:00:00. > :00:07.We'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers
:00:08. > :00:13.Friends of family of Bailey Gwynne, the 16-year-old stabbed to death
:00:14. > :00:16.at school in Aberdeen, have tonight been staging
:00:17. > :00:22.A 16-year-old boy will appear in court tomorrow over his death.
:00:23. > :00:26.The founder of the failed charity, Kids Company, has said it provided
:00:27. > :00:28.Relatives of soldiers killed in the Iraq War criticise the latest
:00:29. > :00:33.It was announced today that the Chilcot report will be out next
:00:34. > :00:37.summer - Labour says the wait is beyond ridiculous.
:00:38. > :00:39.A 16-year-old boy will appear in court tomorrow over his death.
:00:40. > :00:42.The founder of the failed charity, Kids Company, has said it provided
:00:43. > :00:45.exceptional value after a report revealed it was handed ?46
:00:46. > :00:50.million of public money despite concerns over the way it was run.
:00:51. > :00:53.Two men are charged with raping a soldier, who was later found
:00:54. > :01:07.Coming up in Sportsday, the former Chelsea doctor is pursuing a case
:01:08. > :01:15.for constructive dismissal. Former player as, colleagues and fans
:01:16. > :01:19.gather in Liverpool. And the best of the action from the world gymnastics
:01:20. > :01:20.championships in Glasgow is all coming up in 15 minutes after the
:01:21. > :01:33.papers. Hello and welcome to
:01:34. > :01:36.our look ahead to what the papers With me are the former trade
:01:37. > :01:39.minister Lord Digby Jones The FT says that David Cameron
:01:40. > :01:48.and George Osborne are seeking an emergency brake
:01:49. > :01:50.on new laws affecting economies outside the eurozone as part
:01:51. > :01:53.of its renegotiations for the EU The I quotes a new report
:01:54. > :02:02.which says young people are suffering the worst economic
:02:03. > :02:04.prospects for several generations. The Independent carries the news
:02:05. > :02:07.that China has announced the end of And the Guardian front pages
:02:08. > :02:14.features the China story, along with the news that
:02:15. > :02:16.the long-awaited report from the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war
:02:17. > :02:21.is scheduled to appear next summer. Spending on credit is
:02:22. > :02:24.at its highest level for a decade, with borrowers owing some ?176
:02:25. > :02:29.billion, according to the Metro. The Telegraph says one ambulance
:02:30. > :02:32.trust is making patients wait twice as long for help
:02:33. > :02:35.if they dial '111' , even if they The Times leads with news that
:02:36. > :02:45.police have demanded the power to see the internet browsing history
:02:46. > :02:47.of everyone in Britain. And a police pilot scheme is telling
:02:48. > :02:51.victims of crime to call them on Skype,
:02:52. > :03:04.according to the Daily Mirror. Let us get started. The Times, the
:03:05. > :03:13.headline is that police want powers to see the public's Web history. The
:03:14. > :03:18.broad picture. We consider ourselves to be a country that is very free,
:03:19. > :03:23.separation of powers, the police controlled by politicians. In this
:03:24. > :03:28.story, the police have been lobbying behind the scenes ahead of a major
:03:29. > :03:33.surveillance bill that will be published next week. They want the
:03:34. > :03:39.government to force Telecom companies to retain data that would
:03:40. > :03:43.disclose specific addresses visited by customers. The police would not
:03:44. > :03:49.have access to the content, but it would know which websites you have
:03:50. > :03:52.been visiting. They need this because there isn't much potential
:03:53. > :03:59.suspect behaviour carried out online. -- is so much. Civil
:04:00. > :04:09.liberties will say it is evidence of an overweening police desire to
:04:10. > :04:15.intervene in our lives. Some politicians, this critics of the
:04:16. > :04:21.surveillance state, they say there should be rejected. One senior
:04:22. > :04:30.officer said that it was about everyday investigation rather than
:04:31. > :04:35.surveillance. We sit here and we can afford when we have got people who
:04:36. > :04:42.want to do us real harm, we can afford the luxury of having a debate
:04:43. > :04:50.as to whether this should happen. And then when an atrocity happens,
:04:51. > :04:56.why it are we not being kept safe? At the end of the day, do I really
:04:57. > :05:00.care if the police are not going to look at what I did, but look at the
:05:01. > :05:08.various websites I chose to look at? If I have got nothing to hide,
:05:09. > :05:17.what am I worried about? Frankly, if somebody is going to try and access
:05:18. > :05:23.help to hate a lot of different groups... If the price I pay for
:05:24. > :05:28.that is the police also look at the websites I have been looking at,
:05:29. > :05:36.that is the price I will pay. Parliament has already said no to
:05:37. > :05:44.this. Parliament is saying, keep us safe. But we are going to tie your
:05:45. > :05:52.hands behind your back. This is mission creep. Police have to prove
:05:53. > :06:01.this works. Here is what David Davis is saying. We have to monitor the
:06:02. > :06:08.monitors. Would you mind if the police looked at yours? Not at all.
