:00:00. > :00:00.And a six wicket defeat against Pakistan in the first one-day
:00:00. > :00:00.international in Abu Dhabi. That is all in Sportsday in 15 minutes,
:00:00. > :00:14.after the papers. Hello, and welcome to
:00:15. > :00:17.our look ahead to what the papers With me are
:00:18. > :00:21.the financial commentator Louise Cooper, and Michael Booker, deputy
:00:22. > :00:25.editor of the Daily Express . Tomorrow's front pages starting
:00:26. > :00:29.with: The i's front page is dominated by the guilty verdicts
:00:30. > :00:35.for Becky Watts' killers. In fact,
:00:36. > :00:37.the teenager's image stares out from The father of the murdered teenager
:00:38. > :00:45.says her stepbrother, Nathan A vaccine may be the way forward
:00:46. > :00:51.in the fight against cholesterol. That is according to the
:00:52. > :00:53.Daily Express. The US Secretary of State John Kerry
:00:54. > :00:56.appears to have poured cold water on the chances of a legally binding
:00:57. > :00:59.treaty at the forthcoming climate That is the lead in the
:01:00. > :01:07.Financial Times. The Daily Telegraph reports
:01:08. > :01:10.on the NICE findings that hormone replacement therapy should be given
:01:11. > :01:12.to double the number of women going through the menopause
:01:13. > :01:16.than currently receive it. Finally, the Times says the
:01:17. > :01:19.Chancellor George Osborne wants to wrestle control of Trident funding
:01:20. > :01:22.away from the Ministry of Defence, creating instead a new funding body
:01:23. > :01:38.that reports to the Treasury. Let's have a look at some of those,
:01:39. > :01:43.and this out we are going to start with the Mayor. Take us there this
:01:44. > :01:50.time. This one word headline sums up the court case. The killers of Becky
:01:51. > :01:55.Watts on the front page of the Mayor. Nathan Matthews found guilty
:01:56. > :02:00.of murder and Shauna Hoare of manslaughter. Going back to the clip
:02:01. > :02:05.earlier of their father and mother, they are together and him saying
:02:06. > :02:10.your son, my daughter, right? And you can see in that interview what
:02:11. > :02:14.effect it has had on that family. You know, we have seen over the last
:02:15. > :02:18.few weeks some of the evidence that has come out and it has been quite
:02:19. > :02:20.shocking. The fact that he pleaded guilty to manslaughter but not
:02:21. > :02:27.guilty of murder and put them through this whole court case just
:02:28. > :02:31.adds to it and the fact that they are very much depraved, these two.
:02:32. > :02:37.She has been in thrall to him since she was 14 and he was 21. It didn't
:02:38. > :02:42.excuse her at all in going along with what happened. The jury clearly
:02:43. > :02:47.didn't take anything that he said particularly seriously, and it took
:02:48. > :02:50.3.5 hours to find them both guilty. And what they are talking about, we
:02:51. > :02:57.talked earlier about what comes out of this, and what the talking points
:02:58. > :03:00.will be is that the fact that he is a porn addict and he had been
:03:01. > :03:04.watching this rape video before he went out and did this. Also the
:03:05. > :03:08.suggestion that they had planned to do this before and plan to do it
:03:09. > :03:11.again as well. Clearly it will open a debate about porn and the
:03:12. > :03:15.availability online and various other places and how it is people.
