:00:00. > :00:00.in 25 matches. Andy Murray takes on Roger Federer tomorrow morning. And
:00:00. > :00:00.news of Manchester City cruising into the League Cup final, all in
:00:07. > :00:18.Sportsday after the Papers in about 15 minutes' time.
:00:19. > :00:25.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing
:00:26. > :00:28.us tomorrow, with me Martin Bentham of the Evening Standard and
:00:29. > :00:33.broadcaster Daisy McAndrew, welcome to both of you. Tomorrow's front
:00:34. > :00:37.pages, then, starting with the Telegraph, saying that thousands of
:00:38. > :00:42.patients suffering from cancer are being denied the drugs they need
:00:43. > :00:46.from the NHS. The metro lead story, three Tottenham Hotspur fans being
:00:47. > :00:50.charged for using racially abusive language. The express says a new
:00:51. > :00:54.treatment soon to be available on the NHS could help Britain's 10
:00:55. > :00:59.million migraine sufferers. China's offshore secrets revealed,
:01:00. > :01:02.that the headline on the front of the Guardian. The Daily Mail is
:01:03. > :01:08.reporting on a 16-year-old student who died after taking ecstasy at a
:01:09. > :01:11.party in London. And the Times are saying Theresa May is in a stand-off
:01:12. > :01:17.with Downing Street over stop and search powers used by police. It
:01:18. > :01:20.also pictures the fold of champion racehorse wrangle under the caption,
:01:21. > :01:25.million dollar baby. -- Frankel. We will begin with the Daily
:01:26. > :01:30.Telegraph, the story about the NHS and the lottery of NHS drugs is the
:01:31. > :01:35.headline, punishing the dying. Martin, this is the idea that not
:01:36. > :01:40.everybody who needs the drugs is getting them. Yes, and the story
:01:41. > :01:45.here is about the body NICE which regulates drugs and decides whether
:01:46. > :01:47.they are cost effective or not. Sometimes there are controversies
:01:48. > :01:52.because they do not license things because they are too expensive, but
:01:53. > :01:57.on this occasion all of these drugs have been approved by them, and yet
:01:58. > :02:04.the report suggests that 14,000 patients per year are not receiving
:02:05. > :02:09.them. Various other drugs are involved. It is suggesting it is a
:02:10. > :02:14.postcode lottery that different trusts, health trusts, are allowing
:02:15. > :02:19.people to have these drugs, others aren't, and again it raises this
:02:20. > :02:21.debate about resources in the NHS. What we don't we have in this
:02:22. > :02:27.story, I think, is an explanation from the trusts that are not giving
:02:28. > :02:30.it to people, why that is. I think they are reading between the lines,
:02:31. > :02:36.these as patient will be that these are very, very expensive drugs, and
:02:37. > :02:38.most of the patients who are not receiving these drugs are terminally
:02:39. > :02:42.ill. Therefore, of course, the suspicion is that in some way these
:02:43. > :02:45.trusts don't see these patients was worth the money and worth the
:02:46. > :02:50.investment, because brutally they are going to die anyway. We have had
:02:51. > :02:54.this many times, this accusation that terminally ill patients, the
:02:55. > :02:58.matter what they are suffering with, don't get the treatment that, as
:02:59. > :03:01.Martin said, organisations like NICE have stipulated that they should be
:03:02. > :03:05.getting. In some of these cases, with these very serious cancers,
:03:06. > :03:09.yes, it is not going to save their life, but they could double their
:03:10. > :03:13.life span from it, and they are not getting the treatment. NICE was set
:03:14. > :03:16.up with the intention of getting away from the postcode lottery,
:03:17. > :03:19.something should be available across the board. I suppose the trouble is
:03:20. > :03:25.you still get to that basic debate, don't you, about the use of
:03:26. > :03:28.resources? Each health trust will have the man is on its resources,
:03:29. > :03:34.different numbers of people being treated in A and so on, so each
:03:35. > :03:41.one has its and -- as its own dilemmas. Nobody wants to see... How
:03:42. > :03:44.much is one drug were compared to smaller treatments to me I suppose
:03:45. > :03:49.people want to see transparency, and they want to understand the wise and
:03:50. > :03:55.wherefores. A lot of charities are saying that the problem is that even
:03:56. > :03:58.when patients do know that these drugs exist, and many times they
:03:59. > :04:02.have never heard of them, these patients are in the most traumatic
:04:03. > :04:04.period of their life, and the last thing they feel like doing is
:04:05. > :04:09.fighting a bureaucracy when they want to be positive and looking
:04:10. > :04:11.after family members. It is a terrible story. Also on the front of
:04:12. > :04:16.the Allograft, an interesting question posed in the headline, is
:04:17. > :04:23.collect's angry wife behind his battle with Rennard? -- the
:04:24. > :04:30.Telegraph. There are plenty of angry women who are angry with Nick Clegg
:04:31. > :04:33.for the way he has handled the Lord Rennard story. I worked with Chris
:04:34. > :04:38.Rennard in a very small team for two years. I am rather long in the
:04:39. > :04:47.truth, we are going back many years, this was up to the 1991 election,
:04:48. > :04:51.1999-2001 election, and my experience of him was as an
:04:52. > :04:57.extremely nice, caring, important and well respected man. He was very
:04:58. > :05:02.powerful, and everybody looked up to him, and everybody knew that, you
:05:03. > :05:06.know, this was a man who could make a big difference. I never, either
:05:07. > :05:11.personally or heard rumours about any of his alleged bad behaviour.
