13/01/2013

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:37. > :00:41.Hello and good morning. It would, of course, be a much better morning

:00:41. > :00:49.if Andrew were here and not me, but I'm keeping the chair warm while he

:00:49. > :00:52.is away getting better. We all look forward to his speedy recovery and

:00:52. > :00:55.wish him well and all the best in the meantime. Now, to business.

:00:55. > :00:58.Joining me here today for our review of the Sunday newspapers are

:00:58. > :01:00.the campaigner and broadcaster, Esther Rantzen, and Gillian Tett of

:01:00. > :01:02.the Financial Times. They'll be taking us through the headlines

:01:02. > :01:04.shortly. MPs returned to Westminster this

:01:05. > :01:07.week after the Christmas break and the usual hostilities were resumed

:01:07. > :01:13.with robust exchanges at the first Prime Minister's Questions of the

:01:13. > :01:15.new year. Ed Miliband may be ahead in the opinion polls, but is that a

:01:15. > :01:21.reflection of the coalition's unpopularity rather than confidence

:01:21. > :01:25.in Labour as an alternative government? I will be talking to

:01:25. > :01:29.the Labour leader in the hope that we can put some flesh on his policy

:01:29. > :01:32.bones. In Belfast, the violence on the streets continues as loyalists

:01:32. > :01:38.and republicans clash over the decision by Belfast City Council to

:01:38. > :01:41.stop flying the union flag every day. In the last 24 hours alone, 29

:01:41. > :01:47.police officers have been injured by fireworks, bricks and other

:01:47. > :01:49.missiles. So what does all this sectarian violence tell us about

:01:49. > :01:54.the political settlement in Northern Ireland and what, if

:01:54. > :01:58.anything, is the way forward? The First Minister, Peter Robinson,

:01:58. > :02:02.will be joining us live from Stormont Castle. Now, this actor

:02:02. > :02:05.has been much on our screens of late, playing a traitorous spy over

:02:05. > :02:13.Christmas, and a few months ago receiving rave reviews for his role

:02:13. > :02:17.in Parade's End as a sex mad vicar! After years of high profile film

:02:17. > :02:20.and TV roles, Rufus Sewell is returning to the stage. I'll be

:02:20. > :02:23.talking to him about the Pinter play Old Times which has just

:02:23. > :02:32.opened in London's West End. But first this morning, the news

:02:32. > :02:35.Good morning. The health watchdog, the Care Quality Commission, is

:02:35. > :02:38.warning that 17 NHS hospitals in England are failing to provide safe

:02:38. > :02:41.levels of staffing. Labour claims the failings reflect what it calls

:02:41. > :02:45.a toxic combination of spending cuts and health service re-

:02:45. > :02:55.organisation. But the Government insists it has increased the number

:02:55. > :02:55.

:02:55. > :02:58.of clinical staff working in the NHS. Late last year the Care

:02:58. > :03:03.Quality Commission highlighted staffing problems in NHS problems

:03:03. > :03:07.in its review of services. Labour has obtained further information,

:03:07. > :03:13.produced a list published in the Sunday Telegraph of those which had

:03:13. > :03:17.unsafe staffing levels are the most recent inspection. It includes 17

:03:17. > :03:23.hospitals, eight Mental Health Unit, and the London Ambulance Service.

:03:23. > :03:27.This comes in advance of the public inquiry report into the scandal at

:03:27. > :03:31.Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust. Its findings will address the failure

:03:31. > :03:37.of regulators to tackle a range of problems including staff shortages.

:03:37. > :03:41.A spokesman said it had told the hospital's they must comply with

:03:41. > :03:45.standards and show how they were going to achieve this. Labour

:03:45. > :03:49.points out that nursing numbers in England are down since the

:03:49. > :03:53.coalition came to power and says they can't provide the standard of

:03:53. > :03:59.care everyone wants to see if they are overstretched. The government

:03:59. > :04:06.says there are more clinical staff, including 5000 extra doctors, and

:04:06. > :04:08.says there can be no excuse for failing to provide appropriate

:04:08. > :04:11.staffing levels. An eight-year-old British girl has

:04:11. > :04:15.been shot dead while on holiday in a small town on the north coast of

:04:15. > :04:18.Jamaica. Imani Green, from Balham in south London, had been in a shop

:04:18. > :04:21.owned by her cousin, when a man walked in and opened fire. She died

:04:21. > :04:24.in hospital. Three other people, who were wounded in the attack in

:04:24. > :04:27.the town of Duncans, are in a stable condition. Police say the

:04:27. > :04:30.shooting may have been in reprisal, for an earlier gun attack. A

:04:31. > :04:40.relative of Imani's, Janelle Parmer, who was at the scene of the attack,

:04:41. > :04:41.

:04:41. > :04:47.told her local radio station what happened. We heard the gunshots and

:04:48. > :04:57.we ran outside and started to call her. I picked her up off the ground,

:04:57. > :05:01.and I realised she was still breathing so they drove us to the

:05:01. > :05:04.hospital, and the rest is history. The chief constable of Northern

:05:04. > :05:07.Ireland, Matt Baggott, has praised the "exceptional courage" of police

:05:07. > :05:09.officers dealing with the violent protests linked to the flying of

:05:09. > :05:12.the union flag in Belfast. Yesterday, 29 officers were injured

:05:12. > :05:16.- the biggest casualty figure for a single day since the violence began

:05:16. > :05:19.more than five weeks ago. Fireworks, bricks and other missiles were

:05:19. > :05:23.thrown as the police tried to break up clashes between loyalist and

:05:23. > :05:26.republican demonstrators in east Belfast. Senior politicians from

:05:26. > :05:32.Belfast, Dublin and Westminster will meet in London this week to

:05:32. > :05:35.discuss the protests. British military planes are to be

:05:35. > :05:37.used to transport French troops and equipment to the West African

:05:37. > :05:42.country of Mali, where the government is struggling to contain

:05:42. > :05:47.an uprising by Islamist rebels. David Cameron's spokesman said the

:05:47. > :05:57.situation in Mali posed a threat to international security. No British

:05:57. > :05:58.

:05:58. > :06:08.forces will be involved in combat operations.

:06:08. > :06:09.

:06:09. > :06:13.France's intervention in Marley seems to have galvanised the army.

:06:13. > :06:18.The militants were making more gains and a state of emergency had

:06:18. > :06:23.been announced. Since France sent in troops, some of those had been

:06:24. > :06:28.reversed. Islamists had been driven out out of the strategic central

:06:28. > :06:32.town that they had ceased earlier in the week, and now another boost

:06:32. > :06:42.for the forces - the UK will be providing logistical support.

:06:42. > :06:47.

:06:47. > :06:50.Downing Street says that no British troops will be deployed in combat.

:06:50. > :06:56.The British government fears the consequences of the ongoing war in

:06:56. > :06:58.Mali and where it could affect the UK, the crisis will be discussed by

:06:58. > :07:01.the National Security Council on Tuesday.

:07:01. > :07:09.That's all from me, for now. I'll be back with the headlines just

:07:09. > :07:15.before ten o'clock. Back to you, James.

