:00:00. > :00:00.will have more on that and reaction to the Premier League action is
:00:00. > :00:00.like, cricket, tennis, and boxing, that is all coming up after the
:00:00. > :00:15.papers. Hello and welcome to our look ahead
:00:16. > :00:19.to what the the papers will be With me are Dan Bilefsky from the
:00:20. > :00:23.New York Times and Tim Montgomerie, The FT leads with reports that
:00:24. > :00:43.senior European Central Bank officials held meetings with senior
:00:44. > :00:46.figures from the financial service industry in the run-up to making
:00:47. > :00:48.important policy decisions like The I says some police and crime
:00:49. > :00:52.commissioners are threatening to sue the Home Office over planned funding
:00:53. > :00:55.changes which they claim are "unfair The Metro has more woe for Chelsea
:00:56. > :01:00.manager Jose Mourinho - he's now being taken to court by the football
:01:01. > :01:02.club's former head physio Eva Carneiro over the dispute which saw
:01:03. > :01:11.her banished from the team bench. The Telegraph says some of Baroness
:01:12. > :01:14.Thatcher's clothes, jewellery and political mementoes are to be
:01:15. > :01:17.auctioned off after the Victoria and Albert Museum turned down an offer
:01:18. > :01:21.to put them on display. The Daily Star carries a picture of
:01:22. > :01:24.London's Docklands enshrouded in fog and warns that it may last for more
:01:25. > :01:29.than a week. The Guardian says the Prime Minister
:01:30. > :01:32.has abandoned plans for British airstrikes
:01:33. > :01:35.on Islamic State targets in Syria. And The Times also leads on that
:01:36. > :01:38.story - alongside a picture the widow and daughter of PC Phillips,
:01:39. > :01:42.the police officer killed while trying to stop a truck -
:01:43. > :01:58.thousands of colleagues attended We will begin with the Times, our
:01:59. > :02:09.times, can I call it that? You made. It is owned by Rupert Murdoch, I
:02:10. > :02:13.properly shouldn't... And now to the story, David Cameron backs down over
:02:14. > :02:18.plan to bomb Syria. The Conservatives and the Lib Dems tried
:02:19. > :02:21.this in 2013 and they lost the vote. They thought maybe with a change of
:02:22. > :02:26.government, they might get it through. Absolutely. That is what
:02:27. > :02:30.the Prime Minister would like to do, he would like to be leading and
:02:31. > :02:34.helping to lead the international fight against what we are seeing in
:02:35. > :02:38.Syria, many of the problems of immigration that we have been
:02:39. > :02:42.worrying about, people feel unrooted in the searing crisis and if we
:02:43. > :02:47.don't tackle these problems at source, and you can disagree about
:02:48. > :02:49.the way of tackling it, but the Prime Minister thinks this is the
:02:50. > :02:53.kind of intervention we need, but he would not bring another vote to the
:02:54. > :02:58.House of Commons, after losing it once, a couple of years ago. He
:02:59. > :03:01.would not do that if he could not be sure of getting it through, and he
:03:02. > :03:05.fears there are so many Tory MPs who have misgivings about getting
:03:06. > :03:09.involved in another foreign war that he did not get this past the House
:03:10. > :03:18.of Commons, and because there's a risk that would be defeated, he
:03:19. > :03:26.cannot be defeated twice. How does this look like the UK -- how does
:03:27. > :03:32.this make the UK look? Is it a major power? Defensive spending has been
:03:33. > :03:38.cut, and this is another example, we have France trying to exert itself
:03:39. > :03:42.in Syria, they have sent some advisers to Syria, but we have got
:03:43. > :03:48.Britain retrenching, that plays into the notion that Britain is no longer
:03:49. > :03:52.aspires to be a global player. When they have those allies who think
:03:53. > :03:59.that David Cameron cannot get the vote through, so he cannot carry on
:04:00. > :04:06.with the strikes? I'm wondering to the extent that Jeremy Corbyn is
:04:07. > :04:10.planning a part in this decision. There was hope, that there would be
