26/02/2012

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:01:32. > :01:34.And in the North West: The proposals for the marina complex

:01:34. > :01:44.that ran aground. As plans for Barrow's regeneration

:01:44. > :01:44.

:01:44. > :35:36.Apology for the loss of subtitles for 2032 seconds

:35:36. > :35:40.hit choppy waters, we ask what's Hello, I'm Annabel Tiffin. In the

:35:40. > :35:43.next 20 minutes: the proposals for the marina complex that ran aground.

:35:43. > :35:49.As plans for Barrow's regeneration hit choppy waters, we asked what

:35:49. > :35:53.next for the town. First, let me introduce our two

:35:53. > :35:56.guests of the day. For this week, we have branched out from

:35:56. > :35:59.Westminster to Brussels with two north-west MEPs. For the

:35:59. > :36:09.Conservatives, Jacqueline Foster, and for UKIP, the deputy leader,

:36:09. > :36:13.

:36:13. > :36:16.Paul Nuttall. We are used to having any bes in

:36:16. > :36:23.here but we don't see you very often. How often are you in the

:36:23. > :36:27.north-west was struck Mark --? me about three weeks of the month

:36:27. > :36:30.we are in Brussels where we do committee work. Once a month, a

:36:30. > :36:34.very controversial journey takes place do Strasbourg because we have

:36:34. > :36:38.to sit there for about 12 times in mid-air. The public does not

:36:38. > :36:42.understand why you do that. There are actually two European

:36:42. > :36:46.Parliament and it comes at great expense to the public, not just to

:36:46. > :36:51.transfer the MEPs, but also the officers and staff all the way from

:36:51. > :36:54.Brussels to Strasbourg. It is about 500 miles. It is a waste of money,

:36:54. > :36:57.and the Strasbourg parliament should be scrapped, quite badly.

:36:57. > :37:03.That is something we will take longer than we have got to talk

:37:03. > :37:06.about, so I am going to move on. Liverpool's hosting the Green

:37:06. > :37:10.Party's spring conference this weekend and, on the face of it, the

:37:10. > :37:12.party has much to celebrate. Over the past few years, the environment

:37:12. > :37:15.has gone from being an ethical sideshow to centre stage politics.

:37:15. > :37:18.Every party is now anxious to show its green credentials. But, where

:37:19. > :37:22.does that leave the people who started it all? In a moment, I'll

:37:22. > :37:24.be talking to the leader of the Green Party, Caroline Lucas, but

:37:24. > :37:27.first, Peter Marshall has been to Merseyside where the environment

:37:27. > :37:32.has become big business. It seems many firms have seen the

:37:32. > :37:34.light when it comes to going green. In fact, this transport

:37:34. > :37:44.refrigeration company in Knowsley has diversified to meet the demand

:37:44. > :37:46.

:37:46. > :37:49.for green energy products. looked to reduce our overheads and

:37:49. > :37:53.one way was to reduce our electricity and gas bill and

:37:53. > :37:56.various other costs. As we looked into it, within the first couple of

:37:57. > :37:59.months, we found it was quite a viable business proposition.

:37:59. > :38:02.Alongside the core business they now supply and install renewable

:38:02. > :38:06.and energy-saving equipment. The Government needs to promote a green

:38:06. > :38:10.agenda. By 2020, 15 per cent of all the UK's Energy should come from

:38:10. > :38:12.renewable sources. It has outlined plans for what it calls the world's

:38:12. > :38:17.first Green Investment Bank, to help firms finance renewable energy

:38:18. > :38:26.schemes. Liverpool hope to be its home, as do Manchester, Warrington

:38:26. > :38:32.and Chester. The north-west is so appropriate. Excuse the cliche, but

:38:32. > :38:34.this is the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution. This will

:38:34. > :38:38.bring in other prospective investors who have got plans for

:38:38. > :38:41.the region and look for Bank Investment. It is about profile.

