:00:00. > :00:00.within days. ``Qatar's. And after the papers, Tom Cruise is saving the
:00:00. > :00:20.world from aliens. But how did critics find the film? Welcome to
:00:21. > :00:42.our look ahead at what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With
:00:43. > :00:45.me are Nigel Nelson, Political Editor of the The Sunday People, and
:00:46. > :00:51.the stand`up comedian Romesh Ranganathan. Tomorrow's paper,
:00:52. > :00:54.beginning with The Observer says the Labour leader Ed Miliband is facing
:00:55. > :00:57.a backbench revolt over his immigration policy `` his critics
:00:58. > :01:00.warn that unless he gets tougher he risks losing working class voters at
:01:01. > :01:02.next year's General Election.The Independent on Sunday features the
:01:03. > :01:05.campaign for justice for two Indian girls who were raped and murdered.
:01:06. > :01:08.The paper also reports that a study here shows that death rates in NHS
:01:09. > :01:11.hospitals significantly increase at the weekends.The Sunday Times
:01:12. > :01:14.alleges it has evidence which shows that the World Cup should not have
:01:15. > :01:16.been awarded to Qatar in 2022. While, the Sun on Sunday reports
:01:17. > :01:19.that police are investigating allegations of match`fixing ahead of
:01:20. > :01:22.the World Cup in Brazil.The Sunday Telegraph's lead is that there will
:01:23. > :01:29.be a radical reform of workplace pensions announced in this week's
:01:30. > :01:34.Queen's Speech. The christian women in Sudan, that
:01:35. > :01:38.is where we are going to begin, with Miriam Ebrahim. It is the main
:01:39. > :01:45.picture story in the Observer, saying that Sudan has lifted the
:01:46. > :01:53.death sentence. The death sentence by hanging after a flogging of 100
:01:54. > :01:57.lashes `` Taylor. That has been lifted as well? We don't know, you
:01:58. > :02:01.imagine that if 100 lashes were given, that is effectively a death
:02:02. > :02:05.sentence. I cannot find anything to say whether she is being released
:02:06. > :02:12.without any punishment at all. It is not clear. It is good news that she
:02:13. > :02:17.is not going to have a death sentence. Sudan says it was an issue
:02:18. > :02:22.of letting justice see the course through. It has to go through
:02:23. > :02:27.various appeal processes. Nothing to do with international outcry that
:02:28. > :02:31.there has been? The international outcry has changed their mind
:02:32. > :02:36.certainly! It is curious that this was announced by the Ministry of
:02:37. > :02:39.foreign affairs in Sudan. They say that Sudan warranties freedom of
:02:40. > :02:46.religion. Maybe the government does, but the courts obviously didn't. ``
:02:47. > :02:52.allows. The question for the government is what are they doing
:02:53. > :02:55.about the legal system? To make sure this does not happen again. Politics
:02:56. > :03:01.and justice seem to be at odds in that country? It is a weird thing
:03:02. > :03:05.that they say they guarantee the freedom of religion. What is going
:03:06. > :03:09.on contradicts that. What is interesting about the story is that
:03:10. > :03:13.it says that she was sentenced to death by hanging for refusing to
:03:14. > :03:17.renounce her christian beliefs. There is this situation where she
:03:18. > :03:22.was sentenced to death if she does not renounce her beliefs. To have
:03:23. > :03:24.that force of belief, that you are willing to not pronounce these
:03:25. > :03:30.beliefs and risked death, that is incredible and difficult to relate
:03:31. > :03:34.to I think. The case was that she should have been a Muslim because
:03:35. > :03:39.her father was. But she married a Christian man? There is this idea
:03:40. > :03:44.that there is a freedom of religion, but it does not seem to be right.
