01/11/2016

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:19. > :00:20.In the rare event of a miscarriage of justice, are exonerees

:00:21. > :00:31.Hello and welcome to Scotland 2016.

:00:32. > :00:35.Lawyers, academics and campaigners have met in Glasgow to discuss

:00:36. > :00:39.the plight of those jailed for crimes they didn't commit.

:00:40. > :00:42.Iraqi forces trying to drive IS out of Mosul have reached the outskirts

:00:43. > :00:50.And the row with Fifa, who say footballers can't wear poppy

:00:51. > :01:03.armbands when Scotland and England play on Armistice Day.

:01:04. > :01:10.We know from the Shawshank Redemption everyone in prison says

:01:11. > :01:13.they are innocent. But some of them really are. A conference has been

:01:14. > :01:19.hearing from some high-profile victims of the criminal justice

:01:20. > :01:22.system. People who serve years and sometimes decades behind bars for

:01:23. > :01:27.crimes they had not committed. Huw Williams reports.

:01:28. > :01:38.On November 1974 -- November 24, 1974 182 people were injured when

:01:39. > :01:45.these bombs went off. Paddy Hill was among those arrested. If they have

:01:46. > :01:49.said from the beginning, we know you didn't do the bombings. We've got

:01:50. > :01:53.you and that's good enough for us. Then he pointed at the ceiling and

:01:54. > :01:56.said, we didn't pick you but you have been selected by people at the

:01:57. > :02:00.highest level of government and they have given us our orders. He said

:02:01. > :02:06.the police used brutality and torture on them. The next thing, the

:02:07. > :02:12.guy with a shot gun would be in, screaming all sorts of abuse at you

:02:13. > :02:21.about your wife, your kids etc etc. They would say, sit in that corner,

:02:22. > :02:24.I don't want to see your face, you Irish bastard, and all of this. Then

:02:25. > :02:28.they would go to the next one and the next one, the five us, and it

:02:29. > :02:33.would be deadly silent for the next minute or so. Then the one with a

:02:34. > :02:37.handgun would come round. Robert Brown served 25 years for the murder

:02:38. > :02:41.of Annie Walsh which he denied until his conviction was overturned in

:02:42. > :02:46.2002. There was no evidence to connect me to the crimes are wider

:02:47. > :02:50.bit possessed in arrestingly? Since the release of the Guildford four in

:02:51. > :02:54.1991 there have been 6000 cases released from the Court of Appeal,

:02:55. > :03:02.from traffic to murder offences, so there are obviously anomalies in the

:03:03. > :03:05.system, and it is a system that is badly flawed. He says the criminal

:03:06. > :03:10.justice system closes ranks if mistakes come to light. It is not

:03:11. > :03:14.about the truth. Truth and justice are not synonymous in a court of

:03:15. > :03:17.law. It is about winning and the prosecution will do anything to win

:03:18. > :03:24.and if that means heading evidence that could clear a defendant they

:03:25. > :03:28.have no qualms about doing so, Huw. This was discussed today at a

:03:29. > :03:31.conference in the University of Strathclyde, home to a group that

:03:32. > :03:35.investigate potential miscarriages of justice under half of people who

:03:36. > :03:41.have exhausted all normal appeals. As students we can do work that a

:03:42. > :03:48.criminal solicitor would not... Would not be eligible for legal aid

:03:49. > :03:51.for. We can go out to look for fresh information. We collaborate with

:03:52. > :03:54.different departments inside the university. The forensics department

:03:55. > :04:00.and the investigative journalism department. These are things they

:04:01. > :04:07.would not be able to get for free and we have been in the past.

:04:08. > :04:12.Organisation works... We do not have the finance to be able to hire in a

:04:13. > :04:14.lawyer and fight the case is ourselves which is what we want to

:04:15. > :04:24.do as an organisation. You have to get a pat on the back to Strathclyde

:04:25. > :04:29.University and others that offer to -- these projects, offering that in

:04:30. > :04:33.their universities, bringing their learning to real-life situations.

