:00:39. > :00:50.he's listening. Fears that Ukraine could
:00:51. > :00:53.he's listening. Hunt has started spelling out
:00:54. > :01:14.In the South West: Labour's
:01:15. > :01:17.In the South West: The rail experts who say the chance of a second line
:01:18. > :01:25.is very slim. And the plan to end
:01:26. > :01:27.changes. And tightening household finances.
:01:28. > :02:00.changes. And tightening household government in Kiev has put the
:02:01. > :02:09.Ukrainian military on full combat government in Kiev has put the
:02:10. > :02:11.Russian troops seem already to be in control
:02:12. > :02:24.Russian troops seem already to be in where Russia has
:02:25. > :02:39.Russian troops seem already to be in taking no notice. This is
:02:40. > :02:46.Russian troops seem already to be in way to Kiev
:02:47. > :02:46.Russian troops seem already to be in correspondent David Stern, he's in
:02:47. > :03:16.Kiev. correspondent David Stern, he's in
:03:17. > :03:35.taking up various positions, also at correspondent David Stern, he's in
:03:36. > :03:48.should also be control because there are other
:03:49. > :03:58.groups, control because there are other
:03:59. > :04:09.least at the moment tacitly resisting.
:04:10. > :04:10.least at the moment tacitly showing Russian troops digging in on
:04:11. > :04:55.the border an even larger incursion into Crimea
:04:56. > :05:36.or elsewhere, for that matter. They also
:05:37. > :05:47.or elsewhere, for that matter. They go next? They have Crimea to all
:05:48. > :05:56.or elsewhere, for that matter. They already been
:05:57. > :06:02.or elsewhere, for that matter. They some unrest in the eastern part of
:06:03. > :06:05.demonstrations and clashes. More ominously, there have been noises
:06:06. > :06:29.from the Kremlin they ominously, there have been noises
:06:30. > :06:33.illegitimate and fascist. It contain risks. They will have to
:06:34. > :07:13.deal with contain risks. They will have to
:07:14. > :07:20.Intelligence Committee in the House of Commons. What should
:07:21. > :07:23.Intelligence Committee in the House going to
:07:24. > :07:32.Intelligence Committee in the House They need to CEOP sit numbers and
:07:33. > :07:42.also the Budapest Memorandum of almost 20
:07:43. > :08:21.years ago the Budapest Memorandum of almost 20
:08:22. > :08:36.events proved this, the Budapest Memorandum of almost 20
:08:37. > :08:41.military action without a parliamentary
:08:42. > :08:43.military action without a required from the executive or,
:08:44. > :08:59.military action without a suspect, there will be very little
:09:00. > :09:13.military action without a which it is clear we haven't the
:09:14. > :09:13.military action without a decisions to the whims of
:09:14. > :10:11.parliamentary approval. That may or decisions to the whims of
:10:12. > :10:17.It requires an engagement from the EU
:10:18. > :10:29.and will be smarting from the failure within a matter of hours
:10:30. > :10:29.and will be smarting from the the east, takes over
:10:30. > :10:56.and will be smarting from the place, our Government, you say,
:10:57. > :10:56.and will be smarting from the some military action in Ukraine the
:10:57. > :11:06.sense some military action in Ukraine the
:11:07. > :11:16.be move to have sanctions against some military action in Ukraine the
:11:17. > :11:33.looking at our internal affairs and reform,
:11:34. > :11:37.looking at our internal affairs and Germany at the centre of
:11:38. > :11:50.looking at our internal affairs and whole appetite for
:11:51. > :11:50.looking at our internal affairs and longer term implications. Mark
:11:51. > :12:00.Field, thank you. longer term implications. Mark
:12:01. > :12:02.Diplomatic Editor Mark Urban. longer term implications. Mark
:12:03. > :12:08.there any prospect of longer term implications. Mark
:12:09. > :12:16.moment, it is nil. The longer term implications. Mark
:12:17. > :12:32.our future limits be? longer term implications. Mark
:12:33. > :12:37.think a couple of steps down longer term implications. Mark
:12:38. > :12:42.energy supplies to longer term implications. Mark
:12:43. > :12:47.about. It is quite clear we longer term implications. Mark
:12:48. > :12:52.Ukraine is longer term implications. Mark
:12:53. > :12:55.exchange crisis. Within literally a longer term implications. Mark
