:00:16. > :00:17.Welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers
:00:18. > :00:20.With me are Caroline Frost, entertainment editor
:00:21. > :00:34.at the Huffington post and the Parliamentary journalist Tony Grew.
:00:35. > :00:37.Tomorrow's front pages, starting with...
:00:38. > :00:40.The FT has a story we've been covering here
:00:41. > :00:43.on BBC News this evening, saying Amazon is to open a high street
:00:44. > :00:45.book shop in a move the paper describes
:00:46. > :00:57.A panel of ten specialist judges will be able to veto anti- terror
:00:58. > :01:02.actions, in the Times? They will be able to execute responsibility to
:01:03. > :01:06.oversee warrants for operations. It has previously been a government
:01:07. > :01:12.operation, something the government have been fighting. It also gives us
:01:13. > :01:19.a heads up of the scale of the anti- terror operations going on. The Home
:01:20. > :01:23.Secretary is going to announce it tomorrow? What do you think security
:01:24. > :01:29.services will think of this? It is a hugely significant change in the way
:01:30. > :01:36.it thinks are done in Britain. For many other countries it is a vital
:01:37. > :01:40.part of their structures. The Secretaries of State for Britain and
:01:41. > :01:46.Northern Ireland have been the only ones who could authorise the police
:01:47. > :01:51.forces against terrorists and crime suspects. It is a significant
:01:52. > :01:55.change. A step away from the executive, towards judicial? What
:01:56. > :02:01.will happen is those ministers will still issue permission for warrants.
:02:02. > :02:09.It does show the scale of what the security services are issuing, seven
:02:10. > :02:16.a day. We will need a significant swathe of judges. These operations
:02:17. > :02:21.can also be very time sensitive. Ministers will issued the warrants,
:02:22. > :02:25.judges will have the opportunity to strike them if they feel there is
:02:26. > :02:30.not enough evidence to warrant the surveillance. The security services
:02:31. > :02:33.could find themselves in a situation where the government wants to go
:02:34. > :02:38.ahead and the judges have voted it down. Would wonder how often the
:02:39. > :02:43.judges would say no to the security services. They are not judges who
:02:44. > :02:46.are, by trade, experts in this field of surveillance and intelligence.
:02:47. > :02:51.They would have to be specially trained in these parts, whereas the
:02:52. > :02:57.security services have a long history of dealing with it. Let's
:02:58. > :03:03.talk about The Metro, quite a few of the papers have quite prominently
:03:04. > :03:12.featured the news that junior doctors will be offered an 11% pay
:03:13. > :03:16.rise. That is to call off the strike that has been threatened. Apparently
:03:17. > :03:25.the BMA are rather sceptical? It reminds me of when the NHS was
:03:26. > :03:36.founded, which was that they stop the doctor's mouths with gold --
:03:37. > :03:40.stuffed. Jeremy Hunt wants to remove a complex banding system within the
:03:41. > :03:45.way to new doctors are paid. They will get paid extra depending on
:03:46. > :03:53.their responsibilities. Unfortunately, the banding accounts
:03:54. > :03:59.for about 40% over the basic pay for junior doctors, so he is talking
:04:00. > :04:03.about an 11% rise in basic pay. It seems that doctors are still very
:04:04. > :04:08.sceptical about it. Jeremy Hunt wants to avoid a strike of EV could
:04:09. > :04:12.cool winter period for the NHS. It will remain to be seen what the
:04:13. > :04:18.doctors make obvious and whether they will go for it. At the moment,
:04:19. > :04:24.given the anger amongst the BMA and junior doctors, I'm not sure if it
:04:25. > :04:30.will be enough. He could be facing significant industrial action. Other
:04:31. > :04:37.public sector workers might say, they are getting 11%, we want more.
:04:38. > :04:41.Exactly. Suddenly everybody starts shifting. The thing about doctors
:04:42. > :04:45.and nurses is that traditionally, they do have the public on their
:04:46. > :04:51.side in a way that perhaps other public sector workers do not. For
:04:52. > :04:56.example, in my social media feeds all you see at sympathetic offerings
:04:57. > :05:01.of support and outpourings of indignation for doctors and nurses.
:05:02. > :05:10.They have a big and colourful demonstration, the other day they
:05:11. > :05:19.had quite a big one. -- had. The whole idea of card sharks, grasping
:05:20. > :05:27.credit card companies are trapping people in a cycle of debt. Up to 5
:05:28. > :05:34.million people? It is an interesting front page for the Sun. They are
:05:35. > :05:38.talking about the fact that, as you said, there is ?61 billion of credit
:05:39. > :05:49.card debt in Britain. There are 2 million people in arrears, 1.6
:05:50. > :05:55.million paying the minimum amount and this page is saying that the
:05:56. > :06:02.undercut companies are not doing in. Out, keeping people in debt is more
:06:03. > :06:10.profitable for them? That is certainly what the Sun is saying --
:06:11. > :06:17.but. The sun is calling for more help for these people. Would you say
:06:18. > :06:26.it is the responsibility of the credit card companies or those who
:06:27. > :06:30.have the debt? There is some advice, there are organisations. This report
:06:31. > :06:40.comes from the Financial Conduct Authority, so it might just be a
:06:41. > :06:47.first step. There could be penalties and sanctions if they don't deal
:06:48. > :06:57.with it. Is the sub headline a bit harsh? They provide a service
:06:58. > :07:04.whereby people can get hold of money quickly, so perhaps... There will be
:07:05. > :07:15.people who see those words as they tautology, -- a, but Ken Clarke was
:07:16. > :07:22.quoted as saying if everyone was forced to clear their mortgages they
:07:23. > :07:26.would have only half a month's worth of savings. We are all in debt.