:07:15. > :07:25.Let's have a look at the front pages as usual. In the Observer,

:07:25. > :07:26.

:07:26. > :07:32.Ken Clarke and Peter Mandelson and getting back together to fight in

:07:32. > :07:37.this story. The Sunday Telegraph has a story about the latest

:07:37. > :07:42.attempt to try and defend the Falklands and the manoeuvring going

:07:42. > :07:49.on in Argentina. A picture of the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh.

:07:49. > :07:57.Scotland on Sunday, the latest manoeuvring ahead of the

:07:57. > :08:03.independence campaign. And the Sun, somebody called Katie is getting

:08:03. > :08:08.married to a builder. These are the headlines. I'm very glad to have

:08:08. > :08:12.with us Esther Rantzen and Gillian Tett. You will be kicking off with

:08:12. > :08:16.the story about Jimmy Savile and the backwash from that.

:08:16. > :08:20.offended very depressing, not just because it is a depressing story,

:08:20. > :08:27.but now because people are beginning to search form more and

:08:27. > :08:31.more dramatic headlines. This one says that police will arrest seven

:08:31. > :08:35.more stars, which is depressing because if it is true it means

:08:35. > :08:42.there is a police leak, and if it is not true it's ridiculous, and

:08:42. > :08:48.the whole operation, I think, should be very focused on child

:08:48. > :08:52.abuse. That is what it is for and what it is about, and yet some of

:08:52. > :08:58.the recent allegations involving Jim Davidson - his agent has had to

:08:58. > :09:05.come forward and say it is about allegations concerning two women in

:09:05. > :09:08.their 20s at the time - it muddies the waters. Do you think there is a

:09:08. > :09:14.concern that these are separate issues about behaviour with young

:09:14. > :09:21.women, behaviour with children, that is getting lumped together?

:09:21. > :09:25.Absolutely. The reality is that Jimmy Savile was active for so many

:09:25. > :09:29.years that invariably what has been uncovered tortures on many aspects

:09:29. > :09:34.of British life. I agree that we should be focusing on the terrible

:09:34. > :09:39.abuse, and it went on covered for such a long time. And the lessons

:09:39. > :09:44.we can learn from it. Could it happen today? Yes, because the

:09:44. > :09:48.British justice system is letting children down. Jimmy Savile should

:09:48. > :09:53.have faced just as when he was alive. He didn't because the

:09:53. > :09:57.adversarial system is so prejudiced against child witnesses that the

:09:57. > :10:04.police and the CPS thought they could never stand up in court.

:10:04. > :10:12.of the pieces I have chosen explains why this has happened and

:10:12. > :10:17.this is a stunning piece, about a journalist who 25 years ago went to

:10:17. > :10:22.interview him. She considers herself a feminist, she's a great

:10:22. > :10:29.journalist, and she says that while she was interviewing him he licked

:10:29. > :10:34.her hand and said some disgusting words to her, and yet in hairpiece

:10:34. > :10:39.she never wrote about it. She said the comment he made was to rude,

:10:39. > :10:45.too personal, and I just excised it in classic female fashion by

:10:45. > :10:50.blaming myself. Do you think that would happen these days? All credit

:10:50. > :10:55.to her from writing this in such searing honesty because the ability

:10:55. > :11:01.of us to be conned and swept along and practise self-censorship is

:11:01. > :11:08.very powerful. Remember paedophiles have to be callous, manipulative,

:11:08. > :11:13.ruthless. They have to groom adults and he was grooming her. His jokey

:11:13. > :11:17.aspects will have allowed her to think that was just Jimmy Savile

:11:17. > :11:24.being Jimmy Savile, and not asking the question who he was doing this

:11:24. > :11:29.to, and how often, because he was grooming everyone. The question to

:11:29. > :11:36.ask after reading this piece is what are we turning a blind eye to

:11:36. > :11:40.today? Let's talk about Europe, a lot of Europe in the papers this

:11:40. > :11:45.morning. There is a lot about that but I will be starting with a

:11:45. > :11:49.stunning piece from the Sun, not known for its cutting-edge foreign

:11:49. > :11:55.policy coverage, which talks about what is happening in Greece right

:11:55. > :12:00.now and the fact that the far right are rising in power with a party

:12:00. > :12:06.called Golden Dawn. You might say why should anyone care? It is very

:12:06. > :12:11.important because, as the economic pressures rise in Europe, and they

:12:11. > :12:15.have not been fixed, we are seeing strains on the political system.

:12:15. > :12:22.The far right have been contained so far, but this piece which

:12:22. > :12:27.describes what the far right is doing is very chilling. Isn't it

:12:27. > :12:32.almost surprising this has not happened earlier? There have been a

:12:32. > :12:38.lot of protests, but no growth for these far right parties until now.

:12:38. > :12:43.Thank heavens, but the project was supposed to act to heal the wounds

:12:43. > :12:47.of World War Two and bring countries together, and it is

:12:47. > :12:54.starting to make increasing tension between the countries. Golden dawn

:12:54. > :12:59.is saying we don't like foreigners, and it is very chilling. Talking of

:12:59. > :13:05.destruction, Northern Ireland. heavens. Northern Ireland, which

:13:05. > :13:08.was such a beacon of hope because the two sides split class Wise,

:13:08. > :13:13.religion Wise, coming together for the greater good of the community,

:13:14. > :13:18.and now we have this. I would like to make a plea to the women of

:13:18. > :13:25.Northern Ireland because when you look at these thuggish crowds, they

:13:25. > :13:30.are all male, some of them very young. Is that true? Yes, not the

:13:30. > :13:35.protest, they include women, but a lot of this is about testosterone

:13:35. > :13:40.and they need to go home to their wives and mothers and they should

:13:40. > :13:45.say stop now. They are bringing a whole country into disrepute. This

:13:45. > :13:50.was a compromise, this Flagstaff, which is incomprehensible if you

:13:50. > :13:56.don't live in Northern Ireland. It seems a peculiar thing to go into

:13:56. > :14:04.the streets about, but let's talk about it rationally. Ask Peter

:14:04. > :14:09.Robinson, where are the women? shall indeed. This next story is

:14:09. > :14:13.about the economy, and wide political tensions are building

:14:13. > :14:18.across the eurozone, and in places like Northern Ireland, where the

:14:18. > :14:22.economy is still very much in the doldrums. This is a nice, on

:14:22. > :14:27.looking at the issue that although we have had a dramatic stock market

:14:27. > :14:31.rally in recent days, people think things are getting better and we

:14:32. > :14:36.are seeing some signs of optimism in some corners of the economy,

:14:36. > :14:42.particularly America, but there are some big road bumps in the days

:14:42. > :14:49.ahead. Places like Spain are very worrying, and in America, although

:14:49. > :14:53.they managed to squeak back off the edge of the fiscal cliff with some

:14:53. > :14:56.bungee-jumping, a last-minute deal, there is another crunch coming in

:14:56. > :15:00.two months because there could be an argument about the Budget.

