:00:15. > :00:21.Hello and welcome to our look at the morning papers.
:00:22. > :00:28.With me are Tom Bergin, a correspondent for Reuters, and the
:00:29. > :00:30.freelance journalist Lucy Cavendish. First, let's have a look at
:00:31. > :00:40.tomorrow's front pages. The Independent's lead story focuses
:00:41. > :00:42.on new figures that suggest thousands of race hate crimes are
:00:43. > :00:44.going unreported. The Daily Telegraph reports on
:00:45. > :00:47.comments by the Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, who says that NHS
:00:48. > :00:49.doctors and nurses should be more open with patients and apologise
:00:50. > :00:52.when they make mistakes. The Guardian leads on claims that
:00:53. > :00:55.taxpayer-funded school academy chains have paid millions of pounds
:00:56. > :00:58.into the private businesses of directors, trustees and their
:00:59. > :01:01.relatives. The Daily Mirror's top story says
:01:02. > :01:06.British police are set to make their first arrests in the case of missing
:01:07. > :01:10.Maddie McGann. The Daily Mail splashes on a report
:01:11. > :01:19.that warns that half of all Brits will be obese by 2050.
:01:20. > :01:24.The time continues on the same team, saying that doctors should
:01:25. > :01:36.treat obesity like they do smoking. So, let's begin! Doctors and nurses
:01:37. > :01:41.must say sorry for their mistakes. It is not an admission of legal
:01:42. > :01:48.liability, it is the right into do, says Jeremy Hunt stop we know that
:01:49. > :01:52.the boss is a big businesses, they might say something is regrettable,
:01:53. > :01:57.but often they refused to say they are sorry because that implies
:01:58. > :02:08.culpability. Yes, it does. We had to the point where -- we are at the
:02:09. > :02:14.point where if someone says sorry, if deal silicon admission of guilt.
:02:15. > :02:18.That is why doctors and nurses don't want to do that. It is a culture of
:02:19. > :02:26.secrecy and not wishing to take Liam. They produced a leaflet, this
:02:27. > :02:40.makes me feel really nervous, it is for pages and is the -- it is
:02:41. > :02:44.entitled, saying sorry. The idea that if you go to the doctor they
:02:45. > :02:52.will diagnose you correct the commerce and nobody needed to say
:02:53. > :02:56.sorry, but what has been exposed is that is not actually the case and
:02:57. > :03:02.people have died in mid Staffordshire and no one had debts
:03:03. > :03:07.-- no one has said sorry. Sorry is the hardest word for. It's to say
:03:08. > :03:13.because that regard legal indications. In America they are
:03:14. > :03:17.changing the legal year, so doctors can say sorry and not open
:03:18. > :03:22.themselves up to liability. Here they are saying that it is not an
:03:23. > :03:28.admission of legal liability. Another interesting then I was
:03:29. > :03:32.reading a book this week about cases in the United States of
:03:33. > :03:36.malpractice. It Tyneside people don't necessarily sue negligent
:03:37. > :03:43.doctors, but these two doctors who have annoyed them. Is that a
:03:44. > :03:56.legitimate case, I don't like you so I will see you? While on the one
:03:57. > :04:02.level you make open up the legal liability, you might also shut down
:04:03. > :04:23.the possibility of a case against you. Empathy is very important.
:04:24. > :04:29.Isn't it possible to say we are sorry that this has happened,
:04:30. > :04:35.without saying I am sorry, I caused this. Yes, I suppose you could word
:04:36. > :04:41.in that way and my -- that might be what they have to-do. You could see
:04:42. > :04:47.through that. To me, that would make it worse. It wouldn't be heartfelt,
:04:48. > :04:53.would it? How many times have we heard politicians say, we regret
:04:54. > :04:59.this. It is not really saying sorry, is it? Let's move on to the Daily
:05:00. > :05:10.Mail. Bombshell report reveals true scale of obesity crisis. It looked
:05:11. > :05:24.like we were heading over a cliff on this. It really does, coming this
:05:25. > :05:28.week after the stories of sugar, this is the next battle ground on
:05:29. > :05:33.regulation. There is talk about that people should improve their own
:05:34. > :05:36.behaviour. Also there is the question about the behaviour of
:05:37. > :05:41.companies. The doors that lead the government is going to come under
:05:42. > :05:47.more pressure to stop so much sugar in foods, and so on. With the
:05:48. > :05:52.industry says that people should be able to make their own decisions.
:05:53. > :06:02.That is right. The whole report on sugar last week, I believe that is
:06:03. > :06:07.true. I edited the Observer food monthly and we did a lot of research
:06:08. > :06:12.into this, especially the attack if case of sugar. There has been a
:06:13. > :06:18.massive change in what people eat from when we were kids. It is an
:06:19. > :06:22.addictive substance, sugar. If the government can persuade the
:06:23. > :06:26.companies to change what is in their food, which is going to be hard
:06:27. > :06:38.anyway, people do get a craving for it. People don't check the amount of
:06:39. > :06:44.sugar that is in something. One of the articles last night was saying
:06:45. > :06:56.that the obesity is our was saying -- the foetus -- obesity is our.