:12:56. > :13:13.money. All of these longer term implications. Mark
:13:14. > :13:27.Mr Putin do next? He has lots longer term implications. Mark
:13:28. > :13:34.deployment suggests the one bite at longer term implications. Mark
:13:35. > :13:36.Ukrainian Government. Of course so longer term implications. Mark
:13:37. > :13:38.far, there hasn't longer term implications. Mark
:13:39. > :13:40.response. The longer term implications. Mark
:13:41. > :13:52.about recent months, longer term implications. Mark
:13:53. > :14:03.other side of the equation. longer term implications. Mark
:14:04. > :14:25.have the other side, if longer term implications. Mark
:14:26. > :14:33.whether Ukraine longer term implications. Mark
:14:34. > :14:42.continue posing very serious longer term implications. Mark
:14:43. > :14:51.Ukraine is longer term implications. Mark
:14:52. > :15:11.would perversely be a net loss for Russia.
:15:12. > :15:41.would perversely be a net loss for they will look at Putin's behaviour
:15:42. > :15:41.would perversely be a net loss for in the big eastern cities in Ukraine
:15:42. > :15:52.yesterday. in the big eastern cities in Ukraine
:15:53. > :16:04.response from Ukrainian armed in the big eastern cities in Ukraine
:16:05. > :16:14.them deploying from barracks. There are
:16:15. > :17:05.not going to let them split away. I would
:17:06. > :17:05.not going to let them split away. I Paddy Ashdown was saying sent Angela
:17:06. > :17:11.Merkel because Paddy Ashdown was saying sent Angela
:17:12. > :17:21.find that response worrying. We need for the West so we go to economic
:17:22. > :17:27.find that response worrying. We need sanctions. Doesn't Vladimir Putin
:17:28. > :17:35.find that response worrying. We need have turned off the gas tap. Yes,
:17:36. > :18:07.find that response worrying. We need are being held,
:18:08. > :18:33.find that response worrying. We need is changing schools, like this one.
:18:34. > :18:40.The changes is changing schools, like this one.
:18:41. > :18:49.toughening exams and making them the core of the
:18:50. > :18:49.toughening exams and making them the in place. But
:18:50. > :19:10.toughening exams and making them the change it all
:19:11. > :19:27.been taken about fine tuning previous direct
:19:28. > :19:27.been taken about fine tuning teachers into classrooms. Full
:19:28. > :19:49.policy teachers into classrooms. Full
:19:50. > :19:51.the sting at the back, teachers into classrooms. Full
:19:52. > :19:56.feeling that there is current Government on types of
:19:57. > :20:12.schools current Government on types of
:20:13. > :20:29.and honest about the shared agenda between
:20:30. > :20:29.and honest about the shared agenda really interested in. The art of
:20:30. > :20:32.Government, really interested in. The art of
:20:33. > :20:39.competing pictures of policy, draws its own visions of a shared
:20:40. > :20:42.agenda, it draws its own visions of a shared
:20:43. > :20:42.idea with teaching draws its own visions of a shared
:20:43. > :20:47.tone of change that the draws its own visions of a shared
:20:48. > :21:19.had sketched draws its own visions of a shared
:21:20. > :21:20.really what ways on teachers every single day. Actually they would look
:21:21. > :21:21.at restoring going to move back from the free
:21:22. > :21:45.schools and going to move back from the free
:21:46. > :22:06.all still to play for. can understand clearly. I don't
:22:07. > :22:12.think that Tristram can understand clearly. I don't
:22:13. > :23:07.before the election. I think we will can understand clearly. I don't
:23:08. > :23:11.those for the sake of it. can understand clearly. I don't
:23:12. > :23:16.having a focus can understand clearly. I don't
:23:17. > :23:29.that the forgotten 15% is properly can understand clearly. I don't
:23:30. > :23:32.schools, all the rest of can understand clearly. I don't
:23:33. > :24:05.it is the quality of leadership of can understand clearly. I don't
:24:06. > :24:08.like you might not repeal anything. can understand clearly. I don't
:24:09. > :24:36.go in a different direction, with country. You have said there will be
:24:37. > :24:40.no more free schools, which means free schools by a different
:24:41. > :25:03.name. means free schools by a different