:38:41. > :38:43.But the green economy faces challenges. The Government is

:38:43. > :38:47.trying to cut the amount of money paid to householders for

:38:47. > :38:49.electricity they feed back into the grid by using solar panels. The

:38:49. > :38:56.industry fears cutting that feed in tariff could cause a devastating

:38:56. > :39:00.drop in demand. The Government have done what they have done for their

:39:00. > :39:04.own reasons, and no one can really understand that. You had a good

:39:04. > :39:07.incentive there, so hopefully, if the Government sort themselves out,

:39:07. > :39:10.get the business back as usual. Liverpool John Moores University,

:39:10. > :39:12.they are working on the green technologies of the future, like

:39:12. > :39:19.using microwaves to speed up incineration, and produce fewer

:39:20. > :39:22.harmful emissions. These technologies that we are trying to

:39:22. > :39:26.look at make things faster and they think -- make things more

:39:27. > :39:32.productive. They are also economically viable. So, green can

:39:32. > :39:35.pay its way? It can, yes. wherewithal for a greener future is

:39:35. > :39:42.out there, but it has to make economic as well as environmental

:39:42. > :39:46.sense. In our Mees -- Merseyside studio is

:39:46. > :39:50.Caroline Lucas, leader of the Green Party. Going green can be big

:39:50. > :39:53.business, but a lot of the mainstream parties are taking this

:39:53. > :39:57.on now. Does that mean, do you think, that your work is done,

:39:57. > :40:00.really? If any that were the case. We have got a coalition government

:40:00. > :40:05.that likes to say it wants to be the greenest government ever, but

:40:05. > :40:09.when you look at what it is doing, it is quite contrary. Your piece

:40:09. > :40:13.just cited the example of the solar feed in Paris. That change that the

:40:13. > :40:17.Government is about to make, not just the amount of money going into

:40:17. > :40:21.the tariff is reducing, but it needs to be done in a predictable

:40:21. > :40:26.way, not a sudden way, as the Government has done it. That move

:40:26. > :40:29.will mean that we are losing about 20,000 jobs in the solar industry.

:40:29. > :40:34.That is one of the fastest-growing industries in this country, and it

:40:34. > :40:38.would be tragic if those jobs go. But the coalition Government wants

:40:38. > :40:41.to introduce the Green Investment Bank, which is going to plough in

:40:41. > :40:46.�15 billion into the green economy. Surely that shows they are taking

:40:46. > :40:50.this seriously? Credit where it is due, I guess, it is a good idea.

:40:50. > :40:56.But of course the mud that it will be able to borrow and lend and pass

:40:56. > :40:59.on has gone down. -- the amount. The time frame has also lent them.

:40:59. > :41:03.There are concerns about whether that Green Investment Bank is going

:41:03. > :41:07.to be able to meet his potential. I hope that it is, but on a whole

:41:07. > :41:12.range of issues so far, in spite of the rhetoric, we have seen very

:41:12. > :41:17.little real action on the ground. cake, but green jobs are well and

:41:17. > :41:21.good, but in this region where there really needs some way of

:41:21. > :41:25.making up for the loss of public sector jobs, is it enough? We need

:41:25. > :41:28.all kinds of different levers to create jobs in places like the

:41:28. > :41:32.north-west and elsewhere. I think the green economy has to be a

:41:32. > :41:34.crucial part of it, and not just because it is good for the

:41:35. > :41:39.environment, but because the green economy is so labour-intensive.

:41:39. > :41:42.There has been a lot of work done with unions and others to show how

:41:42. > :41:45.we can create one million new jobs across the country. And not just

:41:45. > :41:48.saying that because you would expect me to, but because it is a

:41:48. > :41:52.really good way of putting money into create jobs that are

:41:52. > :41:55.sustainable into the future, and in industries that are labour

:41:55. > :41:59.intensive. This green economy is far more labour intensive and the

:41:59. > :42:02.fossil fuel economy that it replaces. There are some real big

:42:02. > :42:05.wins out there, and the Government's challenge now is to

:42:05. > :42:10.show some real ambition around maximising the benefits that are

:42:10. > :42:15.out there. Do stay with us. Paul Nuttall, do you think that the

:42:15. > :42:23.green jobs can stimulate our economy? I am not sure actually.

:42:23. > :42:27.What I will say is that if we carry on down the line of this Greek

:42:27. > :42:32.environmental -- green environmentalism in terms of energy,

:42:32. > :42:38.if we continue with this crackpot idea, quite frankly the lights will

:42:38. > :42:43.go out in Britain very soon indeed. What ideas? Wind farms, for example.

