:00:41. > :02:25.cleaner and some lost documents Yesterday
:02:26. > :02:30.cleaner and some lost documents him go, he was
:02:31. > :02:35.cleaner and some lost documents he would not have done anything
:02:36. > :03:19.wrong, but he set himself a very high standard
:03:20. > :03:21.wrong, but he set himself a very is the document he was presented
:03:22. > :03:35.putting through a bill that will demand tougher checks on
:03:36. > :03:38.putting through a bill that will he himself did not do enough checks
:03:39. > :03:43.to he himself did not do enough checks
:03:44. > :04:09.is an odd bit where he he himself did not do enough checks
:04:10. > :04:15.school educated lad. He is the he himself did not do enough checks
:04:16. > :04:21.supply of. He is he himself did not do enough checks
:04:22. > :04:37.is customary that he himself did not do enough checks
:04:38. > :05:22.a great chap he will be back next week.
:05:23. > :05:27.a great chap he will be back next has got a grip on the situation at
:05:28. > :05:27.last. For
:05:28. > :05:59.last. tractor. He waded into
:06:00. > :06:00.last. Next it was the chair of the
:06:01. > :06:05.Environment Agency, Lord Smith, Next it was the chair of the
:06:06. > :06:08.faced angry residents. Sought Next it was the chair of the
:06:09. > :06:42.river is out. That is precisely what we are going to do. Where he
:06:43. > :06:49.river is out. That is precisely what rivers and stitches can
:06:50. > :07:02.river is out. That is precisely what Secretary Owen Paterson has not been
:07:03. > :07:02.river is out. That is precisely what higher. Some residents were told to
:07:03. > :07:09.evacuate. higher. Some residents were told to
:07:10. > :07:18.big gap in the network. Look at the higher. Some residents were told to
:07:19. > :07:23.in. What is the long-term solution for flood prone areas of the
:07:24. > :07:39.country? I am joined from Oxford by want the Government to do?
:07:40. > :07:45.country? I am joined from Oxford by to make sure it
:07:46. > :07:49.farmer and landowner around here knows should
:07:50. > :07:53.farmer and landowner around here years. First, to solve the
:07:54. > :08:03.farmer and landowner around here there is money
:08:04. > :08:07.to do the dredging? When the waters start to subside
:08:08. > :08:08.to do the dredging? When the waters become a key part of this?
:08:09. > :08:25.a river and you see trees growing and
:08:26. > :08:28.a river and you see trees growing only because there is silt,
:08:29. > :08:40.a river and you see trees growing to have
:08:41. > :08:53.a river and you see trees growing stop the dredging? If
:08:54. > :09:00.a river and you see trees growing least some dredging on these
:09:01. > :09:06.a river and you see trees growing They are carrying water that comes
:09:07. > :09:23.a river and you see trees growing level of the flood plain on
:09:24. > :09:26.a river and you see trees growing infiltration upstream and you also
:09:27. > :09:33.a river and you see trees growing the levels and upstream so as to
:09:34. > :09:37.have active flood plain that can store water. This idea it
:09:38. > :09:55.have active flood plain that can about dredging is
:09:56. > :10:02.have active flood plain that can locally, the
:10:03. > :10:10.have active flood plain that can taken away and there is a very good
:10:11. > :10:10.have active flood plain that can perfectly well. In
:10:11. > :10:16.have active flood plain that can dredging has not taken place. There
:10:17. > :10:23.are dredging has not taken place. There
:10:24. > :10:32.when they do do some of dredging, the Environment
:10:33. > :10:35.when they do do some of dredging, barmy. We need to take the
:10:36. > :10:35.when they do do some of dredging, of the rivers and build the banks up
:10:36. > :10:40.so we of the rivers and build the banks up
:10:41. > :10:54.future. We have to of the rivers and build the banks up
:10:55. > :11:02.need to make sure repairs are done more quickly. All right, let
:11:03. > :11:05.back to Oliver Tickell. Is it not the case a lot of people on your
:11:06. > :11:05.side the case a lot of people on your
:11:06. > :11:47.needs to turn into wilderness the case a lot of people on your
:11:48. > :12:05.me put that to Tessa the case a lot of people on your
:12:06. > :12:43.remember is a lot of the case a lot of people on your