:25:04. > :25:05.Thursday and plans for a big new school,
:25:06. > :25:16.We want schools to work together in a network of
:25:17. > :25:19.We want schools to work together in challenge, rather than this
:25:20. > :25:53.We want schools to work together in You say that, but your
:25:54. > :25:55.We want schools to work together in and that was always the
:25:56. > :25:58.We want schools to work together in have an insertion
:25:59. > :25:59.We want schools to work together in Children only have one chance at
:26:00. > :26:01.education. What about Children only have one chance at
:26:02. > :26:09.school? Our focus is on the leadership of the
:26:10. > :26:15.school? Our focus is on the it should be easier for parents
:26:16. > :26:15.school? Our focus is on the they are dissatisfied with existing
:26:16. > :26:18.schools, they schools and you are reneging on
:26:19. > :26:36.that. schools and you are reneging on
:26:37. > :26:47.new schools schools and you are reneging on
:26:48. > :27:00.Making sure we turned them around, just
:27:01. > :27:01.Making sure we turned them around, Bradford, and as we saw in the
:27:02. > :27:13.Making sure we turned them around, schools in Suffolk,
:27:14. > :27:16.Making sure we turned them around, the moment get the best
:27:17. > :27:17.Making sure we turned them around, education. Except that in your own
:27:18. > :27:27.backyard, education. Except that in your own
:27:28. > :27:35.good or outstanding school. 148 out of 150 of the worst
:27:36. > :27:43.good or outstanding school. 148 out should not have
:27:44. > :27:45.good or outstanding school. 148 out We face challenges,
:27:46. > :27:49.good or outstanding school. 148 out Wolverhampton does and
:27:50. > :27:54.good or outstanding school. 148 out large parts of
:27:55. > :27:57.good or outstanding school. 148 out share excellence
:27:58. > :28:05.schools and making sure we have quality
:28:06. > :28:05.schools and making sure we have of structure but of leadership. It
:28:06. > :28:50.is of structure but of leadership. It
:28:51. > :28:50.responsibilities. I understand that but you
:28:51. > :29:07.Where we have seen the sett ing up of Derby, Suffolk, we
:29:08. > :29:20.Where we have seen the sett ing up leadership. I was in Birmingham
:29:21. > :29:20.Where we have seen the sett ing up are queueing round the block to get
:29:21. > :29:22.into are queueing round the block to get
:29:23. > :29:34.passionate and are queueing round the block to get
:29:35. > :29:38.this Government would set up are queueing round the block to get
:29:39. > :30:03.school around and now people walking two jobs in the potteries,
:30:04. > :30:16.the steel industry, walking two jobs in the potteries,
:30:17. > :30:52.Rover, JCB, walking two jobs in the potteries,
:30:53. > :30:57.teacher? He He never taught walking two jobs in the potteries,
:30:58. > :31:06.sector are qualified. They walking two jobs in the potteries,
:31:07. > :31:20.Teachers who unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:21. > :31:20.paid unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:21. > :31:31.teachers. Why did you make unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:32. > :31:34.education systems which unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:35. > :31:41.having the most unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:42. > :31:49.that anyone can simply turn unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:50. > :31:56.teaching in the classroom. We want unqualified teachers. Your parents
:31:57. > :32:15.deepest subject knowledge, for the passion in learning
:32:16. > :32:15.deepest subject knowledge, for the the 147th to the 18 18th best
:32:16. > :32:59.private unqualified teachers. People were
:33:00. > :33:05.running that unqualified teachers. People were
:33:06. > :33:28.to run a school. We have an issue about discipline
:33:29. > :33:32.to run a school. We have an issue not good enough to have your initial
:33:33. > :33:41.teacher trainingaged work through your career
:33:42. > :33:49.deal with digital technology. Refresh
:33:50. > :33:59.deal with digital technology. Not in charge of a subject
:34:00. > :34:01.deal with digital technology. blame you. It is uplifting. Would
:34:02. > :34:09.deal with digital technology. you sack all unqualified teachers?