:04:11. > :04:15.Labour rebels against Jeremy Corbyn's position, but it does not
:04:16. > :04:20.seem there will be enough Labour rebels to outweigh the number of
:04:21. > :04:26.Tory rebels. These are issues which have split the parties within, as
:04:27. > :04:27.much as between. You have noninterventionist and
:04:28. > :04:33.interventionists in both parties and you need them to cobble together a
:04:34. > :04:35.cross-party coalition, to get this through, and David Cameron has
:04:36. > :04:41.concluded that he cannot get this through the House of Commons. It is
:04:42. > :04:44.a very complicated picture. And now to another story, police chiefs
:04:45. > :04:50.threatened to sue the Home Office because of changes to funding. Some
:04:51. > :04:55.forces will lose out on funding and they are threatening the Home
:04:56. > :05:00.Secretary with a judicial review. Some forces feel they cannot bear
:05:01. > :05:04.any more cuts. At the time of austerity we are seeing these cuts
:05:05. > :05:12.on across-the-board, and in New York in 2011, they tried similar cuts,
:05:13. > :05:16.with a $400 million deficit, and the murder rate went down, not long
:05:17. > :05:20.after, and so the histrionic reaction might just be that. And the
:05:21. > :05:24.other hand, it was an interesting counterpoint with the tragic killing
:05:25. > :05:28.of this British police officer, that these are cuts which are happening
:05:29. > :05:34.almost within a 24-hour period. Interesting counterpoint. Some
:05:35. > :05:40.forces are facing cuts between 25 and 40% and they say they cannot
:05:41. > :05:44.attend crimes like burglaries. That will alarm the public, the overall
:05:45. > :05:47.picture is that we are seeing a global reduction in crime, even
:05:48. > :05:52.though we have seen big cuts already in place budget, crime is continuing
:05:53. > :05:58.to fall, but the question is, are we going to get to the point where the
:05:59. > :06:04.public start to see services like proper police attendance at various
:06:05. > :06:08.forms of crime withdrawn or delayed? The police have a vested interest in
:06:09. > :06:10.this, they might not be the most independent people to be judging
:06:11. > :06:15.this, but they now say that the cuts have gone far enough and if they go
:06:16. > :06:23.any further, core services will be imperilled. The Financial Times.
:06:24. > :06:33.EPA, the Environment Protection Agency in the United States, alleges
:06:34. > :06:38.that VW cheated on prestige Porsche and Audi models. It is not just the
:06:39. > :06:49.cars that I like driving, but something that you might, as well.
:06:50. > :06:55.The New York Times type of car. We would aspire to drive Porsches.
:06:56. > :07:01.Course. It goes further than those top-level cars which until now we
:07:02. > :07:06.were not aware they might have the software, as well. Volkswagen were
:07:07. > :07:10.reeling from the initial allegations, and now the more
:07:11. > :07:14.prestige cars are recused of potentially having these cheating
:07:15. > :07:20.devices in them and that is another blow to the prestige of this
:07:21. > :07:27.company, but also to Germany. -- are recused. Germany's reputation is
:07:28. > :07:33.built on its manufacturing. -- are accused. I cannot help asking, are
:07:34. > :07:41.people going to buy less Porsches and Mercedes, because of the
:07:42. > :07:46.emissions rating? You buy these cars because you trust them for a
:07:47. > :07:54.liability, and if you pay extra for these cars, will you pay extra if
:07:55. > :08:01.they are damaged in this way? You won't buy any more Porsches Quest
:08:02. > :08:07.For More they will have to pay big fines -- you won't buy any more
:08:08. > :08:12.Porsches? We have a statement from VW, they say that they wish to
:08:13. > :08:17.emphasise that no software has been installed in the three litre diesel
:08:18. > :08:27.power units to alter emission characteristics in a forbidden
:08:28. > :08:35.manner. They said they will cooperate in this matter. Forbidden