:12:44. > :12:58.Drainage has been taking the case a lot of people on your
:12:59. > :13:09.year the flooding minister agreed the case a lot of people on your
:13:10. > :13:12.Is it not time to the case a lot of people on your
:13:13. > :13:15.people run their land rather than being told what to do by the
:13:16. > :13:24.Environment Agency, being told what to do by the
:13:25. > :13:36.considerable power being told what to do by the
:13:37. > :13:48.happen, but they have signed being told what to do by the
:13:49. > :13:50.wildlife. It is not much good if being told what to do by the
:13:51. > :14:04.your house is underwater. being told what to do by the
:14:05. > :14:35.vision? You give the money to the drainage
:14:36. > :14:46.vision? You give the money to the relationship with the
:14:47. > :14:57.vision? You give the money to the the electoral college system which
:14:58. > :14:59.vision? You give the money to the member, one vote system. A union
:15:00. > :15:08.member would have to become an affiliated
:15:09. > :15:12.member would have to become an year. But the unions would
:15:13. > :15:32.member would have to become an of the vote at the conference and
:15:33. > :15:36.member would have to become an trade union has
:15:37. > :15:46.member would have to become an saying it is music to his ears. The
:15:47. > :16:14.member would have to become an Chuka Umunna joins me now for
:16:15. > :16:17.secretaries determine this, whether secretaries determine this, whether
:16:18. > :16:27.the individual members want us to be in
:16:28. > :16:31.the individual members want us to be want to make sure the
:16:32. > :16:47.trade union members, people who teach our
:16:48. > :16:49.trade union members, people who and we are also
:16:50. > :17:04.trade union members, people who this day and age
:17:05. > :17:04.trade union members, people who Labour conferences, there will be
:17:05. > :17:38.the single most Labour conferences, there will be
:17:39. > :17:38.the group of people who will Labour conferences, there will be
:17:39. > :17:42.contest, we are seeking Labour conferences, there will be
:17:43. > :18:01.towards more of vote process. At the moment we have
:18:02. > :18:07.They still have a lot vote process. At the moment we have
:18:08. > :18:20.a member of the GMB union and the Unite union,
:18:21. > :18:24.a member of the GMB union and the and that is an important
:18:25. > :18:37.a member of the GMB union and the would be casting their votes.
:18:38. > :18:37.a member of the GMB union and the envelopes for people to return
:18:38. > :19:19.a member of the GMB union and the have to hand over
:19:20. > :19:33.a member of the GMB union and the them a lot of
:19:34. > :19:33.a member of the GMB union and the as you put it! The idea that
:19:34. > :19:42.individual trade as you put it! The idea that
:19:43. > :19:50.They will not have their leadership decide
:19:51. > :19:55.that for them. Let money. The Labour Party manifesto
:19:56. > :20:04.will be reflecting the interests of people can say we are not going to
:20:05. > :20:19.give people can say we are not going to
:20:20. > :20:27.seats than anybody else in people can say we are not going to
:20:28. > :21:16.determining factor. They won't be. people can say we are not going to
:21:17. > :21:19.an important business person in people can say we are not going to
:21:20. > :21:43.executive of the ITV, people can say we are not going to
:21:44. > :21:54.chairman of the chief executive With the
:21:55. > :22:22.chairman of the chief executive businesses, not all FTSE
:22:23. > :22:30.chairman of the chief executive million companies. The largest ones,
:22:31. > :22:30.chairman of the chief executive sector jobs in this country come
:22:31. > :22:37.from sector jobs in this country come
:22:38. > :22:43.important part sector jobs in this country come
:22:44. > :22:50.supply chains. So you cannot name a single chairman
:22:51. > :23:31.supply chains. So you cannot name a correct? I
:23:32. > :23:43.supply chains. So you cannot name a "if it creates wealth, let's
:23:44. > :23:44.supply chains. So you cannot name a it" . Another quote, that it borders
:23:45. > :23:50.on predatory taxation. it" . Another quote, that it borders
:23:51. > :23:50.you are anti-business. I it" . Another quote, that it borders
:23:51. > :24:04.with them. One of the interesting rate of tax is that he made some