:15:00. > :15:04.in the papers today quite a few businessmen are taking both sides

:15:04. > :15:09.on the European issue, which has suddenly caught their attention,

:15:09. > :15:14.but there are voices on both sides. Absolutely, and we are seeing are

:15:14. > :15:19.the issue of Europe coming to the fore and people saying what the

:15:19. > :15:24.question of the UK is going to do about Europe is very important. The

:15:24. > :15:31.Americans said last week we really don't want the UK to leave the EU.

:15:31. > :15:34.One of the other pieces I chose was an excellent column about what

:15:34. > :15:40.David Cameron is doing in Europe and suggesting that if he wants to

:15:40. > :15:44.find a good strategy to follow, he should be copying John Major. Look

:15:44. > :15:49.back to the supposedly boring man of British politics, who, in his

:15:49. > :15:54.own quiet way, acting like a gentleman, managed to extract some

:15:54. > :15:59.big concessions from Europe. He didn't do it by shouting and

:15:59. > :16:05.screaming, he tiptoed around. This is suggesting that is what David

:16:05. > :16:11.Cameron should be doing. He also says that if you re read Margaret

:16:11. > :16:21.Thatcher's Bruges speech, there are some sections were David Cameron

:16:21. > :16:22.

:16:22. > :16:29.thought they could not read it out Somebody has had a go at a national

:16:29. > :16:34.icon, it cannot be true! absolutely, Clare Balding! She

:16:34. > :16:38.always says the right thing, in the right way. And out comes this

:16:38. > :16:43.journalist, alas, in the Mail on Sunday, being extremely hostile to

:16:43. > :16:47.her, on the grounds that Clare Balding said, nobody Highers me for

:16:47. > :16:53.my dress sense, for my looks, it is only because of the work that I do.

:16:53. > :16:56.Now, back at the dawn of time, I was on television in 1968, and I

:16:56. > :17:02.had no dress sense, and I was not gorgeous and good-looking, like all

:17:02. > :17:07.of the children on television today. Surely not. No, I wasn't. And

:17:08. > :17:12.funnily enough, when people asked me to do fashion things, I said, no,

:17:12. > :17:18.I have got to be judged by my work. I think that Clare Balding has a

:17:18. > :17:23.point. I say, forget horses for a moment, I particularly look like a

:17:23. > :17:31.horse, I have appeared surrounded by horses, and the teeth were very

:17:31. > :17:33.difficult to tell apart, but I am in favour of women doing what Clare

:17:33. > :17:39.Balding does, and I think this journalist has once again put her

:17:39. > :17:44.foot in it. There is an interesting aspect on this in the United States,

:17:44. > :17:48.talking about this, people in the media getting presented in a very

:17:48. > :17:56.sexualised fashion, which is very disappointing and very dangerous.

:17:56. > :18:06.Speaking about female icons, someone has written a piece about

:18:06. > :18:10.

:18:10. > :18:14.Marks & Spencer's. Yes, I must talk about this wonderful piece, written

:18:14. > :18:17.by Esther Rantzen. She talks about the fact that she was part of the

:18:17. > :18:21.generation that grew up loving Marks & Spencer's, and has been

:18:21. > :18:26.disappointed recently by the fact that the clothes are caught in a

:18:26. > :18:30.limbo land, neither fashionable, nor cheap and cheerful. It very

:18:30. > :18:34.much reflects a bigger business problem faced by M&S, which is that

:18:34. > :18:38.unfortunately, it has just unveiled some very disappointing Christmas

:18:38. > :18:43.sales figures, it had a tremendous mess up with the announcement of

:18:43. > :18:49.its results, many people looking at the CEO, saying, what are you

:18:49. > :18:56.doing? It is going to be a big challenge. Just time for a couple

:18:56. > :19:01.more, Esther, duckhouses? Yes, one voice was completely unheard in all

:19:01. > :19:09.of the stuff about the MP's expenses, and that was the quack of

:19:09. > :19:16.the duck. Alan Titchmarsh has bravely come out and said, my ducks

:19:16. > :19:22.love their duckhouse, it is for the Conservation of ducks.

:19:22. > :19:32.duckhouses are good, but we should not pay for them. Very quickly,

:19:32. > :19:32.

:19:32. > :19:36.this is my favourite story, because it says that Adele is terrified of

:19:36. > :19:41.the Oscars next week. It shows that even if people seem confident in

:19:41. > :19:44.public, they are off and faking it. Too many girls these days think, I

:19:44. > :19:48.have to be really confident to succeed, and because I am not

:19:48. > :19:53.confident, I am going to take myself out of the game. This shows

:19:53. > :19:56.that everybody suffers from confidence problems at the start.

:19:56. > :20:06.Somebody like Esther Rantzen is a great example of an icon of

:20:06. > :20:11.somebody who is on TV. We might even have her on the show if we are

:20:11. > :20:15.lucky. Both of you, thank you very much indeed. It is very cold, and

:20:15. > :20:23.maybe it is going to get a bit colder. With a while the more

:20:23. > :20:26.specific forecast, here's Matt Taylor. Good morning. You summed it

:20:26. > :20:29.up quite nicely. There will be some up quite nicely. There will be some

:20:29. > :20:35.children in southern and Western areas over the next few days

:20:35. > :20:41.disappointed by the lack of snow. Rain in Northern Ireland mainly,

:20:41. > :20:50.with icy conditions and snow over the hills. In Scotland, around the

:20:50. > :20:53.coast and over some low-level sites, it is mainly rain and sleet. We

:20:53. > :20:59.will eventually see some snow away from the coast in the north-west of

:20:59. > :21:03.England and in the far north of Wales. But many southern areas stay

:21:03. > :21:08.dry and bright during the day. Tonight, across northern, central

:21:08. > :21:12.and eastern parts of England, some more significant snow will start to

:21:12. > :21:19.fall, giving a covering for the Monday morning rush-hour. There

:21:19. > :21:24.could be some ice around as well. It could be quite a difficult start

:21:24. > :21:32.to Monday. Keep in touch with your latest travel news before you set

:21:32. > :21:39.out. Another band then pushes through Scotland. Significant snow,

:21:39. > :21:44.down the eastern side of the country. But southern most counties

:21:45. > :21:49.of England, it will be pushing back to sunshine later on Monday.

:21:49. > :21:59.Feeling cold, and as the week goes on, it will feel even colder,

:21:59. > :22:00.

:22:00. > :22:03.Petrol bombs and rubber bullets, death threats and injured policemen

:22:03. > :22:07.- in recent years, we might have thought that was the language of

:22:07. > :22:10.Northern Ireland's past, but we were wrong. The decision in

:22:11. > :22:14.December by Belfast City council to stop flying the Union flag every

:22:14. > :22:17.day has sparked violent riots, which are now spreading, with

:22:17. > :22:21.loyalists and police clashing across the city, and beyond.

:22:21. > :22:25.Children as young as 11 have been arrested for violence. Local

:22:25. > :22:30.politicians have been attacked. The dispute shows no sign of going away.