:07:27. > :07:34.Speaking of debt, let's talk about the tax man. The Telegraph have a
:07:35. > :07:43.story about the tax man zero entering his phone. Half of the
:07:44. > :07:54.calls go unanswered. This is a report, for years they have been
:07:55. > :08:00.telling the government that it is a shambles and now it is even worse.
:08:01. > :08:03.Millions of people have put incorrect information on their tax
:08:04. > :08:07.forms because they cannot speak to someone. It questions whether the
:08:08. > :08:15.government is doing a good enough job of raising the tax threshold.
:08:16. > :08:21.There are significant cuts to public services and benefits. It is not
:08:22. > :08:31.just about hate MRC, you'll also about the -- it is also about the
:08:32. > :08:36.effects of tax -- HMRC. People just want to talk to someone online, as
:08:37. > :08:40.well. Taking a phone call is more Labour intensive. They would have to
:08:41. > :08:45.really consider it worth their while financially to make that kind of
:08:46. > :08:52.decision. On the same page, the taxman is getting it again for
:08:53. > :09:03.failing to penalise wealthy tax evaders. Trying to get away from
:09:04. > :09:11.financial matters, the Times and the express have got this report which
:09:12. > :09:16.sounds very interesting. If you go for a stiff walk for half-an-hour,
:09:17. > :09:19.it is actually better than going to the gym all calling for a run. I
:09:20. > :09:31.don't quite understand how it works? I don't understand either --
:09:32. > :09:44.going. It appears to be taken from the annual health survey for England
:09:45. > :09:49.between 1999-2012. -- or. Scientists believe because humans have been
:09:50. > :09:55.walking upright, it is a natural behaviour that may reduce the risk
:09:56. > :10:02.of obesity. They talk about men and women of the age of 50 experiencing
:10:03. > :10:06.strong benefits. This has reached a sweet spot in terms of not being too
:10:07. > :10:11.demanding. We know that if any incentives are made too demanding,
:10:12. > :10:16.British public will tear it up. A 30 minute walk, five days a week. We
:10:17. > :10:32.all think we are probably capable of it. Do you do it? May be. I walk
:10:33. > :10:37.around in circles -- maybe. I follow their instructions of not going to
:10:38. > :10:49.the gym. A half-hour walk is very good view. -- good for you. The FT,
:10:50. > :10:57.Amazon kind of reinventing the wheel. They are opening a real
:10:58. > :11:02.bookshop in Seattle which sells real books in a real shop with shelves?
:11:03. > :11:13.Its history has gone full circle. This is the great machine that has
:11:14. > :11:19.put so many independent booksellers at of business. For them to suddenly
:11:20. > :11:23.sniffed the zeitgeist and think they will now give something back to the
:11:24. > :11:32.community May be regarded with very wry chuckles. I wonder if it is a
:11:33. > :11:41.1-off? I think what they are more interested in is the consumer
:11:42. > :11:49.behaviour. I'd say that was their interest. It is a response to the
:11:50. > :11:52.market. It makes an interesting point, the way that Amazon's
:11:53. > :11:57.business model works is that it takes orders from people, get their
:11:58. > :12:01.money and then purchasers the books. It is the opposite of a traditional
:12:02. > :12:06.bookseller, who has two buy the stock and hope people will come in
:12:07. > :12:13.and buy it. As you said, it is completely alien to the whole
:12:14. > :12:17.business model. The idea of wandering into a bookshop and having
:12:18. > :12:22.a browse around, looking at the books, it has kind of gone out the
:12:23. > :12:26.window? You can't do that on the Amazon website. It tries to, it has
:12:27. > :12:30.hugely sophisticated algorithms where if you liked one book, you
:12:31. > :12:38.might also like this. But, it is a machine. Do you prefer physical
:12:39. > :12:47.books? Yes. Yes. No algorithm will ever be able to recreate what
:12:48. > :12:57.happens when you go into a shop and see the actual physical look. --
:12:58. > :13:01.book. It is about having their way of it in your hand. It is probably
:13:02. > :13:04.no coincidence that this is happening in the sweet purchasing
:13:05. > :13:14.months just before Christmas. You can't give somebody a file... Well,
:13:15. > :13:21.you can but... You could buy them an e-book. Talking about things that
:13:22. > :13:30.are new, talking about Instagram which is a favourite with many. This
:13:31. > :13:34.is the Australian Instagram lady with more than half a million
:13:35. > :13:43.followers, who quit saying it is not real life? That's a shock. Why did
:13:44. > :13:51.she think it was real life? People her age are blurring the lines.
:13:52. > :13:58.There is a watt of data of people between 15 to 25, their identity
:13:59. > :14:07.kind of has a word combination of online and real life -- a lot. What
:14:08. > :14:13.she has done is, she is very popular amongst young women. She has deleted
:14:14. > :14:17.thousands of photos but also gone back to some photos and pointed out
:14:18. > :14:28.that they are fake. She has recaptured a photo inset, I was paid
:14:29. > :14:34.to wear is -- these clothes. She also said she used to be one of
:14:35. > :14:38.these women who looked at perfect women on Instagram and wanted to be
:14:39. > :14:43.them. Now she is one, and it doesn't mean anything. It is a message but
:14:44. > :14:50.it is not going to stop anything with Instagram. I am wondering how
:14:51. > :14:54.she got the message out. She made an 80 minute YouTube video.
:14:55. > :14:58.Thank you to my guests Caroline Frost and Tony Grew.
:14:59. > :15:19.Coming up next, it's time for Sportsday.
:15:20. > :15:22.Hello and welcome to Sportsday. I'm Hugh Woozencroft.