:08:36. > :08:38.manner, what does that mean? That is the worst kind of corporate tour,
:08:39. > :08:46.maybe it was better in German. Yes, something lost in translation. This
:08:47. > :08:52.is Liz Truss saying that she cuts the bad bits off food which is
:08:53. > :08:59.passed the best before date. I'm squeamish North American, we just
:09:00. > :09:02.had a story about mouldy bread, and Americans, we have a perception of
:09:03. > :09:05.being very healthy and very squeamish, when it comes to mould
:09:06. > :09:11.them but you Brits are made of tougher things. We are, it's the
:09:12. > :09:17.climate. Maybe so, it is foggy and rainy and may be you like mouldy
:09:18. > :09:23.bread. I'm not sure I would want to eat mouldy bread. I'm with Liz
:09:24. > :09:27.Truss, she says that she is of the school, if the cheese has got mould
:09:28. > :09:37.on it, just cut the end off and eat the rest. I was in France, and all
:09:38. > :09:44.of my French colleagues would begrudge me if I did not eat mouldy
:09:45. > :09:47.cheese. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall has been looking at the War of
:09:48. > :09:54.waste, third food in this country does not get eaten, so maybe this
:09:55. > :09:57.trust will have a look at that. The fee and a Thamesdown be Margaret
:09:58. > :10:03.Thatcher collection. -- Victoria and Albert Museum turns down the
:10:04. > :10:12.Margaret Thatcher collection. This is outrageous. Something we agree
:10:13. > :10:17.on. We are agreed, Margaret Thatcher is a global I come, she changed 21st
:10:18. > :10:23.century history, and it's hard to imagine that they would not attract
:10:24. > :10:28.people, she was a political Queen. -- global icon. She did not wear a
:10:29. > :10:32.high-end fashion, she was no Princess Diana. She did where
:10:33. > :10:41.produce brands, especially in her more majestic years. -- she did
:10:42. > :10:52.where close I do not think she would approve of
:10:53. > :10:57.your colours tonight. I doubt she would, but maybe that is all to the
:10:58. > :11:03.good. If it is going to be auctioned, you can buy yourself and
:11:04. > :11:10.so. Moving swiftly on. -- buy yourself a memento. And now, the
:11:11. > :11:16.former Chelsea doctor, Eva Carneiro, who rather ceremoniously was ousted
:11:17. > :11:25.from Chelsea. You know a bit about this? Such a sad story, to see
:11:26. > :11:30.Chelsea's fall and fall, it gets worse, they had a terrible result at
:11:31. > :11:33.the weekend, losing against Liverpool, Jose Mourinho behaving
:11:34. > :11:37.like a child in his press conferences and now one of the
:11:38. > :11:44.instances which was the early warning that the season was growing
:11:45. > :11:49.bullseye going wrong, -- that the season was going wrong, when Jose
:11:50. > :11:54.Mourinho had the falling out with Eva Carneiro, and he is being sued
:11:55. > :12:01.personally. This is endlessly fascinating. Nothing to do with the
:12:02. > :12:06.fact that she looks very sexy and attractive. You support Manchester
:12:07. > :12:12.United? Yes. Would you turn down Jose Mourinho? Not a couple of years
:12:13. > :12:17.ago, but now I think he has really damaged himself, not just the
:12:18. > :12:21.performance, which is a great collapse, but how he has behaved
:12:22. > :12:27.afterwards, trying to blame everyone else but himself for what is a
:12:28. > :12:32.terrible but formance. He called her naive, is that terrible? That is a
:12:33. > :12:46.bit rude, when she is an expert physio. It is soccer, you have got
:12:47. > :12:51.to choose a team. Right, I can't possibly, I need to retain my
:12:52. > :12:57.objectivity. I would try to persuade him, but it does not seem like it is
:12:58. > :13:06.likely. Maybe not. That is it for the first review, but my guests will
:13:07. > :13:10.be back at 1130. Stay with us, at 11 we have more on the possible causes
:13:11. > :13:17.of the Russian jet crash in the Sinai Peninsula at the weekend. The
:13:18. > :13:19.airline has ruled out pilot error, but the Egyptian authorities have
:13:20. > :13:21.said it is too early to say.