:06:09. > :06:16.And we come from and divides. Neither of us minds. But it is the
:06:17. > :06:24.principle. I am a law-abiding citizen. What I think is the
:06:25. > :06:32.hallmark of an advance democracy, at least we are having a debate. We are
:06:33. > :06:44.talking about the thin end of the wedge. And there are European
:06:45. > :06:47.rulings. What they say, there are European court rulings on data
:06:48. > :06:56.retention. Look at security of data. If this is held for a year or
:06:57. > :07:06.longer buy these telecom companies and they are not secure, we are more
:07:07. > :07:10.vulnerable. We have got to get a way in which we can stop people from
:07:11. > :07:16.doing us harm. We have to give those people entrusted with that task to
:07:17. > :07:21.have all the power in the world to keep us safe. They always say they
:07:22. > :07:34.need these powers. Can we trust them. There are good and bad things
:07:35. > :07:38.we do in our lives. The mirror getting a bit of outrage
:07:39. > :07:58.against on policeman running around. That is
:07:59. > :08:05.the first thing he said. What is the story about? This is what it is. The
:08:06. > :08:12.police are saying, how do we get more value for money? We have got to
:08:13. > :08:18.give more services. What can we do? One thing they have come up with, we
:08:19. > :08:28.will interview certain people who might be assisting on Skype. It
:08:29. > :08:35.sounds reasonable. And what happens, complete copout, this is dreadful.
:08:36. > :08:43.It starts out as an idea, and then it becomes default. In terms of the
:08:44. > :08:51.actual quality of police response, the body in your house reassuring
:08:52. > :08:55.you. Victims will lose out. You want a police officer in your house
:08:56. > :09:02.showing concern. Of course. But police plan to ditch home visits,
:09:03. > :09:10.slammed as a copout. It is newspaper language. What they are saying,
:09:11. > :09:15.public sector cuts, we have got this. This is the overall
:09:16. > :09:22.narrative. That is what newspapers do. You will find the same thing
:09:23. > :09:32.when we get to the Daily Mail about population. Something that might not
:09:33. > :09:39.get us so steamed up. I think this falls to you, Henry. It is about
:09:40. > :09:50.motorcars. One cannot feel sorry for vaults weighed in. -- Volkswagen.
:09:51. > :10:00.Think about the amount it will cost to fix one of the cars brought in.
:10:01. > :10:05.It counteracts the cheating of the emissions test. The question is
:10:06. > :10:10.whether every single one of those people will come forward and claim
:10:11. > :10:13.from Volkswagen. Whether every single one of those people will be
:10:14. > :10:19.entitled to that particular compensation. They claim that
:10:20. > :10:34.something between 10-20 employees were involved in this particular
:10:35. > :10:40.scandal. The one thing I would say, a policeman working in Newcastle, a
:10:41. > :10:46.businesswoman in Manchester, this is not about business at it. There are
:10:47. > :10:53.loads of people, 99% of business people in Britain, do not want this
:10:54. > :10:59.image that all businesses are like this. You have got one of the major
:11:00. > :11:06.car companies who have been at it and they deserve serious punishment
:11:07. > :11:10.and serious putting right the wrong. Because they have been breaking the
:11:11. > :11:15.rules. It does not mean everybody has been breaking the rules. But you
:11:16. > :11:22.trust to the brand. It is a massive and global. People thought they were
:11:23. > :11:31.more fuel-efficient. Now it is a sham. This is not about breaking the
:11:32. > :11:40.rules, this is about consequential loss. Somebody has got a diesel
:11:41. > :11:46.engine and it is worth ?500 less. Who is going to give them the ?500?