:34:10. > :34:11.deal with digital technology. status. What if they say no? If
:34:12. > :34:15.deal with digital technology. are not interested in
:34:16. > :34:21.skills and deepening their knowledge they should not
:34:22. > :34:22.skills and deepening their knowledge If a free school or academy hired a
:34:23. > :34:23.teach If a free school or academy hired a
:34:24. > :34:32.then forced by you they will be in breach of the law.
:34:33. > :34:43.They they will be in breach of the law.
:34:44. > :34:47.pathway to making sure they are qualified.
:34:48. > :34:49.pathway to making sure they are don't want to do this, will
:34:50. > :35:07.pathway to making sure they are them? It is not an
:35:08. > :35:08.pathway to making sure they are teacher of Brighton college finds
:35:09. > :35:14.incredibly inspeechational teachers teacher of Brighton college finds
:35:15. > :35:24.teaching qualifications. It is teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:35:25. > :35:28.challenging circumstances, teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:35:29. > :35:32.ability. Being teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:35:33. > :35:45.college is an easy gig teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:35:46. > :36:14.think Ed is teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:36:15. > :36:16.I love the teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:36:17. > :36:20.everybody from teaches 20 or 30 quids with
:36:21. > :36:28.We are a big, broad happy family on our way to Government. Thank you
:36:29. > :36:33.We are a big, broad happy family on We say goodbye to
:36:34. > :36:33.We are a big, broad happy family on Scotland who leave us for Sunday
:36:34. > :36:47.Hello, I'm Lucie Fisher, coming up politics
:36:48. > :36:58.Hello, I'm Lucie Fisher, coming up on
:36:59. > :37:10.National Park's villages. And for
:37:11. > :37:11.Councillors across the region have been busy setting their budgets this
:37:12. > :37:17.week put up council tax for the first
:37:18. > :37:18.time in recent years. In Cornwall they voted for a rise of almost 2%,
:37:19. > :37:23.whilst approving cuts of and confirming plans to close two
:37:24. > :37:36.respite centres for disabled children. It is
:37:37. > :37:42.have extreme budget pressures. We have extreme budget pressures. We
:37:43. > :37:42.to look at doing things differently. No one
:37:43. > :37:54.centres. Stephen, this is terrible timing,
:37:55. > :37:58.cutting services for disabled children while at the same time
:37:59. > :38:08.putting up council tax. These services are going to be
:38:09. > :38:16.choices facing councillors in real communities. ``
:38:17. > :38:33.of ?40 million in services. That ?40 million is almost exactly the amount
:38:34. > :38:45.share. We are not at the moment, that is
:38:46. > :38:46.Labour is responsible for these cuts. Do you think the public is now
:38:47. > :38:55.ready wary of us all, and I think we have
:38:56. > :39:04.to demonstrate that we have increase, they understand that that
:39:05. > :39:08.is necessary. But they want to spending their money wisely. That
:39:09. > :39:12.means facilities for disabled moment, are taking the biggest hit
:39:13. > :39:29.of all. It is so unfair. vulnerability of the Dawlish line
:39:30. > :39:36.this week. The Network Rail boss experts say the prospects of a
:39:37. > :39:43.second line remain as slim as ever. We'll hear from one of them after
:39:44. > :39:44.The storm in early February left this rail line at Dawlish hanging by