:22:30. > :22:32.I am joined now kicking from Belfast by the First Minister of

:22:32. > :22:37.northern island, and the leader of the Democratic Unionist Party,

:22:37. > :22:41.Peter Robinson. You are meeting Martin McGuinness later in the week

:22:41. > :22:47.- what do you hope to get out of those talks? Are you hopeful of

:22:47. > :22:50.some kind of resolution? First of all, it is important to be saying

:22:50. > :22:59.that we have come through decades, some would say centuries of

:22:59. > :23:03.conflict and division. The politicians of this generation

:23:03. > :23:07.determined that they were not going to put down the line of trying to

:23:07. > :23:11.get a resolution to those difficulties. We took some historic

:23:11. > :23:15.decisions, and we agreed to move forward to build a shared society

:23:15. > :23:18.in Northern Ireland. It is important to tell the wider

:23:18. > :23:22.community in Northern Ireland, and indeed our friends in the rest of

:23:22. > :23:25.the United Kingdom, that we are not giving up on that. We are of the

:23:25. > :23:29.view that we are determined to build the kind of society where

:23:29. > :23:33.everybody can have a peaceful and stable existence. Of course there

:23:33. > :23:36.are people who are against what we are doing. There are people on the

:23:36. > :23:42.Republican side, dissidents, who are attempting to undermine the

:23:42. > :23:46.process here in Northern Ireland. And there are those who are using

:23:46. > :23:50.the present flags protests in order to try to undermine the stability

:23:50. > :23:53.of this strong system. They will not succeed, because we are

:23:53. > :23:56.absolutely determined that we are going ahead. We are absolutely

:23:56. > :24:01.determined, because the people have supported what we are doing at

:24:01. > :24:06.Stormont. We had Brit the election, and that is the only way you can

:24:06. > :24:10.determine the future direction of Northern Ireland. More than 99% of

:24:10. > :24:14.the elected representatives who were returned are in support of the

:24:14. > :24:20.system. To get back to the question, what do you expect to achieve at

:24:20. > :24:24.the meetings this week? Well, in the meetings this week, we have

:24:24. > :24:28.regular meetings with the United Kingdom government and with the

:24:28. > :24:31.Irish government, and we will deal with all of the outstanding issues.

:24:31. > :24:35.We will discover all of the issues, not just the violence on the

:24:35. > :24:39.streets. -- we will discuss. That's because we are not going to lose

:24:39. > :24:43.our focus on moving forward. But we will deal with those issues, and we

:24:43. > :24:47.will make it clear that condemnation exists in the wider

:24:47. > :24:51.community who believes that the way forward is to throw petrol bombs or

:24:51. > :24:57.stones at the Police. You do not sound like a man with a plan on

:24:57. > :25:01.this issue? We have already set up a unionist forum, and the purpose

:25:01. > :25:06.of that is to draw away from the protest those who want to deal with

:25:06. > :25:09.the actual issue - and the only way you can deal with that issue is

:25:09. > :25:13.through the political process. The flag on Belfast City council is not

:25:13. > :25:17.going to go up because somebody throws a petrol bomb at a policeman.

:25:17. > :25:20.The only way forward is through the political process, and we are

:25:20. > :25:25.trying to encourage people to engage in that, and we're trying to

:25:25. > :25:28.bring forward channels so that people can talk, so that the sense

:25:28. > :25:32.of that way forward is heard by everyone. Do you take any

:25:32. > :25:36.responsibility for what has taken place? Some of your supporters have

:25:36. > :25:41.been on the streets. Your party has very vocally opposed the decision

:25:41. > :25:46.over the flag - do you take responsibility yourself? I think it

:25:46. > :25:50.was a big mistake on the part of Sinn Fein, the SDLP and the

:25:50. > :25:54.Alliance Party to change the status quo at Belfast. It was a bad

:25:54. > :25:58.decision. But bad decision or not, the only way of addressing bad

:25:58. > :26:01.decisions which are taken within the democratic process is through

:26:01. > :26:04.the democratic process. Of course we have no responsibility, because

:26:04. > :26:09.the people who are out throwing stones and petrol bombs at the

:26:09. > :26:15.police are not supporters of mind, or my party. These are people who

:26:15. > :26:19.are against the political process, in which we are engaged. What does

:26:19. > :26:23.this 40 days of violence tell you about the political settlement in

:26:23. > :26:25.Northern Ireland? Some say it shows that there are still substantial

:26:25. > :26:32.minorities within Northern Ireland who feel excluded from the

:26:32. > :26:35.political process, excluded from the economic process, and that this

:26:35. > :26:41.has been late and for some time, and we are now seeing it on the

:26:41. > :26:44.streets? Well, I think there are political issues, and there are

:26:44. > :26:48.people who feel disengaged, and people who feel that if we are

:26:48. > :26:51.trying to build a shared society, they are not getting their share.

:26:51. > :26:57.This was one of the arguments which were brought forward to the

:26:57. > :26:59.coalition government, when they attempted, and succeeded, to reduce

:26:59. > :27:03.substantially the funds which were available to us in Northern Ireland.

:27:03. > :27:07.That while we have been able to tick the box of getting political

:27:07. > :27:10.structures up, we needed to win the support of the overwhelming

:27:10. > :27:15.majority of people in Northern Ireland, we had to show them that

:27:15. > :27:22.devolution work. I think we all recognise that it is no accident

:27:22. > :27:27.that the violence is occurring but a month and he -- is occurring

:27:27. > :27:30.predominantly in areas which have been associated with deprivation.

:27:30. > :27:33.Finally, for those who might be thinking about taking part in more

:27:33. > :27:37.violence tonight, what would you say to them? The only way forward

:27:37. > :27:42.in Northern Ireland is true the political and -- is true the

:27:42. > :27:45.political process. That has been endorsed overwhelmingly by the

:27:45. > :27:48.people of Northern Ireland. Any grievances have to be addressed

:27:48. > :27:53.through the democratic process. It will not change anything to be

:27:53. > :28:03.involved in violence on the streets. Thank you very much. For many of us,

:28:03. > :28:08.he first came to our attention in Middlemarch, as Will Ladislaw.

:28:08. > :28:15.Since then, Rufus Sewell has been a brooding presence in a variety of

:28:15. > :28:21.roles on our screens. It has been five years since he last appeared

:28:21. > :28:29.on the London stage, but he is now returning to the West End in Harold

:28:29. > :28:36.Pinter's most mysterious play. Here he is as a British intelligence

:28:36. > :28:43.officer, trying to recruit new agents, in Restless. How can I

:28:43. > :28:53.believe you? Why would I lie to you? My brother is dead, that is

:28:53. > :28:55.

:28:56. > :29:01.all I care about. What is this, some kind of joke? You are a

:29:01. > :29:08.British citizen, you will earn �500 a year. We will get your father

:29:08. > :29:15.into hospital, the best treatment. You can do something to avenge that

:29:15. > :29:17.death. Welcome to the show. Tell us first something about this Harold

:29:17. > :29:21.the Prime Minister play. It is described as his most mysterious,

:29:22. > :29:26.and perhaps most challenging. That's saying something for Harold

:29:26. > :29:30.the Prime Minister. It is the only Harold the Prime Minister play I

:29:30. > :29:36.have ever done, so I cannot really compare it, other than a short one

:29:36. > :29:42.I did, called Victoria Station, a few years ago. But yes, it is about

:29:42. > :29:48.three people in a farmhouse, a husband and wife, and they are

:29:48. > :29:52.about to be visited by the wife's best friend from 20 years before.

