:00:00. > :00:00.Gross are searching closer to the bridge in West London where she was
:00:00. > :00:21.last seen. Welcome to our look at what the
:00:22. > :00:26.papers will bring us tomorrow. With ours is Susie Boniface, the Fleet
:00:27. > :00:37.Street Fox, and Tim Stanley, a columnist for the Telegraph. What
:00:38. > :00:44.are you known as? With my hair, I was compared to Danny La Rue this
:00:45. > :00:48.evening! The FT says the Prime Minister faces more angry questions
:00:49. > :00:52.from Tory backbenchers following the promise of more devolution for
:00:53. > :00:57.Scotland. The Independent says that Labour plans to limit child benefits
:00:58. > :01:02.to an annual rise of 1% if they win the next General Election. The Metro
:01:03. > :01:09.has the body of Hannah Witheridge being flown home. The Telegraph says
:01:10. > :01:12.Ed Miliband has been backed into a corner over his refusal to sign up
:01:13. > :01:18.for the government plans for home rule in England and the Guardian has
:01:19. > :01:26.picked cheers of Emma Thomasson, one of the leading ladies at the protest
:01:27. > :01:31.marches against climate change. The Financial Times, then. Tory anger as
:01:32. > :01:40.Cameron tracks on the English pledge. `` backtracks. This was
:01:41. > :01:46.promised in a Roche, wasn't it? This is a problem, massive constitutional
:01:47. > :01:50.change being talked about but this came from that FrontPage file which
:01:51. > :01:54.itself came from the back of one opinion poll showing that there was
:01:55. > :01:59.a possibility of independence and in the vote and that turned out to be
:02:00. > :02:02.false. They have tied themselves into this timetable which Gordon
:02:03. > :02:06.Brown has promised will definitely happen no matter what and I am
:02:07. > :02:11.certain that Gordon Brown is not the Prime Minister and it is not up to
:02:12. > :02:16.him! I cannot think of any former Prime Minister who is telling want
:02:17. > :02:19.anyone else what to do. They get to this point where they don't know
:02:20. > :02:24.what will happen but something must add it does not matter what anybody
:02:25. > :02:27.does, they will be said to have lost or annoyed somebody, whether it
:02:28. > :02:36.Scotland or elsewhere or something and it will be a dogs backlist. Yes,
:02:37. > :02:39.I agree with all of that. It is extraordinary that we have had this
:02:40. > :02:43.massive vote in which 56% of the Scottish people said they wanted to
:02:44. > :02:50.stay in the union and they voted for no change and how many days later? I
:02:51. > :02:53.have lost track. Four days later and were discussing devo max for
:02:54. > :02:57.Scotland, which in the general panic was something they had to put on the
:02:58. > :03:05.table, but also English votes for English voters and possibly regional
:03:06. > :03:08.assemblies and this constitutional convention and the Financial Times
:03:09. > :03:12.says Tory MPs are angry that the Prime Minister has not committed
:03:13. > :03:14.himself to devo max and giving English control over English
:03:15. > :03:23.Parliamentary votes. It is only Sunday! He is having his big
:03:24. > :03:26.meeting... They promised so much! It is tomorrow at Chequers, about what
:03:27. > :03:33.he will do, and already Tory MPs are saying, when West make you cannot
:03:34. > :03:38.make up a constitution overnight, it is the Americans a couple of
:03:39. > :03:43.decades. We will come back to this in a different guise with a Ed
:03:44. > :03:47.Miliband being cornered. We stay with the Financial Times, the global
:03:48. > :03:50.call for climate change action and thousands of people around the world
:03:51. > :03:57.on the streets calling upon politicians to do something useful
:03:58. > :04:01.in New York. Isn't much chance of success? This shows how pointless