:05:12. > :05:16.Now, I'm not saying that the allegations are not true, I simply
:05:17. > :05:20.have no idea, but the way that the party has handled it has been an
:05:21. > :05:25.absolute dogs dinner. -- dog's dinner. What about this question, is
:05:26. > :05:30.it just allowing the question to sit there? It does rather do that,
:05:31. > :05:35.suggesting that she has been left furious, but not actually explaining
:05:36. > :05:40.how they know this. Obviously, these ideas go around, people here
:05:41. > :05:43.things, and that may well be the case, she is very much standing up
:05:44. > :05:48.for woman in all the things she does, Miriam Clegg, so it would not
:05:49. > :05:55.be surprising that you took that view, but we haven't actually heard
:05:56. > :05:58.it direct from the horse's mouth. Going back to your dog's dinner, how
:05:59. > :06:02.do they get out of it? Leadership is a very difficult business,
:06:03. > :06:07.especially when you are faced with something like this, and I do think
:06:08. > :06:10.that Nick Clegg was dammed if he did and dammed if he didn't. These were
:06:11. > :06:13.serious allegations from women who were themselves respected within the
:06:14. > :06:17.party, certainly they have to be listened to, and the internal
:06:18. > :06:20.workings of the Lib Dems are so ridiculously convoluted and
:06:21. > :06:26.complicated that they have really tied Nick Clegg's hands behind his
:06:27. > :06:30.back, and he has not been able to do what most leaders in a modern
:06:31. > :06:34.democracy should be able to do, which is kind of, in some ways, what
:06:35. > :06:37.he wants in order to create stability in order to send that
:06:38. > :06:41.message down. So there was a problem there, and funnily enough, Chris
:06:42. > :06:44.Rennard was one of the people that I often heard the moaning the
:06:45. > :06:49.ridiculous constitution that the Lib Dems add, whereby they had all these
:06:50. > :06:53.reports and so many chiefs, so many chiefs rather than just one cheap.
:06:54. > :06:59.Where he goes from here... Watch the next few days! The High Court, by
:07:00. > :07:04.the sound of its! Very expensive lawyers and very high profile
:07:05. > :07:09.coverage. The Metro has a story which does appear any De Graaf as
:07:10. > :07:16.well, the Y word. -- in the Telegraph. This is three Tottenham
:07:17. > :07:20.fans being charged for using the word Yid, it is a subject of
:07:21. > :07:23.controversy, because Tottenham fans have this chance because of their
:07:24. > :07:28.association with Jewish supporters of the club. They see it,
:07:29. > :07:34.apparently, as something that is self mocking. They say it is a word
:07:35. > :07:38.they have taken ownership of. Exactly, it was chatter that there,
:07:39. > :07:44.with some hatred, and they have turned it around. -- chanted at
:07:45. > :07:47.them. The FA have said it is inappropriate and might be offensive
:07:48. > :07:51.to some people. David Cameron got involved and said he thought, in
:07:52. > :07:55.essence, that it was acceptable if it was used in a self mocking way
:07:56. > :08:00.and should only be prosecuted as an offence if it was inciting hatred.
:08:01. > :08:05.Obviously, we don't know the context of this, it will be thrashed out in
:08:06. > :08:11.court. I have sympathy with David Cameron's point of view, because I
:08:12. > :08:15.think a word like that surely has to be either given with hate or
:08:16. > :08:20.received with beer, but if it is neither received with beer, as in
:08:21. > :08:24.Glenn Hoddle and Les Ferdinand, the two most celebrated as both players
:08:25. > :08:28.ever, they are bombarded with the word when they come on as a form of
:08:29. > :08:34.adulation. It is very, very difficult, and as you said, it is
:08:35. > :08:42.their word, they should do what they want with it. On the other and, it
:08:43. > :08:47.is not nice in many other contexts. Troenks events in Syria in the
:08:48. > :08:54.Guardian. Killings in Syria could be the tip of the iceberg. That's when
:08:55. > :08:59.of the fears we have heard today. This may not be the whole story?