:04:34. > :04:37.Jubilant scenes when the Birmingham six's convictions were overturned,

:04:38. > :04:42.but like every victim of a miscarriage of justice, the effects

:04:43. > :04:47.continue. I still look at everything out here in terms of jail. I cannot

:04:48. > :04:51.get out of the habit. The only good thing they did for us is they took

:04:52. > :04:53.us out of the prison, but they did not take the prison out of us.

:04:54. > :04:54.Paddy Hill ending that report by Huw Williams.

:04:55. > :04:57.Joining us now to discuss this more is Dr Rhonda Wheate

:04:58. > :05:09.She is director of the clinical Law programme there. Thank you for

:05:10. > :05:12.coming in. How common are miscarriages of justice and how do

:05:13. > :05:15.they happen? It is very difficult to see how common they are because

:05:16. > :05:20.obviously we do not hear about all of them and do not find out they

:05:21. > :05:24.have happened. There are incentives in the criminal justice system that

:05:25. > :05:27.mean for example if you want to be eligible for parole you need to

:05:28. > :05:31.admit you were guilty. And so you will have instances of people who,

:05:32. > :05:35.having spent a long durations in prison, will plead guilty, or will

:05:36. > :05:39.admit their guilt at that stage, simply to be released. So there are

:05:40. > :05:45.examples of miscarriages of justice that we cannot tell they are

:05:46. > :05:49.officially but we know, particularly through organisations like this,

:05:50. > :05:53.that this is happening. It is very difficult to quantify but we do know

:05:54. > :05:59.that it happens. Is often the case, as we heard in the film, that

:06:00. > :06:01.universities and students, more students, often end up being the

:06:02. > :06:10.ones doing a lot of the groundwork to try to bring these cases to the

:06:11. > :06:13.forefront? -- law students. Yes, there is a tradition in legal

:06:14. > :06:22.schools, the good ones, trying to Google Street -- trying to

:06:23. > :06:26.infiltrate in students that mentality so there is a long history

:06:27. > :06:32.of innocence Project in universities for that reason. Certainly others do

:06:33. > :06:38.work, in organisations such as MOJO, the miscarriages Of Justice

:06:39. > :06:41.Organisation, trying to raise awareness about the problem which is

:06:42. > :06:45.what the conference tonight was trying to do. Obviously we have a

:06:46. > :06:48.criminal justice system that works extremely well the vast majority of

:06:49. > :06:59.the time and it is a human process, Abbey -- about judgment as well, so

:07:00. > :07:02.it is hard to see how something could be absolutely perfect? Yes, a

:07:03. > :07:05.human process and there will be human responses to various steps

:07:06. > :07:10.along the way but that is not to see it could not be better. For

:07:11. > :07:15.instance, in the forensics side of what happens in a criminal trial

:07:16. > :07:18.which is what I have looked at and how juries understand forensics

:07:19. > :07:22.science, for example, the forensic scientists are humans and will have

:07:23. > :07:25.natural biases and inclinations and things that are not necessarily

:07:26. > :07:31.strictly scientific and the information they give in court is

:07:32. > :07:36.interpreted by tutors who are not scientific experts, bringing all

:07:37. > :07:39.their humanity into how they make decisions -- interpreted by jurors.

:07:40. > :07:42.So there are many places in the criminal justice system where things

:07:43. > :07:46.can go badly wrong. We have changed our attitude a lot towards legality

:07:47. > :07:53.I think due to TV programmes and even films and even talking about

:07:54. > :07:58.Making A Murderer, the net Skelfers Netflix series. Does it surprise you

:07:59. > :08:04.they can attract huge audiences of people who are intrigued by the

:08:05. > :08:09.stories? -- the Netflix series. It doesn't surprise me because many of

:08:10. > :08:12.us have a feeling that if I have done nothing wrong and I have

:08:13. > :08:18.nothing to fear, if I am innocent all come out in the wash. Is it

