12/06/2016

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:00. > :00:07.people are celebrating the Queen's 90th birthday.

:00:08. > :00:11.The Kingdom, meanwhile, has never been closer to leaving the EU.

:00:12. > :00:13.11 days to go, and no-one - but no-one -

:00:14. > :00:37.My guests this week: Prime Minister David Cameron,

:00:38. > :00:43.on the edge of pulling off an audacious gamble

:00:44. > :00:49.or presiding over a catastrophic misjudgment.

:00:50. > :00:51.And Ukip's Nigel Farage, the rebel leader

:00:52. > :01:00.close to dramatically changing the course of this country.

:01:01. > :01:03.And on this very important weekend,

:01:04. > :01:05.analysing the referendum news and much else,

:01:06. > :01:08.including what's happening in America,

:01:09. > :01:12.former Bush advisor and Republican commentator David Frum,

:01:13. > :01:18.and from the TaxPayers' Alliance, Dia Chakravarty.

:01:19. > :01:22.Now, we are not a programme that constantly blows its own trumpet,

:01:23. > :01:29.so we've invited the very best here to do it for us.

:01:30. > :01:32.Alison Balsom, who's not only a front-line musician herself,

:01:33. > :01:35.but is encouraging all of us to go back to those musical instruments

:01:36. > :01:38.we abandoned as children and get playing again.

:01:39. > :01:43.But first, the news with Ben Thompson.

:01:44. > :01:45.Europe's football governing body, Uefa,

:01:46. > :01:49.says it'll investigate violent clashes in Marseille last night

:01:50. > :01:51.at the end of England's 1-1 draw against Russia.

:01:52. > :01:54.A group of Russians broke through a thin line of stewards

:01:55. > :01:58.to throw punches and kicks and steal England flags.

:01:59. > :02:00.It's the third day of attacks and skirmishes

:02:01. > :02:05.in the French port city, as Simon Clemison reports.

:02:06. > :02:09.The match is over, the violence left outside, or is it?

:02:10. > :02:17.A white seating block is emptying, and here's why -

:02:18. > :02:19.it appears Russian supporters were chasing the English

:02:20. > :02:21.across the stand, a flare having been let off.

:02:22. > :02:24.This kind of outbreak is highly unusual.

:02:25. > :02:27.And yet security is meant to be ultra-tight,

:02:28. > :02:28.raising big questions for the authorities.

:02:29. > :02:32.they started to invade the England fans in the corner.

:02:33. > :02:37.Of course, the English supporters ran, and they had nowhere to go.

:02:38. > :02:40.I just saw a bunch of Russian fans running over to the England fans,

:02:41. > :02:44.and all the England fans were running off

:02:45. > :02:47.and jumping over the fence, it was awful.

:02:48. > :02:49.So the operation on the streets of Marseille overnight

:02:50. > :02:57.on the threat being posed by terrorists.

:02:58. > :03:00.but no repeat of yesterday's ugly scenes,

:03:01. > :03:02.when suddenly the clashes got much more serious.

:03:03. > :03:07.Police say both sides were involved, along with the French.

:03:08. > :03:10.But it is only small groups which are thought

:03:11. > :03:13.to be causing problems, although the tournament

:03:14. > :03:16.is only 24 hours old - these are the early stages.

:03:17. > :03:19.This country desperately wants to focus on the football,

:03:20. > :03:25.The Eiffel Tower paying tribute to a first appearance by Wales

:03:26. > :03:30.David Cameron has warned that the UK economy would shrink

:03:31. > :03:32.if the country votes to leave the European Union.

:03:33. > :03:35.He said spending on health and pensions would suffer.

:03:36. > :03:39.Former Conservative Cabinet minister Iain Duncan Smith,

:03:40. > :03:43.from the Leave campaign, described his warning as

:03:44. > :03:45.a "vindictive and desperate attempt to bully and frighten pensioners."

:03:46. > :03:47.Meanwhile, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby,

:03:48. > :03:53.has said he will vote for the UK to remain in the EU.

:03:54. > :03:56.Celebrations continue for the Queen's 90th birthday weekend.

:03:57. > :03:59.Today, Her Majesty will attend a huge street party

:04:00. > :04:02.with 10,000 guests on the Mall for the Patron's Lunch.

:04:03. > :04:05.It's a celebration of the Queen's patronage of charities

:04:06. > :04:08.and organisations across the UK and the Commonwealth.

:04:09. > :04:12.where guests will enjoy a picnic afternoon tea,

:04:13. > :04:21.and there will be a procession of entertainers.

:04:22. > :04:26.Within the last few minutes, reports coming in from Orlando, where it is

:04:27. > :04:31.believed a gunman has taken hostages at a gay nightclub in the city.

:04:32. > :04:36.There is a suggestion that a number of people have been shot at the

:04:37. > :04:39.Pulse club. Photos and social media show dozens of emergency vehicles at

:04:40. > :04:41.the scene. No official details of the incident have yet been given.

:04:42. > :04:43.That's all from me, for now. Back to you, Andrew.

:04:44. > :04:46.Now to the papers, and with me to review

:04:47. > :04:49.the papers are David Frum, Helena Kennedy and Dia Chakrabarty.

:04:50. > :04:57.A lot of politics, a lot of Europe, Justin Welby talking to the Mail on

:04:58. > :05:02.Sunday, voting in, and a lot of the coverage is about David Cameron's

:05:03. > :05:07.claim that Brexit may put pensions at risk or NHS ringfencing or you

:05:08. > :05:13.name it! And there is the front of the Observer with England fans

:05:14. > :05:16.rioting at the top. The Sunday Telegraph, PM's Brexit pensions

:05:17. > :05:20.warning, and like many papers, pictures of the Royal Family on the

:05:21. > :05:24.balcony. The Sunday Times has a different take, a leaked UK plan,

:05:25. > :05:29.from diplomats, they say, to open the door to 1 million Turks,

:05:30. > :05:32.diplomat in Ankara and advising that in order to stop Turkey leading in

:05:33. > :05:38.millions and millions of refugees, they might have to let 1 million or

:05:39. > :05:42.so Turks have special passports into the UK. We will talk to the Prime

:05:43. > :05:46.Minister about that, and a slightly unsettling picture of Boris Johnson

:05:47. > :05:51.wearing mascara and lipstick, part of Project Fear, I am sure you

:05:52. > :05:56.agree! The Sunday express, panic grips Downing Street, they will say

:05:57. > :06:09.gleefully. And the Sunday Mirror is spread between happy and inglorious.

