:00:14. > :00:18.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:19. > :00:21.bringing us tomorrow. With me are Vincent Moss, the Political Editor
:00:22. > :00:29.of the Sunday Mirror, and the author and journalist Shyama Perera. First
:00:30. > :00:33.the front pages. The Sunday Telegraph is looking at calls from
:00:34. > :00:37.95 MPs for powers to veto every aspect of EU law.
:00:38. > :00:39.The Observer reports on Brussels fight against the Government's
:00:40. > :00:42.attempts to change EU immigration rules.
:00:43. > :00:46.The Sunday Times has followed that theme and led on a story about the
:00:47. > :00:48.Government planning to ban EU migrants from claiming welfare
:00:49. > :00:53.payments for up to two years after arriving in the UK.
:00:54. > :00:57.The Independent on Sunday revisits the Iraq war, with a story that the
:00:58. > :01:01.UK is to answer for alleged war crimes.
:01:02. > :01:06.The Mail on Sunday splashes on more claims about the former Co-op bank
:01:07. > :01:15.chairman Paul Flowers. So, let's begin! We are going to
:01:16. > :01:23.talk about Europe, because I don't -- it is in several other papers.
:01:24. > :01:29.Let's look at how the Telegraph is covering it. 95 Conservative MPs
:01:30. > :01:35.call for an EU law veto. They want every aspect of EU law to be open to
:01:36. > :01:38.a veto in Westminster. An extraordinary appeal. It doesn't
:01:39. > :01:46.stand a chance, does it? Not really. The Eurosceptic Sunday
:01:47. > :01:51.Telegraph has a story saying that 95 MPs have written to David Cameron,
:01:52. > :01:54.wanting to block future laws and revise existing laws. They once a
:01:55. > :02:06.white card to cherry pick the bits they like. It will never happen.
:02:07. > :02:09.They just want to get out of Europe. They are starting to put the
:02:10. > :02:19.pressure on as we are coming up to the election. I think that the
:02:20. > :02:26.elections coming up in Europe, I think these MPs are worried about
:02:27. > :02:34.the rise of the European -- the UK Independence party. They are piling
:02:35. > :02:39.pressure on Conservative HQ. The bill that is supposed to give us a
:02:40. > :02:49.referendum in 2017, even that is looking dicey. Now Bill is going to
:02:50. > :02:53.get through. What interests me about this, and you probably have the
:02:54. > :03:00.answer, is how does he and third -- the Prime Minister respond to this?
:03:01. > :03:05.What is the response? You can say yes. Does he just step back and let
:03:06. > :03:12.the UK Independence party swallow up all of these constituencies, or does
:03:13. > :03:17.he do something incredibly stupid? He is ready starting to be
:03:18. > :03:23.incredibly stupid by trying to buck your -- European Union law. He will
:03:24. > :03:26.continue to top tough. You will hear stronger and stronger rhetoric on
:03:27. > :03:34.things like immigration. It probably will change much in reality.
:03:35. > :03:38.European law takes years to change, not months. Iain Duncan Smith is
:03:39. > :03:42.talking about being tough on immigration and whether they can
:03:43. > :03:45.claim benefits. We will hear a lot of this up until the elections in
:03:46. > :03:52.May because it is the issue that concerns voters the months. We are
:03:53. > :03:57.going to have the most interesting alliance after the next election.
:03:58. > :04:07.This will split the vote on over the place. This will not do these MPs
:04:08. > :04:12.any favours at all. What is really interesting, and I think we should
:04:13. > :04:17.be running lots on this, or running a book on it, is what is the mix of
:04:18. > :04:20.the next government going to be? There will not be a majority
:04:21. > :04:25.government. While all of this is happening, I wish there were some of
:04:26. > :04:30.the he could step out of the box and say we will end up with the UK
:04:31. > :04:37.Independence party having 10% and the Conservatives having whatever. I
:04:38. > :04:42.think we have more of a rough ride ahead, and a new way of government
:04:43. > :04:45.for the foreseeable future. Like today in Germany, where they have to
:04:46. > :04:53.form coalitions every time. That would be a real change for us. Is
:04:54. > :04:59.that how you read this? Yes, although Labour are ahead,
:05:00. > :05:04.Conservatives are realising that they cannot win unless they come to
:05:05. > :05:08.some sort of deal with UKIP. That is the thing that obsesses nearly every
:05:09. > :05:14.conservative MP I speak to. Let's have a look at the story and Europe
:05:15. > :05:20.in the Observer. It is an essay, really. Defiant Russell slaps down
:05:21. > :05:25.Britain's threats to rewrite immigration rules. The President of
:05:26. > :05:29.Europe says that the idea of free movement of such a basic tenants of
:05:30. > :05:38.the European Union that there is no way we will let that slide. I think
:05:39. > :05:44.we forget that we are not part of that land mass. On the continental
:05:45. > :05:48.mainland, people are crossing borders everyday without having to
:05:49. > :05:54.think about it. Of course they want to keep that. We have got the island
:05:55. > :06:02.mentality of being scared of people crossing over. He makes the point
