:00:00. > :00:00.about the FA Cup match. Salford is owned by a number of other players.
:00:00. > :00:13.This is all in sports day in 15 minutes after The Papers.
:00:14. > :00:16.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers
:00:17. > :00:21.With me are Laura Hughes, political correspondent
:00:22. > :00:25.for the Daily Telegraph and Joseph Harker, who's assistant
:00:26. > :00:41.The Daily Mail claims a British flight was close to being struck
:00:42. > :00:43.by a missile in Egyptian airspace, a few months
:00:44. > :00:47.The Telegraph shows a tired tourist waiting to be flown
:00:48. > :00:52.The fallout from the Russian plane crashing in Egypt is also
:00:53. > :00:58.The i says that intelligence about the crash suggests a bomb was
:00:59. > :01:04.The main Financial Times story says a job surge in the US could pave
:01:05. > :01:09.And the Express claims many over 50s in Britain are struggling to get
:01:10. > :01:25.We will start with two or three papers that are looking at the
:01:26. > :01:31.ongoing developments in the Russian airliner crash that happened a week
:01:32. > :01:41.ago. Here is how The Times are reporting it, bomber blew plane
:01:42. > :01:46.departed black box experts. They say that a bomb could be heard 20
:01:47. > :01:50.minutes into the flight. According to the report is that we are hearing
:01:51. > :01:53.which not been confirmed this explosion did not sound like a
:01:54. > :02:00.technical issues that we seem to be edging closer to the ball theory. If
:02:01. > :02:04.we can hear a sound in the background of this black box does
:02:05. > :02:10.seem to point to even more evidence. From the day of the crash itself, it
:02:11. > :02:12.was spread over such a large area it felt like there had been an
:02:13. > :02:20.explosion at high altitude and as the word now my -- and as there were
:02:21. > :02:25.no Mayday signals it seems to be pointing in that direction. Egypt
:02:26. > :02:29.and Russia have seemed to deny it but now they seem to be responding
:02:30. > :02:32.and Russia seems to believe it could have been an act of terrorism
:02:33. > :02:39.because it has stopped flights going to Sharm el-Sheikh as well.
:02:40. > :02:45.Initially they were saying it could not be a missile because it was
:02:46. > :02:50.flying too high and because of the way that the wreckage was scattered
:02:51. > :02:54.on the ground. No, they are still saying it is something different but
:02:55. > :03:00.not technical or pilot error. The Daily Mail have this story about a
:03:01. > :03:06.passenger jet flying in August and a report that it narrowly missed a
:03:07. > :03:14.missile which they say was from an Egyptian military exercise. We will
:03:15. > :03:18.look at that any moment. The other way that this incident is being
:03:19. > :03:26.reported is in the mirror on pages six and seven. It says that there is
:03:27. > :03:30.a fiasco at the airport. A lot of people talking about the chaos.
:03:31. > :03:33.People did not know if they were going to the plane back to the
:03:34. > :03:42.terminal and David in limbo for a couple of days. We saw the
:03:43. > :03:45.ambassador for Britain speaking to angry British people abroad asking
:03:46. > :03:48.when they would be leaving. The Transport Secretary said this
:03:49. > :03:52.morning that most Britons would be leaving and getting home, but we
:03:53. > :03:59.only had eight planes that actually blew out. I think the general
:04:00. > :04:02.consensus was that David Cameron had done the right thing and if it was
:04:03. > :04:06.about security they were happy to wait, but they wanted to know what
:04:07. > :04:09.was going on. People speaking to various news channels were saying
:04:10. > :04:12.that they were finding out what was happening from British media reports
:04:13. > :04:19.and not from people on the ground and Egypt. There seemed to have been
:04:20. > :04:24.conflicting experiences for people. Some people were left with no
:04:25. > :04:29.information but there were improvements in place insecurity
:04:30. > :04:34.that make people feel safer, but the confusion at the end of the holiday
:04:35. > :04:37.is not what you are expecting. There will have to be improvements because
:04:38. > :04:43.security was absolutely dire. The good thing is at least significant
:04:44. > :04:48.improvements can be made quickly, but at the same time it seems that
:04:49. > :04:58.because they wanted the tourists to BB graduated leather luggage that
:04:59. > :05:01.cost further delays. -- they wanted the tool is to leave without their
:05:02. > :05:10.luggage and that caused further delays. 5000 people are stranded. It
:05:11. > :05:14.has been very focused on British people who are stuck but there are