:29:52. > :29:56.And it turns out that they have a kind of shared history, all three

:29:56. > :30:01.of them, and that their own versions of the past are slightly

:30:01. > :30:06.conflicting, and there is a crossover between these two women

:30:06. > :30:10.in their memory. It is complicated, it is about memory and whether you

:30:10. > :30:14.can trust it. When you're performing, delivering, do you

:30:14. > :30:21.understand everything you say all the time, or are there so many

:30:21. > :30:25.interpretations, as there would seem to be, that...? I try to

:30:25. > :30:30.understand exactly what I mean, if you know what I am saying! There is

:30:30. > :30:35.an added complication, in that Kristin Scott Thomas and Lia

:30:35. > :30:38.Williams, two fantastic actresses, are alternating roles. So, for

:30:38. > :30:42.three or four nights, Kristin Scott Thomas will play my wife, and Lia

:30:42. > :30:48.Williams will play the visitor. And then, four nights later, they swap

:30:48. > :30:52.around. Later on in the run, I think we are going to do one

:30:52. > :30:56.version for the matinee and one for the evening. Occasionally, we will

:30:56. > :31:01.flip a coin. This is the idea at least. So, if it is complicated in

:31:01. > :31:06.its normal version... But strangely enough, this kind of shines a light

:31:06. > :31:16.on the play in an interesting way.. It is not just a gimmick to attract

:31:16. > :31:18.

:31:18. > :31:24.Hopefully it will work on both of those levels. I responded to this

:31:24. > :31:32.amazing part and the cast, and then I thought oh, they are swapping as

:31:32. > :31:37.well, we will work that out. That has worked out to be so much part

:31:38. > :31:42.of the play that I find it hard to separate it now. Maybe some people

:31:42. > :31:50.thought it was a gimmick for people to buy more tickets, maybe it will

:31:50. > :31:57.have that effect as well, but it is not about that. I understand his

:31:57. > :32:02.widow was there last night, did that go well? We went round to her

:32:02. > :32:07.house in rehearsals, and she laid on some food and we had a drink,

:32:07. > :32:11.and she was very welcoming and helpful. We felt a lot of support

:32:12. > :32:15.from her so it would not have been frightening thing, but the first

:32:15. > :32:22.time you ever do it, it was wonderful to find out she had been

:32:22. > :32:28.there but I'm glad I found out after and not before. Why has it

:32:28. > :32:32.been such a long gap since you were lost on stage? When I left drama

:32:32. > :32:38.school I did a lot more plays because I could not get any part on

:32:38. > :32:42.television, but it has been about five years. I finished rock'n'roll

:32:42. > :32:47.wanting to do another great role as soon as possible, but for some

:32:47. > :32:53.reason there is a certain level of typecasting I have to work with. I

:32:53. > :32:57.haven't accepted it, but I have to work within its parameters. In

:32:57. > :33:02.theatre, no. If I'm offered something based on a previous

:33:02. > :33:06.success, I'm not really interesting. When you say I have played dark and

:33:06. > :33:10.brooding characters, I want blonde and bubbly. That is almost a joke,

:33:10. > :33:20.but anything I have established as a strength, I want to walk away

:33:20. > :33:24.

:33:24. > :33:29.from. We remember you first from Middlemarch March, do you have

:33:29. > :33:39.happy memories of that? For me it was interesting because I got two

:33:39. > :33:45.jobs at the same time. It came from one job - James Saunders' Making It

:33:45. > :33:55.Better, and the same haircut did for both, luckily. We did a few

:33:55. > :33:57.

:33:57. > :34:00.weeks in the play, then I would go and shoot Middlemarch a, but it was

:34:00. > :34:06.followed by an enormous length of unemployment so I didn't get too

:34:06. > :34:14.excited by it. Parade's End did incredibly well. I think we have a

:34:14. > :34:24.small club we can play now that chose to in your madness. Left in

:34:24. > :34:28.

:34:28. > :34:38.the hall... Your friend, another medical man. Take two of course to

:34:38. > :34:40.

:34:40. > :34:45.certify a lunatic. Oh, very good. It is all about the eyebrows. A how

:34:45. > :34:50.long does this play last four? We started previews last night so it

:34:50. > :34:57.was exciting to do it in front of a packed house, and reopen in about

:34:58. > :35:01.three weeks, for about 12 weeks, and after that, who knows? Thank

:35:01. > :35:05.you. Yesterday the Labour leader Ed

:35:05. > :35:10.Miliband delivered a speech in London where he try to flesh out a

:35:10. > :35:15.team first heard last September at the party conference. Labour is the

:35:15. > :35:19.One Nation party, but what does it mean? What are the specific

:35:19. > :35:25.policies behind this opaque phrase? And how seriously does he take

:35:25. > :35:31.warnings that on economic competence, he has yet to win over

:35:31. > :35:39.the public. He is with me now. Welcome to the show. Your big idea

:35:39. > :35:43.at the moment is One Nation Labour, where everybody plays a part. In a

:35:43. > :35:48.One Nation Britain, why should rich people be able to claim child

:35:48. > :35:53.benefit? Let me first say, on behalf of myself and everybody

:35:53. > :35:59.across politics, I wish Andrew Marr a speedy recovery. Best wishes to

:35:59. > :36:04.him and his family. On One Nation, let me take a step back, what is it

:36:04. > :36:08.about? It is about the way I want to govern this country, learning

:36:08. > :36:12.from history which says the way that we have succeeded is by making

:36:12. > :36:17.sure everybody plays their part and we have rebuilt the country

:36:17. > :36:20.together. That was the lesson after the Second World War and has always

:36:20. > :36:25.been the lesson from difficult economic times. That means that you

:36:25. > :36:29.have got to make sure everybody has an opportunity to play their part,

:36:29. > :36:35.and also that everybody shows responsibility to the top of

:36:35. > :36:38.society. To come to your specific question, my way that people at the

:36:38. > :36:43.top should be paying responsibility is not by cutting the top rate of

:36:43. > :36:47.income tax. I think universal benefits are important bedrock of

:36:47. > :36:53.society. I wouldn't have made that choice this government is making,

:36:53. > :36:58.but neither would I have made a choice to cut the top rate of

:36:58. > :37:03.income tax from this April. It is a difference of view about how UN

:37:03. > :37:10.force responsibility. Personally, I think this government is not doing

:37:10. > :37:16.that at the top. So, you would reverse this? I'm not going to say

:37:16. > :37:20.that, no. Her can you attack the government for it? A let me explain

:37:20. > :37:25.because I have got to be telling you what I would do in government

:37:25. > :37:29.now. I don't know the state of the finances, and I have made it clear

:37:29. > :37:34.that we will come forward at the election and say exactly what we

:37:34. > :37:40.would reverse. If I came on to this programme and promised to reverse

:37:40. > :37:45.this and that, you would be saying how will you be paying for it? I

:37:45. > :37:49.have got to be saying what I would be doing, what choice as I would be

:37:49. > :37:58.making in government now. Frankly the government can't tell you what