:06:03. > :06:09.that I have heard others make before in the European Union, he said I
:06:10. > :06:14.would like to see the UK making its case for reform from within the EU
:06:15. > :06:21.rather than having one hand on the escape hatch. I think George Osborne
:06:22. > :06:25.will make a speech along those lines this week. The reforms are needed,
:06:26. > :06:30.that we will stay within and tried to reform from within. The Observer
:06:31. > :06:35.is very pro-European, saying Brussels. Sign any British FM to
:06:36. > :06:40.rewrite the immigration rules and there is no chance of curbing free
:06:41. > :06:50.movement -- curbing free movement between EU states. I don't think
:06:51. > :06:56.much will change. High in case of the builders with this issue of
:06:57. > :07:00.Europe? It causes lots of problems with the Conservatives, and always
:07:01. > :07:10.has. Is it just the aspect of immigration are particularly
:07:11. > :07:21.concerned people is to mark -- particularly concerns people? I
:07:22. > :07:26.think voters think it is bonkers that their MPs are concerned about
:07:27. > :07:33.this boat when they are struggling to pay the bills. In the Observer,
:07:34. > :07:37.police were aware of Mark Duggan flash points. We saw people
:07:38. > :07:43.gathering today in Tottenham for a vigil over the death of Mark Duggan,
:07:44. > :07:51.who was shot lawfully in August 2011. We saw riots spread out across
:07:52. > :07:54.the country after that shooting. The suggestion here is that the lease
:07:55. > :08:00.new that the shooting of Mark Duggan would trigger wider disorder and
:08:01. > :08:08.despite the later came from Scotland Yard that the riot is in Tottenham
:08:09. > :08:14.could not have been predict did. This is a total nonstory. People
:08:15. > :08:20.knew that the shooting of Mark Duggan cooed cause widespread
:08:21. > :08:27.disorder, despite the fact that they claim those riots after Mark Duggan
:08:28. > :08:30.could have been predicted. They could not predict it was going to
:08:31. > :08:36.spread across England. What you see when you read on is that they put
:08:37. > :08:40.into play all sorts of mechanisms to ensure that if there was some I wake
:08:41. > :08:44.of this order in Tottenham they could deal with it. What they did
:08:45. > :08:51.not do was think ahead to other places. They plan for what they knew
:08:52. > :09:00.would happen. What they didn't do is guess what might happen. So, it
:09:01. > :09:07.confirms that, to me. They were aware that things might happen like
:09:08. > :09:13.the police station in Tottenham might need a bit more protection,
:09:14. > :09:19.they were not aware of how big the riots would become. The judges who
:09:20. > :09:24.sat on all those cases on people who were caught up in the riot said it
:09:25. > :09:28.was absolutely opportunistic and they couldn't say that it was
:09:29. > :09:35.connect with some sort of civil protest that happened in London. I
:09:36. > :09:41.think it was a time when people work climbing the Cenotaph and shops were
:09:42. > :09:52.having their windows smashed by young protesters. There was a wee of
:09:53. > :09:59.at rest in the country anyway and this provided an opportunity for
:10:00. > :10:05.people to vent, but not necessarily about what was happening in
:10:06. > :10:11.Tottenham. The family of Mark Duggan do not feel they have seen justice
:10:12. > :10:15.done. We have to trust the jury system. We have to trust that they
:10:16. > :10:36.did come to the correct verdict. There is a call for a tax on fruit
:10:37. > :10:43.juice. People should think seriously about it. If you want those
:10:44. > :10:54.vitamins, have some fruit. With everyone thinking about diets, that
:10:55. > :10:58.theme is hitting home. I find this story interesting for a different
:10:59. > :11:06.reason. I think drinks are behind the obesity epidemic. 20, 25 years
:11:07. > :11:10.ago, when Starbucks and all the big coffee companies started. I would go
:11:11. > :11:16.in and have four cappuccinos across the day. What I did not think about
:11:17. > :11:20.was that was probably two pints of milk a day I had not been having
:11:21. > :11:31.before across five working days. I was having an extra day off Kallis
:11:32. > :11:37.to ease -- calories every week. When people drink, they do not think in
:11:38. > :11:46.terms of calories. A lot about sugar at the moment. The Bay City 's art
:11:47. > :12:00.is suggesting there should be a tax on some of the fizzy drinks. --
:12:01. > :12:11.obesity tsar. Emma Thompson and Sandra Bullock are up for Golden
:12:12. > :12:16.globes tomorrow night. Apart from Jennifer Lawrence, the average age
:12:17. > :12:32.of the 39 women who are nominated for awards, the average age is 45.
:12:33. > :12:43.In their prime! We disagree about Gravity. That is it for The Papers
:12:44. > :12:53.this hour. We will be back at 11:30pm. Stay with us here on BBC
:12:54. > :12:56.News. At 11pm, we'll have more on the legacy of one of the most
:12:57. > :13:00.influential and divisive figures in Israeli history - Ariel Sharon, who
:13:01. > :13:24.has died at the age of 85. Coming up next, it's Reporters.
:13:25. > :13:30.Welcome to this special on the future of fuel. I am David Shukman
:13:31. > :13:31.and I am in