:00:00. > :00:00.That will get you in trouble. And, coming up this week's Film
:00:00. > :00:14.Review, Mystery Road, the latest crime drama from down under.
:00:15. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing
:00:20. > :00:21.us tomorrow. With me is the political commentator, Jo Philips,
:00:22. > :00:28.and Nigel Nelson, who's political editor at the Sunday People.
:00:29. > :00:31.Tomorrow's front pages. Former Liberal Democrat leader Paddy
:00:32. > :00:33.Ashdown accuses Tory ministers of a kneejerk response to the terrorism
:00:34. > :00:37.threat from extremists, says the front page of the Observer.
:00:38. > :00:39.The Independent on Sunday says parliament will ask what government
:00:40. > :00:42.officials knew about abuse in Rotherham after a report this week
:00:43. > :00:48.revealed more than a thousand children were abused in the town.
:00:49. > :00:54.Cameron faces UKIP by`election bloodbath, according to the results
:00:55. > :00:57.of a poll by the Mail on Sunday. The Sunday Times says some of the
:00:58. > :00:59.UK's most influential imams have condemned British Muslims fighting
:01:00. > :01:02.alongside extremists in Iraq and Syria.
:01:03. > :01:06.A remarkable new heart drug could cut deaths by a fifth according to
:01:07. > :01:07.the Sunday Telegraph. The paper also has an image of Rona Fairhead, the
:01:08. > :01:18.first woman to run the BBC Trust. And the Sunday Express claims
:01:19. > :01:27.Britons fighting for IS are to be told not to come back to the UK.
:01:28. > :01:31.So, the breaking news of Ashya King being found, the five`year`old boy,
:01:32. > :01:36.it came too late for the front pages of the papers. A lot of them
:01:37. > :01:40.focusing on talks over the weekend between David Cameron and Nick Clegg
:01:41. > :01:44.and what they will do with this terrorism threat. Let's begin with
:01:45. > :01:52.the Sunday express because it is confusing. Jihadis told, do not come
:01:53. > :01:55.back. Is that possible? It is curious because apparently,
:01:56. > :01:58.according to a government source who told the Sunday express that David
:01:59. > :02:03.Cameron will announce on Monday that they are looking at stopping British
:02:04. > :02:07.citizens re`entering the country if they are suspected of terrorist
:02:08. > :02:11.activity, taking away their passports. I understand from
:02:12. > :02:18.listening to Alex Carlisle, the former adviser on terrorism that you
:02:19. > :02:25.can't actually make someone stateless, which is what would
:02:26. > :02:28.happen to these people. If they have another nationality that is OK but
:02:29. > :02:32.you can't just say to somebody, you can't come back to this country if
:02:33. > :02:38.you are a British citizen as far as I understand. There are a load of
:02:39. > :02:42.not just civil rights issues but legal issues and I think the
:02:43. > :02:46.precedents... I don't know that any other country does this. The
:02:47. > :03:00.presumption is that they do have another nail `` nationality. It does
:03:01. > :03:04.say, Britons fighting. We are confused about how this would work.
:03:05. > :03:09.If it could be carried out, I would be in favour of it. I just wonder
:03:10. > :03:14.how you could do it legally. What David Cameron has got to do is
:03:15. > :03:22.whatever it takes to minimise the risk. You cannot eliminate risk but
:03:23. > :03:25.you can minimise it. I would prefer him taking away the passports to
:03:26. > :03:31.stop them travelling in the first place which is perfectly legal. Over
:03:32. > :03:36.50 passports have been taken in the last year, so that is possible. That
:03:37. > :03:41.announcement on Monday from David Cameron, we will find out the
:03:42. > :03:45.conclusions and legislation. The Sunday Telegraph reports on the
:03:46. > :03:50.situation in Ukraine, with Nato saying they have evidence of Russian
:03:51. > :03:55.troops crossing into Ukraine. The Sunday Telegraph reports on Putin on
:03:56. > :04:02.the verge of war with Europe over Ukraine. There has been threatening
:04:03. > :04:07.rhetoric from him, hasn't there? He has and I assume he thinks he can
:04:08. > :04:12.get away with it. That is because he has. I think that is where the
:04:13. > :04:16.presumption comes from. Maybe he feels that we are so engaged in what
:04:17. > :04:23.is going on in the Middle East that we will let him sort of do whatever
:04:24. > :04:27.he wants to. He has got Angela Merkel to deal with. Indeed. The
:04:28. > :04:34.problem is how to stop him. I don't think Europe have an answer. We can
:04:35. > :04:38.put more sanctions on. According to the Telegraph, he is hoping to use
:04:39. > :04:45.the city of London to stop Russians passing money through. Does that
:04:46. > :04:49.damage asked? `` us. Of course it does but you have to suffer some
:04:50. > :04:53.pain to do that. The other thing is to withhold the right for them to
:04:54. > :04:57.hold the 2018 World Cup. That might hurt them harder than anything else.