:37:58. > :38:03.state the government finances will be in. If everyone should play

:38:03. > :38:09.their part in a One Nation Britain, why should rich pensioners be able

:38:09. > :38:14.to claim a free bus pass, a free television licence, and winter fuel

:38:14. > :38:19.allowance? It goes back to what I said earlier. If you are saying to

:38:19. > :38:23.me that we should make everything in our society means tested, not

:38:23. > :38:27.universal, that would include child benefit, the health service, old-

:38:28. > :38:31.age pension, that is not the road I want to go down because I think

:38:31. > :38:38.everybody, as part of being a citizen of the country, is entitled

:38:38. > :38:42.to some basic things. Then the question is how do you make sure

:38:42. > :38:46.people make a proper contribution, and the where you do that is

:38:46. > :38:51.through the tax system. I wouldn't be cutting the top rate of income

:38:51. > :38:56.tax, I would be making another change. At the moment the richest

:38:56. > :39:00.in society get much more in terms of pensions tax relief than middle-

:39:00. > :39:05.income families. Ed Balls said the other day... What I don't

:39:05. > :39:08.understand is this - you are prepared to say we will tax the

:39:08. > :39:14.rich more on their pension contributions but we will not take

:39:14. > :39:19.their child benefit from them. I don't see why there is a principled

:39:19. > :39:24.difference. Because there is an important principle about the way

:39:24. > :39:27.our country works. If you are saying to me there is one perfectly

:39:27. > :39:32.legitimate view which I disagree with, which is to means test

:39:32. > :39:39.everything, that is what you are saying. Millionaires get a free

:39:39. > :39:42.health service... They get a free health service. I don't see you

:39:42. > :39:46.coming to me and saying we should means test millionaires when it

:39:46. > :39:51.comes to the health service. You have a basic foundation that

:39:51. > :39:56.everybody gets Andy make sure you tax people fairly. Of course we

:39:56. > :40:02.should look at the balance, but that is the right way forward. In

:40:02. > :40:09.the end, the government will say they are taking child benefit away,

:40:09. > :40:13.and they are hitting middle income families, families on 50,000,

:40:13. > :40:23.60,000, and the prime minister can't answer the question why is it

:40:23. > :40:31.that... Let me make this point. It is this distinction about why it is

:40:31. > :40:35.a fair way of doing it. Why is the tax system fairer? Because it

:40:35. > :40:40.avoids the anomalies. A your message to pensioners this morning

:40:40. > :40:44.is that there pension benefits are safe? There my message is that the

:40:44. > :40:49.election will set out what we say. That is another thing you can't

:40:49. > :40:55.tell us. We introduced the winter fuel allowance, I think it is a

:40:55. > :41:01.good policy, but I am saying I will come forward at the election saying

:41:01. > :41:06.precisely what policies we will follow. Isn't it a principle of One

:41:06. > :41:11.Nation labour that you want to keep universality and not means test.

:41:11. > :41:16.is important as the bedrock of the system, but why is it so difficult

:41:16. > :41:22.to make these judgments now? It is because of what is happening to

:41:22. > :41:26.borrowing in this country. It is going up, not down, and One Nation

:41:26. > :41:33.labour says we have to operate in different circumstances - there

:41:33. > :41:37.will be less money to spend. Because of that, we have to make a

:41:37. > :41:41.different choice on the top rate of income tax, decisions we have

:41:41. > :41:45.talked about on public sector pay, so across a whole range of areas we

:41:45. > :41:49.have said why we are in more difficult times and why difficult

:41:49. > :41:54.decisions unnecessary. You a brother stood up in the House of

:41:54. > :42:01.Commons this week and said "we need to choose between old-age benefits

:42:01. > :42:09.or long-term care". He is saying the time has come to make those

:42:09. > :42:13.choices. I am making choices, but you don't like my choice. I would

:42:14. > :42:18.like you'd tell me what it means come the next election. If I was in

:42:18. > :42:23.government tomorrow, we would not be cutting the income tax rate to

:42:23. > :42:28.45p. This is about what offer you give to British people down the

:42:28. > :42:32.road. I know, and I think the sensible thing for a party in

:42:32. > :42:36.opposition to do is to set out, when it comes to the election, its

:42:36. > :42:40.choices but I think you will have a pretty clear sense of where we

:42:40. > :42:44.stand on these issues, that we would not run this country in the

:42:44. > :42:54.interests of a few people at the top. It would be a much fairer

:42:54. > :42:58.system. This week you voted against a real terms cut in tax credits,

:42:58. > :43:02.but in a One Nation Britain, shouldn't those on welfare play

:43:02. > :43:06.their part as well? Of course they should, but the most important

:43:06. > :43:11.thing we need to do to get the benefits bill down is to get people

:43:11. > :43:14.back to work. Why is it rising under this government? Not because

:43:14. > :43:21.George Osborne is being generous to people, but because the government

:43:21. > :43:27.has failed on the economy. That is why are they are borrowing �212

:43:27. > :43:31.billion more than they promised. On this deficit issue, you get it down

:43:31. > :43:38.through a combination of decisions on tax and spending, but growth is

:43:38. > :43:43.the missing ingredient. We don't have any growth, and that is the

:43:43. > :43:49.issue this country is facing. you accept, clearly the creation of

:43:49. > :43:53.jobs would help the benefit bill, not alone, but it is a third of

:43:53. > :43:57.government spending. Do you accept that at some stage you will have to

:43:57. > :44:05.cut the welfare bill instead of just promising jobs. The best way

:44:05. > :44:09.to do that is to get unemployment down. It is the best way because...

:44:09. > :44:14.Why is the government having to spend more than they forecast on

:44:14. > :44:17.social security? Not because of generosity but because they are

:44:17. > :44:22.failing on unemployment. We said we would make a decision on pensions

:44:22. > :44:27.tax relief for the richest, to put people back to work and say after

:44:27. > :44:31.two years if you are offered a job you have got to take one. Real

:44:31. > :44:41.welfare reform is a different choice than what this government is

:44:41. > :44:43.

:44:43. > :44:48.making. This is about what promises you are making to the British

:44:48. > :44:52.electorate. It is not reasonable at this stage in the parliament to set

:44:52. > :44:58.out the precise manifesto. I'm happy to talk about it would we

:44:58. > :45:02.publish it. You could be prime minister in two years, and yet

:45:02. > :45:07.there is this gaping lead crooner with the electorate not knowing

:45:07. > :45:10.what you promise to do. If I don't agree with that. We set out

:45:10. > :45:15.policies on banking reform, on the way we need to make the vested

:45:15. > :45:20.interest at the top of our society play by the rules. We set out

:45:20. > :45:23.policies on energy reform to get a better deal for people. One Nation

:45:23. > :45:33.is about responsibility going to the top of society and spreading

:45:33. > :45:34.

:45:34. > :45:38.opportunity. We set out how we get 50% of young people who don't go to

:45:38. > :45:48.university, how to get them proper qualifications. We have got more

:45:48. > :45:53.

