26/04/2014

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:00. > :00:00.Titanic has been sold at auction for a record fee, it was written eight

:00:00. > :00:20.hours before the ship hit an and sank. `` hit an iceberg.

:00:21. > :00:26.Welcome to our look ahead at what the papers will be bringing us

:00:27. > :00:38.tomorrow. With me is the parliamentary editor of politics

:00:39. > :00:47.Home.com, and the political editor of The Times. We start with the

:00:48. > :00:53.Observer. School meals could be fuelling an obesity epidemic. The

:00:54. > :00:58.Independent, reporting that Nigel Farage has survived a difficult week

:00:59. > :01:09.of headlines and harmed. The Sunday Times also leads with UKIP. A new

:01:10. > :01:12.twist in the so`called Plebgate scandal is the splash on the mail on

:01:13. > :01:18.Sunday. And the Telegraph, leading on the tragic deaths of those

:01:19. > :01:25.petition military personnel. `` British. And the Sunday express, a

:01:26. > :01:37.potential breakthrough in the Madeleine McCann case.

:01:38. > :01:44.Let's begin with those headlines. Gentlemen, the Independent on

:01:45. > :01:54.Sunday. A cartoon picture of Nigel Farage. It reminds me of a guard in

:01:55. > :02:00.front page earlier in the week. It has been an interesting week for

:02:01. > :02:08.UKIP. The Westminster village perceived his interview with Nick

:02:09. > :02:13.Robinson as a bit of a car crash. And a story about using actors in

:02:14. > :02:22.their party literature, employing his wife who is German, but these

:02:23. > :02:28.are very SW1 attacks. Lots of UKIP attack throughout the country comes

:02:29. > :02:35.from older voters in particular. They are more likely to see through

:02:36. > :02:41.this and just think that these attacks, if you support Nigel Farage

:02:42. > :02:44.just broadly, without knowing much about politics, you would expect

:02:45. > :02:52.these attacks from national newspapers. The success of UKIP is a

:02:53. > :02:55.double edged sword. They will be pleased they are leading Labour in a

:02:56. > :03:06.recent Sunday Times poll but it will increase scrutiny. Who knows their

:03:07. > :03:11.policy on education? Health? That is why it reminded me of the Guardian

:03:12. > :03:15.story. Highlighting that they don't have any MPs are any well`publicised

:03:16. > :03:22.policies besides immigration. Yet rival parties are worried. They were

:03:23. > :03:29.talking about a flat tax of 31%. Increasing expenditure on defence.

:03:30. > :03:33.Primary school economics. Now they are looking to flirt with Labour

:03:34. > :03:38.voters, pulling votes from both major parties, they are talking

:03:39. > :03:44.about a higher tax rate. Abolishing the bedroom tax. All sorts of

:03:45. > :03:49.claims, yet no scrutiny commensurate with the current polling. I think

:03:50. > :03:56.that will change, and when it happens, Nigel Farage, who

:03:57. > :04:03.unquestionably has a huge amount of popular appeal, that will diminish

:04:04. > :04:10.as policies come under scrutiny. He is a personable face, coming across

:04:11. > :04:15.quite well, doesn't he? Most people in this country have no idea about

:04:16. > :04:19.the European Parliament, tonight for these elections is around 40%, you

:04:20. > :04:28.will get protest votes, UKIP will do well. The party in government will

:04:29. > :04:31.do less well. That is why the Tories are at a high for MEPs, the last

:04:32. > :04:39.round of elections was during the Gordon Brown premiership. The front

:04:40. > :04:52.page of the Sunday Times, a picture of Nigel for Farage, and saying that

:04:53. > :04:58.UKIP is leading on 31%, three points clear of labour, and the Tories are

:04:59. > :05:06.languishing on 19 points. Probably within the margin of error. But this

:05:07. > :05:13.is interesting. The front page of the Independent. Cross`referencing