:03:45. > :03:48.The government has stepped in and released her because of
:03:49. > :03:52.international pressure. It shows it works. However you look at it, it is
:03:53. > :03:57.good news. But, one case. There could be many more? That is the
:03:58. > :04:07.beer, but this is what it comes down to. The international community not
:04:08. > :04:12.only turning their backs. `` that is the fear. But what happens
:04:13. > :04:16.elsewhere? To have that dialogue will help us understand where they
:04:17. > :04:19.are coming from. And prevent other women suffering the same fate. The
:04:20. > :04:23.point you make about helping us to understand what they are coming from
:04:24. > :04:27.is important `` where they are coming from. We have a similar
:04:28. > :04:31.situation in this country where there is some fear around Islam
:04:32. > :04:35.Islamic beliefs. With a story like this coming out, there is that worry
:04:36. > :04:41.that you have, that people associate the story with being about Islam,
:04:42. > :04:47.and it is actually about an interpretation of Islam. `` Islam
:04:48. > :04:50.and Islamic beliefs. People are suspicious in this country, the
:04:51. > :04:55.general public consensus is that if you look at this report about halal
:04:56. > :04:59.chicken in restaurants, the nature of those reports indicate that there
:05:00. > :05:05.is a feeling of the public being unsure of Islam. With a story like
:05:06. > :05:09.this, the danger is that people think it is representative of Islam.
:05:10. > :05:13.It is important to us to get an understanding so we get a context of
:05:14. > :05:16.these things and so going forward we have a better understanding of where
:05:17. > :05:21.these people are coming from. Let's stay with the Observer, the main
:05:22. > :05:24.story is regarding immigration. A subject on everyone's minds,
:05:25. > :05:29.particularly following the elections of late. Miliband must get tough on
:05:30. > :05:33.EU migrants, that is the demand from MPs. That has also been demanded of
:05:34. > :05:42.David Cameron. There's only so much you can do with the current state of
:05:43. > :05:45.play. The EU is all about freedom of movement? It is, but you can open a
:05:46. > :05:53.debate about it. The trouble we have seen from the European elections and
:05:54. > :06:00.UKIP success. Farage was prepared to talk about immigration and other
:06:01. > :06:07.party leaders were not. `` UKIP's success. People put that as the
:06:08. > :06:12.number one concern. Let's get the facts out there and debate, our UKIP
:06:13. > :06:21.trading on myths and hearsay? Is there something out there that we
:06:22. > :06:24.need to address? ``are. UKIP, the driving force behind the increasing
:06:25. > :06:28.popularity is the failure of the leaders of the main parties to
:06:29. > :06:31.tackle immigration as an issue. People are worried about sounding
:06:32. > :06:35.racist. That is the situation we are in. UKIP are willing to talk about
:06:36. > :06:40.it and people feel a concern that they have is being dealt with. I am
:06:41. > :06:43.really happy about that. It galvanises their support. You can
:06:44. > :06:47.understand that the main party is reluctant to talk about it because
:06:48. > :06:55.it is such a difficult situation but it has to be opened up. People feel
:06:56. > :06:58.it is not being discussed so when one person is willing to discuss it,
:06:59. > :07:02.everyone gets excited. It is felt that it is a burning issue. My
:07:03. > :07:06.concerns are not being dealt with. If you are in a situation where you
:07:07. > :07:11.have lost your job and you are told it is because of immigration and it
:07:12. > :07:14.is not dealt with, you can understand why people are
:07:15. > :07:17.frustrated. Let's move on to the Sunday Telegraph, radical pension
:07:18. > :07:24.reforms. Pensioners will be able to invest in lest risky mega form ``
:07:25. > :07:34.less risky mega funds. How will this work? As we do more research on it,
:07:35. > :07:41.broadly, the idea is that people will group together, you form a mega
:07:42. > :07:46.fund, and as a result, everyone is together and the administration
:07:47. > :07:51.costs go down. This is a system that operates in Holland. According to
:07:52. > :07:55.the calculations, if you put the same amount of money into a pension
:07:56. > :08:01.pot in Britain, and the same amount in Holland, the Dutch pensioner will
:08:02. > :08:04.get 30% more. It is a good kind of system. What David Cameron is
:08:05. > :08:11.looking for is something eye`catching for the Queen's
:08:12. > :08:15.speech. It has nothing terribly exciting in it, because he is
:08:16. > :08:20.bringing in some bills that have already been out there. This is the
:08:21. > :08:24.chance for him to start. It will distract people from the immigration
:08:25. > :08:29.issue? I don't think so. They have had a go at it by using the words
:08:30. > :08:34."mega fund". That is obviously exciting. My mum would be excited.