:04:02. > :04:09.those marches are because the point of the story is... Stay at home,
:04:10. > :04:12.don't protest! I believe you should put pressure on government to do
:04:13. > :04:16.something but the point of this is that China and India are not taking
:04:17. > :04:20.part in these talks and will not pledge themselves to anything. We
:04:21. > :04:24.can introduce all these low wattage bulbs that we want and ban all of
:04:25. > :04:34.the over energetic vacuum cleaners who want to China and India are not
:04:35. > :04:39.going to do this, what is the point? Doesn't the rest of the world have
:04:40. > :04:44.to set an example? EU emissions are 10% of the total and China is 28%
:04:45. > :04:48.but that is because China makes everything, European manufacturing
:04:49. > :04:52.is that a low because of the recession and the economies are
:04:53. > :04:57.different and it is quite simple, they will have more manufacturing
:04:58. > :05:00.and more emissions and fuel rules. I do nothing China really feels that
:05:01. > :05:05.they need to what Emma Thomasson, with the best will in the world,
:05:06. > :05:10.thanks. They tend not to follow western examples on things, not on
:05:11. > :05:15.human rights... George Bush was ignoring the summit and the only
:05:16. > :05:20.reason they have cut this is because the industry has collapsed. The
:05:21. > :05:24.Labour plan to freeze child benefit at the conference, we hear all sorts
:05:25. > :05:32.of pledges and potential policies. There is a suggestion that child
:05:33. > :05:36.benefit with the rising by only 1% in the first to make financial
:05:37. > :05:44.years. But does seem contradictory. `` two financial years. When they
:05:45. > :05:47.wanted to cut child benefit for people over ?43,000, they said
:05:48. > :05:53.everybody should because universal benefits can be useful? Labour have
:05:54. > :05:56.definitely gone back, and they are not fixing one of the mistakes in
:05:57. > :06:02.the coalition cuts, which was it were not going to introduce cuts for
:06:03. > :06:09.2`parent families when they both worked and earned under ?42,000 and
:06:10. > :06:15.they still got child benefit, single parents, they got nothing. The
:06:16. > :06:20.system needs re`form, we spend ?31 billion every year on child benefit
:06:21. > :06:22.and child tax credit and pain that two people who seem wealthy is
:06:23. > :06:27.something which a lot of people might have albums with, it needs
:06:28. > :06:31.reforming but cutting this by 1% sounds like a lot and a lot of
:06:32. > :06:36.papers are making a big deal out of this that over one year it will make
:06:37. > :06:44.a difference of ?10. It will save ?400 million. Ten quid per child. If
:06:45. > :06:49.it was not captured 1% you might get 20 quid extra in your child benefit
:06:50. > :06:52.but if it was, you would only get ten quid. When you put things
:06:53. > :06:57.together you see those savings. Politically this is very
:06:58. > :07:00.significant, the problem is this has been overshadowed by Scotland and he
:07:01. > :07:04.did not want that to happen. Two different things have changed, the
:07:05. > :07:11.Tories could always say, what are your reforms going to be? They are
:07:12. > :07:15.saying this 1% cut. Labour has always been hooked on the idea of
:07:16. > :07:19.universal at the back they are saying in the mirror, that they will
:07:20. > :07:25.take away some of the winter fuel benefits from the very wealthy.
:07:26. > :07:29.Good. I would agree and that something Cameron will not do and he
:07:30. > :07:37.has been pressured by people and his staff but he is still hooked on
:07:38. > :07:40.universal concepts. Overnight the position has flipped and Labour has
:07:41. > :07:46.the potential to look tougher on welfare and public policies. I think
:07:47. > :07:53.he is hooked on keeping pensioners happy because they vote for him.