:03:16. > :03:21.And I think it is right that we should have that debate. And the
:03:22. > :03:24.family, you can see this as something that the family are really
:03:25. > :03:32.never going to get over. And for the time being, the father of Becky and
:03:33. > :03:37.the mother of Nathan Matthews, the murderer, are together but one
:03:38. > :03:42.wonders how can they get over this? And both of them, it is an utter
:03:43. > :03:47.tragedy to discover your daughter has been brutally murdered is one of
:03:48. > :03:55.the worst things that can happen to you, but also to discover that your
:03:56. > :03:59.son is a killer, a brutally depraved, sexually motivated killer,
:04:00. > :04:02.but also someone who effectively killed his half sister. It is no
:04:03. > :04:08.surprise to me that Nathan Matthews... You look at front pages
:04:09. > :04:13.like this, and frankly it doesn't happen very often, that is why it is
:04:14. > :04:18.remarkable and on the front page of the newspaper, when you see how
:04:19. > :04:24.normal these people are, this isn't the bogeyman, look at. But when you
:04:25. > :04:31.look through some of the evidence, some of what has come out, there
:04:32. > :04:36.were clearly issues with this man. His family may be or maybe
:04:37. > :04:41.didn't... His grandmother said some very worrying things, but clearly
:04:42. > :04:45.nobody ever took it further. And I think it must be absolutely tragic
:04:46. > :04:50.to wonder, could I have done something to have stopped my son
:04:51. > :04:56.doing this? Let's move on to other matters. Take us to the front of the
:04:57. > :05:00.Telegraph. The number of women on HRT to double. The Health Watchdog
:05:01. > :05:04.is saying that not enough women are receiving hormone treatment. This is
:05:05. > :05:10.a story that becomes much more interesting to me the older I get.
:05:11. > :05:15.Effectively what NICE is saying is that there was a 2002 study showing
:05:16. > :05:21.that hormone replacement therapy increased or linked HRT to breast
:05:22. > :05:24.cancer, slightly elevated breast cancer risk. And this has
:05:25. > :05:31.essentially made doctors very wary of prescribing HRT. 1.5 million
:05:32. > :05:35.women at the moment experiencing menopausal symptoms but only one in
:05:36. > :05:40.ten of them are prescribed HRT and what NICE has said is that is wrong,
:05:41. > :05:43.in terms of the risk, reward, the sort of balance of extra risk
:05:44. > :05:47.compared with the benefits of going on HRT, actually doctors are
:05:48. > :05:53.prescribing wrongly and they should put more women on HRT. It is amazing
:05:54. > :05:56.to see a line in this, it is the first time there has been advice on
:05:57. > :06:00.how to treat menopause. It is something which you would think is
:06:01. > :06:05.out there, and being discussed, especially given how vocal NICE are
:06:06. > :06:09.on various matters, drinking while pregnant and things like that. It is
:06:10. > :06:13.the first time, it seems it is a bit lacking in them not coming out with
:06:14. > :06:17.this. If there is a big serious report that came out in 2002 and if
:06:18. > :06:21.they are prescribing it, they will not want to get the blame. If
:06:22. > :06:25.someone does end up with cancer, they will say you saw this report,
:06:26. > :06:30.you knew about it, why have you prescribed a? It is good that NICE
:06:31. > :06:33.have come out and said this, because it affects people including the
:06:34. > :06:39.families. Could affect the husband when the wife is going menopausal!
:06:40. > :06:42.It can lead to depression. If people are feeling this down about it it
:06:43. > :06:49.can lead to more psychological problems. And the husband as well!
:06:50. > :06:57.Shall we move on? When you said people, actually, women! The
:06:58. > :07:05.knock-on effect, it does affect everyone. And let's not forget the
:07:06. > :07:10.man! I couldn't agree more. Tory funding under fire from... David
:07:11. > :07:16.Cameron! Tories awful, says the Tory Prime Minister. It is a Catch-22
:07:17. > :07:21.from the local Conservative council. In his hat on as the constituency MP
:07:22. > :07:30.people have been saying there are lots of cutbacks. He goes back on
:07:31. > :07:36.Friday we all do, and this row has blown up. People have come to see
:07:37. > :07:39.him. There has been plans to trim ?50 million from budgets. That
:07:40. > :07:43.leaves daycare centres and elderly centres at risk. People have been
:07:44. > :07:45.talking to him about this. He has now written a letter which has been
:07:46. > :07:51.in the local paper, meaning the Oxford mail, talking about how
:07:52. > :07:56.terrible these cuts are, and if they are going to make cuts, make them
:07:57. > :08:00.elsewhere. Talking about back-office savings. Not very specific, selling
:08:01. > :08:05.off property they don't need. But as he has been reminded by the local
:08:06. > :08:12.council, you can't actually use profits from selling off property to
:08:13. > :08:16.prop up savings from posterity. It is a Tory run council, why he would
:08:17. > :08:20.seek to do this in his own counsel... I'm not sure what a
:08:21. > :08:26.back-office saving is, is it selling a fax machine? You are showing your
:08:27. > :08:33.age! -- council. It shows the numbers. The chair of the council
:08:34. > :08:36.said council spending had fallen. He pointed out grant funding from
:08:37. > :08:46.central government had halved from ?122 million in 2012 to ?62 million
:08:47. > :08:51.in 2015-16 and the council has saved ?626 million in the last five years.