:05:15. > :05:19.almost twice as many Russians who are there. It was a Russian plane
:05:20. > :05:22.that went down. Some people are suggesting that things are being
:05:23. > :05:25.sold because the Egyptians are tried to provoke a reaction and they are
:05:26. > :05:29.annoyed that Britain jumped in there and said it was a bomb attack
:05:30. > :05:35.because obviously that will have an impact on their two of them so they
:05:36. > :05:45.want to do everything they can to calm people down. -- tourism. They
:05:46. > :05:56.have just got over the last hiatus. You mentioned the story in the mail,
:05:57. > :05:59.rocket attack on UK to reject. A pilot dodged a missile above Sharm
:06:00. > :06:07.el-Sheikh. We do not have a huge amount to go on, have we? This was a
:06:08. > :06:12.Thomson flight in August and it seems that the pilot spotted this
:06:13. > :06:19.missile. Two months before the plane crash on Saturday, a pilot spotted a
:06:20. > :06:25.rocket and took a bases action and it missed by around 1000 feet. From
:06:26. > :06:32.the headline you would think this must be some kind of ices rocket,
:06:33. > :06:35.but then they say that an Egyptian government spokesman investigated
:06:36. > :06:38.the incident and they believe it was not a targeted attack and it was
:06:39. > :06:45.likely to be connected to routine exercise is being conducted by the
:06:46. > :06:49.Egyptian military. -- ices rocket. I think they are saying that to make
:06:50. > :06:53.people feel more comfortable, but if the Egyptian military could of done
:06:54. > :06:58.this in August there is much as they could have done last weekend as well
:06:59. > :07:06.and it could have been friendly fire. Except if there was a bomb on
:07:07. > :07:14.board. They have called it a bomb because they are presuming that ices
:07:15. > :07:18.two cannot hit a plane at that height, and it opens up another
:07:19. > :07:26.possible cause. It does leave other things open. According to this
:07:27. > :07:31.report only does in the cockpit knew what might have been flying close
:07:32. > :07:35.by. The only new because the site as it was happening and I think the
:07:36. > :07:40.biggest question here is why there was no communication? Why did we not
:07:41. > :07:46.know there were military exercises as we were flying over? How was that
:07:47. > :07:49.allowed to happen? We do not know how high up this plane was flying
:07:50. > :07:54.because the suggestion was with the jet that came down it was too high
:07:55. > :07:58.to have been reached by a missile in the hands of militants, so it is an
:07:59. > :08:05.alarming story but there are a lot of questions there. The Egyptians
:08:06. > :08:10.have confirmed that they fired a rocket towards a plane, which is
:08:11. > :08:16.astonishing. A couple of stories in the Telegraph, a battle over
:08:17. > :08:21.military pay rises as they are denied automatic pay increases under
:08:22. > :08:26.Osborne's controversial plans. Ministers are happy that they got
:08:27. > :08:29.the 2% defence spending, but the issue is that many military
:08:30. > :08:32.personnel believed that the government is spending too much
:08:33. > :08:41.money on equipment and that we do not have an up men to man this
:08:42. > :08:44.equipment. There is an eternal dispute going on and they are
:08:45. > :08:48.arguing that if you do not give the incentive to stay you will have lots
:08:49. > :08:52.of very high up and talented officers leaving to work in the
:08:53. > :08:56.private sector and that this will just put people off joining when we
:08:57. > :08:59.need people there. Why are we spending money on equipment when we
:09:00. > :09:06.don't have the personnel to operate it? It is a peculiar message to
:09:07. > :09:12.centre the Armed Forces, but it is money again, isn't it? This is
:09:13. > :09:15.Jeremy Corbyn's argument against Trident why spend billions on
:09:16. > :09:20.something that has no value to this country and that will never be used.
:09:21. > :09:26.It is a deterrent. When these cuts are taking place and the boots on
:09:27. > :09:32.the ground are being put in jeopardy. Another story in the
:09:33. > :09:36.Telegraph, Prime Minister, everyone to have the right to fast broadband.
:09:37. > :09:40.Rights are bestowed upon it and someone has to enable us to get
:09:41. > :09:46.broadband of any sort in some places. Where I live in south London
:09:47. > :09:51.you do not necessarily have the right to high-speed broadband, so I
:09:52. > :09:56.am not sure. It is a great vision and we want every home to have
:09:57. > :10:00.access to high-speed, but obviously it will take a lot of time and
:10:01. > :10:06.digging and roadworks before that comes to fruition. It is a measure
:10:07. > :10:11.of deprivation these days, not having access to the Internet.
