:00:00. > :00:00.of Fulham after less than three months in charge. Felix Magath
:00:00. > :00:14.replaces him. All that in 15 minutes after The Papers.
:00:15. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:20. > :00:26.bringing us tomorrow. With me are journalist Eva Simpson and
:00:27. > :00:34.broadcaster Alice Arnold. Tomorrow's front pages. A lot of the
:00:35. > :00:36.papers are showing a picture of Lizzy Yarnold.
:00:37. > :00:39.Lizzy Yarnold features on the front of the Express, which also has some
:00:40. > :00:42.good news, finally, about the weather, saying "storm misery to end
:00:43. > :00:45.at last". The i also goes with the weather,
:00:46. > :00:50.saying the storms are "wreaking destruction" across the UK.
:00:51. > :00:52.The Telegraph has an interview with the Archbishop of Westminster who
:00:53. > :00:57.has been criticising the government's welfare reforms,
:00:58. > :01:00.claiming they "punish the poor." The Mail claims the NHS is losing
:01:01. > :01:04.the files of almost 2,000 patients every day.
:01:05. > :01:13.And the Independent says there is "an immigration crisis on Britain's
:01:14. > :01:19.doorstep". It says hundreds of refugees from war-torn countries are
:01:20. > :01:24.being left to rot in a camp. I want to come back to the Winter
:01:25. > :01:27.Olympics and Team GB's success later, but the story that is
:01:28. > :01:34.dominating so many of the papers is the ongoing storms, and the headline
:01:35. > :01:41.in the Express, storm misery to end at last. An optimistic note. Very
:01:42. > :01:45.optimistic. Given the weather in the past few weeks and months, it is
:01:46. > :01:49.great news, but if you scroll down to the sub headline it says only
:01:50. > :01:56.after violent 80 mph wind, snow and rain. So... Yes, I think the
:01:57. > :02:01.forecast is a little better but the storms are obviously not at their
:02:02. > :02:05.peak for some of the country. We are expecting high wind tomorrow, even
:02:06. > :02:10.in London, up to 60 mph and higher across the rest of the country. At
:02:11. > :02:14.first glance, this is quite a pleasing headline but when you read
:02:15. > :02:22.further into the story, it is not all that it seems. And there is more
:02:23. > :02:29.rain. Yes, but all the BBC whether staff know their stuff. And they are
:02:30. > :02:34.all generally saying the extremes of the low pressures, which is what is
:02:35. > :02:38.causing the wind and storms, they will not be as extreme. That is what
:02:39. > :02:41.they see in the long-term forecast. Any forecaster will tell you they
:02:42. > :02:47.cannot forecast more than three or four days in advance, but the
:02:48. > :02:51.Express, for once, might be sort of right, that the absolute worst of it
:02:52. > :02:58.is over. However, the Telegraph contradict that, and they say we
:02:59. > :03:01.have warnings of flooding until spring. Flooding can go on longer
:03:02. > :03:06.than the bad weather, because the weather -- the water seeps through
:03:07. > :03:10.and it takes quite a long time to make floods, so the rain happening
:03:11. > :03:15.now might not affect flooding for a week or so. So the flooding could go
:03:16. > :03:18.on much longer than the storms. The Telegraph suggest it will go on for
:03:19. > :03:25.a considerable time and that should not surprise anyone, sadly. I like
:03:26. > :03:29.the very small cartoon, with a couple, and the man is holding up a
:03:30. > :03:37.speeding fine notice which says, our roof was photographed on the road
:03:38. > :03:40.doing 85 mph. Humour in despair. I think it will take many people along
:03:41. > :03:43.time to see any humour in this situation, given the appalling
:03:44. > :03:50.circumstances they find themselves in. Many of the newspapers are going
:03:51. > :03:54.to this. But there is no doubt that the amount of homes still without
:03:55. > :04:00.power, we have the updated figure earlier, as was an considerably from
:04:01. > :04:05.24-hour 's ago. Seeing the Somerset Levels, it is no surprise, even with
:04:06. > :04:09.no more rain, that the headline will be correct. It is long-term for
:04:10. > :04:12.these people. Long after those who have not been flooded have forgotten
:04:13. > :04:15.about the floods, those people will still be dealing with not being able
:04:16. > :04:23.to get back into their homes. It takes months. And insurance. And
:04:24. > :04:26.insurance, which will be a problem, or getting insurance next time,
:04:27. > :04:29.which they may not be able to do. But just the upheaval of having your
:04:30. > :04:34.home ruined, for thousands, is dreadful. And it won't be in the
:04:35. > :04:38.headlines for that much longer but they will still be dealing with it.
:04:39. > :04:42.And if you do sort it out, you will be wondering what the happening 12
:04:43. > :04:47.months. Will the floods return? Some people have only just finished their
:04:48. > :04:50.house from the previous occasion. On to the Daily Mail and a different
:04:51. > :04:58.story. The only paper that has this story, the headline, 2000 NHS
:04:59. > :05:03.patients' records are lost every day. It is slightly compensated
:05:04. > :05:06.because they are lost in lots of different ways. We were reading this
:05:07. > :05:11.earlier, and we were struck because it said many of the records had been
:05:12. > :05:20.sold on eBay. I know you can get many things on eBay, what patient
:05:21. > :05:25.records! -- but patient records! But it is not quite that. It turns out
:05:26. > :05:29.that among other things, three former NHS computers were sold on
:05:30. > :05:37.eBay. It strikes me as a bizarre way to... And the hard drives allegedly
:05:38. > :05:43.had not been wiped. Again, it would cause concern. We constantly hear
:05:44. > :05:48.stories about data going missing and things ending up in skips, in dumps
:05:49. > :05:52.in the back of cars. As a patient, you expect your records to be
:05:53. > :05:56.treated with the utmost care, so the fact that they are being discarded
:05:57. > :06:02.all over the place is worrying. Even left in a grocery store, apparently.