:06:10. > :06:16.You have chosen a big spread from the Observer. It is easy, and we

:06:17. > :06:21.have got this on the front of the papers, this shameful behaviour on

:06:22. > :06:24.the part of British fans, and yet at the same time it is a more

:06:25. > :06:28.complicated story, because the level of brutality meted out by Russian

:06:29. > :06:33.fans seems to be extraordinary, and they have gone with hand axis, with

:06:34. > :06:37.weapons and so on. And so we are talking about something that really

:06:38. > :06:43.is ugly, and it is kind of interesting that it is the bringing

:06:44. > :06:47.together of the most an attractive end of the European family, I am

:06:48. > :06:51.afraid, and it is actually about fascist elements operating here.

:06:52. > :07:05.Most of the English fans were not doing that, and that easy thing

:07:06. > :07:07.about in -- inglorious Britain, because this turned into something

:07:08. > :07:12.truly different, because of the way in which gangs used this, and it is

:07:13. > :07:17.partly about the old reputation still lingering. You know, the Brits

:07:18. > :07:21.are up for a fight, but it turned incredibly ugly... Worrying that the

:07:22. > :07:27.Russians were able to bring flares and fireworks and stuff and

:07:28. > :07:30.gunpowder into a stadium weather is supposed to be incredibly strong

:07:31. > :07:33.anti-terrorist security. It is one of the reasons why you have to have

:07:34. > :07:36.close proximity between police forces working across borders in

:07:37. > :07:41.order to deal with this stuff, but one of the ugly things was, hearing

:07:42. > :07:48.some of the fans actually chanting about being rightly Brexiteers, that

:07:49. > :07:54.is not going to win much friendship across Europe, if that is the face

:07:55. > :07:57.of some of the argument. But I do think that here this is about

:07:58. > :08:01.something else, and we shouldn't automatically reach for our

:08:02. > :08:05.criticism of that. I think that we are talking about something else. A

:08:06. > :08:09.very good spread in the Observer talking about how the Russian media

:08:10. > :08:14.has boasted about the Russians coming out on top in this disgusting

:08:15. > :08:17.display. Not very good. One of the problems of the referendum is that

:08:18. > :08:21.we enjoy the rest of the world, and we should not ignore what is going

:08:22. > :08:28.on in your country, particularly interesting. You have a Hillary

:08:29. > :08:32.Clinton story from the internet. ABC News. How is it that Hillary

:08:33. > :08:39.Clinton, quite popular here, I understand, has had so much trouble

:08:40. > :08:45.putting away an unfunny Larry David imitated inside her party? Bernie

:08:46. > :08:51.Sanders. And finds a sub running close to Donald Trump, who strikes

:08:52. > :08:57.many people as completely implausible as a candidate. -- finds

:08:58. > :09:00.herself. Many Americans regarded as people and self-seeking, and this is

:09:01. > :09:14.a new story that give some perspective that

:09:15. > :09:21.explains why... This man had given huge amount of money first to the

:09:22. > :09:27.Clinton campaign and the Clinton Foundation, getting close to the

:09:28. > :09:31.security system, and he is a Clinton super delegate as well. New e-mails

:09:32. > :09:36.have surfaced that this was personally directed by Hillary

:09:37. > :09:40.Clinton's chief of staff, who directed that they be stalled, and

:09:41. > :09:44.that is her own e-mail address. You are a Republican, you have been a

:09:45. > :09:47.Republican commentator for a very long time, so would you prefer to

:09:48. > :09:55.see Donald Trump Peter Lawrie Clinton or not? My preferences get

:09:56. > :10:06.in a way of pointing out what is important here. This is why it is so

:10:07. > :10:10.hard for her. This is a big negative for her. When she made her

:10:11. > :10:14.announcement address, she said, many of you think I am in this for

:10:15. > :10:19.myself, and you address that because you know it is a widespread feeling.

:10:20. > :10:25.It is a good story to explain what is the anchor weighing down the

:10:26. > :10:29.Clinton campaign. I'm sorry, but this is something you are going to

:10:30. > :10:32.hear more and more from a panicked Republican Party, who really cannot

:10:33. > :10:36.stand the idea that Hillary Clinton is going to end up in the White

:10:37. > :10:41.House, even when they are saddled with Trump. It is so one fair,

:10:42. > :10:48.because this man has great technical skill... He is a commodity trader.

:10:49. > :10:56.He has got considerable technical skill, and that is what they are

:10:57. > :10:59.talking about. Let's now moved to own controversies, the story about

:11:00. > :11:05.the Prime Minister's warnings about pensions being cut. Yes, this adds

:11:06. > :11:09.on to a number of stories that have come out of the Remain side lately,

:11:10. > :11:15.talking about how disastrous it is going to be the us if we leave the

:11:16. > :11:18.EU. This is another example, and we have heard this will be taken away

:11:19. > :11:23.from you, that will be taken away from you. This is now particularly

:11:24. > :11:28.looking at pensioners, we know this is a group that votes more than a

:11:29. > :11:31.lot of other groups, so it is important for David Cameron. The

:11:32. > :11:34.Tories have done this in the past, they have a way of keeping the

:11:35. > :11:44.pensioners sweet, to get that vote out. This is an extension of it.

:11:45. > :11:47.This is based on the IFS warning of a ?20 billion black hole, so

:11:48. > :11:52.difficult decisions will have to be taken. You are a Brexit support

:11:53. > :11:57.yourself. I certainly am, although the TaxPayers' Alliance does not

:11:58. > :12:01.take a view on this. These are all... Economics is speculative on

:12:02. > :12:05.both sides, these are all predictions, and economists to get

:12:06. > :12:08.them wrong. I do not blame them for getting them wrong, these are hard

:12:09. > :12:13.predictions to get right. What I blame them for is claiming that this

:12:14. > :12:16.is infallible, which it is not. Here we have a situation where David

:12:17. > :12:20.Cameron seems to be saying, if it happens that we have an economic

:12:21. > :12:28.disaster, we cannot be sure that we can protect you pensioners from what

:12:29. > :12:31.comes from it. But again, that is speculative. It is a bed thing to

:12:32. > :12:35.say, in a sense, it is about likelihoods and percentages. But why

:12:36. > :12:38.isn't it also a question of priorities for David Cameron? If he

:12:39. > :12:43.thinks that their benefits should remain, you know, he will still be

:12:44. > :12:46.in the Government, or some form of it, the Conservative Party

:12:47. > :12:49.presumably will still be in government. If they want this

:12:50. > :12:53.election on that mandate, why can't they say that this is something we

:12:54. > :12:58.will protect, if they think it is what they want to do? This is the

:12:59. > :13:03.problem for those who want to leave Europe, you do not have any serious

:13:04. > :13:07.economists on your side. All the big international economic bodies are

:13:08. > :13:12.saying, this is not a good idea, and you say it is speculative - it is

:13:13. > :13:17.not, it has all been modelled and block that with great care. It is

:13:18. > :13:21.still all speculative, and as you well know, this is essentially a

:13:22. > :13:26.debate between... We have said this before, but this is the case, even