:08:19. > :08:22.helpful? Yes, I do think it is helpful, these sorts of programmes,

:08:23. > :08:25.particularly Making A Murderer in raising awareness that being

:08:26. > :08:30.innocent is not necessarily enough. It is a big system and you can get

:08:31. > :08:41.lost along the way and end up convicted. Of course it often does

:08:42. > :08:43.not end at exoneration. You looked at the idea today of support. What

:08:44. > :08:46.happens to people who are exonerated? Is easy to go on and

:08:47. > :08:48.live a normal life? No. There are older obvious difficulties with not

:08:49. > :08:52.having any work experience, having lost years of relationships with

:08:53. > :08:56.your family, particularly children. We found that many of the exonerees

:08:57. > :08:59.spoke to very poignantly about having lost all contact with their

:09:00. > :09:03.children and not being able to come to grips with that when they leave

:09:04. > :09:09.prison. So it is more than having a box ticked to say, books, you were

:09:10. > :09:16.wrongly convicted, no carry on with your life -- to say, oops. No smoke

:09:17. > :09:20.without fire, having to put up with that kid of attitude. Do these

:09:21. > :09:27.people get further support? Organisations such as MOJO either

:09:28. > :09:31.specifically to provide resources and support but they are under

:09:32. > :09:35.difficult circumstances themselves in terms of resources that it is not

:09:36. > :09:38.really ever enough. They do their best to cope with the volume of

:09:39. > :09:41.cases coming through but they are inundated with letters from

:09:42. > :09:45.prisoners and people seeking their help from both sides of the divide.

:09:46. > :09:49.Those who are still convicted and those who have been exonerated.

:09:50. > :09:54.Thank you so much for coming in, Doctor Rhonda Wheate.

:09:55. > :09:56.16 days after beginning their assault, Iraqi forces have

:09:57. > :09:58.for the first time entered the outskirts of Mosul

:09:59. > :10:01.since Islamic State militants captured it more than two years ago.

:10:02. > :10:04.Militant fighters have put up stiff resistance but the battle for Mosul

:10:05. > :10:07.The fight against IS brings together disparate, competing forces

:10:08. > :10:16.And there are growing concerns for one million people thought to be

:10:17. > :10:22.Earlier I spoke to Haissam Minkara, deputy country director

:10:23. > :10:24.He describes what life is like for civilians

:10:25. > :10:37.Mosul city has been under the Isis occupation, or under the control of

:10:38. > :10:44.Isis, for the pasts years. Reports of the year from people - we don't

:10:45. > :10:49.have first hand information. But reportedly people fleeing Mosul are

:10:50. > :10:55.speaking about... -- reports that we hear from people. They are speaking

:10:56. > :10:58.problems with medicine and supplies. You imagine the infrastructure has

:10:59. > :11:04.also been badly damaged? Do you not people can access health care and

:11:05. > :11:07.education? The fighting reported yesterday is raising our concerns

:11:08. > :11:15.about serious damage to the infrastructure and about potential

:11:16. > :11:22.casualties among civilians. They are calling all of the combating parties

:11:23. > :11:28.to make sure they do not use heavy ammunition or that they do not

:11:29. > :11:35.bombard the heavily populated and built-up areas to make sure that

:11:36. > :11:39.minimal damage is happening to the infrastructure that is meant to

:11:40. > :11:43.serve the civilians there. And do you expect that things like bombs

:11:44. > :11:49.will have been left behind? Should IS fighters flee? Like any other

:11:50. > :11:55.combat field, there are serious fears of unexploded mines and bombs

:11:56. > :12:00.that have been left behind and that is a serious risk, that civilians

:12:01. > :12:08.could be exposed to. We call on all of the combating parties, on the

:12:09. > :12:11.coalition and on the Iraqi forces, to communicate clearly to civilians

:12:12. > :12:16.in Mosul and in areas that are taken over about the risk they might be