:08:52. > :08:56.Cameron is saying the spending has increased so someone has it wrong
:08:57. > :09:00.somewhere. There seems to be a significant discrepancy in the
:09:01. > :09:04.figures here. Are you telling me there is always a discrepancy in the
:09:05. > :09:08.figures when it comes to politics and spending? I agree that as a
:09:09. > :09:12.reckless thing to say but I am sticking with it. I think you are
:09:13. > :09:17.probably fairly safe in that position. Moving onto The Times,
:09:18. > :09:21.staying in politics, Jeremy Corbyn is now a member of the privy Council
:09:22. > :09:29.we are not quite sure what went on at Buckingham Palace, or are we?
:09:30. > :09:33.Will he have kissed the Queen? The Times is going for... Let's be
:09:34. > :09:37.careful here, the Labour leader may even have agreed to kiss the
:09:38. > :09:41.Queen's hand when he became a privy Counsellor. A gesture included in
:09:42. > :09:46.the protocols of the ceremony at Buckingham Palace. And I don't even
:09:47. > :09:52.know what the privy Council is! And he didn't kneel, apparently. A body
:09:53. > :09:55.of advisers to the Queen issuing executive instrument and orders of
:09:56. > :10:03.Council. In practice, it means he has now been given information he
:10:04. > :10:06.would not otherwise be given. But sometimes when we look at these
:10:07. > :10:11.things, what a ludicrous country we are! To go through all this
:10:12. > :10:19.rigmarole. At the end of the day, it is fairly meaningless, yes. It is
:10:20. > :10:24.all part of the pageantry of this fine democracy that we call Great
:10:25. > :10:32.Britain. What people like it. People do like it. I don't like it. I am an
:10:33. > :10:37.atheist Republican, a bit like Corbyn, actually, and by Almighty
:10:38. > :10:41.God, which properly doesn't exist, to be true and faithful servant
:10:42. > :10:45.under the Queen's majesty, an unelected representative. It is no
:10:46. > :10:51.wonder he didn't want to say that. If you are an atheist Republican I
:10:52. > :10:58.would see you not warming to that. Why would you agree to say that to
:10:59. > :11:04.join... There are other views available on that. Go and read a
:11:05. > :11:07.book about physics! I had felt sorry for him in some of the treatment he
:11:08. > :11:11.has been getting over various things, Jeremy Corbyn, but at the
:11:12. > :11:15.end of the day when he missed the first opportunity to do this and
:11:16. > :11:18.took off on a holiday he almost created the situation. And as an MP
:11:19. > :11:23.he is quoted in here. Instead of shutting up and getting on with it,
:11:24. > :11:27.he made it an issue. This is a Labour MP saying this. Let's just
:11:28. > :11:33.not go there. I have already stated my position. Take us to the FT
:11:34. > :11:38.again. Not again, we haven't been here, have we? That was an hour ago.
:11:39. > :11:42.Big tech takes over, people don't want to be bankers any more.