:13:27. > :13:32.Andrew Mitchell, part of the Remain campaign... Is this the BBC trying

:13:33. > :13:37.to be fair? You have had a fair amount of time too. I want to move

:13:38. > :13:42.to the Labour side of the argument, however, which is that it does seem

:13:43. > :13:45.the Labour Party is losing votes to Ukip in the North in particular, and

:13:46. > :13:49.your message has not got through to traditional voters. It is something

:13:50. > :13:53.the Labour Party has to be really worried about, and in many places,

:13:54. > :13:56.where in fact there are not even immigrants, people appearing the

:13:57. > :14:01.idea that the future of their children will be affected by

:14:02. > :14:03.immigration, and where there are very few people from anywhere else

:14:04. > :14:08.in Europe or abroad. But the point about it is that a rather nasty

:14:09. > :14:12.campaign has caught the public attention, so that people think that

:14:13. > :14:16.their ills are about immigration, rather than being about a government

:14:17. > :14:20.that has made choices on austerity which has greatly affected the

:14:21. > :14:26.family lives of people that are not well off. I think that, if people

:14:27. > :14:35.that upset about migration, maybe we should to them. You misunderstand

:14:36. > :14:40.your problem, maybe it would be respectful to say, I hear it. You

:14:41. > :14:44.have ugly politics being run up the flagpole, that is happening in your

:14:45. > :14:50.country too, but we really have to hone in on... Let me bring you a

:14:51. > :14:54.warning from America, which is if you have a legitimate concern, and

:14:55. > :14:58.responsible people do not address it, you get Donald Trump - don't

:14:59. > :15:07.wait for Donald Trump to address your migration problems.

:15:08. > :15:13.Let's move to the David Cameron interview. I'm a great admirer of

:15:14. > :15:19.David Cameron. He has been the right man for the time. One thing that has

:15:20. > :15:21.been painful is watching the conservative coalition be smashed,

:15:22. > :15:31.not just by the vote but by the way it has been handled. You hear is

:15:32. > :15:35.talking about the vote, Nigel Farage supporters will feel it is a lot

:15:36. > :15:43.broader to returning to the coalition. That it is a locked door.

:15:44. > :15:48.Migration is a massive issue. Angela Merkel's message, unbelievably

:15:49. > :15:57.irresponsible, is one of the drivers in shattering confidence in the

:15:58. > :16:04.European Union. The Mac are you a Brexit supporter? America has always

:16:05. > :16:08.wanted to see Europe to be a stronger, more reliable friend.

:16:09. > :16:14.Obviously, British people will have this integrity of British democracy

:16:15. > :16:21.close. The Mac I want to see one more thing... Please don't. We need

:16:22. > :16:28.to review the papers as well. There is an interview with Boris Johnson.

:16:29. > :16:35.This is quite an interesting interview with Boris Johnson. They

:16:36. > :16:42.put questions like, you're part of the establishment as well, having

:16:43. > :16:49.been to Eton and Oxford. Let's not forget on the other side they are

:16:50. > :16:55.also part of that. Why is it establishment? What was interesting

:16:56. > :17:01.is when asked whether he regrets saying anything in the past, he gave

:17:02. > :17:05.quite a candid answer, he says, I don't, I'm trying to tell it exactly

:17:06. > :17:09.as I see it. People know that I sometimes say things that can be

:17:10. > :17:13.misconstrued but I need to be as painful to what I think as I

:17:14. > :17:19.possibly can, that has got me into trouble and also got me out of it. I

:17:20. > :17:23.thought that was quite candid. The cause we all laugh at him, and think

:17:24. > :17:36.he says things that are not scripted, but that is who years. --

:17:37. > :17:39.who he is. The last story. I think we've had a major intervention by

:17:40. > :17:46.Justin Welby, you says Brexit will hit the economy, we should know

:17:47. > :17:50.that, the EU needs reform, the referendum is about so much more, it

:17:51. > :17:56.is a vote for peace, stability and the values we fought for in two

:17:57. > :18:00.world wars. He is talking about bridge building, and we should be

:18:01. > :18:03.going back to the principles behind this. Thank you all very much.

:18:04. > :18:06.And so to the weather, I've been very lucky this week,

:18:07. > :18:09.Glasgow was like Barcelona on a good day.

:18:10. > :18:13.as the muggy South has endured thunderplump after thunderplump.

:18:14. > :18:23.So what can we expect this week? Here's Tomasz Schafernaker.

:18:24. > :18:34.I'm being told what schadenfreude means! I tell you what, the weather

:18:35. > :18:39.is all over the place. Not just today but tomorrow, Tuesday,

:18:40. > :18:46.Wednesday, quite possibly Thursday and Friday. It is a mishmash. You

:18:47. > :18:53.can see heavy showers across northern areas, the South as well.

:18:54. > :18:55.The best advice is, if you are out for any lengthy period of time, take

:18:56. > :19:09.your on Brad. -- on Brad R. There will be more rain around, it

:19:10. > :19:18.will be another marquee, close mate. 14 degrees in London. Once again,

:19:19. > :19:28.more of the same tomorrow. Sunshine and showers through the course of

:19:29. > :19:34.the day. Temperatures may get up to 20 degrees. The week ahead, more

:19:35. > :19:37.showers, coastal areas could enjoy some sun.

:19:38. > :19:40.Chairman Mao began his long march to power in Jiangxi Province.

:19:41. > :19:45.it was an agreeable saloon bar somewhere in Kent.

:19:46. > :19:49.But for him too, it's been an astonishing journey.

:19:50. > :19:52.Dismissed and ridiculed for years, he is perhaps the man

:19:53. > :19:54.most responsible for taking us so close

:19:55. > :20:12.I say you are responsible, partly because I presume David Cameron help

:20:13. > :20:18.the referendum to scupper you. It was to shoot the Ukip Fox. The

:20:19. > :20:26.perception was it was Tory votes, but ironically we probably had

:20:27. > :20:31.Labour more. He went into the election promising a referendum, he

:20:32. > :20:35.got a majority, he spent much of last year saying Britain could do

:20:36. > :20:41.fine outside the European Union and he would not rule anything out in

:20:42. > :20:46.terms of which way he would vote, now it's a daily Prophet of doom as

:20:47. > :20:51.to what would happen to our pensioners and everybody else. Which

:20:52. > :20:57.is the real David Cameron? On Friday, when the markets closed, the

:20:58. > :21:05.Footsie was down 100 points, nearly ?40 billion was wiped off. It is a

:21:06. > :21:08.fact and these are not Europhile scaremongers, these are hard-nosed

:21:09. > :21:18.people trying to praise the risk of Brexit. I worked in this free 20

:21:19. > :21:24.years. Sterling is up since March. What happened on Friday was very bad

:21:25. > :21:30.economic figures from America and the fact that the growth forecast