:08:35. > :08:37.She is part of a lottery syndicate at work, pulling everything
:08:38. > :08:44.together, and she would be well on board with this. If you are worried
:08:45. > :08:48.about immigration, and then they will reform pensions, you will not
:08:49. > :08:52.say that you are happy now because it has been dealt with `` pooling.
:08:53. > :08:54.That is not what people are asking. Everybody wants to know if there
:08:55. > :09:07.will be enough money to keep you going? I agree, that is not... The
:09:08. > :09:12.doorstep issue is immigration. I am keen on pensioners to! I am sure you
:09:13. > :09:20.are, he is biased about his own concerns! `` too! Let's have a look
:09:21. > :09:26.at the Sunday Times, Nick Clegg finds himself on the front, but not
:09:27. > :09:34.for particularly positive reasons. He is the least popular leader in
:09:35. > :09:36.modern British political history. It is horrible, he is having a
:09:37. > :09:41.difficult time at work, and he thinks, it could be worse, but he
:09:42. > :09:45.reads this paper, and things, no, it couldn't! What is astonishing is
:09:46. > :09:54.that he is more unpopular than Gordon Brown. According to YouGov,
:09:55. > :10:04.his unpopularity rating is `65 whereas Gordon Brown's was 62. ``
:10:05. > :10:08.`62. He is only slightly less unpopular than Miklik. Is he going
:10:09. > :10:14.to survive it? There are rumblings that he has to step down `` Nick
:10:15. > :10:19.Clegg. He has to get it sorted out before the general election. He is
:10:20. > :10:24.not out of the woods yet. I don't think Vince Cable was plotting
:10:25. > :10:29.against him. He has to face this party conference in the autumn.
:10:30. > :10:32.Under Liberal Democrat rules, it is the local parties who can decide to
:10:33. > :10:38.unseat him. There will be moved to do that. My guess is he will decide
:10:39. > :10:43.it, but he could move into a tricky summer. The Sunday Telegraph, what
:10:44. > :10:49.should you do about how do you do? The form of greeting that is social
:10:50. > :10:54.and trough Pol `` social anthropologist says we should be
:10:55. > :10:59.bringing back into use. We have said that it was first used in 1600, and
:11:00. > :11:09.was an enquiry about people 's health. We have been able to
:11:10. > :11:14.discover the etiquette. I would turn to you, and so, how do you do Lady
:11:15. > :11:19.Windermere? How do you do Lord Darlington? That is how Oscar Wilde
:11:20. > :11:24.did it. I am glad that someone has said that, on social media, they
:11:25. > :11:31.said, do do do the funky Gibbon! I will not, if you don't mind! How do
:11:32. > :11:37.you do implies that you care about how the other person is doing. When
:11:38. > :11:41.you are really not that bothered. If you are terribly British, and
:11:42. > :11:45.someone asks how you are, you would say that you are fine. The truth is
:11:46. > :11:50.rarely ask it, you don't really care! If someone says, actually,
:11:51. > :11:54.they are having a complete nightmare... The point that the
:11:55. > :11:57.anthropologist was talking about is that greetings have become more
:11:58. > :12:01.complicated. When you go out to someone to kiss them on one cheek,
:12:02. > :12:08.or do you do it on both cheeks? Do you shake hands or not? We may have
:12:09. > :12:12.over complicated it. Perhaps, is simple hello is the answer. If you
:12:13. > :12:17.are Dutch, it is three kisses and never ends! Kiss inflation is a
:12:18. > :12:22.problem! I would go for four sometimes! If I am feeling Lucky! A
:12:23. > :12:30.clash of glasses can also be an issue. Lady Windermere, Lord
:12:31. > :12:38.Darlington, it has been good having you both here. Thank you for joining
:12:39. > :12:42.us. Stay with us, at midnight, we will have more on that accident on
:12:43. > :12:44.the Scottish Borders where three people died after two crashes during
:12:45. > :12:46.the Jim Clark Rally.