:45:53. > :45:56.policy than most oppositions half If I was coming along 2.5 years

:45:57. > :46:01.before an election, without knowing the state of the public finances,

:46:01. > :46:05.without knowing the state of the economy, giving the details of a

:46:05. > :46:09.manifesto, you would be saying, that is not responsible. By the way,

:46:09. > :46:19.Labour do this in the past, in 1992, and it was a mistake. We are not

:46:19. > :46:23.going to make that mistake. spent the last week attacking the

:46:23. > :46:26.government on the millionaires' tax cut, as you called it. Raising

:46:26. > :46:30.attacks like that has nothing to do with the state of the economy in a

:46:30. > :46:34.couple of years' time. A course it is part of the economy. It is part

:46:34. > :46:37.of the overall judgment you make about the state of the economy. We

:46:37. > :46:41.will make sure we have greater tax fairness in this country. I think

:46:41. > :46:45.the tax system is unfair. I think middle-income families are getting

:46:46. > :46:49.a raw deal from the tax system, as are low-income families. We could

:46:49. > :46:56.play this game for the whole interview, where you say, what is

:46:56. > :46:59.going to be in your manifesto, and I say... Am not asking for a budget,

:47:00. > :47:02.I am asking for a very specific policy. The top rate of income tax,

:47:02. > :47:06.the whole thrust of your argument against the government over the

:47:06. > :47:12.last 10 days, throughout the entire welfare debate, has all been

:47:12. > :47:18.about... I think it is very unfair... Labour might accept this.

:47:18. > :47:22.You say it is unfair, but you might accept it. If I was in government

:47:22. > :47:27.tomorrow, I would be reversing that. By the way, one area where we have

:47:27. > :47:31.got to take action is tax avoidance. We have got a situation where many

:47:31. > :47:36.British companies and individuals are paying their fair share of tax.

:47:36. > :47:40.They looked in horror at a system where some multinational companies

:47:40. > :47:44.from other countries can make huge profits in Britain and not pay

:47:44. > :47:48.taxes in Britain. This is scandalous. It has got to change.

:47:48. > :47:52.The next Labour government will change it. We will end the tax

:47:52. > :47:55.secrecy. We cannot have a situation where we do not know how much tax

:47:55. > :47:59.people are paying, against how much profit they are making. I am

:47:59. > :48:03.serving notice that we will take action, we will end the situation

:48:03. > :48:07.where you can get away with making big profits in Britain, and with no

:48:07. > :48:11.justification at all, not pay any tax. Frankly, it is an insult to

:48:11. > :48:15.hard-working taxpayers in this country. Transparency is one thing

:48:15. > :48:20.- what else would you do to change the actual tax system itself? A lot

:48:20. > :48:24.of these companies at the moment are not actually breaking the law...

:48:24. > :48:27.Well, first of all, the Prime Minister is talking about greater

:48:27. > :48:31.transparency, and he has got to push for that on an international

:48:31. > :48:35.basis. But he has also got to say that if it does not happen

:48:35. > :48:38.internationally, we will make sure that it happens here at home. Why

:48:38. > :48:42.is that so important? We have got to know how much tax people are

:48:42. > :48:46.paying, against profits. I think that will make it harder for

:48:46. > :48:51.companies to do the wrong thing. Secondly, we have got to look at

:48:51. > :48:55.the rules on how companies can distribute their profits. That is a

:48:55. > :48:59.problem we have got in relation to this issue. Countries like Denmark

:48:59. > :49:03.have a much tougher approach. Our policy review will be looking at

:49:03. > :49:08.those examples and making sure that we act. It is a very clear

:49:08. > :49:12.statement that I am making, we will act on this issue, James. We cannot

:49:12. > :49:16.have a situation where companies feel that they can get away without

:49:16. > :49:22.paying their proper fair share. companies like Amazon, Google,

:49:22. > :49:25.Starbucks, will not be able to do what they are doing? I am saying

:49:25. > :49:31.this to all companies. You will have to pay a proper, fair share of

:49:31. > :49:36.tax in Britain. Let's have a look at the most important issue, the

:49:36. > :49:41.economy. Peter Mandelson says that your task this year is to increase

:49:41. > :49:48.to us -- increase trust in Labour's fiscal credentials - why is that

:49:48. > :49:53.trust not there now? There is always work for the party in

:49:53. > :49:58.opposition. We had a financial crisis on a global scale while we

:49:58. > :50:01.were in power. It is something we have got to build. Going back to

:50:01. > :50:05.our previous conversation, that is why we have not make promises now

:50:05. > :50:09.about which cuts we would reverse, because we are not going to make

:50:09. > :50:14.commitments which we cannot afford. That's why our policy review focus

:50:14. > :50:17.is precisely on this question, how to deliver more with yes. You will

:50:17. > :50:19.see Andy Burnham talking about greater integration of services in

:50:20. > :50:23.the Health Service, to make sure that we can deliver more, and even

:50:23. > :50:26.when there is less money around. Yvette Cooper will be looking at

:50:26. > :50:30.the police, how to make sure that even in tough times, you can

:50:30. > :50:34.deliver the kind of policing that people want with less money around.

:50:34. > :50:40.That is a change from the last government. It is about saying,

:50:40. > :50:44.there is less money to spend. One- nation Labour is about how we

:50:44. > :50:52.change our country with having less money to spend. George Osborne has

:50:52. > :51:00.had to repeatedly changed his plans, he has had an omnishambles budget,

:51:00. > :51:03.he has had a double-dip recession, and yet people seem to trust him...

:51:03. > :51:07.They were given the benefit of the doubt by the electorate, and people

:51:07. > :51:11.said, let's see if it works. I think people are coming to the view

:51:11. > :51:15.that it is not working. But if you were saying to me, do we have a big

:51:15. > :51:20.job to do to build that economic credibility? Absolutely, we do. It

:51:20. > :51:24.was not popular in our party when Ed Balls said, I'm afraid, in this

:51:24. > :51:29.Parliament, we put jobs ahead of pay in the public sector. It was

:51:29. > :51:33.unpopular, in fact, but it was the right thing to do. That is a sign

:51:33. > :51:39.of our determination to be absolutely tough and clear about

:51:39. > :51:42.the circumstances facing the next Labour government. You mentioned Ed

:51:42. > :51:49.Balls - does he scare middle- England a little? Can you guarantee

:51:49. > :51:54.that he will be your Chancellor, will he be Shadow Chancellor at the

:51:54. > :51:57.next general election? Absolutely. We have said that we will go into

:51:57. > :52:02.the next election as a team. But what I am not going to do is to

:52:02. > :52:05.start measuring the curtains for Downing Street. Will he be your

:52:05. > :52:12.Shadow Chancellor? Yes, he is doing a great job, and he will continue

:52:12. > :52:16.to do so. He is the person who said, in August 2010, that actually, I'm

:52:16. > :52:21.afraid, this is not going to work, these plans from the Government. He

:52:21. > :52:26.turned out to be right. And those kind of good judgements are

:52:26. > :52:29.incredibly important in politics. So, if David Miliband comes back to

:52:29. > :52:34.the Shadow Cabinet, he will not be Shadow Chancellor? There is no

:52:34. > :52:41.vacancy for Shadow Chancellor. me just deal with cabinet issues -

