:00:00. > :00:00.South Korea's Prime Minister resigns after criticism of his government is
:00:00. > :00:00.handling over the ferry tragedy. More than 300 people are thought to
:00:00. > :00:17.have died when the ferry sank earlier in the month. Hello and
:00:18. > :00:23.welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us
:00:24. > :00:27.tomorrow. With me is Lucy Cavendish, who is a Sunday Telegraph columnist,
:00:28. > :00:33.and Tom Bergin from Reuters. That makes him a journalist to!
:00:34. > :00:36.Tomorrow's front pages. Starting with the independent leading new
:00:37. > :00:40.rules to drive the long`term unemployed and to work, it says they
:00:41. > :00:44.will be forced to attend job centres every day. The Financial Times says
:00:45. > :00:47.talks between China and the US on carbon dioxide emissions appear to
:00:48. > :00:52.be the most promising development in nearly 20 years of negotiations. The
:00:53. > :00:55.mattress is a triple killer has been awarded ?800 in compensation after
:00:56. > :01:04.prison guards broke his nose or purpose. `` the metro says. A report
:01:05. > :01:07.into high taxes and redtape stifles entrepreneurs in Britain in the
:01:08. > :01:14.Times. The Guardian says a leading doctor has said whether
:01:15. > :01:21.understaffing has contributed to high deaths in babies. This is the
:01:22. > :01:34.picture of the British barrister who the paper says is engaged to George
:01:35. > :01:37.Clooney. And hayfever sufferers are in for a bad summer. Let's start
:01:38. > :01:43.with the daily Telegraph carrying the story of the elite servicemen
:01:44. > :01:49.who died in the Afghan helicopter disaster. Four of those men are
:01:50. > :01:55.pictured on the front page. Tributes have been paid this evening from the
:01:56. > :02:01.commanding officers. They sounded like they all had promising careers
:02:02. > :02:07.ahead of them. They are described as elite servicemen, they appear...
:02:08. > :02:13.There has not been a confirmation of who they were attached to, as often
:02:14. > :02:17.is the case, but they were all special forces people. Very highly
:02:18. > :02:22.regarded, it is difficult to get into those units. They seem
:02:23. > :02:31.incredibly accomplished. Some have done multiple tours in Afghanistan.
:02:32. > :02:35.It is a very sad story. They have spoken of mechanical failure, it
:02:36. > :02:38.reinforces that war zones are incredibly dangerous even when
:02:39. > :02:41.people are not in fighting. This is the cost of having a military
:02:42. > :02:45.presence anywhere in the world. In addition to those tributes, we have
:02:46. > :02:51.had heartbreaking tributes paid by their families. They have lost these
:02:52. > :02:54.men so close to the presence of international troops. It is
:02:55. > :03:00.heartbreaking, the thought of them going off in the first place must be
:03:01. > :03:05.so difficult, it must make their friends and families feel very
:03:06. > :03:09.frightened. And so close to thinking you were going to get this person
:03:10. > :03:12.that you love back. When you look at the photographs, it is interesting
:03:13. > :03:17.that the daily Telegraph is the only newspaper with it. It is
:03:18. > :03:23.heart`wrenching to see it, unbelievable, their loved ones could
:03:24. > :03:28.be thinking they are going to walk through the door, it looks like it
:03:29. > :03:31.is an accident. It could bring into question what has happened, whether
:03:32. > :03:35.it was faulty equipment, which has dogged this whole situation in
:03:36. > :03:38.Afghanistan, with questions over Kate and not having the right
:03:39. > :03:50.equipment. Putting people in jeopardy. ``kit. These have had a
:03:51. > :03:54.fantastic service record? There have been a number of helicopters with
:03:55. > :04:02.problems, like generics, there have been a number of accidents.
:04:03. > :04:08.``Chinooks. There has been mechanical failure suspected as a
:04:09. > :04:13.problem. When you have equipment that is perfectly good, but
:04:14. > :04:18.sometimes it can fail in particular circumstances. The Times has Labour
:04:19. > :04:27.'s corporate head hard by UKIP. The party is now is to middle`class.
:04:28. > :04:31.They have dealt with the Tory voters, swept them up, and are now
:04:32. > :04:35.going to focus on getting Labour voters to come with us. It sounds
:04:36. > :04:44.like they could be succeeding? Are they? I don't know, I think it is
:04:45. > :04:51.all froth. There is a real and genuine concern about what is going
:04:52. > :04:54.on here, with UKIP. They do not have any MPs, at the moment they do not
:04:55. > :04:59.have an agenda they are working from. They have people who say
:05:00. > :05:04.things like Lenny Henry should live in a black country. They are doing a
:05:05. > :05:10.great job of making people not particularly like them. There is the
:05:11. > :05:14.idea that Labour are drifting towards the middle classes, as if
:05:15. > :05:18.the people who are in that party are not middle`class. Ed Miliband, and
:05:19. > :05:22.the people around him, are in what I would call champagne socialists, in
:05:23. > :05:28.the past. They must find a way of getting the working classes back. I
:05:29. > :05:33.do not know what the implication is, it is going somewhere that could
:05:34. > :05:39.be potentially nasty. They are looking at immigration and welfare.