:05:14. > :05:20.each other. Yet Nigel Farage and his popular appeal seem to have a Teflon

:05:21. > :05:25.quality. Picking up on what Tony said, European elections, they don't

:05:26. > :05:29.have a big effect, people use it as a protest, but I suspect there is

:05:30. > :05:35.something else at work, and it is the persona of Nigel Farage. There

:05:36. > :05:40.is a real trouble in politics. Vocabulary issues. If you ask a

:05:41. > :05:46.politician, why are you favour of the minimum wage? They will say,

:05:47. > :05:52.because I think it is right. That is not an answer or an explanation,

:05:53. > :05:59.just a restatement of a preference. There is this linguistic routine

:06:00. > :06:03.politicians clock but, Nigel Farage actually gives an answer. That is

:06:04. > :06:11.why he gets this idea he is honest. Yet he is quite duplicitous if you

:06:12. > :06:16.look at the facts of his expenses, but he looks honest simply because

:06:17. > :06:23.he comes out with an answer. Let's move on to the Sunday

:06:24. > :06:28.Telegraph. A picture of Bernie Ecclestone with a much taller women.

:06:29. > :06:33.We had an interesting story that the Telegraph is claiming as an

:06:34. > :06:38.exclusive, an interview with the former Bishop of Canterbury, saying

:06:39. > :06:42.we are now a post`Christian nation. He says Britain is no longer a

:06:43. > :06:49.nation of believers. Your take on that? It is also interesting that he

:06:50. > :06:55.says he generation of widespread worship is over. For the Muslim

:06:56. > :07:01.population, that is not true. In terms of Christian, he is

:07:02. > :07:07.pessimistic. He was my favourite Archbishop of Canterbury I must say.

:07:08. > :07:20.Did he make the top ten? Get voted off? I never liked the beard! It was

:07:21. > :07:24.untidy! You were saying, he's been pessimistic. But look at the

:07:25. > :07:29.polling. More than half the public regard Britain as a Christian

:07:30. > :07:35.country. 52% described themselves as either practising or non`practising.

:07:36. > :07:40.There could always be a religious revival which is why I think he is

:07:41. > :07:46.been pessimistic. David Cameron said we should be more evangelical. I

:07:47. > :07:50.have no idea if David Cameron actually knew what he was saying. To

:07:51. > :07:54.a lot of gay people that sounds quite scary, that our rights will be

:07:55. > :08:00.taken away. Incredibly cack`handed for the Prime Minister to attempt to

:08:01. > :08:05.insert himself into a religious context. It won't be the last time.

:08:06. > :08:11.People are much more quiet about their Christianity.

:08:12. > :08:17.Even though he is pessimistic in the context of that hole, the overall

:08:18. > :08:24.trend, the last couple of hundred years, it is towards secularism.

:08:25. > :08:28.That has accelerated. Science is replacing previous explanations

:08:29. > :08:33.given by theologians. I suspect that both amongst Christians and other

:08:34. > :08:36.faith groups, including Muslims, people often talk about muscle

:08:37. > :08:41.children growing up to become slums, I don't think that will

:08:42. > :08:48.happen. `` muscle and children growing up to become muscles.

:08:49. > :08:58.I think this trend towards secularism is inexorable. And these

:08:59. > :09:05.comments something we should worry about? I wouldn't. It is positive.

:09:06. > :09:09.It is just the case that religion used to be compulsory. Now it is

:09:10. > :09:13.not. And that is good for the church, because it is full of true

:09:14. > :09:21.believers and not just people who go because society expects them to. The

:09:22. > :09:26.Observer. Top doctor slams school meals policy for viewing child

:09:27. > :09:30.obesity. An interview with Professor Terence Stephenson, the chair of the

:09:31. > :09:40.Academy of medical and royal colleges. He says that because

:09:41. > :09:43.academies can opt out of nutritious guidelines then some children are

:09:44. > :09:51.not getting healthy food. It is a fair point. The excellence of the

:09:52. > :09:55.Jamie Oliver experiment is it created an evidenced `based approach

:09:56. > :10:00.to school meals. A certain set of schools were given nutritious

:10:01. > :10:04.lunches, they tracked to see what happened in terms of educational

:10:05. > :10:08.attainment, concentration, absenteeism. The figures improved.

