:00:13. > :00:20.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing
:00:21. > :00:22.us tomorrow. With me are Miranda Green, the former press secretary to
:00:23. > :00:26.the Liberal Democrats and Liam Halligan, a commentator, at the
:00:27. > :00:29.Telegraph. Tomorrow's front pages. The Financial Times says the
:00:30. > :00:32.government has ordered a review into the sell`off of state assets just
:00:33. > :00:36.days before MPs publish a report into last year's privatisation of
:00:37. > :00:38.Royal Mail. Teachers could be stripped of the right to hold
:00:39. > :00:43.rolling strikes, without fresh ballots, according to the Telegraph.
:00:44. > :00:49.The Express says following four simple rules could add ten years to
:00:50. > :00:52.your life. The charity Christian Aid has branded the singer Katie Melua
:00:53. > :00:59."a fallen hero", after she was named in a list of celebrities involved in
:01:00. > :01:02.a tax avoidance scheme. The cyclist Chris Froome is shown with blood on
:01:03. > :01:07.his face on the front of The Guardian, after multiple crashes
:01:08. > :01:09.made him abandon the Tour de France. After the Home Office lost records
:01:10. > :01:11.about allegations of child abuse, The Independent claims documents
:01:12. > :01:17.relating the transfer of fugitives have also disappeared from the
:01:18. > :01:20.Foreign Office. Tax avoidance schemes are the main issue on The
:01:21. > :01:23.Times. It claims some tax avoiders won't have to pay back the money
:01:24. > :01:28.they owe, because inspectors didn't challenge their tax returns in time.
:01:29. > :01:31.And the Daily Mail explores an unusual theory for Brazil's World
:01:32. > :01:45.Cup semi final defeat. They ask if it was down to the pop star Mick
:01:46. > :01:59.Jagger. So let's begin... I am interested to hear your views on
:02:00. > :02:05.that. The Times, it has been made a celebrated cause in the last few
:02:06. > :02:13.months. Yes, the attempts to tackle tax avoidance. This scheme was used
:02:14. > :02:21.by 1600 people, not just celebrities but also doctors, barristers and so
:02:22. > :02:28.on. Those people try to shelter billions of pounds in revenue in a
:02:29. > :02:32.complex mechanism involving fabricated losses that they could
:02:33. > :02:46.then offset. What I would say in their dissent is that `` defence, it
:02:47. > :02:50.is not that many people in the grand scheme of things. It is a good story
:02:51. > :02:58.that you have to look into the numbers to see the scale. I think it
:02:59. > :03:05.is because of staff shortages. Is this illegal? No. What is the
:03:06. > :03:10.problem? That is a metaphysical problem. Most would say that you
:03:11. > :03:15.have a moral obligation to arrange your tax affairs but I think many
:03:16. > :03:20.people would reasonably say that if you set up a company's structure
:03:21. > :03:23.with the sole intention of importing taxes rather than carrying out
:03:24. > :03:39.commercial affairs, in a court of law, you will often be judged to be
:03:40. > :03:42.E `` evading. Many of these celebrities are people who work with
:03:43. > :03:48.major charities, and that is the point here. Herston eight put out a
:03:49. > :04:01.statement saying that it is morally wrong for people to avoid paying
:04:02. > :04:04.their fair share `` Christian Aid. Particularly for celebrities who
:04:05. > :04:10.have a relationship with these groups. It is a great story for the
:04:11. > :04:19.Times, they have made the running on this one. But if you are a celebrity
:04:20. > :04:23.and have loads of cash and handed over to your financial advisor to
:04:24. > :04:33.deal with as they see fit to be advantage to you, `` be, are you
:04:34. > :04:44.going to say how are you doing this? Of course you are. What am I
:04:45. > :04:48.going to say? Katie Melua is one of the few people who paid the money
:04:49. > :04:52.back before she was required to and so we should be making that clear in
:04:53. > :04:58.fairness to her. It is not just celebrities, there are lawyers and
:04:59. > :05:10.doctors and so on. Ignorance is no excuse before the law. But it is not
:05:11. > :05:13.illegal. No, but in the current climate where the fiscal laws are so
:05:14. > :05:24.tight on so many people, they do come under scrutiny and rightly so.