:12:17. > :12:20.exposed to, and not to call civilians to go back unless the

:12:21. > :12:29.areas are cleared from these unexploded materials and IUDs. How

:12:30. > :12:36.have you been helping people leaving Mosul? How strong is their desire to

:12:37. > :12:38.return? Oxfam and other humanitarian agencies have been increasing their

:12:39. > :12:43.preparedness to respond to the people in need around Mosul. People

:12:44. > :12:48.have been responding for the past few weeks. In the Mosul corridor,

:12:49. > :12:55.supporting the people who fled the areas around Mosul city. We have

:12:56. > :13:06.been providing clean water, we have been providing NFIs, non-food items,

:13:07. > :13:14.bedding, blankets, kitchen supplies, for people who fled. We are now

:13:15. > :13:19.focusing on the areas where the majority of internally displaced

:13:20. > :13:29.people have settled. We are expecting more people to come. The

:13:30. > :13:33.scale of the crisis is huge. Their expectations, we are talking about

:13:34. > :13:39.more than 200,000 people who might be fleeing Mosul in the next few

:13:40. > :13:44.weeks. If these expectations have been realised, the scale of the

:13:45. > :13:51.response at the moment is not up to that level. Oxfam and all of the

:13:52. > :13:56.other agencies are in need of funding to be able to respond to the

:13:57. > :14:02.scale of the need. Haissam Minkara, thank you so much for joining us.

:14:03. > :14:05.Well, joining me now from London is David Loyn.

:14:06. > :14:09.After a 37-year career as a BBC foreign correspondent,

:14:10. > :14:11.he's now a senior visiting research fellow at King's College London's

:14:12. > :14:30.A very good evening to you. Why are IS putting up such a strong

:14:31. > :14:38.resistance in Mosul as opposed to other places? This is where their

:14:39. > :14:47.caliphate began. This is where they came up two years ago launching this

:14:48. > :14:54.way of fighting Jihad on behalf of world is lamb, they said. It was a

:14:55. > :14:59.huge call to people not just in Iraq and Syria but to outside. It is the

:15:00. > :15:03.place where they launched their moves into neighbouring Syria and

:15:04. > :15:09.taking vast quantities of the countryside around. Even though

:15:10. > :15:17.they've lost other places, they will fight for muscle. So to take it back

:15:18. > :15:23.would be a huge gain for the Iraqi forces. Will this be supported by

:15:24. > :15:28.air strikes or will it be a ground operation? We can expect that

:15:29. > :15:32.thereafter special forces on the ground and aerial spotters working

:15:33. > :15:38.alongside Iraqi special forces which we understand are now outside the

:15:39. > :15:51.city itself. They will be calling in occasional ground strikes. We saw in

:15:52. > :15:59.northern Syria, it took three months for Kabani to fall. Don't expect

:16:00. > :16:05.Mosul to fall quickly. A couple of years ago IS slaughtered thousands

:16:06. > :16:10.of Iraqi soldiers as they crumbled but they are now much better trained

:16:11. > :16:13.and resourced and have UK and US special forces support on the ground

:16:14. > :16:21.and drone and air strikes as well when they need to call them in from

:16:22. > :16:30.the US side. Those Iraqi forces are supported by Kurdish fighters, the

:16:31. > :16:35.Peshmerga, SUNY nationals, how natural a coalition is this and how

:16:36. > :16:41.long might it last afterwards? Mosul will fall but it might take two or

:16:42. > :16:45.three months and there will be significant damage to the

:16:46. > :16:48.infrastructure of the town with civilian casualties, hundreds of

:16:49. > :16:55.thousands of people fleeing their homes if they can get away. IS will

:16:56. > :16:58.try and hold hostages as they try to control and fight for every inch of

:16:59. > :17:05.the ground with suicide bombers remaining behind. There is then the

:17:06. > :17:09.big strategic question as to what happens next. There is no natural

:17:10. > :17:15.alliance between the Kurds from the north and the Iraqi forces coming

:17:16. > :17:21.from the south. In the past, they have been opposed to each other. For

:17:22. > :17:25.the Kurds, this is a move towards stabilising their position in the

:17:26. > :17:29.north. Kurdish northern Iraq is the most stable part of the country.