:39:45. > :40:02.a thread. The same could be by council leaders. We are talking
:40:03. > :40:17.about, in Plymouth, four into the region. It is important
:40:18. > :40:39.that could be a challenge. We are going
:40:40. > :40:41.to have a lot of competition, a big hurdle to overcome, to convince the
:40:42. > :40:42.government that we spending in the South West is ?212
:40:43. > :40:54.per head of ?337 is spent in the North West and
:40:55. > :40:59.the figure for London is ?774. The historically low transport
:41:00. > :41:14.investment in the region is linked to the relatively low number of rail
:41:15. > :41:21.which is to benefit from electrification of the
:41:22. > :41:21.routes is handed out using some strict criteria designed to protect
:41:22. > :41:31.taxpayers' money from rash decisions, but there might be some
:41:32. > :41:39.wriggle room. Transport economists, transport politicians,
:41:40. > :41:39.determining factor in transport decision`making is an economic
:41:40. > :41:45.analysis, working complicated, it could be done to a
:41:46. > :41:51.powerful lobbying group where the Prime Minister goes on
:41:52. > :41:56.holiday. In that respect, we are laughing. Should the PM want to fly
:41:57. > :42:11.to the region he won't be landing future would mean you would have to
:42:12. > :42:14.extend and wide the runway, would be ?40 million before you even
:42:15. > :42:17.have to go and buy houses and businesses that would be affected by
:42:18. > :42:22.that. up against. Easing overcrowding on
:42:23. > :42:25.commuter trains in the South East will always be a vote winner.
:42:26. > :42:32.Dawlish have the government's attention
:42:33. > :42:44.That's when politicians and council leaders will have to
:42:45. > :43:05.man responsible for setting up the model which was used when deciding
:43:06. > :43:15.It might be possible if that route really
:43:16. > :43:15.to build it than to maintain the existing route through Dawlish
:43:16. > :43:33.that route to ensure that it remains broadly open for the rest
:43:34. > :43:39.going to be cheaper? They are talking hundreds of millions of
:43:40. > :43:58.railways are very expensive, new land would have to be bought.
:43:59. > :43:58.is highly unlikely there would be any money for an alternative? Safety
:43:59. > :44:10.is always paramount. The railway felt would be unsafe. Stephen, this
:44:11. > :44:20.is the man who provided the funding that we now work on.
:44:21. > :44:24.say we're going to vote against HS2 unless you bring money, he is saying
:44:25. > :44:34.this could potentially have no effect at all? There are costs of
:44:35. > :44:39.this annual repair at Dawlish, costs to businesses because people are not
:44:40. > :44:46.able to come into the region. Whilst the storm in terms of weather may
:44:47. > :44:54.political storm has passed. It is political storm has passed. It is
:44:55. > :44:57.cut off from real connectivity with London. All three parties in the
:44:58. > :44:57.region will be strongly pressing the government
:44:58. > :45:05.that the Secretary of State has already acted to order a feasibility
:45:06. > :45:13.study. We need to see the but we also have to bear in mind
:45:14. > :45:18.there is cost at the moment of relying on a piece of rail link that
:45:19. > :45:25.is showing itself to be unreliable. We heard Ben Bradshaw, coming
:45:26. > :45:25.together perhaps not to vote for HS2.
:45:26. > :45:43.opposite of what you want, the message is for people to stay away?