:06:57. > :07:03.Clearly people should take care of themselves and exercise some
:07:04. > :07:10.restraint. If they don't. But it is so yummy! It is dealing with
:07:11. > :07:16.children, that is when they are hooking them in. We will have
:07:17. > :07:21.hospitals full of people with obesity related disease. It could be
:07:22. > :07:24.as bad as smoking. And now the government have put all sorts of
:07:25. > :07:32.warning signs and ad campaigns and the information inside there. It is
:07:33. > :07:36.not difficult to access. The numbers affected will be so much higher than
:07:37. > :07:43.those who smoke. It is heading in so many different things. It is a
:07:44. > :07:47.problem with the food industry. Remember when they tried to bring in
:07:48. > :07:57.the traffic light system and back caused an outcry. -- that caused an
:07:58. > :08:00.outcry. Tax is a much more meaningful thing. If these things
:08:01. > :08:08.become more expensive, people will consume less of them. It seems that
:08:09. > :08:15.the time of putting this off might not be for much longer. Let's move
:08:16. > :08:19.on to the independent stop race hate, a crime the police cannot
:08:20. > :08:23.solve. An exclusive from the Whitehall editor saying that tens of
:08:24. > :08:28.thousands of race hate crimes are going unreported. Two military
:08:29. > :08:39.leaders are warning that they don't have the fear in the police to
:08:40. > :08:44.investigate these offences. This is exactly the same thing that was
:08:45. > :08:49.shown last year, when the crime survey was compared to the police
:08:50. > :08:56.figures. It is a difficult crimes sometimes to prove, race hate, or
:08:57. > :09:00.any sort of hate crime. The police might see someone coming maybe with
:09:01. > :09:06.a violent assault, they say it will be hard to stick it on the racially
:09:07. > :09:17.motivated, so let's just go with plain assault. Maybe they are not
:09:18. > :09:23.being pursued as he graces -- hate cases. It is important for people to
:09:24. > :09:28.have the right crime investigated, isn't it? Yes, this reminds me of
:09:29. > :09:36.what was going on that rape cases will be. Reporting them because the
:09:37. > :09:42.rates of conviction were so low. But they had to go through in terms of
:09:43. > :09:51.getting it to court. It was such a trauma. Sobbing. Reporting it. I'm
:09:52. > :09:56.sure there is part of that in here. I can prove it, it will cause a
:09:57. > :09:59.tremendous amount of problems, maybe there will be a lot of comeback in
:10:00. > :10:07.the community were a live, so didn't get reported. But how do you know,
:10:08. > :10:16.when they don't get reported? The crime survey is a sample of about
:10:17. > :10:21.50,000 people. The police could surely argued that if you don't come
:10:22. > :10:25.in reported, we cant investigated. I have been to the police station 12
:10:26. > :10:45.times two reports a few small crimes. Sometimes it can seem very
:10:46. > :10:56.bureaucratic. Maybe people don't bother. That is the message that I
:10:57. > :11:02.got, on two occasions. Cash bonanza for Academy firms. These other firms
:11:03. > :11:06.that run academy schools. They are given a lot of lassitude. The
:11:07. > :11:10.suggestion is that there needs to be greater scrutiny on how they are
:11:11. > :11:15.using this money. Wasn't this the point, that they were supposed to
:11:16. > :11:23.have freedom? It is a very difficult story to explain in a nugget.
:11:24. > :11:32.Essentially, a person with lots of money set and Academy, then somehow
:11:33. > :11:38.manages to employ them rather as someone else, then that Academy
:11:39. > :11:47.reinvest in all the company that this person owns in the first
:11:48. > :11:54.place. Ie it is not a good ring. That is all completely wrong. It is
:11:55. > :11:57.a good story to expose. What the Guardian is saying, quite rightly,
:11:58. > :12:09.is that there needs to be far more transparency over what is happening.
:12:10. > :12:13.It will be supplied into people that there is a more scrutiny. If you
:12:14. > :12:17.read through the story, they defend these payments and say there are
:12:18. > :12:25.different reasons why these are appropriate. Well, they are going to
:12:26. > :12:31.defend them, hands up! There will say that the school spends a lot of
:12:32. > :12:38.money, so the local community has the chance to get some of that. It
:12:39. > :12:42.appears that the oversight of the schools was not as close as people
:12:43. > :12:45.would have liked. In the daily Telegraph, happier marriages with
:12:46. > :12:51.the couples without children. This is a huge study conducted into
:12:52. > :12:57.Britain's relationships and apparently childless couples have
:12:58. > :13:07.happier marriages! Of course they do! Number one, they are better
:13:08. > :13:13.off. Number two, they have time for each other all stop number three,
:13:14. > :13:33.they can go on holidays, did crosswords together. We disagreed on
:13:34. > :13:38.this. I could look that and before I had children, externally it looks
:13:39. > :13:48.like a more idyllic kind of relationship. Because it is! I
:13:49. > :13:52.wonder would I have gotten bored of that that they didn't have children.
:13:53. > :13:59.The thing is, you do have to make time. I say without -- people
:14:00. > :14:15.without children and they envy them! It is a different type of
:14:16. > :14:24.relationship. I find it more fun. Who wants to play Scrabble in the
:14:25. > :14:28.evening? I'm sure that I would have been happy without them. If you're
:14:29. > :14:34.trying to play Scrabble, they come in and say that that is not the
:14:35. > :14:37.right word. People probably do have happier marriages without the
:14:38. > :14:43.stresses and strains of children on an emotional and financial level.
:14:44. > :14:50.When the kitchen never closes. That was very animated, that last story.
:14:51. > :14:53.That's it for The Paper this hour. We'll be back at half-eleven for
:14:54. > :14:58.another look at the stories making the morning's papers. Stay with us
:14:59. > :15:02.here on BBC News. Coming up next, it's time for Click.