:42:43. > :42:47.They are more than a costly distraction, they don't work. They

:42:47. > :42:52.only work 25% of the time and when you most need energy, during cold

:42:52. > :42:56.snaps or heat waves, the wind does not blow so they don't work. Even

:42:56. > :43:01.where it does blow to strong, you have to turn them off. All they are

:43:01. > :43:05.doing is making rich landowners richer. Jacqueline, you are on the

:43:05. > :43:10.environment committee in Brussels. Do you think that these are

:43:10. > :43:16.crackpot ideas? I think some of them are. I am not a great fan of

:43:16. > :43:19.wind farms. I think you have got to look in the round, really. What do

:43:19. > :43:24.we actually need to keep the country going? What do we need in

:43:24. > :43:26.certain industries? Where I would agree with Caroline, I think a lot

:43:27. > :43:32.of the manufacturing industries over the years have started to come

:43:32. > :43:36.up trumps in terms of the way that the manufacturing. If you Broughton

:43:36. > :43:42.best from energy, I have always supported expanding our nuclear

:43:42. > :43:46.capacity in this country. I am very pleased the Government has actually

:43:46. > :43:52.decided that it will do this. the Conservatives now see

:43:52. > :43:56.themselves as a Green Party? It is worldwide. It is part and parcel -

:43:56. > :43:59.when you are a grown-up party and you have to take responsibility to

:43:59. > :44:04.be the government of the day, of course you are going to take into

:44:04. > :44:09.account all sorts of... Before I come back, let's bring Caroline

:44:09. > :44:13.back in. I'm sure you want to respond. And surprisingly, I do.

:44:13. > :44:17.Look at Germany, where they are putting in more solar panels in a

:44:17. > :44:21.month than Britain does in a year. That is good for the economy - they

:44:21. > :44:23.are doing very well economically at the moment. This idea that

:44:23. > :44:28.environmental policies are a distraction from business as usual

:44:28. > :44:31.for grown-up politics is cloud- cuckoo-land. Some of the things

:44:31. > :44:35.that Ball said about wind power is not the case. If you look at

:44:35. > :44:40.nuclear power stations, both of your guests sing in favour of these,

:44:40. > :44:44.but they regularly go off-line and stay off-line. When that happens

:44:44. > :44:48.because of some problem in the mechanism, you have got a huge

:44:48. > :44:56.amount of energy that is taken off- line at once. At least with a range

:44:56. > :45:00.of different renewables, you have got a range that you can draw on.

:45:00. > :45:04.All right, Caroline, I'm sorry we are running out of time. Thank you

:45:04. > :45:09.for joining us. Now, still on the subject of the economy. Formal than

:45:09. > :45:16.two decades now, regeneration has been the name up of the game in

:45:17. > :45:19.post-industrial Britain. Until last year, millions of pounds of

:45:19. > :45:22.regeneration money came from the regional North West Development

:45:22. > :45:25.Agency, and a lot of that money was match funded by Europe. But, when

:45:25. > :45:27.the agency was abolished by the coalition government in 2010, those

:45:28. > :45:32.funds dried up. Naomi Cornwell has been to Barrow-in-Furness in

:45:32. > :45:35.Cumbria where plans for the marina have been left high and dry.

:45:35. > :45:37.This was Barrow's big dream - a �200 million transformation of the

:45:37. > :45:41.town's waterfront, with a marina, homes, hotels and a large

:45:41. > :45:49.industrial park. But, many years after the plans were unveiled, work

:45:49. > :45:53.has stopped. There is little to see for the �7 million so far spent.

:45:53. > :45:58.is frustrating for people. When we started the project initially, I

:45:58. > :46:02.believed that we would have it done in five or seven years' time. I had

:46:03. > :46:05.visions of houses and penthouses and God knows what. The project was

:46:05. > :46:08.mainly funded by the North West Development Agency. In 2010, the

:46:08. > :46:11.Government announced it would abolish the agency and its grants

:46:11. > :46:18.have since dried up. But it has not stopped Barrow Council buying up

:46:18. > :46:21.land. If we don't do that as a council, then what we are saying to

:46:21. > :46:25.the people is that Barrow would develop and expand, so we have to

:46:26. > :46:28.keep that going. That is our plan for the future. It is a big

:46:28. > :46:31.disappointment for Barrow, a town with high levels of deprivation.

:46:31. > :46:34.The proportion of people claiming jobseeker's allowance is higher

:46:34. > :46:41.here than the national average. So is the proportion of the population

:46:41. > :46:46.on incapacity benefit. Many agree that Barrow needs a boost. We could

:46:46. > :46:51.do with something like that. It is just on the edge. Yes, definitely.

:46:51. > :46:56.Then you might get ships and that coming in, too, which would help.

:46:56. > :47:00.What do you think Barrow needs? better shopping centre. That's it.

