:00:00. > :00:00.attempts as Liverpool manager. Sam bogus -- Burgess is expected to make
:00:00. > :00:17.a decision about switching back his allegiance in rugby. More sport
:00:18. > :00:20.after the papers. Welcome to our look ahead to what the papers are
:00:21. > :00:27.bringing us tomorrow. We are joined tonight by the daily Mirror
:00:28. > :00:33.columnist Susan Boniface and James Martin. Good evening to you both.
:00:34. > :00:37.That's some of the front pages. The Independent has a story that police
:00:38. > :00:42.have used powers under the terrorism act to seize the laptop of a BBC
:00:43. > :00:45.Newsnight journalist who has been investigating Western born
:00:46. > :00:50.jihadists. The Financial Times leads on a review calling for a third of
:00:51. > :00:56.board seats at Britain passed my biggest companies to be held by
:00:57. > :01:02.women by 2020. Job advisers will be based in food banks after the idea
:01:03. > :01:11.was pioneered in Manchester. The Daily Telegraph was showing Prince
:01:12. > :01:20.Harry laughing with Michelle Obama. In the Guardian, they said there
:01:21. > :01:27.were warning signs and these were ignored regarding kids company. The
:01:28. > :01:31.England World Cup date was secretly doomed because of a deal to award
:01:32. > :01:36.the tournament to Russia. In the Daily Express, please have run out
:01:37. > :01:41.of clues as they scale back the search for Madeleine McCann. In the
:01:42. > :01:45.Guardian, the headline, ministers ignored repeated warnings on Kids
:01:46. > :01:52.Company. Does this reveal anything new? Yes, and it does not. What is
:01:53. > :01:56.shocking is the kind of knew that, for many years, repeated government
:01:57. > :02:03.of various colours had been very keen on Karl Andree and given it
:02:04. > :02:07.lots of money. This report shows that the Government of David Cameron
:02:08. > :02:10.and Gordon Brown have repeatedly intervened to keep giving money to
:02:11. > :02:15.Kids Company when there appears to be problems. More than that, they
:02:16. > :02:18.have given a total of ?15 million over 15 years without apparently
:02:19. > :02:21.once ever having involved a competitive process for those
:02:22. > :02:27.grants, which every of the charity in the country would have had to
:02:28. > :02:31.have gone through. Why would Kids Company behave like a proper
:02:32. > :02:35.charity, with cash reserves and an audit trail and transparency, if the
:02:36. > :02:40.Government who is handing them money does not ever once expect them to do
:02:41. > :02:43.that? You can almost forgive them for thinking money was falling out
:02:44. > :02:50.of the sky because it was, effectively. What is really damaging
:02:51. > :02:53.is, right at the end, in 2013, the Department for Education, under
:02:54. > :02:59.David Blunkett, I think it was then, no, it was not, it was the Tories,
:03:00. > :03:03.decided there was a public interest case on the basis government would
:03:04. > :03:06.suffer reputational damage if it stopped funding them. That is
:03:07. > :03:09.because they are either being blackmailed to some extent. If you
:03:10. > :03:14.stop giving us money, we will make you look back. More likely, they are
:03:15. > :03:20.doing the job the Government should have been doing and funding the
:03:21. > :03:24.charity. Kids Company does not come out well. Various departments do not
:03:25. > :03:29.come out well. The people who come out of it worse on the ones who rely
:03:30. > :03:37.on Kids Company. Sir Mark and we should never forget people who use
:03:38. > :03:43.the services. -- We should never forget. It does confirm the series
:03:44. > :03:46.of stories we have been getting about Kids Company having a spell
:03:47. > :03:53.over various government ministers. The ministers, time and again, we
:03:54. > :03:58.should not forget that five days before Kids Company was declared
:03:59. > :04:03.bankrupt, it got another 3 million from the Government. David Cameron
:04:04. > :04:11.intervenes and said, no, we have to give Camilla some money. It is
:04:12. > :04:16.unprecedented to open the chequebook. They said they were
:04:17. > :04:22.doing lots of fantastic stuff. The people they helped said they were
:04:23. > :04:25.doing a lot of fantastic stuff. There was no audit trail or
:04:26. > :04:31.paperwork and you could not be sure harmony be but they were helping and
:04:32. > :04:36.in what way they were helping. All charities do great work. Why was
:04:37. > :04:42.this charity so special? This is what does not come up in the audit
:04:43. > :04:50.office report. This charity's chief executive got to go on question Time
:04:51. > :04:54.quite often, that is why. In the Metro, picking up on the story we
:04:55. > :04:58.have been talking about today. Duncan Smith says he wants to try
:04:59. > :05:06.out job advisers being based at food banks. It has broadly been welcomed.