:24:05. > :24:12.comments arguing against rate of tax is that he made some
:24:13. > :24:14.different now. Digby rate of tax is that he made some
:24:15. > :24:40.his own opinions, rate of tax is that he made some
:24:41. > :25:31.money? I think ultimately rate of tax is that he made some
:25:32. > :25:41.a level beyond which the tax rate of tax is that he made some
:25:42. > :25:54.increase its two rate of tax is that he made some
:25:55. > :26:07.office we didn't have one, the 50p will raise. In the three
:26:08. > :26:16.years of operation the 50p will raise. In the three
:26:17. > :26:46.was based on extrapolation the 50p will raise. In the three
:26:47. > :26:53.tax revenues. -- 75%. Is it not a the 50p will raise. In the three
:26:54. > :27:22.them, they will just the 50p will raise. In the three
:27:23. > :27:39.something else. Let's the 50p will raise. In the three
:27:40. > :27:48.they go because you the 50p will raise. In the three
:27:49. > :27:57.have lost a huge chunk of your tax base. They
:27:58. > :27:57.have lost a huge chunk of your tax are advocating here is not
:27:58. > :28:14.controversial. Those are advocating here is not
:28:15. > :28:23.other major economy that subscribes to this?
:28:24. > :28:39.other major economy that subscribes than us. Can you
:28:40. > :28:49.other major economy that subscribes fact that those with
:28:50. > :28:59.other major economy that subscribes Over the past week it seems
:29:00. > :28:59.other major economy that subscribes service Ofsted, Lib Dem sources have
:29:00. > :29:27.continued to needle service Ofsted, Lib Dem sources have
:29:28. > :29:32.Giles Dilnot. It's unlikely service Ofsted, Lib Dem sources have
:29:33. > :29:33.Clegg and his party colleague schools minister David Laws
:29:34. > :29:39.Clegg and his party colleague is said to have been furious with
:29:40. > :29:39.The is said to have been furious with
:29:40. > :29:49.decision to remove Sally is said to have been furious with
:29:50. > :29:51.him to not is said to have been furious with
:29:52. > :30:19.remarkable thing is said to have been furious with
:30:20. > :30:30.between Nick Clegg and is said to have been furious with
:30:31. > :30:39.attacks can help them with is said to have been furious with
:30:40. > :30:57.post 2015. One spat does not a is said to have been furious with
:30:58. > :31:12.people who are happier to publically express
:31:13. > :31:12.people who are happier to publically his views on Coalition. It is
:31:13. > :31:43.difficult for his views on Coalition. It is
:31:44. > :32:06.shows the Lib Dems have a his views on Coalition. It is
:32:07. > :32:27.blue attacks are misplaced and irresponsible.
:32:28. > :32:40.blue attacks are misplaced and will see more of this?
:32:41. > :33:00.blue attacks are misplaced and politicians right now, and wants
:33:01. > :33:03.blue attacks are misplaced and now picking fights with the Tories
:33:04. > :33:12.on a range of issues, some of them trivial. Is this a Pirelli used to
:33:13. > :33:24.on a range of issues, some of them privy to Nick
:33:25. > :33:30.of the banks. That is now being sorted out. But
:33:31. > :33:47.is we have seen a string of attacks, almost an enemy within
:33:48. > :34:01.is we have seen a string of attacks, and this morning Nick Clegg has had
:34:02. > :34:07.is we have seen a string of attacks, Lib Dems do that we
:34:08. > :34:12.is we have seen a string of attacks, year before the election so
:34:13. > :34:17.is we have seen a string of attacks, strategy of trying
:34:18. > :34:30.is we have seen a string of attacks, the Lib Dems?
:34:31. > :34:44.is we have seen a string of attacks, together and far more
:34:45. > :34:52.Why does he need them? I do not think he does. You would be happy to
:34:53. > :35:18.see the Lib Dems go? I would always be
:35:19. > :35:26.see the Lib Dems go? I would always have had single
:35:27. > :35:40.see the Lib Dems go? I would always that have collective
:35:41. > :36:18.see the Lib Dems go? I would always stops, there is paralysis as the row
:36:19. > :36:19.see the Lib Dems go? I would always Business is worried about this
:36:20. > :36:25.anti-European rhetoric and that Business is worried about this
:36:26. > :36:29.Tory party. That Business is worried about this
:36:30. > :36:37.make our own constant Lib Dem attacks on you?