:47:00. > :47:03.Regeneration in the town centre. The Dock Museum shows the town's

:47:03. > :47:06.main industry through the ages. But shipbuilding has been in decline

:47:07. > :47:08.over the last 20 years, prompting calls for new jobs in other sectors.

:47:08. > :47:11.That is the challenge facing Cumbria's Local Enterprise

:47:11. > :47:14.Partnership. LEPs were set up to replace the regional development

:47:14. > :47:22.agencies. They can help projects but the Government money, but can't

:47:22. > :47:26.fund things themselves. It is extremely tough, so I think we have

:47:26. > :47:30.to admit that the days of speculative development on these

:47:30. > :47:36.types of industry are for the time being gone. Development will need

:47:36. > :47:40.to be led by investors, rather than speculative developers, and we are

:47:40. > :47:44.talking to a number of investment developers. The town's prospects

:47:44. > :47:47.aren't perhaps as bleak as it may seem here. Out at sea, a new

:47:47. > :47:51.industry has emerged, as wind farms transform the Cumbrian coast line.

:47:51. > :47:54.They have been championed by Furness Enterprise. It wants to

:47:54. > :47:57.attract more private investors into Barrow to help regenerate the town.

:47:57. > :48:04.But it, too, faces an uncertain future, and will close in August

:48:04. > :48:09.unless more funding can be found. There are still opportunities. We

:48:09. > :48:13.have a cluster of companies in this area involved in solid state

:48:13. > :48:16.lighting, the new energy efficient lighting for the 21st century. With

:48:16. > :48:20.the right kind of support from the Government, we can make a real

:48:20. > :48:23.impact and create jobs. But we are not getting back from the UK

:48:24. > :48:32.government. There are concerns that delays to regeneration projects

:48:32. > :48:38.could have a big impact on young people in towns like Barrow.

:48:38. > :48:41.any apprenticeship I can found his with BAe. The members of Furness

:48:41. > :48:48.Youth Council pass on their ideas on improving the town to the local

:48:48. > :48:52.authority. There is not much here, there is not much choice. I would

:48:52. > :49:00.not get a job here. There is a little chance that I would get a

:49:00. > :49:05.job here. I would rather work away. When people will take more interest

:49:05. > :49:15.in Barrow, people will then be interested because it is their home

:49:15. > :49:16.

:49:16. > :49:20.town and they will want to come back. I have no objection to

:49:20. > :49:24.Manchester or Liverpool in their share, but you can't do

:49:24. > :49:28.regeneration simply in cities because all that happens is the

:49:28. > :49:32.town's Dye. I would like to see a JCB digger on here as soon as

:49:32. > :49:35.possible. I will have to be a little bit patient. The dream has

:49:35. > :49:45.not died, but the wait for Barrow's bright future might take longer

:49:45. > :49:49.than anyone here expected. Professor Alan Harding joins us in

:49:49. > :49:54.the studio. Taking that last point that was made, what is the future

:49:54. > :49:58.of regeneration for our north-west pounds? The last speaker was right

:49:58. > :50:04.to suggest that there has been a big concentration on cities. I

:50:04. > :50:07.think that is for a good reason. If you look at the statistics, it will

:50:07. > :50:11.demonstrate that it is the bigger urban areas that have had most

:50:11. > :50:15.success. For a government that is concentrating on success, then the

:50:15. > :50:18.implications for areas like Barrow, even though there are quite

:50:18. > :50:23.concerning in some areas, I think follow from what we have been doing

:50:23. > :50:27.in recent years. Barrow has benefited from some European

:50:27. > :50:31.funding in the past. Obviously the big cities much more so. Is that

:50:31. > :50:36.all going to change in the future? There is a review going on at the

:50:36. > :50:42.moment of European funding for the next period, which follows 2014.