:45:44. > :46:00.does have to go out loud and clear, but Cornwall
:46:01. > :46:00.absolutely vital for local businesses. It is completely
:46:01. > :46:19.England is a routinely cut off. Kate, you are a bit
:46:20. > :47:01.sympathetic towards Devon and Cornwall the
:47:02. > :47:02.situation, isn't it? If you don't have the services, customers cannot
:47:03. > :47:14.use them. a point here, that perhaps your
:47:15. > :47:21.funding formula works on paper but doesn't
:47:22. > :47:21.world? I think it probably does work. We know that when we put on
:47:22. > :47:29.extra of the trips on HS2 are going to be
:47:30. > :47:38.trips that transfer from the or 20 years' time. There are people
:47:39. > :47:53.down here who commute to work, who job. Do they not count? In
:47:54. > :48:03.Inverness, job. Do they not count? In
:48:04. > :48:08.needs to be built, it will need to get across it.
:48:09. > :48:28.those additional costs are and how big that cost saving would be by
:48:29. > :48:28.building a better railway, which was never subject to such...
:48:29. > :48:43.Cameron likes to come down here on holiday? I hope it does help, it is
:48:44. > :48:56.depressing that we have to rely on that. Four two 5 million a day in
:48:57. > :49:01.beautiful the landscape, the more difficult it often becomes.
:49:02. > :49:01.is now considering allowing new open`market houses to
:49:02. > :49:17.reports. Dartmoor, one of the region's most
:49:18. > :49:45.desirable harder to get off the ground because
:49:46. > :49:45.of government funding cuts. This is a 100% affordable housing scheme, we
:49:46. > :49:51.are incidences where you have to have an
:49:52. > :50:08.element of market cost subsidy understand why it is going to be
:50:09. > :50:14.challenging for housing associations. At the moment, only
:50:15. > :50:20.100% affordable housing schemes like park's villagers. It has been in
:50:21. > :50:31.place since 2008. In that target of 250. The park's authority
:50:32. > :50:36.is looking at allowing open market housing to be built. The developers
:50:37. > :50:37.and housing associations would have to be very rigorous in the way in
:50:38. > :50:45.which they showed that there is no other way in which it could
:50:46. > :50:46.an open market cross subsidy element. It is not something that we
:50:47. > :51:00.want to entertain, we are document. It is something that we
:51:01. > :51:07.are keeping an open mind on, shall we say. The consultation on this
:51:08. > :51:19.draft policy ended this week. The authority will vote on it in spring.
:51:20. > :51:28.that they must protect land, I understand that. But
:51:29. > :51:36.the main settlements to allow more affordable housing, but I really
:51:37. > :52:07.cannot see that happening. The park authority says
:52:08. > :52:11.very difficult thing. National parks and conservation areas, there is a
:52:12. > :52:35.settings, they go through the normal planning procedures. One of the
:52:36. > :52:57.problems we have had in the past residential use. Stephen, why are
:52:58. > :53:02.these clauses provided? You have to put that question to the National
:53:03. > :53:06.that Dartmoor is a working community, we have families
:53:07. > :53:09.facing the same kind of housing pressures that I see in my
:53:10. > :53:10.constituency. To say that we're going
:53:11. > :53:28.up in. We do have to look at these rules closely. Nobody, least of all
:53:29. > :53:38.me, who comes from competing over our countryside. What
:53:39. > :53:38.do you make of this, Kate? Have we reached a point with
:53:39. > :53:43.crisis where we need to develop market `` open market housing in
:53:44. > :53:57.sensitive areas? We who, on the whole, or very low
:53:58. > :54:01.wages. That is what people ending up, if the bubble goes
:54:02. > :54:41.up, house prices What is an affordable home at the
:54:42. > :54:52.end of day? Would you agree with that? To some extent.
:54:53. > :54:56.We have got a problem with population increase. Down in the
:54:57. > :55:08.Southampton, South Dartmoor, you are talking under
:55:09. > :55:08.villagers, ex`council houses, even the restriction, they have to be
:55:09. > :55:35.lived in by people having worked or affordable homes than when we
:55:36. > :55:45.arrived. The Labour government sold off 400,000 affordable
:55:46. > :55:48.and I have argued very plainly, we need more homes, a broader spectrum.