:09:00. > :09:03.Exactly. The story here points out that Syrian activists say an
:09:04. > :09:06.estimated 50,000 detainees are unaccounted for, so that obviously
:09:07. > :09:12.adds another 40,000 even if 11,000 were among those 50,000 and yet the
:09:13. > :09:16.numbers could be almost incalculable. It's an absolutely
:09:17. > :09:21.grim and gruesome story. The story unfortunately is that it makes the
:09:22. > :09:24.prospects of any settlement, any agreement, from the start of the
:09:25. > :09:29.Geneva talks tomorrow, even more remote. It didn't look very
:09:30. > :09:34.promising even before this came out with the talks starting with many of
:09:35. > :09:39.the combatants not participating and it makes it all the more difficult
:09:40. > :09:42.and the killings may go on unfortunately. Killing does happen
:09:43. > :09:47.in wars but this is something quite different. They refer to these as
:09:48. > :09:51.torture centres. Most would think of them as concentration camps. Many
:09:52. > :09:57.people are drawing comparisons with Belsen and Auschwitz which will send
:09:58. > :10:02.a shiver down the spine of any politician thinking, how on earth do
:10:03. > :10:05.we deal with this if it's on that scale of atrocity and also, how can
:10:06. > :10:08.we not do something if it's on that scale?
:10:09. > :10:12.Let's move to the front of the Daily Mail. This story has provoked an
:10:13. > :10:18.interesting series of talking boys on BBC News today. A generation of
:10:19. > :10:23.men still living with their parents. Daisy, we are told this is to do
:10:24. > :10:27.with economics and a whole array of other factors as well? It's to do
:10:28. > :10:31.with tuition fees, the cost of your first home. I was reading average
:10:32. > :10:37.costs of a first home has jumped from ?50,000 in 1996 perhaps when we
:10:38. > :10:42.were looking to buy our first home, not saying we are all that old, it's
:10:43. > :10:46.nearly ?200,000 now. You know, I've often reported that a first time
:10:47. > :10:50.buyer can't get their deposit together until an average age of 36.
:10:51. > :10:56.I worry. I was in a fortunate position when in my first job that I
:10:57. > :11:01.could live with my parents because my parents lived in London that.
:11:02. > :11:04.Gave me an immediate advantage over all the other young people of my age
:11:05. > :11:10.whose parents didn't live in London. You have to have a north -- you have
:11:11. > :11:16.a north south divide and an urban rural divide. That schism is going
:11:17. > :11:20.to get bigger and bigger. The old idea of people getting on their bike
:11:21. > :11:26.to move jobs is already completely flawed for the same reason. It's
:11:27. > :11:32.difficult. We have this problem with internships that people have to work
:11:33. > :11:37.for nothing to get their foot in the door. Bank of Mum and dad. Yes, the
:11:38. > :11:43.figures hardly reflect the impacts of those things. That's just at the
:11:44. > :11:45.very start of it. If anything, the situation's going to get worse
:11:46. > :11:51.because prices are going up of housing, debts are increasing for
:11:52. > :11:54.young people and it's grave concern to all parents actually, never mind
:11:55. > :12:01.the children. Quite! It's a big issue that people don't want to see.
:12:02. > :12:05.They generally hope their children have a better future than they do,
:12:06. > :12:09.not a worse one that. 's a big issue of concern for a lot of people. It's
:12:10. > :12:15.interesting that it's significantly statistically more men than women
:12:16. > :12:19.and in the old days we might say that's because women are moving in
:12:20. > :12:23.with their house houses -- hiss and getting married. -- Husbands and
:12:24. > :12:25.getting married. It makes me wonder whether they just want their laundry
:12:26. > :12:30.done! Worried about the Lang Juan of --
:12:31. > :12:37.language of politics. Stop the hate, your thoughts on this? She's a young
:12:38. > :12:43.MP, exactly my age. I don't want to bang on about age but we are coming
:12:44. > :12:50.back to Tory party, the party of hate and she's called Nicky Morgan,
:12:51. > :12:55.a Treasury Minister electd two years ago at the last election, and this
:12:56. > :12:59.is still the issue that I think the Tory party hasn't dealt with
:13:00. > :13:05.properly. A positive message she's saying? Yes, she's talking about
:13:06. > :13:13.might raying, welfare and the European Union and so on, although
:13:14. > :13:14.in most of those areas, they are in tune with the public, so I wonder
:13:15. > :13:23.about that. She said we need to be more positive, although I also
:13:24. > :13:24.think, talking about the things we are doing positively, which is an
:13:25. > :13:36.echo about the Theresa May argument about the nasty party. But the
:13:37. > :13:37.economic message is that the country is doing well and Labour has this
:13:38. > :13:45.issue as well that they are trying to say what people aren't doing so
:13:46. > :13:46.well. People don't like to hear negative messages necessarily. Apart
:13:47. > :13:47.from in elections. Yes. We'll return to that no doubt in an hour's time.
:13:48. > :13:53.That's it for this hour. Thank you both very much.
:13:54. > :13:53.Back at 11. 30 for another look at the stories making the news
:13:54. > :13:56.tomorrow. We'll have the latest on the shocking images smuggled out of
:13:57. > :13:59.Syria which war crimes expert says is evidence of systematic killing, a
:14:00. > :14:12.day ahead of the critical talks. Coming up next, Sportsday.
:14:13. > :14:23.Welcome to Sportsday with me Will Perry. The headlines:
:14:24. > :14:24.9-0 on aggregate. Manchester City despatch