:05:25. > :05:32.Some missed their own deadline which is amusing. We're going to go to
:05:33. > :05:36.this one, no hope of limiting migrants. After David Cameron's
:05:37. > :05:41.extraordinary victory and defeat over failing to prevent Jean`Claude
:05:42. > :05:48.Juncker the coming head of the European commission, we have moved
:05:49. > :05:54.into the more serious business of whether or not Britain can bring any
:05:55. > :05:58.concessions out of our European Union partners on our terms of
:05:59. > :06:08.membership, on the way it operates, in order to try to get a yes vote in
:06:09. > :06:12.the referendum. Here we have a story which we are likely to see many more
:06:13. > :06:18.of in the next year or so which is Russell 's saying, no, not really.
:06:19. > :06:25.David Cameron had a meeting with all of the Eurosceptic MPs including the
:06:26. > :06:29.UKIP representatives and Jean`Claude Juncker has said very clearly that
:06:30. > :06:36.free movement is not something that is going to be limited in the future
:06:37. > :06:39.and that is, of course, the fundamental right within the
:06:40. > :06:49.European Union to go and work where you want to. He is really upping the
:06:50. > :06:51.ante on Cameron saying that he doesn't believe that everyone moving
:06:52. > :07:02.around the labourer market is a parasite or a criminal `` labour. He
:07:03. > :07:08.is paraphrasing the rhetoric of some political parties and has been
:07:09. > :07:20.reported to have put his thumbs up off`camera but it was actually on
:07:21. > :07:27.camera when a Labour MEP brought it up. Do you think he will be voting
:07:28. > :07:36.for a Labour at the next election? I think it is unavoidable. There is no
:07:37. > :07:46.question of any negotiation. He got his what he is basically saying ``
:07:47. > :07:53.that is what. He is basically saying to Cameron, this is what happens
:07:54. > :07:59.when you mess with me. But what you are seeing in this story is what you
:08:00. > :08:05.see again and again, a throwaway remark leading to what the British
:08:06. > :08:12.Eurosceptic press can use to create the most perfect headline. Free
:08:13. > :08:17.movement is a marginal issue as only something like 3% actually choose to
:08:18. > :08:22.utilise it. Now David Cameron is saying that important concerns are
:08:23. > :08:28.being dismissed as marginal issues. You must vote to leave. He was
:08:29. > :08:39.pushing his finger over the red button on that one. The Telegraph,
:08:40. > :08:43.we must stop roving school strikes. Much of the public will be surprised
:08:44. > :08:49.that the ballot for this strike that is taking place tomorrow actually
:08:50. > :09:02.took place many years ago. The summer of 2012. We have one in 8
:09:03. > :09:09.million children `` over 8 million affected and that is the issue that
:09:10. > :09:15.David Cameron is flagging. He is putting pressure on the Lib Dems and
:09:16. > :09:22.on Labour. Ed Miliband is saying that he doesn't support or oppose
:09:23. > :09:27.the strikes, it seems to be a classic case of say nothing and then
:09:28. > :09:33.you will get elected. But the Lib Dems are going to come under
:09:34. > :09:40.pressure as well. There seems to be an error about what David Cameron is
:09:41. > :09:45.trying to do here `` air, which raises into the voters minds, Tori
:09:46. > :09:56.performs about trade unions back in the 80s `` Tory reforms. They may
:09:57. > :10:04.also include manifesto laws which means unions must have a majority in
:10:05. > :10:09.order to be able to vote. This strike is not only an a mandate that
:10:10. > :10:14.his two years old, it also includes less than one in ten actual
:10:15. > :10:17.teachers. It is a difficult one for the Lib Dems. They're going
:10:18. > :10:25.to work out where they stand on this and at the moment, they are making
