are not among the 45,000
:21:03. > :21:20.who have viewed it so far, This will be made gay dog 's first
:21:21. > :21:24.flight and an evil plane. A big dog in no clearly big space. We are
:21:25. > :21:27.heading for a meeting at New Broadcasting House. I am at Glasgow
:21:28. > :21:35.airport. We are waiting to through security. Insecurity, the check
:21:36. > :21:40.under the harmless of Renton, to make sure he was not trying to
:21:41. > :21:48.smuggle anything. While we were being searched giving the security
:21:49. > :21:53.people a good sniff? And the departure lounge, we were informed
:21:54. > :21:58.we would get put onto the aircraft first, to give the dog came to
:21:59. > :22:03.settle. But as you can see, this piece he was going into was not all
:22:04. > :22:08.that big. I must say, the crew were excellent and rough for more
:22:09. > :22:14.interested in the dog is wealthier than Maine, which is feeding off I
:22:15. > :22:19.suppose! And to mark the occasion, he was given his wings. Since a
:22:20. > :22:24.victim, people have been asking if Renton was frightened about taking
:22:25. > :22:29.off and landing? No, he just lay down and went to sleep. That was
:22:30. > :22:36.just his first flight and he was just a scam on the return journey. I
:22:37. > :22:39.will not hesitate to take on a flight once again.
:22:40. > :22:41.That was reporter Ian Hamilton and his guide dog Renton,
:22:42. > :22:46.Joining me now to discuss some of the day's news are the model
:22:47. > :22:50.and actress Eunice Olumide and the journalist Paul Gilbride.
:22:51. > :23:03.Welcome to both of you. Let us talk to you first about that 1p income
:23:04. > :23:17.tax proposal. How would you both feel about that? No. It is one of
:23:18. > :23:21.those things where your automatic reaction is definitely not. If you
:23:22. > :23:27.can justify what it is going to be spent on, that could potentially be
:23:28. > :23:31.a justification. I do think that people in general are becoming much
:23:32. > :23:37.more sceptical about taxation and that is because you see a lot of
:23:38. > :23:43.companies, that is in reference to corporation tax, the likes of
:23:44. > :23:50.Google, Starbucks and other companies who work out ways that the
:23:51. > :23:58.come across as making a lot less profit than the actually do by using
:23:59. > :24:03.offshore accounts. So, you think people may say, why should we be
:24:04. > :24:10.paying? Yes, I think it has to be very justified for people to agree.
:24:11. > :24:14.We have Kezia Dugdale seen he thought -- she thought teachers
:24:15. > :24:23.would be happy to pay more if it was being invested in schools and local
:24:24. > :24:29.services. Possibly if they have any vested interest. But most people
:24:30. > :24:33.involved full zero. This not closely at about whether Labour will make
:24:34. > :24:37.people pay more taxation. This is about them trying to put clear red
:24:38. > :24:42.water between themselves and the Scottish National party. This is not
:24:43. > :24:48.so much about positioning themselves to win more seats, it is about them
:24:49. > :24:54.trying to save some. Trying to get back some of these voters who
:24:55. > :25:01.deserted them in the general election. Is it otherwise move
:25:02. > :25:06.trying to push the Scottish National party back into the same corner as
:25:07. > :25:12.the Conservatives? Yes, it is a clever move, but will it attract a
:25:13. > :25:17.lot of new voters to the party? Probably not. It is very clear for
:25:18. > :25:22.the money is going, will that help persuade people? As I said before,
:25:23. > :25:27.it is imperative that people know what is happening to the money, we
:25:28. > :25:30.get is being spent. It is only in that situation that people will feel
:25:31. > :25:38.comfortable about that and I think that is only fear. And remember, the
:25:39. > :25:42.1p for Scotland from the Scottish National party did not work out so
:25:43. > :25:53.well? No, but again, it seemed a good idea at the time. Gordon Brown
:25:54. > :25:59.was the Chancellor at the time. If we look at John Smith in 1992, we
:26:00. > :26:05.were a nation waiting for the Labour Party to form the next government.
:26:06. > :26:10.It did not happen because the party was not trusted on taxation. It does
:26:11. > :26:15.not have a good record. Letters move on to David Cameron and the European
:26:16. > :26:20.Union deal. It could pave the way for a referendum in June. Needless
:26:21. > :26:27.to say, Nigel Farage was not impressed. This package is hardly
:26:28. > :26:32.worth talking about. It was pathetic. There's not one single
:26:33. > :26:39.poor comeback the United Kingdom. There is no possibility of us
:26:40. > :26:44.controlling our borders. Will that swing it for a lot of people,
:26:45. > :26:47.controlling the borders? I think a lot of people have made up the
:26:48. > :26:52.remainder of this topic already. I think people will be influenced by
:26:53. > :26:57.certain aspects of what David Cameron has achieved not achieved.
:26:58. > :27:03.For me personally, I do think it is good to see that -- save the
:27:04. > :27:08.European Union. Whether we think it is a good thing about bad thing, it
:27:09. > :27:13.is important to be part of, so that we can help to encourage more
:27:14. > :27:20.positive direction and perhaps even lead in a more positive week. And we
:27:21. > :27:26.that is beneficial for Europe and beneficial for countries with the
:27:27. > :27:30.European Union. If you are against is staying and the European Union,
:27:31. > :27:36.this will not change of opinion and if you were for it, you look for it
:27:37. > :27:42.anyway. There is no substance from what he has brought back. It is a
:27:43. > :27:48.fig leaf to give waverers within its own cabinet and partly an excuse not
:27:49. > :27:56.to step out of line and back button scheme. I think external factors
:27:57. > :28:03.will dictate whether Britain votes to stay in the European Union. If it
:28:04. > :28:14.is held in June, the polls say -- the opinion polls appear to show
:28:15. > :28:19.that people will vote to stay in. If it is left later, that could be a
:28:20. > :28:25.factor. I want to talk about happiness. A new survey says that
:28:26. > :28:31.65-79 -year-old are the happiest of all in the United Kingdom. It said
:28:32. > :28:37.young people along with the retired having more satisfaction. Do you
:28:38. > :28:42.feel that is true? I think it is. I think when you get to the final team
:28:43. > :28:46.in your life, you have been set through so much, you appreciate
:28:47. > :28:55.life. It is one of the things we make the lacking is an appreciation.
:28:56. > :29:00.We do have a lot learnt when we live in a society as connected as we do
:29:01. > :29:07.and you can see other people make up more than you, you focus rather than
:29:08. > :29:12.focusing on being grateful for what you have actually got. That could
:29:13. > :29:16.lead to anxiety and feeling like you are not doing as well as you
:29:17. > :29:22.actually are doing. We are just about to run out of time, but any
:29:23. > :29:26.tips for contentment? Do not worry about things that keep you awake at
:29:27. > :29:28.night. That sounds like very sensible advice.
:29:29. > :29:31.That is all from us tonight. Thank you for watching.
:29:32. > :29:34.I will be back at the same time tomorrow night.