:05:07. > :05:10.Except that for the past five years, Iain Duncan Smith has insisted there
:05:11. > :05:15.is no need for food banks, the trust is running the food banks is making
:05:16. > :05:23.it up and imagining there is a problem. Now he will start to put
:05:24. > :05:27.government advisers in there. Iain Duncan Smith might be missing the
:05:28. > :05:32.point about the key users of food banks. A quarter of them have jobs.
:05:33. > :05:37.Are those job advisers saying you will need another job. That is what
:05:38. > :05:43.one of the organisations told us tonight on BBC News. A lot of them
:05:44. > :05:46.already have jobs. Sign it is not an issue of food banks and
:05:47. > :05:50.unemployment, it is an issue of people not being paid enough to do
:05:51. > :05:56.the jobs they have. With tax credit cuts, there are small lightly to be
:05:57. > :06:01.greater numbers using the food banks. Moving onto the times. It
:06:02. > :06:06.will make many football fans feel quite sick when they read this
:06:07. > :06:11.tomorrow. Secret Fifa deal ruined England's World Cup bid. This is not
:06:12. > :06:17.coming from a journalist, this is coming from Sepp Blatter. This is an
:06:18. > :06:23.amazing interview that Sepp Blatter gave to the Tass news agency in
:06:24. > :06:30.Russia today. He has essentially dropped that any right in it.
:06:31. > :06:36.Essentially going he is saying, before it went to vote that Russia,
:06:37. > :06:41.and then the US were going to get the World Cups. We put up 21 minim
:06:42. > :06:46.plans to try to get the World Cup. 2 million came direct from taxpayers.
:06:47. > :06:50.Surely we should be asking for some of that back. The president of the
:06:51. > :06:55.FA was asked that exact question and he said he would look at that
:06:56. > :07:02.again. That chance of getting any of that money. They wanted it to be in
:07:03. > :07:11.Eastern Europe and in America. Sepp Blatter has said, we agreed it was
:07:12. > :07:13.going to Russia and then America. When it came to the boat, Nicolas
:07:14. > :07:18.Sarkozy had lunch with a guy from Qatar and then lunch with teeny and
:07:19. > :07:23.they decided it was going to Qatar. Corruption did not work the way Sepp
:07:24. > :07:30.Blatter thought it would. It was corrupt in a different way. Votes do
:07:31. > :07:36.count for something... We spent ?21 million. It is not so much a case of
:07:37. > :07:40.getting our money back, we should have an audit of how we spent the
:07:41. > :07:47.money. We should have just gone to lunch with Nicolas Sarkozy. Surely
:07:48. > :07:53.we must get 1 million of the 21 million back? Do we totally trust
:07:54. > :07:58.anything that Sepp Blatter is saying? He is being investigated on
:07:59. > :08:04.two continents. He is head of an organisation eg has been in charge
:08:05. > :08:12.of for two decades. He has a lot to fight for, to win, and Toulouse. I'm
:08:13. > :08:21.not sure many of us would trust him. This has become like a bad
:08:22. > :08:25.carry on film. Eye-macro none of the eight candidates have talked about
:08:26. > :08:32.Russia not hosting the World Cup or Qatar either. In the Telegraph,
:08:33. > :08:37.fantastic picture. It shows Prince Charming meeting the First Lady. It
:08:38. > :08:42.makes you wonder what it is he has them too hard to produce that kind
:08:43. > :08:49.of smile. I did not say that. What is really good, for the first time
:08:50. > :08:52.in living history, we have a generation in the Royal family, two
:08:53. > :08:57.princes, you are doing really good work. They are doing stuff we all
:08:58. > :09:01.approve of. Prince William is flying helicopters and saving lives and
:09:02. > :09:05.Prince Harry is trying to raise awareness with the Invicta 's games
:09:06. > :09:12.and for paralysed people and veterans, people who have lost
:09:13. > :09:16.limbs. It is fantastic stuff. People who complain about the Royals, they
:09:17. > :09:20.do not have jobs and so on, Kate Middleton can start working any time