:21:31. > :21:35.was downgraded and borrowing is still out of control. These are

:21:36. > :21:43.ludicrous scare stories being put up. Even if sterling were to fall

:21:44. > :21:47.after Brexit, so what? We have a floating currency and it would be

:21:48. > :21:54.good for exports. I will tell you so what. I bumped into our man in the

:21:55. > :21:58.park and he said, all my friends and family are voting to leave but I

:21:59. > :22:01.cannot because I have investments and pensions and I'm really worried

:22:02. > :22:08.about what is going to happen. He looks at the forecasts and that is

:22:09. > :22:17.why he's worried. I understand that these relentless scare tactics, some

:22:18. > :22:21.people are being scared. Let me say this, the IFF is, this great

:22:22. > :22:26.independent god of economic forecasting is funded mostly by the

:22:27. > :22:32.British government and over 10% of their income comes from the European

:22:33. > :22:37.Union. You're not saying they are a corrupt organisation. I am seeing

:22:38. > :22:41.75% of their funding comes from the British government and the EU. You

:22:42. > :22:47.are saying we should not trust what they say? I'm saying if you work for

:22:48. > :22:52.the government and the EU and you ask to produce a report, you don't

:22:53. > :22:55.bite the hand that feeds you. That is a very serious allegation against

:22:56. > :23:02.people regarded as gold standard advisers. Well at the start you said

:23:03. > :23:09.was it in a saloon bar in Kent, actually it was London. I said

:23:10. > :23:14.London as well. All the experts said it would be good for Britain to join

:23:15. > :23:19.this and I thought it would not, the experts said if we did not join the

:23:20. > :23:24.euro it would be doomed. Investment would dry up. The central point is,

:23:25. > :23:27.everything the Prime Minister and George Osborne says is predicated on

:23:28. > :23:33.the idea that we are part of something that is good for the

:23:34. > :23:38.British economy, and the answer is, for tariff free access to the

:23:39. > :23:46.European market, we need to pay a net membership fee of ?34 million a

:23:47. > :23:51.day, accept regulation on the 84% of our economy that is not exports to

:23:52. > :24:01.European countries, and we have to accept... But surely the single

:24:02. > :24:04.market has been useful for British... The common market was

:24:05. > :24:09.good for us, it gave us a bigger market. The single market is

:24:10. > :24:13.actually inhibiting us in a world, we live in a global economy and

:24:14. > :24:18.nobody talks about this, we put up trade barriers against countries all

:24:19. > :24:23.over the world as part of the EU and my answer is this, we are not

:24:24. > :24:25.leaving Europe, we are divorcing ourselves from feeling political

:24:26. > :24:32.union so we can re-engage with the world. If we vote to leave them a

:24:33. > :24:36.lot depends on the kind of negotiation that follows and you say

:24:37. > :24:40.it will be up and nine negotiation, they will not cut off their noses to

:24:41. > :24:46.spite their faces but I say that is unlikely. You want to see the end of

:24:47. > :24:54.the EU and this to be the solution and collapse of the EU structures.

:24:55. > :25:00.The people we will be negotiating with will be very angry and not want

:25:01. > :25:04.to negotiate in a friendly way. I tell you who is angry, the people of

:25:05. > :25:11.Europe, they said they did not vote for this, they finished up with a

:25:12. > :25:15.currency that has made beggars of the South, a migrant policy

:25:16. > :25:23.tailoring countries apart. There is a tariff free area that extends from

:25:24. > :25:28.Iceland to Turkey. That exist. We are eurozone's biggest market. There

:25:29. > :25:33.are elections coming up next year in France and Germany. This will take a

:25:34. > :25:39.long time, beyond those negotiations. The most powerful

:25:40. > :25:44.lobby in the whole of Europe is the German car industry. They need this

:25:45. > :25:51.market very badly. Even if things did go wrong, let us just assume,

:25:52. > :25:57.and Angela Merkel is happy to see hundreds of thousands of German car

:25:58. > :26:04.workers laid off. Even in that scenario, the benefit we join for is

:26:05. > :26:08.outweighed by the net membership fee alone. The worst-case scenario,

:26:09. > :26:15.economic way, is better than where we are today and gives us the chance

:26:16. > :26:20.to start thinking globally. For the last 70 years we've had peace in

:26:21. > :26:23.Europe, we've had a much longer history where every time there has

:26:24. > :26:28.been trouble in Europe we've had to get involved and spend our blood and

:26:29. > :26:33.our treasure. Are you absolutely sure that the collapse of the EU is

:26:34. > :26:38.not going to be angry, difficult, divisive and cause more problems? If

:26:39. > :26:44.we had been part of a greater Europe we would not have been able to

:26:45. > :26:52.intervene in the last two Mac wars. That is a debating point. Look at

:26:53. > :26:57.Europe's role in the break-up of Yugoslavia. Look at Greece. Look at

:26:58. > :27:01.the rise of the extreme politics of the extreme right and the extreme

:27:02. > :27:09.left. This is not a happy Europe. The answer for peace, firstly, Nato

:27:10. > :27:15.is an example of countries cooperating together. Provided

:27:16. > :27:19.Europe is democratic, it will never go to war. Let's talk about

:27:20. > :27:26.immigration, you told Andrew Neal you wanted to return to the old norm

:27:27. > :27:37.of immigration in the 1950s. That was 30,000 a year. Is that a fair

:27:38. > :27:46.folk of Western Mark -- they figure? Absolutely. Net migration is 180

:27:47. > :27:52.8000. So you want a serious cut. This government is not handling

:27:53. > :27:57.immigration from outside the EU well. The fact that 20,000 illegal

:27:58. > :28:02.immigrants were given permanent leave to Remain, is it any wonder

:28:03. > :28:10.boat was found off Hastings with people in it? The government has

:28:11. > :28:15.failed on the staff and on the EU stuff we have no control at all.

:28:16. > :28:20.This Prime Minister promised the British people he would bring it

:28:21. > :28:25.down to tens of thousands, knowing we have an open door. You are not

:28:26. > :28:31.the kind of guy who wants to stop family reunions so that would carry

:28:32. > :28:37.on? Provided they are legitimate and we know that we are doing properly.

:28:38. > :28:43.They were running at 40 3000. You want to get it down to 40,000. You

:28:44. > :28:52.cannot let anybody else in. Let's be clear, getting back to a norm that

:28:53. > :28:55.starts to relieve the pressure, I mean, people cannot get GP

:28:56. > :29:05.appointments, people cannot get their kids on the housing ladder. It

:29:06. > :29:13.needs a government led by people and it needs us to stop the open door to

:29:14. > :29:18.500 million people across the EU. Let's put that to one side and think

:29:19. > :29:28.afterwards nobody from the EU tries to come here. You still got 188,000,

:29:29. > :29:35.43,000 with Family Reunion, the numbers simply do not add up. We

:29:36. > :29:39.will have a tougher immigration policy and I think everyone knows

:29:40. > :29:42.that when it comes to Family Reunion, the boundaries have been

:29:43. > :29:50.stretched. You said you wanted quality migrants, and you said, we

:29:51. > :29:55.don't want Albanian murderers and people with HIV. Is that your view?