:36:38. > :36:55.What makes constant Lib Dem attacks on you?
:36:56. > :37:14.House of Commons, it was the Liberal constant Lib Dem attacks on you?
:37:15. > :37:24.referendum bill. And the European road today. It strikes
:37:25. > :37:26.me that given the European road today. It strikes
:37:27. > :37:54.the Lib the European road today. It strikes
:37:55. > :38:05.vote at the last election and at the moment there is no sign in the
:38:06. > :38:14.welcome it if Nick Clegg is starting to
:38:15. > :38:17.welcome it if Nick Clegg is starting last election are radical,
:38:18. > :38:28.progressive people who want to see a much
:38:29. > :38:35.there. We know what both of you want, but what
:38:36. > :39:04.there. We know what both of you election or will it break
:39:05. > :39:04.there. We know what both of you before the election. Do you think it
:39:05. > :39:09.will survive or before the election. Do you think it
:39:10. > :39:10.has delivered a great deal in many ways, but
:39:11. > :39:48.has delivered a great deal in many have done in the last three, there
:39:49. > :39:59.Hello, I'm Lucie Fisher, coming up on the
:40:00. > :40:14.defying the Government's new term`time holiday fines.
:40:15. > :40:14.girls will see their grandfather in South Africa. It's
:40:15. > :40:22.joined by two Devon MPs, the Conservative Gary Streeter and
:40:23. > :40:28.Labour's Ben Bradshaw. Welcome both. Relations between Westminster and
:40:29. > :40:33.the weather`beaten South West got the head of the Environment Agency
:40:34. > :40:38.saying Britain must decide whether floods. But the Government said it
:40:39. > :40:51.could afford to do both and visit to the Levels since the
:40:52. > :40:57.flooding started. Have you said
:40:58. > :40:58.us what's happened over the recent years and what we
:40:59. > :41:03.because of the money the government has put on the table. The Prime
:41:04. > :41:13.Minister made an announcement just specifically for Somerset and that
:41:14. > :41:16.means that we will be able to do a full dredge of eight kilometres over
:41:17. > :41:19.the next few Meanwhile, as the region's main
:41:20. > :41:29.railway line Secretary was in Dawlish to inspect
:41:30. > :42:05.the damage. to your question at Prime Minister
:42:06. > :42:18.'s Question Time. I think there has been a greater
:42:19. > :42:31.sense of urgency but McLoughlin and the Prime Minister
:42:32. > :42:46.himself came down. floods for greater real resilience
:42:47. > :42:47.in general after we lost the line for nearly a month last year.
:42:48. > :42:53.is still to be delivered. Can we trust the
:42:54. > :42:59.deliver these policies? I have had two meetings with the
:43:00. > :43:07.Transport Secretary over the last five
:43:08. > :43:30.clear that the hole in the wall will be fixed whatever the cost.
:43:31. > :43:36.business. It does
:43:37. > :43:36.track at Dawlish shocked everyone. The line has often seen shutdowns in
:43:37. > :43:43.the past As we've heard, the Transport
:43:44. > :43:46.Secretary remains committed to the route, confirming that it could be
:43:47. > :44:01.re`open in six weeks, but he's also now
:44:02. > :44:03.was passionate in her defence of the route.
:44:04. > :44:05.It is vital for our tourism industry, it is vital for our
:44:06. > :44:09.economies and it is doable this line up and running and it is
:44:10. > :44:11.much more affordable to do that now and we need a
:44:12. > :44:32.million breakwater to protect the track but a growing number of
:44:33. > :44:35.which is, of course, far from new. King Canute got washed away when the
:44:36. > :44:45.sea came in. He said hold back the exact with the same with Network
:44:46. > :44:45.Rail. This year they will fill out the holes in the wall and keep the
:44:46. > :44:46.sea at sea at bay. You won't, the sea is
:44:47. > :44:48.stronger. The other idea new bird population may have delayed
:44:49. > :45:10.works to protect the line. respect of the Dawlish Warren which
:45:11. > :45:20.we all know it's going to be closed for six
:45:21. > :45:31.Agency is looking at the impact any work could have on local birds. But
:45:32. > :45:34.the Transport Secretary dismissed Labour's allegation that the
:45:35. > :45:40.Government was putting birds before people.