:11:47. > :11:55.Argue surprised that no other car company, I thought others would be
:11:56. > :11:58.discovered. But it seems to have been one rogue business. The testing
:11:59. > :12:07.regime has allowed car companies to do things to make sure they get
:12:08. > :12:12.within the tests. A good example, and I think we owed this to Jeremy
:12:13. > :12:20.Clarkson, on some fuel consumption test. They used to go past the beam,
:12:21. > :12:30.switch off the engine, go into neutral, and then start it again.
:12:31. > :12:38.What I think was coming here was, VW have taken it another step. This is
:12:39. > :12:43.now taking the Mickey. I am not surprised that one has been
:12:44. > :12:46.hammered. I would not be surprised that in the boardrooms, most people
:12:47. > :13:01.are saying, please tell me we are not doing this. There are regular --
:13:02. > :13:09.rigourously auditing verse. A lot of these tests, the it is going on. You
:13:10. > :13:17.have to look whether regulation was poorly implemented. I would have
:13:18. > :13:22.thought that within the boardrooms of the automotive world, you are
:13:23. > :13:31.going to have everybody scrambling around saying this is not happening.
:13:32. > :13:36.The Metro, spending on credit hits a ten year high. The figures are
:13:37. > :13:45.absolutely colossal. But we need to be clear on what we are talking
:13:46. > :13:50.about. Why does it matter? When you look at the component parts of the
:13:51. > :13:57.financial crisis, there are four or five different things happening
:13:58. > :14:02.creating a perfect storm. Some was poor regulation, poorly implemented.
:14:03. > :14:09.Some of it was politicians basking in the sunshine of people feeling
:14:10. > :14:15.good. One of them was arsenic. The average Joe in the street who was
:14:16. > :14:27.saying, I love this, I can borrow a lot of money cheaply. Is it
:14:28. > :14:31.dangerous? If it is not asset backed, if what you are doing is
:14:32. > :14:37.borrowing for something that is worth more than that, so there is a
:14:38. > :14:43.degree of equity, and you can service it is not of your income,
:14:44. > :14:49.nothing wrong with that. If the value comes down, and you cannot
:14:50. > :14:55.service it any more, because interest rates go up, the debt
:14:56. > :15:01.service goes up, then you are in trouble. That is what you have to be
:15:02. > :15:10.careful of. Are we heading for a correction? I think we are. History
:15:11. > :15:20.repeats itself. Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are
:15:21. > :15:31.tuned to repeat it. I do not want people to suffer. But we had it so
:15:32. > :15:37.good for quite sometime. I am getting letters from banks and all
:15:38. > :15:44.sorts of things. Some people will say, OK, brilliant. And the cold
:15:45. > :15:52.winter will come at some point. He is absolutely right. I am worried
:15:53. > :15:54.that I am agreeing with you. There is a front-page picture in the Daily
:15:55. > :16:05.Telegraph of some actor with a sword. It is all about the Battle of
:16:06. > :16:12.Agincourt. Henry just said, we have not talked about this. This is a
:16:13. > :16:16.nice segue. People do not know history. Here is an example of where
:16:17. > :16:21.we should learn from history. 600 years ago last Saturday, Henry fifth
:16:22. > :16:30.took his guys over to France and eat an army five times his size. --
:16:31. > :16:41.beat. What the photograph is about, there was a service for the 600 is
:16:42. > :16:49.since Agincourt. The lesson, complacency. In sport, and media, in
:16:50. > :16:52.business, in public sectors, one of the greatest evils is where you
:16:53. > :17:00.think, all you have to do is turn up and you will win. The French made an
:17:01. > :17:20.enormous stake. They got absolutely wiped out. We won. Get him off. I do
:17:21. > :17:24.not know what French for enough is. But the other thing we got out of
:17:25. > :17:34.this was all the vineyards. And you very much. -- thank you. Well done,
:17:35. > :17:37.both of you. Great fun with the papers. Coming up next, Sportsday.