:07:54. > :08:09.That is rather mean`spirited out OK. The Daily Mirror, Balls out... I
:08:10. > :08:12.just realise what that sounds like! You cannot see this but Ed Balls has
:08:13. > :08:18.been playing football and he has accidentally cut one of our
:08:19. > :08:25.newspaper reviewers! Rob Merit from the Northern Echo. He has come off
:08:26. > :08:34.worse and I have, says Rob. He did not score any goals. The point is
:08:35. > :08:38.that it will get tough. He says he will cut ministerial pay by 5%,
:08:39. > :08:46.which will win votes, but at the moment they get 100 and ?43,000 odd
:08:47. > :08:53.bird year but that will be cut to ?128,000, not the most difficult
:08:54. > :08:56.thing. It says that a vet and Ed Balls will lose ?13,000 between
:08:57. > :09:03.them. Does remind us that it is weird... They are married to each
:09:04. > :09:12.other. It is still not properly form but it will go some way to getting
:09:13. > :09:18.votes and the people will like it. David Cameron and Gordon Brown took
:09:19. > :09:21.pay cuts. It is not the same pay cut they would expect nurses and
:09:22. > :09:29.teachers to take. They also would expect a rise of ?74,000 per year as
:09:30. > :09:36.a starting salary. They will lose tea and biscuits. They are! The
:09:37. > :09:43.Telegraph, you will be pleased, Miliband cornered over home rule. He
:09:44. > :09:48.refused to say whether he backs the plan to ban Scottish MPs from voting
:09:49. > :09:52.on English laws. This so`called West Lothian problem. I thought he was
:09:53. > :09:58.clear he wanted to give English MPs greater scrutiny of legislation? But
:09:59. > :10:05.they would be allowed to vote? He has admitted apparently that that
:10:06. > :10:09.was unfair. So he has conceded in principal, apparently, that this is
:10:10. > :10:13.unfair but the problem that he has is the classic Labour won, he is
:10:14. > :10:17.worried that he could win the next election but because of the spread
:10:18. > :10:21.between people voting in Parliament, he might not be able to control
:10:22. > :10:26.English legislation. This could be nothing because I looked this up and
:10:27. > :10:31.I must write this down, since 1997, out of around 3000 laws, the vote,
:10:32. > :10:38.the impact of Scottish roads has only mattered in 21 cases. In
:10:39. > :10:41.Parliament. It is not very important that they'd affect things like
:10:42. > :10:45.foundation hospitals so they did matter but if they calculate that is
:10:46. > :10:49.the small number that are affected, having said that, I think that this
:10:50. > :10:56.grand idea for constitutional convention signs like he had heard
:10:57. > :11:01.of the idea and was not quite sure what it was. I think they are right.
:11:02. > :11:07.He has thrown something up, taking it out of the long grass because it
:11:08. > :11:13.wants to win in 2015. Surely there will be more consultation on at? We
:11:14. > :11:17.are not constitutional experts and it is like tapestry, it has been
:11:18. > :11:21.woven over time and you pull one thread because it does not look
:11:22. > :11:26.right, such as the West Lothian question, and it comes apart because
:11:27. > :11:31.if you take Scottish MPs out of initials, you say no Scottish MP
:11:32. > :11:38.could be Prime Minister so the Scots would be one step further to
:11:39. > :11:42.independence again. And the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
:11:43. > :11:46.They would still have issues like foreign policy and defence? They
:11:47. > :11:50.made a difference over the vote on Syria. The reason Scotland has a
:11:51. > :11:54.parliament is because there is a case to be made for it, there is no
:11:55. > :11:59.precedent for a lot of what is proposed, such as regional semis,
:12:00. > :12:03.where would they be? It has been written, as Ed likes to say, not on
:12:04. > :12:09.the back of a cigarette packet. That is all we have time for. We have
:12:10. > :12:16.more to get through so we shall bring you back later. For another
:12:17. > :12:21.look at the front pages. Stay with us. We will have more on the Labour
:12:22. > :12:36.Party pledge to raise the minimum wage to a pounds per hour. Coming
:12:37. > :12:41.up, it is time for click. Where are the extremists hiding? Without
:12:42. > :12:42.realising it? They have already told the