:50:42. > :50:45.All the indications are that the UK as a whole will get much less of an

:50:45. > :50:49.allocation and it has this time around. Simply because there are

:50:49. > :50:53.areas of southern and eastern Europe which are statistically

:50:53. > :50:57.worse off than the UK. So they might get back pot of money that we

:50:57. > :51:01.might otherwise have got? Yes, at the European funding is likely to

:51:01. > :51:07.shift away from that big physical project do things like business

:51:07. > :51:11.development, entrepreneur realism, high technology and so on. Talking

:51:11. > :51:15.about Europe, the economy is struggling, there is no about --

:51:15. > :51:20.doubt about that, but there is over �1 billion of European funding that

:51:20. > :51:24.is not being used. It was earmarked to help England's poorest regions

:51:24. > :51:28.and cities lying unspent. Why is that? I have no idea. It is one

:51:29. > :51:35.thing having a north-west development agency that is part of

:51:35. > :51:42.rate mechanism and clearly everyone knew what they did, and... But that

:51:42. > :51:48.has gone now. People can blame, of course they can. The money is going

:51:48. > :51:51.to then be - the whole thing will be utilised through the local

:51:51. > :51:56.enterprise partnerships. It is just that the structure is different. It

:51:56. > :52:01.does not mean to say that there is less money or more money. If it

:52:01. > :52:04.depends on who bids for what, but much funding still applied when it

:52:04. > :52:10.was the north-west development agency. There is nothing new there.

:52:10. > :52:13.The LEPs can't directly give money. The regional development agencies

:52:13. > :52:17.did have their own money. That is the difference. They can't match

:52:17. > :52:22.the European funding any more, so the European funding is not

:52:22. > :52:25.forthcoming. The European funding is still... The funding promised is

:52:25. > :52:31.still available. What is different is that the mechanisms in the

:52:31. > :52:35.north-west and across the UK are different. Is that right, Paul, is

:52:35. > :52:42.it just the structure that is different? Jackie is right. It is

:52:42. > :52:44.more localised. I am a great believer in localism. If the is

:52:44. > :52:48.organisations are run by a democratically elected councillors

:52:48. > :52:52.and businesses, then I am all in favour. There is a bigger issue

:52:52. > :52:56.here. You are talking about European funding. There is such a

:52:57. > :53:00.big misnomer. It is our own money. So you are saying it is the money

:53:00. > :53:04.that we have been given in the first prize? Absolutely. �50

:53:04. > :53:08.million a day, it cost this country to be a member of this organisation.

:53:08. > :53:11.We sent the money out there, they sent half of it back and we are

:53:11. > :53:15.expected to say thank you. There is no such thing as European money, it

:53:15. > :53:23.is our money. How can we get this money to our regions that really

:53:23. > :53:27.need it? A moment it is lying there and nobody can access it. We need a

:53:27. > :53:32.referendum and we spend our own money sensibly on a foreign people

:53:32. > :53:37.in our own country. I think the more realistic prospect is that we

:53:37. > :53:41.need to think more carefully about much funding for things. He is

:53:41. > :53:44.right, the money is on the table and we need to find Mechelen --

:53:44. > :53:48.different mechanisms for finding the match funding. In Barrow, my

:53:48. > :53:51.understanding is that the assets of the ritual Development Agency had

:53:51. > :53:56.been transferred to another organisation, the homes and

:53:56. > :54:00.communities agency. There is some prospect that the agency will be

:54:00. > :54:04.able to realise the value of some of those assets. That is just one

:54:04. > :54:08.example. Local-authority is, you know, have got assets which they

:54:08. > :54:14.can use to back European funding. It is not a lost cause. It's now

:54:14. > :54:17.time for our round-up of this week's events with Gill Dummigan.

:54:17. > :54:20.Lancashire MPs lobbied this week for BAe Systems's bid to build the

:54:20. > :54:25.Indian Government's new fighter force. At the moment, France is the

:54:25. > :54:27.preferred bidder. But MPs met David Cameron to urge him to keep up the

:54:27. > :54:30.pressure. The House of Commons this week

:54:30. > :54:33.debated calls for a new inquest into the death of a teenage victim

:54:33. > :54:36.of the Hillsborough disaster. The mother of Kevin Williams has always

:54:36. > :54:40.contested the verdict that he died accidentally. More than 100,000

:54:40. > :54:43.people signed her online petition, triggering the debate.

:54:43. > :54:47.A public inquiry has been called for after a damning report on adult

:54:47. > :54:51.social services at Wirral Council. Last week, the Labour leader Steve

:54:51. > :54:58.Foulkes was voted out by councillors. The new man in charge

:54:58. > :55:03.says an inquiry is the only way to restore trust.

:55:03. > :55:07.I know that the prime minister has shown an interest. Ministers in

:55:07. > :55:10.London are showing an interest. We will speak to them to see if we can

:55:10. > :55:12.get this sorted. Finally, mothers in the Isle of Man

:55:12. > :55:22.have been out on the streets protesting. They are concerned at

:55:22. > :55:24.