:29:56. > :30:01.I want this country to be a normal country. Normal countries all over

:30:02. > :30:05.the world don't allow criminals to settle in their country, don't allow

:30:06. > :30:10.people to come into the country who would be a huge burden on the health

:30:11. > :30:22.service. Would you include things like to brag your losses and other

:30:23. > :30:25.difficult diseases? -- tuberculous. Let's be clear. We have a national

:30:26. > :30:30.health system at breaking point, literally at breaking point, many

:30:31. > :30:34.will tell you that, because things are serious, it is a National Health

:30:35. > :30:40.Service, not an international health service. How do you know people have

:30:41. > :30:44.got HIV when they come in? If you go to Australia you need to prove

:30:45. > :30:50.things. You are getting into specific details and looking for a

:30:51. > :30:54.big headline. What I'm saying is, the way Australia does it is simple,

:30:55. > :30:59.you've got to be under 45, have a trade or skill, have some money,

:31:00. > :31:06.bring your own health insurance. Doesn't that sound sensible?

:31:07. > :31:12.Balsom what about all those British businesses, care homes, hospitals,

:31:13. > :31:15.restaurants, coffee shops, who rely at the moment on not very

:31:16. > :31:29.? Do they go under? Of the new jobs that were created in the UK last

:31:30. > :31:34.year, over 70% of them went to people who are not British. There

:31:35. > :31:38.are 1.7 million Brits who are not employed at the moment, maybe they

:31:39. > :31:42.are all lazy, but I don't think so. I think what is happening is that

:31:43. > :31:46.big companies are choosing foreign labour over British labour. Going

:31:47. > :31:50.back to the HIV thing, you didn't really answer my question, whether

:31:51. > :31:56.you still think that people with HIV should not be allowed into this

:31:57. > :32:00.country? Yes or no? To get free health care? We do not know why they

:32:01. > :32:04.are coming in, they come in for all sorts of reasons, do you keep them

:32:05. > :32:12.out? I am sorry, you are trying to get me... Should we say to people,

:32:13. > :32:16.from all over the world, if you have got a very serious disease, we are

:32:17. > :32:20.very happy for the National Health Service to provide whatever health

:32:21. > :32:25.care you want, at the same time as it now takes people all over Britain

:32:26. > :32:31.a fortnight to get a GP appointment? It is about priorities, isn't it?

:32:32. > :32:36.And my priority would be to put our own people first - it is about time

:32:37. > :32:40.we did. Final question, we are very close to the referendum, very close

:32:41. > :32:46.to the result, and the two camps seem very close indeed. Many but you

:32:47. > :32:52.ahead at the moment. If in the end you lose 51-49, is it over? Well,

:32:53. > :32:57.let's remember one thing. The vast majority of our political us want to

:32:58. > :33:02.stay part of the European Union, many regret the Prime Minister's

:33:03. > :33:06.decision to give us a referendum. If the Leave side was too narrowly

:33:07. > :33:09.lose, the chances of parliament giving us another referendum in the

:33:10. > :33:14.short-term is probably pretty slim. So I do view this as the one

:33:15. > :33:18.opportunity, and you know, there is nothing radical about this. All we

:33:19. > :33:22.want to do is take back control of our lives and put power back in the

:33:23. > :33:27.hands of the British people. An awful lot of people will very angry

:33:28. > :33:31.if the Remain campaign win by a sliver and they think it has been an

:33:32. > :33:37.unfair campaign. Could you see problems on the streets if that

:33:38. > :33:40.happens? I have not mentioned violence, there might be violence

:33:41. > :33:43.inside the Conservative Party, that is certainly true. A lot of his own

:33:44. > :33:48.MPs think that he has used taxpayers' money wrong way and is

:33:49. > :33:52.not running a full, free and fair election campaign. I do not expect

:33:53. > :33:55.violence from the people of this country, I expect profound

:33:56. > :33:59.disappointment. There has been a change in this debate. People have

:34:00. > :34:02.had enough of being threatened by the Prime Minister and the

:34:03. > :34:06.Chancellor, and I think, collectively, people are beginning

:34:07. > :34:10.to put two pinger is up to the political class. They may very well

:34:11. > :34:11.be, Nigel Farage, thank you for joining us.

:34:12. > :34:13.The Prime Minister will be joining me shortly.

:34:14. > :34:17.is that he once played the drums at school.

:34:18. > :34:20.But like many amateur musicians, he gave up after a while,

:34:21. > :34:21.perhaps mercifully, if you ask Mrs Cameron.

:34:22. > :34:24.Well, a new initiative called BBC Get Playing is aimed

:34:25. > :34:26.at encouraging lapsed musicians to take up their old instruments again.

:34:27. > :34:28.Earlier, the trumpeter Alison Balsom,

:34:29. > :34:30.one of the world-class musicians who's backing the season,

:34:31. > :34:38.I think it's a fabulous initiative, because so many people,

:34:39. > :34:41.I've met thousands of people who've said, "I used to play this

:34:42. > :34:44.instrument or that instrument, and I gave up and I regret it."

:34:45. > :34:46.And the thing that I just want to say all the time,

:34:47. > :34:48.over and over again, is that playing music

:34:49. > :34:52.We know that, it's been proven in so many ways.

:34:53. > :34:56.Good for the brain, good for the lungs, good for everything.

:34:57. > :34:58.Absolutely, for the trumpet, absolutely, good for the lungs.

:34:59. > :35:02.But it's also good for the community.

:35:03. > :35:06.So I guess, there are lots and lots of people who have a dusty violin,

:35:07. > :35:09.a kind of old oboe or a clarinet they picked up a few

:35:10. > :35:14.So you can talk to them right now, what's your message to them?

:35:15. > :35:16.The message is, go and look in the loft, go and look

:35:17. > :35:18.for an instrument, look for the instrument

:35:19. > :35:21.you've always wanted to play, or that you used to play,

:35:22. > :35:25.The BBC has lots of information on how you can play music that

:35:26. > :35:27.they've provided and even join in with the virtual orchestra

:35:28. > :35:32.It's a very exciting time for you, you've got a big concert

:35:33. > :35:34.at the Albert Hall, you've got a new album out,

:35:35. > :35:37.and you've just got your OBE, so congratulations to you for that.

:35:38. > :35:39.Tell us a little bit about the album.

:35:40. > :35:42.So the album that has just come out is the trumpet and piano repertoire,

:35:43. > :35:45.it's a live concert, because I love to just record a live concert.