:55:49. > :55:56.Who properly rented accommodation? Which
:55:57. > :56:08.government was that? policies out of it? We have got this
:56:09. > :56:35.lack of housing stock, to three years. The process is
:56:36. > :56:41.cumbersome and bureaucratic and takes too long. We also
:56:42. > :56:46.accept the need income in these four more homes. `` in communities for
:56:47. > :56:56.more homes. We do need Dorset, there are areas with
:56:57. > :57:13.planning within a timescale, then you have to
:57:14. > :57:14.forfeit forfeit that. We have so many
:57:15. > :57:57.plots... I have to on flood defences. And a new idea
:57:58. > :58:03.for solving the Somerset problem. You could actually penned the
:58:04. > :58:07.Broads. Ministers said they want to limit
:58:08. > :58:08.toll increases on the Tamar Bridge, the Torpoint ferry and the Dartmouth
:58:09. > :58:23.to angered by plans for more
:58:24. > :58:27.Conservation Zones at sea. The fish don't
:58:28. > :58:29.And a Mid Devon Councillor was described as a brazen and convincing
:58:30. > :58:45.liar after he was convicted of benefit fraud,
:58:46. > :58:57.the council? I think it's amazing that people convicted or charged
:58:58. > :59:04.with things remain on a council. At the very least, they should absent
:59:05. > :59:27.but not be suspended as to resign is extraordinary.
:59:28. > :59:40.But quite clearly what you are saying is my view as well. He
:59:41. > :59:51.This week grant Shap said he wanted both for being here. Andrew,
:59:52. > :59:59.This week grant Shap said he wanted to rebrand the Tories
:00:00. > :00:04.This week grant Shap said he wanted Conservative Party MP said
:00:05. > :01:01.This week grant Shap said he wanted boring old logo. We asked him
:01:02. > :01:01.This week grant Shap said he wanted financial crash was caused by too
:01:02. > :01:08.little regulation not too much. We elephant in the room, the lack of
:01:09. > :01:19.women on the elephant in the room, the lack of
:01:20. > :01:38.blue. Our would elephant in the room, the lack of
:01:39. > :01:40.coalition cage but elephant in the room, the lack of
:01:41. > :01:44.that soon. Why does it elephant in the room, the lack of
:01:45. > :01:53.want it to fly to the left. I hope elephant in the room, the lack of
:01:54. > :01:57.the Robert Hall pin one. being serious. The others were fun.
:01:58. > :02:35.It is income. Rebranding is not enough.
:02:36. > :02:47.The one income. Rebranding is not enough.
:02:48. > :02:51.thing we know as the income. Rebranding is not enough.
:02:52. > :02:53.beginning to think it isn't. If you income. Rebranding is not enough.
:02:54. > :03:01.look at all public opinion research, there are
:03:02. > :03:03.look at all public opinion research, They won't vote Tory or contemplate
:03:04. > :03:17.the They won't vote Tory or contemplate
:03:18. > :03:27.means new name, new logo. It will mean new people
:03:28. > :03:28.means new name, new logo. It will strivers in the people
:03:29. > :03:32.means new name, new logo. It will party so
:03:33. > :03:33.means new name, new logo. It will through, the struggles we've had.
:03:34. > :03:38.How many of the six drawing through, the struggles we've had.
:03:39. > :03:45.manifesto have had ever a mortgage. through, the struggles we've had.
:03:46. > :03:47.schoolboy! It is through, the struggles we've had.
:03:48. > :03:48.was funny you mentioned an elephant. through, the struggles we've had.