:45:41. > :45:42.All this just got washed away? Some will see those visits to
:45:43. > :45:58.damage here has even surprised rail experts and it is not the
:45:59. > :45:58.this train near Taunton. We have simply got to play the
:45:59. > :46:07.game that the Scots play and get all our MPs together. There
:46:08. > :46:14.length of the line. Let's have those 50 ramming home
:46:15. > :46:24.mainline from Paddington to Penzance is an important regional artery.
:46:25. > :46:26.As ever, it all comes down to cost. But be it the estimated 100 million
:46:27. > :46:30.for a diversion or even the 400 million for a second sea wall, many
:46:31. > :46:57.are pointing out these figures project to be spent on the
:46:58. > :47:09.south`west, is that right? High Speed 2 as a vanity project.
:47:10. > :47:12.People in the South West are asking how these MPs who have been
:47:13. > :47:20.representing this part of the world for years
:47:21. > :47:20.times as much money spent on transport in the
:47:21. > :47:33.railways were not improved, was inevitable. It is no good asking for
:47:34. > :47:35.money now, will happen.
:47:36. > :48:20.We have seen waves smashing into the sights of trains with passengers on
:48:21. > :48:20.board. It is not come `` it has not come as a surprise to passengers in
:48:21. > :48:32.There should be investment right the way down the line rather than
:48:33. > :48:43.billion going up north. The government
:48:44. > :49:28.for a real link in the south`west? I think we should use the High Speed
:49:29. > :49:45.used for High Speed 2 would fix the problem at a Dawlish.
:49:46. > :50:00.Then says it doesn't need to unpredictability and more crises and
:50:01. > :50:11.how can we think think climate change is happening
:50:12. > :50:11.You can't have a climate change sceptic at the head
:50:12. > :50:25.changing and we have to adapt to that. We
:50:26. > :50:40.investment to our railway line and we can use this as leverage, saying
:50:41. > :50:54.that we won support High Speed 2 existing line open. In the long run,
:50:55. > :51:08.we need a lane which is less vulnerable to the
:51:09. > :51:08.anger in the south`west. They need to get
:51:09. > :51:29.centres. Do you
:51:30. > :51:32.put before humans? The details don't seem to be quite
:51:33. > :51:43.conservation of wildlife. Of course we have to get our priorities right.
:51:44. > :52:02.It is difficult for the Green party, isn't it,
:52:03. > :52:07.We have to learn to undertake that balance at. Lots of the emphasis is
:52:08. > :52:12.on getting things open for business but much of the business is tourism
:52:13. > :52:16.and when we look at these lines we need to think about the quality of
:52:17. > :52:17.the lives of people who live in the south`west and also tourism and the
:52:18. > :52:33.beautiful part that bit of railway as many people
:52:34. > :53:09.doubling of flights down here. should
:53:10. > :53:15.But only because they had put them up, which was shocking.
:53:16. > :53:17.They are keeping us all informed and doing all they can to get this
:53:18. > :53:22.the longer term solutions to ensure that we are connected to the
:53:23. > :53:33.more? You had 14 years and we just kept patching up the railways.
:53:34. > :53:54.No, we to both the investments and
:53:55. > :54:05.recognises climate change as believe the promises they are making
:54:06. > :54:09.because those made in the past weren't delivered.
:54:10. > :54:22.party? I think some
:54:23. > :54:29.cost`effective. If
:54:30. > :54:29.Trident then we could improve quality of life.
:54:30. > :55:00.of the Green party's suggestions and I agree it is untenable to
:55:01. > :55:15.proposing will not just save money but meet the needs of older
:55:16. > :55:43.television, vegetating. By coming here it's stimulating my
:55:44. > :55:55.managing the staffing of the centres so, in effect, we're twice
:55:56. > :55:57.economic climate double funding. The council's meals on wheels
:55:58. > :55:57.service could also subsidised hot meal but the council
:55:58. > :56:09.says not enough people are using Instead it will help people to get
:56:10. > :56:15.their meals in Exeter.