:35:46. > :35:50.There's not a lot, but what we've chosen is all my favourites

:35:51. > :35:53.from the repertoire, and it's like going to a concert,

:35:54. > :35:57.Actually, today I'm just off to finish recording

:35:58. > :35:59.my Christmas album. Christmas album already?!

:36:00. > :36:04.And you are playing some Bach for us at the end.

:36:05. > :36:07.Alison, thank you so much indeed for coming in.

:36:08. > :36:10.And Alison Balsom will play us out later,

:36:11. > :36:15.but first I'm joined by the Prime Minister, David Cameron.

:36:16. > :36:21.Welcome, Prime Minister. Some pretty bloodcurdling warnings this morning

:36:22. > :36:25.for pensioners, the NHS and the armed services, people will say this

:36:26. > :36:30.is yet more project Fear, yet more scaremongering. Well, what it is is

:36:31. > :36:33.saying that if we vote to leave the European Union and the single

:36:34. > :36:39.market, that will have economic consequences. Of course, there are

:36:40. > :36:42.experts, the Governor of the Bank of England, the IMF, the IFS, all

:36:43. > :36:45.saying the economy would be smaller and we would have less money to

:36:46. > :36:50.spend on public services, but I also think there is a deep piece of

:36:51. > :36:55.common sense, and I want to take a moment to set it out. In the single

:36:56. > :36:59.market, we get free access to 500 million consumers, crucial for our

:37:00. > :37:04.economy, where almost half of what we sell goes. If we have less good

:37:05. > :37:08.access, which we would if we left, it would impact on the economy, on

:37:09. > :37:13.car-makers, aeroplane makers, the seven industries. We look behind us

:37:14. > :37:17.at the enormous industry on the wall, the London financial centre.

:37:18. > :37:22.If we restrict access, we will be less well off, and that affects what

:37:23. > :37:29.we can spend on public services. There is no saving from leaving the

:37:30. > :37:32.EU, there is a cost, and my message is clear - do not risk it. These

:37:33. > :37:35.things, ringfencing the NHS, spending an up on defence, these are

:37:36. > :37:41.political choices. You could equally say that you would raise taxes or

:37:42. > :37:50.borrowing. That is true, of course. If, as the IFS, frequent and

:37:51. > :37:54.trenchant critics of the Government, they say there would be a ?20- 40

:37:55. > :37:58.billion black hole, and you could meet that by putting up taxes on

:37:59. > :38:01.hard-working people, or by going back to borrowing more and putting

:38:02. > :38:07.the economy at risk. Or it could be cut in things like pensions or

:38:08. > :38:12.health. And we do not have to vote for that, we do not have to risk it.

:38:13. > :38:16.We can take the better choice, and I think it is worth stopping for a

:38:17. > :38:22.moment and thinking, how will we feel on the 24th of June? If we vote

:38:23. > :38:24.in, there will be a wall of investment, companies responsible

:38:25. > :38:30.for making things in this country will want to employ more, make more.

:38:31. > :38:35.We will have a strong and bright future inside a reformed European

:38:36. > :38:38.Union. If we vote out, it is a decade of uncertainty. You have

:38:39. > :38:41.chosen this morning to one pensioners in particular that they

:38:42. > :38:45.will lose the triple lock. This is what Iain Duncan Smith has said,

:38:46. > :38:49.what we now have is a Vindicat bands desperate attempt to bully and

:38:50. > :38:55.frighten the British people, particularly pensioners. -- a

:38:56. > :38:58.vindictive and desperate. The Conservative Party said that

:38:59. > :39:04.protecting pensioners was a priority, but it is now apparent

:39:05. > :39:11.that there is not do to use or jettison NFF it's to get as to stay

:39:12. > :39:17.in the EU. -- in their efforts to get us to stay in the EU. Of course,

:39:18. > :39:24.it is a priority, but if we did face a black hole like that in our public

:39:25. > :39:28.finances, we would have to make difficult choices, and our pensions

:39:29. > :39:33.promise is based on a growing and succeeding economy, and all of the

:39:34. > :39:36.experts, and I agree with them, and most in business agree, if we cut

:39:37. > :39:40.ourselves off from the most important market, the economy will

:39:41. > :39:45.be smaller, and that has consequences. We will be taking a

:39:46. > :39:50.risk with jobs and growth, and we should not do that. Risks that other

:39:51. > :39:53.clubs because you called the referendum in the first place. Just

:39:54. > :39:58.because it is right to hold the referendum does not mean that you

:39:59. > :40:02.should not be clear about the potential consequences. Nigel Farage

:40:03. > :40:07.was just saying if the pound falls, so what? Briefly, he thought it

:40:08. > :40:12.would go back up again. If the pound falls, that means the prices in our

:40:13. > :40:16.shops go up, the weekly shop costs people more, the family holiday

:40:17. > :40:20.costs more. Outside the single market, airfares will cost more.

:40:21. > :40:24.These are all risks we should avoid, we should not risk it. The challenge

:40:25. > :40:27.to you is that this is scaremongering, you have been

:40:28. > :40:33.quoting the IFS all morning. They say, if we turned out to take a ?40

:40:34. > :40:37.billion hit to public finances, it would be a smaller hit than the

:40:38. > :40:42.effect of the 2008 recession, below the downgrades to the forecast made

:40:43. > :40:46.by the OBR between 2012 and 2013, and we have coped with those. The

:40:47. > :40:51.Treasury themselves forecast that if we leave, the recession will be the

:40:52. > :40:56.shallowest since 1956. It is not Armageddon. Who wants to vote for a

:40:57. > :41:01.shallow recession? The 2008 recession was the worst since the

:41:02. > :41:04.war. This would be the first one that was self-inflicted, and that is

:41:05. > :41:09.what the Bank of England and the IFS and the Treasury and others think.

:41:10. > :41:13.But the roof does not come down. I know what it is like, as Prime

:41:14. > :41:17.Minister, trying to fill in a black hole, trying to deal with the

:41:18. > :41:20.aftermath of recession, trying to get people back to work, meant the

:41:21. > :41:25.public finances, making decisions which many people watching will not

:41:26. > :41:29.have agreed with, because they were tough and difficult. I don't want us

:41:30. > :41:37.to have to make any more of those decisions, and if we vote to stay

:41:38. > :41:40.in, we don't have to. If we vote to come out, we are putting ourselves

:41:41. > :41:43.deliberately in a less good position in a key market. People believe that

:41:44. > :41:47.you are overstating the case, and if you look at the audience in the ITV

:41:48. > :41:51.debate, they were not listening to you, and the reason that they were

:41:52. > :41:55.not listening is because the warnings have been too extreme, too

:41:56. > :41:59.specific, all that stuff about house prices falling by 18% and so forth,

:42:00. > :42:03.coming from the Treasury, which cannot forecast very much ahead.