:17:30. > :17:39.Effectively ceding from the rest of the country in 2013. There has to

:17:40. > :17:43.not been as much violence in that part of the country and they will be

:17:44. > :17:48.looking to stabilise control in Mosul even though it is beyond their

:17:49. > :17:52.frontier of northern Iraqi Kurdistan. They will be trying to do

:17:53. > :18:09.what they had done incur cook before. -- Kirkuk. Even once the IS

:18:10. > :18:17.forces are pushed out, which they will be no doubt in the next few

:18:18. > :18:19.months, there is a real concerned as to whether it can be stable in the

:18:20. > :18:23.future. Thank you. Fifa has turned down

:18:24. > :18:26.a request from the English and Scottish Football Associations

:18:27. > :18:28.to allow their players to wear a poppy on their shirt or

:18:29. > :18:31.on an armband during their World Cup qualifier match on

:18:32. > :18:34.Armistice Day next week. The world governing body's rules

:18:35. > :18:38.forbid what it calls "political, religious or commercial

:18:39. > :18:40.messages" on team strips. But many believe none of those

:18:41. > :18:42.descriptions apply to the poppy. The SNP's Stewart McDonald,

:18:43. > :18:45.whose Glasgow constituency is home to Hampden Stadium,

:18:46. > :18:47.has written to the Scottish FA urging them to call on Fifa

:18:48. > :18:59.to overturn the ban. Very good evening to you. Why, in

:19:00. > :19:07.your view our Poppy is not political? They just aren't. Many

:19:08. > :19:14.people have tried to use it for political gains but most people up

:19:15. > :19:24.for that. The Poppy itself is a symbol of remembrance. It is a time

:19:25. > :19:28.of year where we remember, in many cases, people from our own family

:19:29. > :19:33.who have been touched by the two world wars. Certainly, that is why I

:19:34. > :19:39.choose to wear the Poppy. It is nothing to do with politics. Where

:19:40. > :19:43.people have tried to do it for political purposes, most decent

:19:44. > :19:49.people have thrown them a rubber ear on that. It is about charity to

:19:50. > :19:55.support veterans who have served our country in the Armed Forces. A great

:19:56. > :20:00.many people share that view but some historians argued it was political

:20:01. > :20:06.from the outset. The well-known veteran Harry Leslie Smith hasn't

:20:07. > :20:11.won a Poppy since 2013. He believes that the spirit of his generation

:20:12. > :20:16.has been hijacked by politics. They are contentious to a degree, do you

:20:17. > :20:23.accept that? Of course they are to a degree but the key choice is --

:20:24. > :20:30.point is choice. People should be free to make the choice of where --

:20:31. > :20:38.whether they wear a coloured Poppy all whether they wear a Poppy at

:20:39. > :20:41.all. Many people have various different reasons for choosing

:20:42. > :20:49.whether or not to wear one. Harry Leslie Smith is to be respected for

:20:50. > :20:54.his point of view. Fifa have no business in trying to stop this

:20:55. > :21:00.happening. If a player wants to wear one, he should be able to do so and

:21:01. > :21:05.if not, they should be free to do so without being hounded as a result of

:21:06. > :21:11.that. The key here is choice. Most reasonable people would back up the

:21:12. > :21:15.idea that it should be down to individuals, or clubs themselves, as

:21:16. > :21:19.happens in Scotland already, if they want to ever Poppy, they should be

:21:20. > :21:25.allowed to do so. If not, they should equally be allowed to do so

:21:26. > :21:32.and respected. Both sides are hopeful that a pragmatic solution

:21:33. > :21:42.can be made and meetings are taking place this week to discuss. Are you

:21:43. > :21:51.happy that there will be a way of finding an agreement? This will

:21:52. > :21:55.happen on Armistice Day and England against Scotland was the first

:21:56. > :22:04.codified international game of football. It happened in Scotland.