:09:21. > :09:26.she likes. The fact they are doing this needs to be praised. There is
:09:27. > :09:33.no secret why this is on many front pages. This is marrying Prince
:09:34. > :09:45.Harry's passions of the Armed Forces and charity work. It is the perfect
:09:46. > :09:50.role for him. The Invictus Games was a huge success and is being hosted
:09:51. > :09:56.in America next time. Eye-macro they are clearly getting on. In the
:09:57. > :10:02.Financial Times, -- They are clearly getting on. In the Financial Times,
:10:03. > :10:09.by 2020 women to hold a third of all board suits. They are reporting a
:10:10. > :10:15.lack of females. When the target was first set a few years back, in 2011,
:10:16. > :10:23.the target at the time, women held just 12% of positions. Setting a
:10:24. > :10:29.target does help. They have never hit it before. It needs to be a
:10:30. > :10:33.voluntary target. Setting a quote of anything, whether gender or race,
:10:34. > :10:39.makes me want to peak. If you can get more women involved on
:10:40. > :10:44.billboards and women not see the reason to stop work just because
:10:45. > :10:51.they have had children and want to keep on going... What about the
:10:52. > :10:54.Labour short list? If you have a quota system where you must have a
:10:55. > :10:59.certain type of person to get in, you do not get the best quality
:11:00. > :11:03.candidates. They should compete on a level playing field. If you have the
:11:04. > :11:09.problem that people selecting them are biased and prejudiced, you are
:11:10. > :11:13.not changing it. It is an interesting point. It is the same
:11:14. > :11:17.time the Davis commission report is coming out. You have a separate
:11:18. > :11:23.report from an executive hiring firm. We have a real roadblock of
:11:24. > :11:27.talented, female executives coming through. They are predicting that we
:11:28. > :11:34.will see less executives in the city. It is a bit more complicated
:11:35. > :11:39.than just putting in a law. It is not just about who is on the board.
:11:40. > :11:45.If they are on the board and they are getting half of what men get, it
:11:46. > :11:52.is not fair, is it? We have a couple of permits to look at the story in
:11:53. > :11:57.the Independent. Outrage at BBC over seizure of journalist's laptop
:11:58. > :12:07.following a Judge Posner order. We all know this producer very well. --
:12:08. > :12:12.a judge's order. From a media and career point of view, he has
:12:13. > :12:19.something great to put on his CV now. Bravo to him! Is this the right
:12:20. > :12:23.thing that police should be using terrorism powers for? These guys and
:12:24. > :12:29.he has been talking to, yes, they are very important and hard to find.
:12:30. > :12:33.A lot of people also use Twitter, Facebook, snap chat. These guys who
:12:34. > :12:38.have gone over from Britain to join ices are not exactly in deep hiding.
:12:39. > :12:43.It feels that this is a bit of a point proving exercise from the
:12:44. > :12:50.police. It is about seeking a court order for something. There are
:12:51. > :12:53.hundreds of jihadists, probably, who have been spoken to by jealous and
:12:54. > :12:56.reported on by newspapers and by TV companies. Some of them are using
:12:57. > :13:02.pseudonyms and some of them are not. They are so easy to find and they
:13:03. > :13:08.are happy to talk to people back here. You just need to say you are a
:13:09. > :13:14.journalist. They should be doing something better than asking the BBC
:13:15. > :13:19.to do their work for them. He knew he would have to give up this
:13:20. > :13:23.information. The BBC has pointed out it was not a confidential source on
:13:24. > :13:31.the laptop, which would be even more worrying. We are going to do it
:13:32. > :13:38.again at 11:30 p.m.. Thanks to you for watching as well. We'll be back
:13:39. > :13:45.at 11:30 p.m.. Coming up, on BBC News, at 11 p.m., more on the fatal
:13:46. > :13:46.stabbing of a schoolboy in Aberdeen. Ahead of that, it is the