:10:26. > :10:30.it clear that they don't want any change. I think it is very
:10:31. > :10:35.interesting where the public would be honest. I tend to feel that there
:10:36. > :10:46.is not a great appetite for a ban on strikes in certain sectors, key
:10:47. > :10:53.public sectors like transportation. I don't think a crackdown is the
:10:54. > :10:57.answer. But to this issue of rolling strikes, what they called a ballot
:10:58. > :11:03.for discontinuous action, which means that the union can decide to
:11:04. > :11:06.call a walkout whenever they want, I am not sure that the public would
:11:07. > :11:18.see that as a fair way of going about things. I think there may be
:11:19. > :11:26.room for reform there. We're going to hear a loss about this going up
:11:27. > :11:32.to May 2015. They will be trying to expose Ed Miliband as not wanting to
:11:33. > :11:35.come down on one side or the other. That's right. Even the leader of one
:11:36. > :11:40.of the unions has said that it is time for them to make up their
:11:41. > :11:47.mind. Labour has no friends on either side of the dispute. That is
:11:48. > :11:54.from their own supporters. Now the Financial Times. The issue of
:11:55. > :12:00.privatizing of the Royal Mail which is very controversial for the
:12:01. > :12:07.reasons that the share price rose considerably from where it had been
:12:08. > :12:11.set on the day of flotation and Vince Cable has been under fire
:12:12. > :12:22.continuously since that time for the handling of the privatized Asian. ``
:12:23. > :12:28.privatisation. He has called an investigation as to how they raise
:12:29. > :12:32.money and it will involve a former Labour minister who is an expert on
:12:33. > :12:45.city affairs. A group of MPs are about to ask `` reduced a critical
:12:46. > :12:49.report on privatisation. Many made an absolute killing buying and
:12:50. > :12:59.selling shares in the prior week 's. They have been flogging them off
:13:00. > :13:02.straightaway. Absolutely and ministers are now saying that a
:13:03. > :13:10.further ?20 billion worth of assets sales could be considered. I think
:13:11. > :13:23.it is probably an attempt by the business department to make some
:13:24. > :13:27.preemptive action. This guy is very financially savvy. When you do have
:13:28. > :13:33.an asset sale, you do undervalue it deliberately, don't you? If it is an
:13:34. > :13:38.IPO, a share flotation, there are other ways of doing it. You do not
:13:39. > :13:45.necessarily need to sell it directly into the stock market. There are
:13:46. > :13:57.many ways to do things. We have ?20 billion worth of sales slated over
:13:58. > :14:04.the next few years. A number of assets, nuclear asset, Royal Mail
:14:05. > :14:11.and it was tough on Vince Cable. They sold off 60% of it and it went
:14:12. > :14:18.up huge amounts. That was just froth. You could say that that is
:14:19. > :14:23.several hospitals lost by the government. They will have egg on
:14:24. > :14:28.their face, imagine if it was the other way around. We're going to go
:14:29. > :14:43.very briefly onto this one and you will have to explain it. Rolling
:14:44. > :14:54.Stone laughed off the idea of being cursed. He has got a Brazilian son,
:14:55. > :14:57.Mick Jagger, from a sling and back in 2010 in South Africa, he wore a
:14:58. > :15:03.Brazilian shirt and they bus to Holland and so we can't always get
:15:04. > :15:11.what he wants... Very good. Can't get no satisfaction. He has said
:15:12. > :15:21.that he took advantage Dove response ability of the first `` he took
:15:22. > :15:33.responsibility for the first goal but not the other six. Very good.
:15:34. > :15:39.That is all for now, be sure to stay with us at the top of the hour for
:15:40. > :15:48.more on the airport security issue. But now, what is the score at the
:15:49. > :15:50.World Cup? It is time to find out.