:05:40. > :05:43.I can see what the underlying message is. Their prospects are
:05:44. > :05:47.looking quite good for UKIP in the European elections which happened
:05:48. > :05:50.next month? Certainly, that will be a secondary concern to the Labour
:05:51. > :05:59.leadership, they will be focused on the general election. Coming from
:06:00. > :06:02.here, this is reflective of what has been said about the party and Ed
:06:03. > :06:08.Miliband being too intellectual. On one hand, it is intuitive, what we
:06:09. > :06:12.are seeing here today. If you think about it, we are not seeing any
:06:13. > :06:21.pollen behind these views. When it comes down to it, is it a
:06:22. > :06:25.constituency affair? ``polling. Are these marginal seats going to be
:06:26. > :06:29.lost to Labour? Realistically, will Labour lose out to the Lib Dems or
:06:30. > :06:33.the Conservatives in some marginal constituencies because of the rise
:06:34. > :06:36.of UKIP? I do not know if that has been proven. The Labour Party is
:06:37. > :06:42.liberal and progressive, it says here, as if that is a bad thing.
:06:43. > :06:46.What is the suggestion? They should become not liberal and retrograde
:06:47. > :06:52.looking? I do not know if that is helpful. Is the concern about UKIP,
:06:53. > :06:58.is that they will upset the vote in some way? There are those old
:06:59. > :07:03.certainties, in some constituencies, but are not there any more? From
:07:04. > :07:08.neighbours perspective, they could always, I guess, attract a certain
:07:09. > :07:15.person, particularly activists, perhaps, they could come out for
:07:16. > :07:19.Labour. It could hurt them. They talk about immigration, for example,
:07:20. > :07:23.that might be an issue that UKIP feels freer to talk about than
:07:24. > :07:26.Labour. It attracts certain people. Is it going to cost them seats? I
:07:27. > :07:35.don't think so. It is a certain idea, it fits with previous
:07:36. > :07:43.comments, said by Hazel blears and others, that they read themselves to
:07:44. > :07:49.attack UKIP ``Blears. Let's go back to the Telegraph. Money getting you
:07:50. > :07:53.down? The doctor can see you now. GPs should offer financial advice
:07:54. > :07:59.from surgeries, because the stress of debt and money worries damage
:08:00. > :08:03.patients well`being. That is certainly probably true. But do GPs
:08:04. > :08:07.have time to do this? And the capabilities? My heart goes out to
:08:08. > :08:11.them. Of course it is true, debt gets everyone down. I imagine no
:08:12. > :08:18.more so than ever. You see people suffering tremendous amounts of
:08:19. > :08:26.stress. `` I imagine now. Clinics have been set up in GPs clinics
:08:27. > :08:35.which have helped. The idea that they can focus on the fact that the
:08:36. > :08:38.reason someone is ill or exhibiting symptoms for example, panic attacks,
:08:39. > :08:41.is because they are in a financial mess. Most people feel it is panic
:08:42. > :08:44.making, and they are given advice to get help. I do not think they should
:08:45. > :08:49.be taking in their current account statements! At that point, they will
:08:50. > :08:53.put their hands in the air and close down completely. In the five minutes
:08:54. > :08:57.you had to see them! I love the idea. I love the idea of the GP
:08:58. > :09:02.telling me I've spent too much on baked beans, that would be great!
:09:03. > :09:08.The rise of payday lenders show people do not make the best
:09:09. > :09:13.financial choices. Why would the GP know better than us? There is room
:09:14. > :09:16.for financial education. If it is in conjunction with the Citizens'
:09:17. > :09:24.Advice Bureau, it makes sense. I do not know that doctors have time to
:09:25. > :09:34.do this. There are micro and macro economics as part of their medical
:09:35. > :09:43.degree! `` they can study. This is the story of a triple killer, he has
:09:44. > :09:47.won ?815 compensation in prison, because guards broke his nasal hair
:09:48. > :09:51.clippers, and they didn't apologise. There is also something
:09:52. > :09:58.to do with his cranberry juice going missing. Compensation for someone
:09:59. > :10:02.who has killed three times? Of course that is going to make people
:10:03. > :10:07.furious. These stories come up regularly. A prompt a lot of
:10:08. > :10:13.outrage. It is difficult to see how you don't get into these situations,
:10:14. > :10:18.given the rules, though, if someone loses their equipment. `` they
:10:19. > :10:25.prompt a lot of outrage. It means that people we don't like will
:10:26. > :10:29.benefit from these rules. It does not mean we should change the rules,
:10:30. > :10:33.necessarily, just in response. It has happened before, where people
:10:34. > :10:36.have done bad things have got compensation for various reasons.