:03:49. > :04:03.Don't think of an elephant of touch. I think it is interesting,
:04:04. > :04:08.they have of touch. I think it is interesting,
:04:09. > :04:37.are won or lost by this particular of touch. I think it is interesting,
:04:38. > :05:03.those sort of voters. There of touch. I think it is interesting,
:05:04. > :05:17.their manifesto. David Cameron sir of touch. I think it is interesting,
:05:18. > :05:20.great. He decides and has his own. of touch. I think it is interesting,
:05:21. > :05:27.ways the Conservatives of touch. I think it is interesting,
:05:28. > :05:32.broaden their appeal of touch. I think it is interesting,
:05:33. > :05:57.line on immigration. We learned net immigration is
:05:58. > :05:57.line on immigration. We learned net rkable whether it is --
:05:58. > :06:21.unrecognisable. Whether rkable whether it is --
:06:22. > :06:31.Others will say, this is getting... It
:06:32. > :06:34.Others will say, this is getting... shares a flat with
:06:35. > :06:59.Others will say, this is getting... nobody knows
:07:00. > :07:28.Others will say, this is getting... How bad, by the Tories own
:07:29. > :07:35.Others will say, this is getting... the fear of
:07:36. > :07:41.Others will say, this is getting... administrative record in
:07:42. > :07:44.Others will say, this is getting... you. This is where
:07:45. > :07:52.be potent. He said it is not about numbers.
:07:53. > :07:57.be potent. He said it is not about communities change. And in the
:07:58. > :07:58.be potent. He said it is not about isn't a dog whistle, a it is a meaty
:07:59. > :08:02.bone for isn't a dog whistle, a it is a meaty
:08:03. > :08:10.is we know why isn't a dog whistle, a it is a meaty
:08:11. > :08:13.EU figures are going up. From Italy isn't a dog whistle, a it is a meaty
:08:14. > :08:14.and Spain as their economies tanked, people came here. If he hadn't made
:08:15. > :08:32.such a people came here. If he hadn't made
:08:33. > :08:44.all over Europe are voting with their feet to
:08:45. > :08:44.all over Europe are voting with best in the abstract for the
:08:45. > :08:52.economy, people best in the abstract for the
:08:53. > :09:01.life. I best in the abstract for the
:09:02. > :09:06.sixties and seventies. Now we are than any of the other major
:09:07. > :09:25.economies than any of the other major
:09:26. > :09:31.Today she is saying maybe people from
:09:32. > :09:33.come in until their economies grow. That's future accession
:09:34. > :09:39.come in until their economies grow. That's Turkey in ten years'
:09:40. > :09:57.come in until their economies grow. coalition. She's
:09:58. > :10:21.come in until their economies grow. was a policy he was happy for the
:10:22. > :10:21.come in until their economies grow. the EU citizens. Have you
:10:22. > :10:28.come in until their economies grow. down on ace strayian, Chinese or
:10:29. > :10:32.American graduates. They down on ace strayian, Chinese or
:10:33. > :10:38.gone for the down on ace strayian, Chinese or
:10:39. > :10:45.numbers just Farran said in the European election
:10:46. > :10:46.either Farran said in the European election
:10:47. > :10:48.UKIP. He turned that to Farran said in the European election
:10:49. > :11:21.come up with a way to spin Farran said in the European election
:11:22. > :11:23.He's not joined but Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:11:24. > :11:45.money. He's not going Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:11:46. > :11:46.that? The fact it has Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:11:47. > :11:59.Grant Shapps is not Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:12:00. > :11:59.described as an historic moment Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:12:00. > :12:08.incremental of what Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:12:09. > :12:19.a long time ago. They Back comes David Owen. Not historic?
:12:20. > :12:23.gone. It is a reform from 20 years ago. Welcome
:12:24. > :12:26.gone. It is a reform from 20 years Miliband's stored up trouble.
:12:27. > :12:27.gone. It is a reform from 20 years McCluskey wants a million new homes
:12:28. > :12:33.and McCluskey wants a million new homes
:12:34. > :12:36.reduction strategy. In McCluskey wants a million new homes
:12:37. > :12:38.time if there is a Labour Government it becomes very difficult. We should
:12:39. > :13:08.keep it becomes very difficult. We should
:13:09. > :13:39.Politics on Tuesday at midday. We'll be