:42:04. > :42:07.They are no longer listening, they do not believe you. I took except

:42:08. > :42:14.that people are confused by having so many statistics, and that there

:42:15. > :42:17.is a lot of frustration because of that, but I think it is actually my

:42:18. > :42:20.job as Prime Minister, when you have got independent forecasts, from the

:42:21. > :42:23.Governor of the Bank of England, whose job it is to warn of risks to

:42:24. > :42:28.the economy, from the IMF, who warns governments when they face risks, it

:42:29. > :42:32.is my job to talk about that. It would be very irresponsible not to

:42:33. > :42:38.do so. But those numbers are basically made up, that is the

:42:39. > :42:44.problem. Well, I don't acceptable stop Steve Hilton, your former

:42:45. > :42:53.adviser, says, they are made up, I know because I used to do that

:42:54. > :42:56.stuff. Except for the IFS that is not eventually cause, I cannot do

:42:57. > :43:04.that with the Bank of England either. -- that is not then Trillick

:43:05. > :43:07.was. For people who find the barrage of statistics confusing, although

:43:08. > :43:11.they are coming from independent bodies, there is such an obvious

:43:12. > :43:15.common-sense and logical point, which is our car makers, financial

:43:16. > :43:20.services businesses, our insurers, they want us to stay in the biggest

:43:21. > :43:23.single market in the world because they see immense opportunity. We

:43:24. > :43:27.should be taking that market and driving the trade deals with China,

:43:28. > :43:31.whose economy we are bigger than as part of the single market, driving

:43:32. > :43:35.deals with America, who we are bigger than as part of the single

:43:36. > :43:38.market, and there are huge and sides, particularly for young

:43:39. > :43:43.people, but there are risks, and we should not risk it. I am suggesting

:43:44. > :43:47.that the tone has been got badly wrong, people are not listening, two

:43:48. > :43:52.thirds do not think they personally will be worse off at the Brexit. It

:43:53. > :44:00.is beginning to sound a bit as if your campaign is vote to stay or the

:44:01. > :44:08.puppy gets it. I do not accept that. There is a hugely optimistic and

:44:09. > :44:13.positive campaign, our slogan is about positivity. That is why we

:44:14. > :44:15.will be talking about the opportunities for young people, the

:44:16. > :44:20.strength that Britain has, and I have seen this over six years as

:44:21. > :44:23.Prime Minister. If I want to help tackle problems, stopping migration

:44:24. > :44:27.from the eastern Mediterranean, trying to clear up Ebola in West

:44:28. > :44:30.Africa, fight climate change, stand up for British interests in the

:44:31. > :44:35.world, you do not diminish your country by being part of the EU.

:44:36. > :44:38.There is a strong, bold, patriotic case for staying in this

:44:39. > :44:46.organisation. And another point that has not come out, if we wake up and

:44:47. > :44:49.we are in, Britain's authority within the EU will be stronger. No

:44:50. > :44:55.other country has done what we have done, hold a renegotiation and a

:44:56. > :44:58.referendum, and people will know that fighting extremism and

:44:59. > :45:01.terrorism, jobs, that is all go into the top of the agenda, and we will

:45:02. > :45:05.be pushing that in Europe and elsewhere. Some people say there is

:45:06. > :45:09.a choice between being in Europe and going global, but that is nonsense.

:45:10. > :45:12.By being in the single market and having economic strength, we have

:45:13. > :45:19.the ability to have global reach as well.

:45:20. > :45:25.When John Major was sitting in that chair he said the NHS would not be

:45:26. > :45:31.safe in the hands of Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Iain Duncan Smith.

:45:32. > :45:35.Would you agree with him? I thought he made a very powerful case for why

:45:36. > :45:45.we should stay in the European Union. Do you agree with him? I am

:45:46. > :45:53.not going to talk personalities. Are you going to get Amber Rudd to do it

:45:54. > :45:56.for you? I am simply going to talk about the facts and Biagi mince

:45:57. > :46:03.which I think there are enough to get into. -- the arguments. If we

:46:04. > :46:09.vote to leave there will be changes in the Conservative Party and those

:46:10. > :46:15.on the Leave side will be enhanced. You have said you will stay on as

:46:16. > :46:22.Prime Minister and carry-out the British people's wishes. That is a

:46:23. > :46:30.rather indistinct thing, the wishes of the British people. Does the

:46:31. > :46:36.manifesto of the Tory Leave side signify, would you bring in an

:46:37. > :46:44.Australian points system, send that money to the NHS? Obviously, if we

:46:45. > :46:50.vote to leave, with the consequence of that would have, and a DIY

:46:51. > :46:55.recession, that has consequences which would be very difficult for

:46:56. > :46:58.the government to deal with but difficult for British families. I

:46:59. > :47:06.worry about British people losing their jobs. The question is, if we

:47:07. > :47:12.vote to leave will be carry-out the instructions, yes, will I carry on,

:47:13. > :47:18.yes, well I construct a government that includes all the talents of the

:47:19. > :47:25.Conservative Party, yes. Do I think it is the best thing for the

:47:26. > :47:29.country, I do not. So you would be introducing an Australian style

:47:30. > :47:34.points system you do not believe in? Would you be taking us out of the

:47:35. > :47:38.single market? There is room to negotiate that. One of the most

:47:39. > :47:43.important moments was when the boat campaign said they wanted to leave

:47:44. > :47:51.the single market. -- when the Leave campaign. They did not need to make

:47:52. > :47:55.that choice. The British public would be voting to leave the single

:47:56. > :48:00.market. We would then need to negotiate a trade deal from outside.

:48:01. > :48:07.Canada is in the process of doing that and it has taken seven years.

:48:08. > :48:12.There is a risk of a lost decade for Britain. Leaving the EU you've got

:48:13. > :48:18.to negotiate the accident, it took Greenland three years, you've got to

:48:19. > :48:20.negotiate a trade deal, it has taken Canada seven years and counting.

:48:21. > :48:28.Then you've got to negotiate trade deals with the 50 other countries

:48:29. > :48:34.covered by this deal. It would suck the energy out of our government,

:48:35. > :48:38.whilst we should be taking on the world and winning, we would be stuck

:48:39. > :48:42.renegotiating these things for a very long time. All the while we

:48:43. > :48:48.would have an economy that was less well off. You have said leaving the

:48:49. > :48:55.single market would put a bomb under the British economy and yet you are

:48:56. > :49:01.in the position of seeing, I will detonate the bomb. I must accept the

:49:02. > :49:08.instructions of the British people. But if we leave the EU, and the

:49:09. > :49:13.German finance minister was very clear, you are either in or out,

:49:14. > :49:17.we've then got to negotiate a trade deal. It is worth stopping and

:49:18. > :49:22.thinking, who has got what sort of trade deal? They will never give us

:49:23. > :49:32.a better deal on the outside than on the inside. You could do a deal that

:49:33. > :49:39.gave us access to the market. You could do that. Believe campaign have

:49:40. > :49:47.specifically rejected that option. The reason is, if you go for the

:49:48. > :49:59.Norway solution, you still pay into the EU and access free movement.