:56:16. > :56:30.What we are seeing is things moving worried about these plans and have
:56:31. > :56:34.demanded more details. particularly older people's
:56:35. > :56:41.quality`of`life, throughout the services and now
:56:42. > :56:51.suddenly we have this big hard to pick apart properly in the
:56:52. > :56:58.interests of people who use these services.
:56:59. > :57:01.need to save ?110 million but insist people will not be left without the
:57:02. > :57:02.services they need. spending more than we are getting
:57:03. > :57:37.and so we have to reduce expenditure.
:57:38. > :57:48.But we have an ageing it will have impact the future.
:57:49. > :58:11.They are asking the community 's round
:58:12. > :58:11.We are freeing up choice for older people.
:58:12. > :58:32.It is not situation of government cuts.
:58:33. > :58:37.We always say this but what can we do it `` do about it if the money
:58:38. > :58:37.needs to be saved? We had no growth
:58:38. > :58:43.three years which is why the deficit is bigger than it should have been
:58:44. > :58:55.which is So the Labour Party would provide
:58:56. > :59:16.the money for meals on wheels? Now our regular round`up of the
:59:17. > :59:16.political week in 60 seconds. The saturation of Somerset
:59:17. > :59:24.continued. As the police helicopter asked the
:59:25. > :59:36.people of As the police helicopter asked the
:59:37. > :59:45.can stop flooding with these old`fashioned solutions. We
:59:46. > :59:46.number ten. We
:59:47. > :59:50.that the only way we're going to get out of this recession
:59:51. > :00:01.than 400 parents have been fined for taking their children on holiday
:00:02. > :00:07.during girls will see their grandfather in
:00:08. > :00:17.South Africa. It's ?70 or whatever it is. And I'll
:00:18. > :00:21.continue doing it. I know we have talked lots about
:00:22. > :00:26.flooding but given flooding but given the extreme
:00:27. > :00:43.weather conditions should we be be living on flood plains.
:00:44. > :01:08.Bringing in a law against it? Just
:01:09. > :01:12.How'd you deliver the homes if you don't call on flood plains?
:01:13. > :01:32.We desperately need new homes but it has to be
:01:33. > :01:58.morning and the teachers were telling me more parents are getting
:01:59. > :02:08.exceptional circumstances that's children should be in school.
:02:09. > :02:09.Even if it is a family visit or... ? There are exceptional circumstances
:02:10. > :02:16.and the headteacher has discretion. Too much control away from parents?
:02:17. > :02:30.My solution is to holiday times and he day prices and
:02:31. > :02:41.that seems like a sensible unrealistic.
:02:42. > :02:42.It is doable. Londoners who otherwise may not have
:02:43. > :02:52.a voice. Both of you, Londoners who otherwise may not have
:02:53. > :02:58.David Cameron get a grip on the Londoners who otherwise may not have
:02:59. > :03:03.floods? Can UKIP push Londoners who otherwise may not have
:03:04. > :03:38.Thursday? Is the speaker Londoners who otherwise may not have
:03:39. > :03:42.what we thought we Londoners who otherwise may not have
:03:43. > :03:44.the best. The Environment Londoners who otherwise may not have
:03:45. > :03:54.being hung out to dry Londoners who otherwise may not have
:03:55. > :03:56.Levels. It is turning Londoners who otherwise may not have
:03:57. > :04:00.crisis by the Government and Londoners who otherwise may not have
:04:01. > :04:14.dealing with the flooding. There is no
:04:15. > :04:15.dealing with the flooding. There is an entire culture within the
:04:16. > :04:18.Environment Agency, European directives about dredging
:04:19. > :04:23.and all European directives about dredging
:04:24. > :04:29.put ahead of people if European directives about dredging
:04:30. > :04:35.difficult circumstances by European directives about dredging
:04:36. > :04:37.them to manage. Chris Smith would European directives about dredging
:04:38. > :04:54.acting under a law European directives about dredging
:04:55. > :05:01.spectacle, they European directives about dredging
:05:02. > :05:10.summer and they will find something European directives about dredging
:05:11. > :05:14.but it is a bigger picture than European directives about dredging
:05:15. > :05:25.whole skill solution that European directives about dredging
:05:26. > :05:32.in autumn and then the water European directives about dredging
:05:33. > :05:43.pictures of the flooding, it is all topsoil
:05:44. > :06:01.pictures of the flooding, it is all we carry out farming.