:06:03. > :06:05.They are talking about the records of GPs being left lying around,
:06:06. > :06:07.which I would have thought they would not be taking out with them
:06:08. > :06:14.anyway, but maybe it is on tablets or something. It strikes me as
:06:15. > :06:22.incredibly odd that the NHS would be selling their second-hand computers
:06:23. > :06:25.on eBay. 2000 records every day. That is extraordinary. It is an
:06:26. > :06:30.incredible lack of security and it has to be tightened up. They are
:06:31. > :06:34.asking us if we will let records be kept on databases. No wonder people
:06:35. > :06:42.are mistrusting of that. Doing the maths, 600,000 odd a year are going
:06:43. > :06:46.missing. I have not seen that story anywhere else apart from the Daily
:06:47. > :06:53.Mail. Onto the financial Times. I think this is an interesting
:06:54. > :06:59.headline. This is all, is it not, Alice, all about what it is calling
:07:00. > :07:03.the middle-class, but how the middle-class is diverging. Yes, it
:07:04. > :07:08.is a history of the middle-class, and they are talking about from
:07:09. > :07:12.1975, 40 years ago, the difference of what we called a middle-class
:07:13. > :07:16.person then and what we call a middle-class person now, in terms of
:07:17. > :07:19.income. And the group, of course, that have stretched away and are
:07:20. > :07:24.becoming completely separate from the rest of what we all consider
:07:25. > :07:30.middle-class, are the bankers. So it says the average earning for a
:07:31. > :07:34.banker is ?102,000. That is what we are talking about as an average, so
:07:35. > :07:38.obviously many bankers get paid an awful lot more than that. Whereas
:07:39. > :07:43.academics, who we would have considered very middle-class and
:07:44. > :07:47.high earners 40 years ago, they are now not considered high earners and
:07:48. > :07:55.they are run under 50,000, just about getting into the 40% tax rate.
:07:56. > :07:59.-- they are on under 50,000. So this is a new phenomenon. There is a new
:08:00. > :08:04.layer of middle-class, led by the financial services, who are paid
:08:05. > :08:08.extraordinary sums of money. Professions which were once
:08:09. > :08:11.considered middle-class and high earning, academics, mechanical
:08:12. > :08:16.engineers and so on, wages have not kept up. I think this is something
:08:17. > :08:20.that has been talked about over the past few months, the idea of the
:08:21. > :08:39.squeezed middle, the middle classes. . #baffled somebody earning
:08:40. > :08:49.?40,000 a year is going to look at the banker bonuses and think, they
:08:50. > :08:53.are meant to be in the same bracket? In the grand scheme of things, it is
:08:54. > :08:57.still a very high salary to be earning, over ?40,000. I think the
:08:58. > :09:01.national level is much lower than that. Still, for a professional or
:09:02. > :09:06.academic, I would expect they would be earning more than that. The
:09:07. > :09:09.Financial Times reminds us that we had the general election of 1
:09:10. > :09:15.million miles away, sometime over the next year or so Labour are
:09:16. > :09:20.planning to restore the 50p rate for people earning over ?50,000. Some
:09:21. > :09:24.Conservatives are pressing for a reduction. Can you see that playing
:09:25. > :09:30.very big over the next few months, once the floods are over, as a
:09:31. > :09:36.mystic story? Is The economy always plays big when it comes to the
:09:37. > :09:40.election, yes. I think I would be surprised if the Conservatives went
:09:41. > :09:45.for 40p. It's brought joy to lots of people, great news from Sochi, where
:09:46. > :09:50.Team GB has won a gold medal, or, more appropriately, Lizzy Yarnold
:09:51. > :09:55.has won a gold medal on the skeleton. Lots of papers showing
:09:56. > :10:01.great photos. Certainly in The Times, a picture of her lying as
:10:02. > :10:10.flat as possible. Boy, do they go quickly? Do you fancy doing this?
:10:11. > :10:14.No, but it has brought joy to us. They don't have a track in England.
:10:15. > :10:19.They don't have one of those I see things. Whatever it is called. They
:10:20. > :10:22.trained to do the running. The running bets are really important.
:10:23. > :10:30.The sprinting bit. She was a sprinter. What they do with the
:10:31. > :10:33.English lot is they pick a few really good sprinters, train them to
:10:34. > :10:38.do the sprinting bit. And in the winter they go to other countries
:10:39. > :10:46.that do have the hurdy-gurdy track thing. And we are obviously very
:10:47. > :10:50.good. Expert analysis! We are very good at pushing 80 trade. She spoke
:10:51. > :10:54.very well. Her interview was brilliant, I loved it. It was really
:10:55. > :10:59.inspirational, encouraging people to follow their dreams, pursue their
:11:00. > :11:02.dreams, not give up. Great for women's sport and great for her.
:11:03. > :11:08.Lets hope there is more medals on the way. That is it for the papers
:11:09. > :11:13.this hour. A big thank you to our guests. You will both be back at
:11:14. > :11:27.11:30 for another look at the stories making the news tomorrow.
:11:28. > :11:31.Hello and welcome to Sportsday. I'm Lizzie Greenwood-Hughes, the
:11:32. > :11:32.headlines this evening: Sir Tom Finney, one of English football
:11:33. > :11:34.greatest players,