:50:00. > :50:06.This is why I think it is so positive on the Remain side. We have

:50:07. > :50:13.a seat at the table to determine the rules. For Britain, the idea that we

:50:14. > :50:20.should aggregate that responsibility and have our year pressed to the

:50:21. > :50:25.glass, trying to find out what 27 countries are doing to affect our

:50:26. > :50:33.future, that would be an abdication of responsibility. Norway are not

:50:34. > :50:39.doing too bad. Yes, but the Norwegians say, if you want to be

:50:40. > :50:45.run by Europe, we take dictation about what the rules are. It is not

:50:46. > :50:50.the ordinary Norwegian people, who are doing pretty well. They have as

:50:51. > :50:57.much oil as Das and only 4 million people. Think of the car industry,

:50:58. > :51:04.they want as negotiating the rules for the electric cars of the future,

:51:05. > :51:11.I want them to be built in Britain. Let us move to the issue your site

:51:12. > :51:15.have most trouble with, immigration. The promise to bring it down to tens

:51:16. > :51:25.of thousands was your biggest single political mistake. It is a challenge

:51:26. > :51:31.to control immigration, when you're economy is growing as well as ours

:51:32. > :51:36.did, we've had a five-year period where we created more jobs than the

:51:37. > :51:45.rest of the EU put together. As recently as 2008, the number of

:51:46. > :51:56.people leaving and coming in was balanced. As the euro zone countries

:51:57. > :52:05.are recovering, the idea that we are shackled to a corpse is nonsense.

:52:06. > :52:10.Being in the EU means we have no control at all over immigration from

:52:11. > :52:14.the rest of the EU, it is untrue that we can control over all

:52:15. > :52:22.immigration if we stay in, that is Paul Johnson of the IFS. That does

:52:23. > :52:32.not take into account what we get if we stay, so that if someone comes to

:52:33. > :52:36.work in Britain. If someone comes to work they get no unemployment

:52:37. > :52:42.benefit. If they don't get a job they will be asked to leave and if

:52:43. > :52:46.they do they need to work, paying into the system before they get

:52:47. > :52:54.access to the welfare system. Some are able to get money in benefits. I

:52:55. > :52:57.think that is a good way of controlling immigration. I think

:52:58. > :53:02.leaving the single market is a massive mistake for our economy and

:53:03. > :53:07.country. I don't think you solve that by seeing unemployment going

:53:08. > :53:13.up, tax revenues coming down, cuts to public services. Those are risks

:53:14. > :53:19.we should not take. If there is a voter watching this thinking, what I

:53:20. > :53:24.care about is controlling immigration, what way should they

:53:25. > :53:34.vote? Fought to stay in the EU because we have complete control. --

:53:35. > :53:40.thought to stay -- vote. If people come here then they need to work or

:53:41. > :53:44.support themselves and they need to pay in before they get out. That was

:53:45. > :53:48.one of the biggest complaints people had, that we had a something for

:53:49. > :53:54.nothing system that we have changed through this negotiation. People can

:53:55. > :54:04.vote to stay in a reformed Europe. How much will that cut? Clearly if

:54:05. > :54:14.you take away ?10,000 of benefits that has an effect. Nigel Farage has

:54:15. > :54:18.raised the issue of Turkey. At the moment it is the British

:54:19. > :54:22.Government's policy for Turkey to join the EU and we are spending

:54:23. > :54:28.money to help that happen. If you change that policy, you could end

:54:29. > :54:37.that part of the argument here and now. This is a red herring, there is

:54:38. > :54:40.no prospect of Turkey joining the EU in decades. You cannot find one

:54:41. > :54:47.expert that thinks it is going to happen because it is not going to

:54:48. > :54:54.happen. They've opened one chapter of 35 they have to open even though

:54:55. > :54:58.this started in 1987. At the current rate of progress they will get there

:54:59. > :55:04.in the year 3000. It is a red herring and they know that. They've

:55:05. > :55:08.admitted to it and they should stop frightening people. A lot of people

:55:09. > :55:13.say they don't believe the establishment. They will find a way

:55:14. > :55:16.of Turkey getting in if it is in their interests. Could you at least

:55:17. > :55:28.say that we will have another referendum if Turkey is getting in?

:55:29. > :55:31.Every country has a veto. Would you use it? Me saying that makes it

:55:32. > :55:36.sound like it is going to happen, it is not going to happen, it is

:55:37. > :55:44.decades away, this is not going to happen. Let me ask you about

:55:45. > :55:47.something else. 20 police forces are investigating Conservatives election

:55:48. > :55:53.expenses. This is a growing story. Did you authorise the paying of a

:55:54. > :56:01.very expensive QC to go to police to stop them making this investigation?

:56:02. > :56:05.This is looking like a cover-up. This is handled by the party

:56:06. > :56:11.chairman and I am confident what we did was right. Did you send a QC to

:56:12. > :56:16.stop the investigation? What happened was we, like many parties,

:56:17. > :56:25.had a national battle bus that went two constituencies, and in our view,

:56:26. > :56:35.it is national expenses. I think that the rate approach. The party

:56:36. > :56:40.chairman is handling it. My final question, are you on the edge of

:56:41. > :56:44.losing? I think, nobody knows what these polls are saying, we are in

:56:45. > :56:48.the middle of an absolutely vital debate for the future of our country

:56:49. > :56:53.and I want us to be stronger, safer, better off, and I don't want us to

:56:54. > :57:02.take the risks with our economy, with futures, with recession. It is

:57:03. > :57:06.agonisingly close. It feels like a very lively debate but I'm confident

:57:07. > :57:16.we have the strongest, most positive case. I think we can be greater if

:57:17. > :57:18.we stay end. There will be sweet music, but first, a flavour of what

:57:19. > :57:20.is coming up after this programme. Join us from Brunel University

:57:21. > :57:22.London at ten, where we'll be asking

:57:23. > :57:24.just one big question. We've gathered environmentalists,

:57:25. > :57:27.escgatologists, economists, writers,

:57:28. > :57:28.people from many faiths, Join me at the same time next Sunday

:57:29. > :57:39.here on BBC One when my guests Andrew Neil will be here

:57:40. > :57:43.with the Sunday Politics in an hour with reaction to what

:57:44. > :57:45.the Prime Minister and But for now, as promised, we leave

:57:46. > :57:51.you with Alison Balsom - and Bach. This is the Badinerie from the

:57:52. > :57:55.Orchestral Suite Number Two.