:52:41. > :52:45.first of all, today, there was this report from the commission, saying

:52:45. > :52:50.that no fewer than 17 hospitals are operating without enough staff to

:52:50. > :52:54.be safe... It is a shocking set of findings. You have got a government

:52:54. > :52:58.which has embarked upon a huge top- down reorganisation of the Health

:52:58. > :53:02.Service, costing billions of pounds, and actually, we have got 7,000

:53:02. > :53:06.fewer nurses in the Health Service. The Government has got to explain

:53:06. > :53:10.what is happening in our hospitals, why this is being allowed to happen,

:53:10. > :53:13.and has got to take action to do something about it. I think people

:53:13. > :53:17.will be deeply concerned about what they see, and what action can be

:53:17. > :53:21.taken.. In the next few weeks, David Cameron will be given a

:53:21. > :53:24.speech in which he is likely to promise some kind of referendum on

:53:24. > :53:27.Europe - why do you think the British people should not have a

:53:27. > :53:32.say over their future relationship with Europe? I think it is

:53:32. > :53:35.incredibly dangerous, what David Cameron is doing. He is essentially

:53:35. > :53:39.sleepwalking us towards the exit door from the European Union. Let

:53:39. > :53:42.me explain why I have made that judgment. If you think about a

:53:42. > :53:46.young person looking for work today. Think about a small business

:53:46. > :53:52.looking for a loan from the bank - what can we do to help them? The

:53:52. > :53:58.last thing we should do is start to say, for some date five, six, seven

:53:58. > :54:03.years hence, let's decide now to have a referendum on in or out of

:54:03. > :54:07.Europe. As Michael Heseltine said yesterday, what does that mean? It

:54:07. > :54:12.means a referendum on a negotiation which has not yet begun, with a

:54:12. > :54:16.timescale which is uncertain and an outcome which is unknown. Either

:54:16. > :54:20.way, David Cameron and myself stood shoulder to shoulder in 2007, we

:54:20. > :54:23.both said this was a bad idea. We know why this is happening, it is

:54:23. > :54:28.because he is worried about UKIP, and worried about what is happening

:54:28. > :54:33.within his own party. Just to be clear, there will be no referendum

:54:33. > :54:38.under a Labour government? There is legislation on the books concerning

:54:38. > :54:42.any major transfer of power. But I am very clear, the question for now

:54:42. > :54:47.is, should we commit to a referendum? I am saying very

:54:47. > :54:50.clearly to you, no is the answer. That is a commitment all the way up

:54:50. > :54:54.to the next election? I am not going to speculate about years

:54:54. > :54:58.hence, but I am giving you a very clear view, it is the one thing to

:54:58. > :55:03.do. While we are on Europe, in the television debates at the next

:55:03. > :55:06.election, should UKIP have a role? That is up to the people organising

:55:06. > :55:10.the debates. I have to say, David Cameron I think is not sure whether

:55:10. > :55:14.he wants to do these debates. I am relishing them, looking forward to

:55:14. > :55:16.them, I hope they happen, I think they will give an insight to the

:55:16. > :55:21.public directly into what is happening at the election. Can you

:55:21. > :55:25.imagine sitting around a Cabinet table with Nick Clegg? What I want

:55:25. > :55:32.is a majority Labour government. Frankly, I am not going to start

:55:32. > :55:39.going into the election thinking about coalitions. The I am looking

:55:39. > :55:42.for a majority Labour government, winning back trust in people. Not

:55:42. > :55:49.just for people at the top, but for the bars majority of people in this

:55:49. > :55:53.country. -- the vast majority. Blair changed your party's name to

:55:53. > :55:58.New Labour, have you changed it to one-nation Labour? I am definitely

:55:58. > :56:03.using that name. I am not going into a rebranding exercise, but

:56:03. > :56:06.one-nation Labour is a way forward for this country. It moves on from

:56:06. > :56:11.old Labour. And it is different from the Conservative Party that we

:56:11. > :56:15.have. Above all, it is bringing the country together, not dividing, as

:56:15. > :56:19.David Cameron has been doing. question - you will not tell us

:56:19. > :56:22.what benefits you will cut, what taxes you will increase, how you

:56:22. > :56:27.will cut the deficit, but you were clear about a referendum, so my

:56:27. > :56:31.last question is this - isn't this lack of detail one reason why many

:56:31. > :56:35.people look at Labour and they say, yes, effective opposition, but they

:56:35. > :56:39.have not quite made the leap yet to being a genuine, credible

:56:39. > :56:43.alternative for government? I do not agree -- I do not agree at all.

:56:43. > :56:47.We have covered all areas from immigration to banking regulation.

:56:47. > :56:50.We have set out a vision to bring this country together and to help

:56:50. > :56:54.everybody across the population have opportunity. We have shown

:56:54. > :56:59.that we will not govern the country for a few which and powerful people.

:56:59. > :57:02.We are setting out policies, from banking to energy, to helping young

:57:02. > :57:05.people get qualifications, which will change this country in a

:57:05. > :57:08.different way, if not by spending more money. That is a big change,

:57:08. > :57:12.it is different either from the last government, or from this

:57:12. > :57:15.government. Thank you very much for being with us this morning. Time

:57:15. > :57:19.for the headlines. The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, has told this

:57:19. > :57:22.programme that a future Labour government will act to make sure

:57:22. > :57:26.that multinational companies pay their fair share of corporation tax.

:57:26. > :57:30.He said that the party would demand transparency over companies' tax

:57:30. > :57:36.affairs, and would look at changing the law to prevent companies from

:57:36. > :57:40.distributing their profits abroad in order to avoid tax in the UK. Ed

:57:40. > :57:44.Miliband said he was shocked at the report from the Care Quality

:57:44. > :57:48.Commission, which found that 17 NHS hospitals in England are failing to

:57:48. > :57:52.provide safe levels of staffing. Labour says that the findings

:57:52. > :57:54.reflect what it calls a toxic combination of cuts and

:57:54. > :58:00.reorganisation, but the Government says that the number of NHS

:58:00. > :58:03.clinical staff has risen since the year 2010. The First Minister of

:58:03. > :58:06.northern island has appealed for an end to the violent protests over

:58:06. > :58:10.the flying of the Union flag. Peter Robinson said that the

:58:10. > :58:13.demonstrations would not change anything, and that the only way

:58:13. > :58:16.forward was through the political process. 29 police officers were

:58:16. > :58:21.injured yesterday after coming under fire from bricks and other

:58:21. > :58:27.missiles during violent clashes between loyalist and republican

:58:27. > :58:35.factions in east Belfast. That's all from me for now. Here's what's

:58:35. > :58:38.coming up after this programme. We will have a special edition of the

:58:39. > :58:46.big question, asking one fundamental question - is it time

:58:46. > :58:48.for all religions to accept evolution? We have got a panel of

:58:48. > :58:55.distinguished writers and broadcasters, but others, to

:58:55. > :58:59.discuss it. That's it for this morning. Next week, Jeremy Vine

:58:59. > :59:03.will be at the helm, and his guests will include the Deputy Prime

:59:03. > :59:07.Minister, Nick Clegg, and one of the greatest names in the film