:22:05. > :22:06.We all know about the German and British soldiers putting down their

:22:07. > :22:12.weapons to play football on the field. The guys playing football

:22:13. > :22:16.next week will be of similar age to those soldiers. If they choose to

:22:17. > :22:19.wear the Poppy, they should be allowed to do so. What a beautiful

:22:20. > :22:22.way for the beautiful game of football to remember them. Thank you

:22:23. > :22:26.for joining us. Thank you. Here with me now to discuss

:22:27. > :22:29.some of today's stories are the Herald's Scottish political

:22:30. > :22:31.editor Tom Gordon, and Ann Landels, who's director of the homeless

:22:32. > :22:43.charity Crisis Skylight Edinburgh. Good evening to you both. Let's

:22:44. > :22:50.start off by talking about poppies. They are contentious. Do you think

:22:51. > :22:53.Fifa have a point to make? They are not universally popular but they are

:22:54. > :22:57.overwhelmingly respected in the UK where the game is going to be

:22:58. > :23:02.played. Some people find them militaristic but it is a small

:23:03. > :23:07.minority of people. Images and symbols which are inflammatory are

:23:08. > :23:13.different from what the copy will be on Armistice Day. If you had both

:23:14. > :23:17.sides are wearing it in unity, both sets of fans, it's not as though it

:23:18. > :23:22.is one set of fans projecting an image to antagonise the other side.

:23:23. > :23:28.It is something that brings everyone together. I think Fifa have got it

:23:29. > :23:30.badly wrong. Do you agree that it is different from Palestinian flags

:23:31. > :23:37.being displayed at a football game recently? I would agree with what

:23:38. > :23:42.has been said already. People should have the right to choose whether or

:23:43. > :23:48.not they wear it. It's so symbolic. You have to remember that there are

:23:49. > :23:54.things like the McRae 's battalion, the Hart players that went to the

:23:55. > :23:58.First World War. Football has that link with sacrifice and if people

:23:59. > :24:02.want to wear it, the fact that it is too British teams and the Poppy is a

:24:03. > :24:09.British symbol, I think it should be allowed. Do you think Fifa in terms

:24:10. > :24:12.of PR at the moment are being viewed differently and trying to get away

:24:13. > :24:16.from some of the negativity surrounding them that this is

:24:17. > :24:22.something they might end up seeing sense on? They do need to get away

:24:23. > :24:30.from negativity. With all of their problems about corruption, to pick a

:24:31. > :24:36.fight about this is a completely misplaced sense of priority. They

:24:37. > :24:41.should just let it roll. 20,000 people in Scotland will be affected

:24:42. > :24:45.by the upcoming benefits cap, according to the chartered Institute

:24:46. > :24:53.of Housing. Where'd you think public opinion stands on this? These

:24:54. > :24:57.benefit changes affect more and more people and you will see public

:24:58. > :25:04.opinion engaged and possibly an arranged by this. When the benefit

:25:05. > :25:09.cap came in at ?26,000 it affected perhaps 900 families in Scotland. It

:25:10. > :25:17.could be 7-11,000 now by some estimates. It is becoming much more

:25:18. > :25:23.widespread. Big families in London, it was before, now you are talking

:25:24. > :25:28.about average families that will be short of rent. It is going to affect

:25:29. > :25:31.a lot of people. People will be affected themselves or know of

:25:32. > :25:39.people and word will get out that it is a bad thing. This is something

:25:40. > :25:43.that you will know a lot about. The benefits included are things like

:25:44. > :25:46.child benefit which a huge number of people get as of right and don't

:25:47. > :25:50.have it counted against their income in this way. It would be good if the

:25:51. > :25:58.Scottish Government could look at ways of mitigating that, either by,

:25:59. > :26:00.in the same way as discretionary housing payments with the bedroom