:11:43. > :11:46.Apparently not, if you have a big degree and you are one of the big
:11:47. > :11:51.boffins, you don't want to go into banking any more. Graduates from the
:11:52. > :11:54.top ten schools are less likely to go into banking than they were
:11:55. > :11:58.before the multibillion dollar losses and the arrests of some
:11:59. > :12:04.people as well. One of the experts says the pay, the rules, and the
:12:05. > :12:08.oversight... I quite like rules. They don't want to do rules! So all
:12:09. > :12:12.these people who were potentially crooks in the banking industry are
:12:13. > :12:16.moving into other places. So in about ten to 20 years, we will have
:12:17. > :12:23.to look for the big scandals in the modern day big tech companies. So
:12:24. > :12:29.good luck with their shares. What does a financial commentator make of
:12:30. > :12:33.this? I completely agree, it is the testosterone fuelled risktakers,
:12:34. > :12:36.rule breakers, motivated completely by money who want to go to banking
:12:37. > :12:40.any more. It hasn't helped the industry they do go into, because
:12:41. > :12:46.they will probably blow that up as well. Do you remember the middle of
:12:47. > :12:50.the dot-com boom, all the graduates from Harvard business School, they
:12:51. > :12:58.all went into the dot-com companies and blew them up. Are you talking
:12:59. > :13:02.about men? I am, generally. Does that include women as well? I have a
:13:03. > :13:08.female friend who has worked in the industry for 20 years and she is
:13:09. > :13:11.fantastic, that all the testosterone fuelled, risk taking men, are
:13:12. > :13:18.finally leaving banking because the money has gone and the rules have
:13:19. > :13:24.arrived. This is my chance to do well. Up until now I have been
:13:25. > :13:29.shunted into the background. So when all these jobs are vacated by the
:13:30. > :13:35.testosterone fuelled rule breakers, and women come in instead, ranking
:13:36. > :13:39.will go in what direction? Have you not seen, there is research that
:13:40. > :13:43.looks at women's analysis of risk, and their management of money, and
:13:44. > :13:47.it has been proven that trade with too much testosterone make bad
:13:48. > :13:51.decisions and women are much more analytical when it comes to their
:13:52. > :13:58.investment decision. There was a quote that I had this weekend about
:13:59. > :14:03.low quality Spivey brokers never pitching to women because women
:14:04. > :14:07.think too much about what shares they buy and sell. It is quite rude
:14:08. > :14:13.quote so I can't actually... Basically women think more about
:14:14. > :14:18.it, rather than just saying yes. This has become a very gender-based
:14:19. > :14:22.conversation. To be fair, that research has been proven about
:14:23. > :14:25.testosterone, you know that. It was very interesting, actually. I will
:14:26. > :14:30.give you that one. We only have a minute left, I am reliably informed
:14:31. > :14:39.in my left ear. Let's talk about garlic and sweat. So all that dating
:14:40. > :14:42.advice not to eat garlic, it is rubbish, apparently. This is the
:14:43. > :14:47.University of Stirling in Scotland. They have done a study of 42 men.
:14:48. > :14:51.They ate garlic, some of which were raw cloves. And they put pads under
:14:52. > :14:56.their armpits to absorb their sweat. Those delightful sweat soaked
:14:57. > :15:00.pads were then given to 85 very brave women who smelt it and said
:15:01. > :15:06.whether they found it attractive or not, and strangely enough, but,
:15:07. > :15:13.garlic odour in sweat was more attractive. No insignia under the
:15:14. > :15:21.arms, no links, just rubbing garlic all over themselves -- no Lynx. It
:15:22. > :15:27.is something to do with the fact that garlic is... It is not a bad
:15:28. > :15:30.smell as long as it is not on the breath. It is attractive to women
:15:31. > :15:32.possibly because of the health benefits it has provided to women
:15:33. > :15:36.possibly because of the health benefits it has provided exactly,
:15:37. > :15:42.the antibiotic properties of garlic, and it also works as an
:15:43. > :15:47.aphrodisiac as well. So they say forget aftershave, go cloves.
:15:48. > :16:03.Coming up next, it is time for Sportsday.
:16:04. > :16:06.England are looking for a new rugby union coach