:04:58. > :05:03.The feel at the moment is that nothing will stop Putin short of
:05:04. > :05:08.brute force and we won't do that. This has been mentioned a lot, the
:05:09. > :05:16.point of no return by EU ministers and by Poroshenko in Ukraine.
:05:17. > :05:20.Absolutely. That is frightening. All`out war. It is terrifying. Of
:05:21. > :05:24.all the stories running on the bulletins and on the front pages,
:05:25. > :05:30.whether it is Syria and Iraq or ISIS and this, there is this feeling of
:05:31. > :05:35.impotence. Yes. 100 years ago, tanks would be rolling over the border.
:05:36. > :05:38.They would. Is that not because, people or a conspiracy theorist will
:05:39. > :05:43.be saying and they do say that it is because of gas and oil. Others will
:05:44. > :05:48.probably argue rightly so that it is because of a nuclear threat, which
:05:49. > :05:53.Putin has mentioned, nuclear bombs. We have moved away from that kind of
:05:54. > :05:57.attitude. One of the things about commemorating the First World War as
:05:58. > :06:05.we are is that world leaders can see just how quickly you can end up in a
:06:06. > :06:09.world conflict. 37 days from the original shooting in Sarajevo to the
:06:10. > :06:13.entire world being at war. They have had these lessons and they do in
:06:14. > :06:17.fairness think that we have progressed on that front. But, on
:06:18. > :06:21.this one, we won't roll tanks into Ukraine, we just won't do it.
:06:22. > :06:28.Sanctions would stop them. So, what can you do? Nothing, angle of Merkel
:06:29. > :06:33.will get cross, but that won't threaten Putin, will it? `` Angela
:06:34. > :06:39.Merkel. Obama has most solution to the Middle East. What can you do? ``
:06:40. > :06:47.no solution. Don't we have peacekeepers? You have to be allowed
:06:48. > :06:51.in by both sides. The Observer. Interesting, isn't it? One in three
:06:52. > :06:54.young workers on low pay, not because they are lying on their
:06:55. > :06:59.backsides and cannot be bothered to get a job it is presumably because
:07:00. > :07:03.there is no proper job to get. It's not about jobs, it is about money
:07:04. > :07:10.and wages. What's interesting on this is that this has been going on
:07:11. > :07:17.for 40 years. Young people, between 21`30, I would have thought that by
:07:18. > :07:20.30 you should be pretty well established. This isn't straight
:07:21. > :07:28.from school. That's why I said what asset. `` said what I said. These
:07:29. > :07:33.aren't people without rival rendition, they have lots of it.
:07:34. > :07:41.That's right and it answers a lot of other questions that seem odd ``
:07:42. > :07:44.without ambition. We presumed people could not get onto the housing
:07:45. > :07:49.market because houses are going through the roof, the prices. The
:07:50. > :07:52.kind of money around their age 40 years ago in relative terms is very
:07:53. > :08:00.different from the money they have now. The other thing is that it has
:08:01. > :08:06.been going on for 40 years, meaning that every government is culpable
:08:07. > :08:09.for what is happening. I remember starting out at work and I never got
:08:10. > :08:15.very much money but it always seemed enough. Here, it is a whole
:08:16. > :08:19.different ball game. There is a generation gap. There is. The
:08:20. > :08:24.proportion of low paid older workers, people between 51`60, has
:08:25. > :08:29.dropped, so there is a huge as you say generation gap. What's
:08:30. > :08:33.interesting is what you and I spend money on, wages, when we were
:08:34. > :08:44.youngsters. I don't think we should go there, should we? (CROSSTALK).
:08:45. > :08:48.Let's move on to the Sunday Times, which is one of a couple of papers
:08:49. > :08:54.to report on the new appointment, she is not quite there yet, but
:08:55. > :08:59.pretty much, the first woman to take charge of the BBC. Tough job always
:09:00. > :09:02.but particularly at the moment, isn't it? Yes. And a good choice of
:09:03. > :09:09.someone who has no baggage, appearance, the former chief
:09:10. > :09:12.executive of the FT and non`executive director of HSBC bank.