:26:01. > :26:06.tax, or looking at ways of supporting people into work because

:26:07. > :26:09.that will take people out of this. The work programme is going to be

:26:10. > :26:13.devolved to the Scottish Government so it would be possible to look at

:26:14. > :26:17.ways of maybe bridging the cost and actually having measures that would

:26:18. > :26:21.help people into work. At the end of the day, most people want to work

:26:22. > :26:27.and support their families and if we can support them to do that it is a

:26:28. > :26:31.good thing. This is a thing that the Scottish Government have expressed a

:26:32. > :26:37.will to do. They have already mitigated in respect of the bedroom

:26:38. > :26:40.tax. What could they do? There is a new study out tomorrow from

:26:41. > :26:45.Sheffield Hallam University and it is not that straightforward. We will

:26:46. > :26:49.get more benefit powers transferred to Holyrood in the next few years

:26:50. > :26:54.but often the amount of money transferred is hacked back as we

:26:55. > :26:57.speak and so it will be quite a small pot that is inherited. It is

:26:58. > :27:02.then down to the Scottish Government to make up the money and cash is

:27:03. > :27:08.tight already. It is not an easy choice to make. Looking ahead to

:27:09. > :27:13.tomorrow. The offensive behaviour in football act. MSP 's want to

:27:14. > :27:17.challenge government laws regarding sectarian behaviour at football. You

:27:18. > :27:23.think this is something that was always going to reach this point

:27:24. > :27:29.given the amount of opposition. It was a rare instance of where all the

:27:30. > :27:35.parties agreed. It is not often you see the Green Party and the Tories

:27:36. > :27:39.aligned on anything. Here they were. They are going to move towards

:27:40. > :27:42.repeal of this. Tomorrow is a largely symbolic boat but it will

:27:43. > :27:49.put the wind up the government -- vote. It shows that the parties can

:27:50. > :27:56.bring concerted pressure to bear on the government at times. It is a

:27:57. > :28:02.difficult law to enforce. Unenforceable laws are often seen as

:28:03. > :28:10.bad laws. We need to look at the football clubs doing more about

:28:11. > :28:13.their fans. We've had examples of successful campaigns, for example

:28:14. > :28:17.against racism and they show a way of working. If the law is not

:28:18. > :28:24.enforceable, it becomes nonsense at the end of the day. Do you think at

:28:25. > :28:30.the outset it was right that politicians should try to take the

:28:31. > :28:36.lead on this? There was a sense at the time that there had been a whole

:28:37. > :28:39.spate of aggressive incidents in 2011 and a feeling that something

:28:40. > :28:47.had to be done. Always a dangerous atmosphere that politicians have to

:28:48. > :28:50.take action in. I think they should have placed themselves and taking it

:28:51. > :28:55.more slowly because it seems to have come with problems. The time is

:28:56. > :28:59.right for reform, not necessarily repeal, because there are useful

:29:00. > :29:04.elements, especially on the threatening communication side of

:29:05. > :29:07.it. But something has to change. Do you think 230 convictions is enough

:29:08. > :29:13.to justify that it has done something? It has done something but

:29:14. > :29:17.it is not really addressing the root of the problem that is what we need

:29:18. > :29:21.to look at. It is creating a different kind of culture so it

:29:22. > :29:28.becomes an acceptable. Not something that you to see. An interesting

:29:29. > :29:31.debate tomorrow? It will be an interesting precedent to set up

:29:32. > :29:35.Parliament. It won't open the floodgates because there are not

:29:36. > :29:38.many areas of overlap between the parties but it will be one to watch.

:29:39. > :29:40.Thanks for coming. Shelly will be here tomorrow

:29:41. > :29:47.night at the usual time. So do please join her then

:29:48. > :30:27.- bye bye. The Mexican peso has been slipxing

:30:28. > :30:32.against the US dollar. The peso goes down when Donald

:30:33. > :30:44.Trump's chances go up. With a week to go, the markets

:30:45. > :30:48.are telling us he's breathing down