:10:37. > :10:43.Could it be suspended? If you go to prison, you lose your rights to that
:10:44. > :10:46.sort of thing? It is difficult, nose hair clippers, of course people will
:10:47. > :10:51.be cross about that. No one will think that is a good thing. It is
:10:52. > :10:57.infuriating and irritating. You could say, look, if they get broken,
:10:58. > :11:03.you get a pay`out for it. They focus on the nose clippers. Most of it was
:11:04. > :11:06.because the prison didn't apologise for the fact that his equipment had
:11:07. > :11:12.been lost. There are some questions about the process here. Perhaps.
:11:13. > :11:17.Basically, they do not think it is a good thing! That is what you are
:11:18. > :11:21.saying! Rules are rules, you can't do anything about it. Let's have a
:11:22. > :11:25.look at this paper, the jobless are told to sign on every day or lose
:11:26. > :11:28.their benefits. These are people, the long`term unemployed, they have
:11:29. > :11:34.to go to the job centre every day, not once every couple of weeks. The
:11:35. > :11:37.way around this is that they sign up for voluntary work? Absolutely, it
:11:38. > :11:42.does not sound like voluntary work, of course, if the option is is that
:11:43. > :11:51.you will lose your income and receipts. It is an interesting one.
:11:52. > :11:55.It is clearly putting a certain label or certain hint around, almost
:11:56. > :12:03.criminalising it. It is like the walk of shame. On the same side, we
:12:04. > :12:06.are not seeing on the tax evasion sighed the same kind of action.
:12:07. > :12:11.That, potentially, raises the question as to whether there are
:12:12. > :12:18.double standards here. `` tax evasion seeing. With Swiss bank
:12:19. > :12:23.accounts, this has not lead to prosecution. It is interesting, to
:12:24. > :12:25.see how this could end up looking. Wouldn't it make it certain though,
:12:26. > :12:31.that if someone is claiming benefits, but is secretly working,
:12:32. > :12:36.they cannot do that? Yes, you would have to go there every single day
:12:37. > :12:42.on. It is difficult. There is something about the feckless people
:12:43. > :12:52.who are not working those jobs available. `` and sign on. Your
:12:53. > :12:57.motivation would go out the window. You probably feel unemployable. The
:12:58. > :13:03.other thing is that some employers are not making it very easy. There
:13:04. > :13:06.is this whole thing about not paying for travel expenses or certain
:13:07. > :13:10.amounts of time, it is a difficult balance to give up your benefits and
:13:11. > :13:14.get a job, if your potential employer is not doing what they
:13:15. > :13:19.should be. I have had people who have had that experience, but I will
:13:20. > :13:22.not name the company. It is scary, none of us are far away from being
:13:23. > :13:27.destitute. Let's have a look at the express, George Clooney is quite far
:13:28. > :13:35.away from being destitute! Has this beauty finally tamed George Clooney?
:13:36. > :13:40.You can hear the sound of hearts breaking across the world. Tom, you
:13:41. > :13:49.have a lot to say about this? ! And asked who he was! I knew who he
:13:50. > :13:51.was. She is a legal eagle, a British Lebanese woman, clever and
:13:52. > :14:00.beautiful, she went to Oxford University. She tamed the man every
:14:01. > :14:12.woman wanted to tame. He had a bet that he would not get married before
:14:13. > :14:19.the age of 50 and he is now 52. This is interesting news. Not to me. As a
:14:20. > :14:26.financial journalist, maybe this tells me that he is selling at the
:14:27. > :14:31.top of the market. Sexiest man in the world for ten or 20 years. He
:14:32. > :14:37.has realised he is at his peak. We will all have to lose interest in
:14:38. > :14:44.him now because he is not single and he is married to someone no one
:14:45. > :14:49.could compete with. She is only 36. But who will replace him as the
:14:50. > :14:57.world's most eligible bachelor? I have no idea. Something to think
:14:58. > :15:03.about on your way home. But will he get married? That is the issue.
:15:04. > :15:14.Thank you for joining us. We will have to leave it there. Thank you to
:15:15. > :15:23.our guests who are sitting there thinking, is it over? Can we go? The
:15:24. > :15:39.headlines are coming up. But next, the Film Review. Hello and welcome
:15:40. > :15:40.the Film Review on BBC