:09:13. > :09:16.I don't think anyone knows much about her but she seems to come in
:09:17. > :09:21.with a clean pair of hands. Apparently, she says she is open to
:09:22. > :09:26.looking at the licensee and different attitudes towards
:09:27. > :09:30.governance of the BBC. And, ?110,000 per year for a three`day working
:09:31. > :09:35.week which in the current climate actually seems not unreasonable.
:09:36. > :09:41.It's a reasonable amount. Some BBC salaries of the past... And, she has
:09:42. > :09:44.a lot in her injury to come into on her first day at work. Obviously,
:09:45. > :09:48.getting over the Jimmy Savile scandal, the investigation into
:09:49. > :09:54.that, the review of the licensee and even a review of the BBC trust
:09:55. > :09:59.itself. Exactly. In a sense, she has the whole future of the BBC in her
:10:00. > :10:03.hands. Wow. The Sunday Times, they did not do what the Sunday Telegraph
:10:04. > :10:06.did which is that she has got three children. That is irrelevant. I knew
:10:07. > :10:13.that you are going to get there. Let's move on. Can't comment. Let's
:10:14. > :10:19.move on to the Independent on Sunday, the Home Office and what it
:10:20. > :10:22.knew about Rotherham and the shocking findings of that report as
:10:23. > :10:27.well in rather that the child abuse scandal occurred. The problem with
:10:28. > :10:32.this one is that it is like the last story we were talking about. This is
:10:33. > :10:35.crossing so many different government planner. What the
:10:36. > :10:40.Independent on Sunday is looking at is Tony Blair's government. It would
:10:41. > :10:44.seem that the suggestion in the article is that the government of
:10:45. > :10:48.the day was bending over so far to try to keep stable community
:10:49. > :10:51.relations, they tended to ignore what was happening on the streets.
:10:52. > :10:58.Particularly in the Muslim community. The Dick Lee. Because of
:10:59. > :11:02.9/11 as well. This is going back to 2001. `` particularly. 9/11 would
:11:03. > :11:13.have something to do with it after the event but the Labour MP and
:11:14. > :11:17.foreign office minister said he was almost fired by Foreign Secretary
:11:18. > :11:21.Jack Straw because he was accused of upsetting Muslim relations because
:11:22. > :11:25.of the speech he was making. If someone like Denis MacShane, the
:11:26. > :11:30.local MP, is stopped from saving things because he would be accused
:11:31. > :11:34.of being racist, how many other is word doing what they should have
:11:35. > :11:42.done when the abuse first came to light `` weren't. What is damning is
:11:43. > :11:48.the Home Office report carried out which hasn't seen the light of day.
:11:49. > :11:52.One Home Office research was sent to Rotherham in 2001 and the report was
:11:53. > :11:58.suppressed if one believes what was in the Independent by the government
:11:59. > :12:03.and local council. There are lots of questions. There is a jigsaw with
:12:04. > :12:08.pieces missing. This story has come from Denis MacShane. It has, yes,
:12:09. > :12:15.obviously. Not wanting to cast aspersions on him, not at all, you
:12:16. > :12:21.do wonder if it was... Why didn't he go some way else. You know, if he
:12:22. > :12:27.really... The next stage is, when Parliament returns, Keith Vaz, chair
:12:28. > :12:30.of the Select Committee, is determined to find out exactly what
:12:31. > :12:35.evidence existed within the Home Office. That committee has said...
:12:36. > :12:39.It is the best way of doing that. The Muslim community and I know this
:12:40. > :12:46.from my own investigation in sexual grooming by men of Pakistani Origin
:12:47. > :12:50.that the community itself has done a lot to work with the police. We are
:12:51. > :12:54.speaking historically, but so far to go and that was the conclusion of
:12:55. > :12:59.the report. We must end it there. Thank you for taking us through the
:13:00. > :13:03.papers. Thank you for tuning in. Stay with us on BBC News because we
:13:04. > :13:08.have the latest on the breaking news story tonight, five`year`old Ashya
:13:09. > :13:33.king, seriously ill, taken by his parents, has been found in Spain ``
:13:34. > :13:34.caddie king. Coming up next, the Film Review `` King. Welcome