:06:02. > :06:04.pictures of the flooding, it is all Agency? I agree with Nick that Chris
:06:05. > :06:04.pictures of the flooding, it is all Smith has been setup in this
:06:05. > :06:12.situation. half an hour, in and out, with no
:06:13. > :06:17.angry people shouting at him. You to half an hour, in and out, with no
:06:18. > :06:20.a farm. It is agreed he half an hour, in and out, with no
:06:21. > :06:25.crisis. But half an hour, in and out, with no
:06:26. > :06:30.London media class who does imagine David Cameron in a pair of
:06:31. > :06:33.wellies. If imagine David Cameron in a pair of
:06:34. > :06:39.Guildford, it would not have dragged imagine David Cameron in a pair of
:06:40. > :06:43.interesting how they are imagine David Cameron in a pair of
:06:44. > :06:58.front of everything else. The farmers for the farmland they were
:06:59. > :07:13.not going farmers for the farmland they were
:07:14. > :07:22.a flood defence system further farmers for the farmland they were
:07:23. > :07:31.sanctuary, it was to save farmers for the farmland they were
:07:32. > :07:32.Environment Agency was talking about farmers for the farmland they were
:07:33. > :07:39.dynamiting every pumping agency farmers for the farmland they were
:07:40. > :08:04.the part of that agency. If farmers for the farmland they were
:08:05. > :08:28.any threat up farmers for the farmland they were
:08:29. > :08:47.UKIP will do better. And they farmers for the farmland they were
:08:48. > :08:51.come second? It looks like farmers for the farmland they were
:08:52. > :09:01.poll this week showed farmers for the farmland they were
:09:02. > :09:20.for UKIP. If they do well in the European elections, they should
:09:21. > :09:23.for UKIP. If they do well in the come a good second? I think they
:09:24. > :09:36.for UKIP. If they do well in the will and if they do not,
:09:37. > :10:43.for UKIP. If they do well in the a lot on UKIP
:10:44. > :10:50.for UKIP. If they do well in the You really... Order.
:10:51. > :10:53.for UKIP. If they do well in the over excitable individual. You
:10:54. > :10:58.for UKIP. If they do well in the to write out 1000 times,
:10:59. > :11:03.for UKIP. If they do well in the questions. He was talking
:11:04. > :11:14.for UKIP. If they do well in the 1000 lines,
:11:15. > :11:14.for UKIP. If they do well in the There was
:11:15. > :11:25.for UKIP. If they do well in the but he never had that in the first
:11:26. > :11:36.place. But he is an incredibly reforming speaker.
:11:37. > :11:37.place. But he is an incredibly will never catch on. It means very
:11:38. > :11:39.frequently there are will never catch on. It means very
:11:40. > :11:45.questions. The deportation of foreign criminals. He
:11:46. > :11:49.could have found a deportation of foreign criminals. He
:11:50. > :11:53.that. He is a real reformer and deportation of foreign criminals. He
:11:54. > :12:04.executive do not like that. That is deportation of foreign criminals. He
:12:05. > :12:11.Government when Parliament has more deportation of foreign criminals. He
:12:12. > :12:16.overcome these increasingly mannered and some of
:12:17. > :12:56.overcome these increasingly mannered think it is a real shame.
:12:57. > :13:13.overcome these increasingly mannered and he is
:13:14. > :13:15.overcome these increasingly mannered we see them every week and they
:13:16. > :13:18.overcome these increasingly mannered getting a bit
:13:19. > :13:20.overcome these increasingly mannered was having to keep that under
:13:21. > :13:49.control, I would be driven slowly mad.
:13:50. > :13:49.control, I would be driven slowly at 11. If it is Sunday, it is the
:13:50. > :13:57.Sunday Politics.