:10:09. > :10:13.They standardised this across the country. A sensible move. What I

:10:14. > :10:17.didn't know until I read the Observer is that free schools can

:10:18. > :10:22.opt out and as a consequence are offering less nutritious meals. That

:10:23. > :10:26.is bad for students. I favour a variety. When you have variation you

:10:27. > :10:29.find the things that work. But we have already had a controlled

:10:30. > :10:39.experiment, why not stick to the standard? There is no evidence in

:10:40. > :10:48.the story that kids who go to free schools are more likely to be obese.

:10:49. > :10:55.It is based on an interview with, admittedly, an expert. He does not

:10:56. > :10:59.have any science behind what he is saying, it seems to be an

:11:00. > :11:10.assumption, prejudice on you are right, free schools have opted out

:11:11. > :11:17.of this. This reminded me of another story this week, the story of the

:11:18. > :11:22.Trojan case in Birmingham. Hardline Muslims trying to influence what was

:11:23. > :11:27.being taught in some academies. It goes to this apparent disconnect

:11:28. > :11:33.between academies and state schools about who is in control of

:11:34. > :11:38.academies. Is that relevant here? In that case, state schools were being

:11:39. > :11:44.allegedly targeted. That story had a lot of warnings in it and it was

:11:45. > :11:48.confusing as to whether Muslim parents were trying to become

:11:49. > :11:55.governors. We do have Islamic schools that run perfectly well and

:11:56. > :11:59.are respected. You agree there was an evidence `based approach to the

:12:00. > :12:02.introduction of standardisation is nutritious meals but you are

:12:03. > :12:11.querying whether free schools have opted out in such a way to reduce

:12:12. > :12:19.standards? Scientists measured. I am not sure `` you on not sure anyone

:12:20. > :12:25.is a scientist, this evening! This man is clearly a genius, Ryan

:12:26. > :12:36.Giggs, doing something at Manchester United. He is the football

:12:37. > :12:41.whisperer. What did he say? United had a good result. Four ` zero after

:12:42. > :12:46.a poor season with David Moyes sacked as manager. He has gone on

:12:47. > :12:52.holiday to the United States. Ryan Giggs, who scored the iconic goal in

:12:53. > :12:59.the FA Cup semifinal replay against Arsenal, one of the great figures in

:13:00. > :13:03.Manchester United's history. It is rather wonderful, starting as a

:13:04. > :13:08.caretaker manager. The problem is they are almost certain not to take

:13:09. > :13:12.him on as a permanent replacement because they have targeted the

:13:13. > :13:17.Netherlands coach. It is interesting that they played with a more

:13:18. > :13:21.flamboyant style. A criticism of David Moyes was he was too

:13:22. > :13:31.pragmatic, which betrayed Manchester United's traditions. The Sunday

:13:32. > :13:42.Times, dad 's Army. To be revived as a film. The classic comedy series

:13:43. > :13:50.drew 18 million viewers. Bill Nighy We'll be in it. They will not be

:13:51. > :14:00.able to fight actors like Arthur alone. People who can inhabit those

:14:01. > :14:07.characters `` Lowe. It will be great, or it will be a disaster.

:14:08. > :14:15.Thanks. Very interesting to talk to you. We will talk to you again in an

:14:16. > :14:23.hour. Stay with us. At 11pm a report from

:14:24. > :14:28.Afghanistan on the helicopter crash that claimed the lives of five

:14:29. > :14:58.British personnel. But next, Reporters.

:14:59. > :14:59.Welcome. From here in the world News room where we send out