:10:12. > :10:16.People feel that it is their human rights. Just as you would expect to
:10:17. > :10:20.have access to water and electricity, people feel that they
:10:21. > :10:27.need the Internet. What is interesting is that the head of
:10:28. > :10:35.columns and suffering -- is that the head of, says that people's
:10:36. > :10:39.broadband are suffering because they have not put the richer in the right
:10:40. > :10:47.place in the house. I need to move mine away from the phone. Now let us
:10:48. > :10:51.look at The Express. There is a doctor crisis for the over 50s that
:10:52. > :10:57.have struggling to see their GP on the day that they fall ill. I is
:10:58. > :11:01.this relevant to the over 50s? I don't know because the story does
:11:02. > :11:04.not say that they are comparing this with any other age group, they could
:11:05. > :11:10.see that any age group struggle to see their GP. Maybe the research was
:11:11. > :11:14.carried out by a group that deals with that age group. It does seem
:11:15. > :11:19.interesting that they have chosen that age group. It does not save the
:11:20. > :11:25.survey and other age groups or maybe it is because more over 50s need to
:11:26. > :11:31.go to the doctor more than young people. I think that we all do. It
:11:32. > :11:41.is not that you are elderly if you are over 50. That is not what I
:11:42. > :11:45.said. There is a 50 year gap there. Maybe it is the elderly bit of that
:11:46. > :11:50.group that would require GP services more than perhaps the under 50s. It
:11:51. > :11:56.could be people who are in the 80s or 90s. Letters would get this
:11:57. > :12:01.Financial Times story, the rise of its fighters as pensioners are
:12:02. > :12:05.geared towards cheaper council. These are people who have withdrawn
:12:06. > :12:10.their pension pot and they have to take advice and they cannot find any
:12:11. > :12:13.human being to give it to them. There was a question at the time
:12:14. > :12:18.that there were not enough people deployed to offer this advice. I
:12:19. > :12:23.think this is like any kind of other service where they have to go
:12:24. > :12:26.through the steps and a direct you. I do not know how well that will go
:12:27. > :12:37.down with a lot of people who want to speak to a people's cutback
:12:38. > :12:41.person. Financial professionals fear exposure to future complaints and
:12:42. > :12:44.they demand high fees to price themselves out of the market. That
:12:45. > :12:49.is why the automated service is required. It all boils down to the
:12:50. > :12:53.fact that no people have the choice to get their annuities in one cash
:12:54. > :12:58.sum and spend as they want on a Lamborghini if they want. I don't
:12:59. > :13:02.think I've heard of anyone who has done that but I am waiting for a
:13:03. > :13:10.couple of years to get the keys for mine. People now have access to an
:13:11. > :13:13.awful lot of money but they will not know how to spend it they get it
:13:14. > :13:19.wrong they get it wrong people live in poverty. Their final years will
:13:20. > :13:21.be spent in real poverty. The professionals are now taking the
:13:22. > :13:25.stance that they do not really want to deal with this or have the risk
:13:26. > :13:32.and that is why this automated service has been put in place. The
:13:33. > :13:44.pensions minister and former BBC papers reviewer says that she
:13:45. > :13:49.welcomes all innovations. That is such a ridiculous statement. If PPI
:13:50. > :13:54.a great innovation that people welcome? We need to look at this and
:13:55. > :13:57.think it throws up really serious issues about whether people are
:13:58. > :14:02.going to be getting the right advice for how they spend an awful lot of
:14:03. > :14:09.money. When you need someone to talk you through the small print, this is
:14:10. > :14:13.probably the most important thing. Whenever I speak to anyone I want to
:14:14. > :14:18.speak to a real person. This is a massive issue. It is not as simple
:14:19. > :14:21.as pressing a button to speak to someone about your washing machine,
:14:22. > :14:28.it is about how to spend all your money. It will only cost you ?109
:14:29. > :14:40.which is a fraction of the cost of getting advice elsewhere. It will
:14:41. > :14:43.give you a report on 30-40 minutes. Surely, as a financial adviser, you
:14:44. > :14:50.are professional and you should know what you are talking about. They are
:14:51. > :14:57.realising that it is high risk. That is it, you survived it. We July to
:14:58. > :15:04.come back at 11:30pm? -- would you like to come back. That is from for
:15:05. > :15:05.now. You'll both be back at half
:15:06. > :15:09.eleven for another look at the Hello and welcome to Sportsday,
:15:10. > :15:20.I'm Lizzie Greenwood-Hughes. Salford City rise to the occasion -
:15:21. > :15:23.giant-killing Notts County