:00:12. > :00:16.We will be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers in a moment.
:00:17. > :00:19.First the headlines at 11:30pm: High security on the streets of Paris
:00:20. > :00:21.tonight, as new footage emerges of police exchanging fire with
:00:22. > :00:25.Prosecutors confirmed 129 are dead and 350 injured, many critically.
:00:26. > :00:36.Eight gunmen wearing suicide vests targeted half a dozen venues.
:00:37. > :00:38.Seven of the gunmen blew themselves up.
:00:39. > :00:44.David Cameron says Britain's terror threat remains at severe level, but
:00:45. > :01:11.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers
:01:12. > :01:20.With me are French-Algerian journalist Nabila Ramdani,
:01:21. > :01:22.Robert Fox, defence editor for the London Evening Standard,
:01:23. > :01:38.and joining us from our Paris bureau is France 24's Leela Jacinto.
:01:39. > :01:45.Tomorrow's front pages, starting with some of the French papers.
:01:46. > :01:53.Sorrow and Anger is the headline on Le Figaro.
:01:54. > :01:56.Liberation has a dramatic front page.
:01:57. > :02:01.It has publishing a special edition about the events in Paris.
:02:02. > :02:03.In the British papers, the Sunday Telegraph has a striking
:02:04. > :02:09.picture of people hanging out of windows to escape the attackers.
:02:10. > :02:11.The Observer focuses on the investigation into those
:02:12. > :02:15.behind the attacks, saying three people have been arrested.
:02:16. > :02:18.The Daily Mail claims the attackers entered Europe as fake refugees.
:02:19. > :02:21.The Sunday Express says the SAS is on the streets of London,
:02:22. > :02:33.The Sunday Times has pictures of the first victims to be named, including
:02:34. > :02:36.Briton Nick Alexander, who worked for the band playing at the Bataclan
:02:37. > :02:50.And the Independent asks "how did it happen and what happens next?"
:02:51. > :02:58.They are questions many of the newspapers try to find the answers
:02:59. > :03:03.to as well. Let's go to Paris. Many of the French newspapers really have
:03:04. > :03:09.had their first proper opportunity to digests what happened in Paris,
:03:10. > :03:23.and react and ask those questions. And the -- Le Figaro focusing on
:03:24. > :03:29.those questions. What is really striking is how different these
:03:30. > :03:40.attacks were to the Charlie Hebdo attacks. The slogan, Je Suis
:03:41. > :03:47.Charlie. It is a very defiant spirit here. If you see Le Figaro, which
:03:48. > :03:54.has a right of centre newspaper, the lower the sorrow and anger, there is
:03:55. > :03:58.we will win the war. So that is a theme that I am seeing this time
:03:59. > :04:06.that I didn't really see after the Charlie Hebdo attacks. Is how
:04:07. > :04:10.newspapers like Le Figaro are reporting on the events of Paris, is
:04:11. > :04:15.that changing as well? Is there a different tone? No, on the reporting
:04:16. > :04:21.it has been pretty straightforward. All of Saturday they were... You
:04:22. > :04:23.know, most of the news was driven by information coming from police
:04:24. > :04:28.sources, which was actually confirmed later this evening when
:04:29. > :04:35.the Paris prosecutor had a press briefing. So, you know, it has been
:04:36. > :04:41.very much focused on what happened. And of course, a lot of victims
:04:42. > :04:46.stories. Because this is a part of Paris that... Paris is not a very
:04:47. > :04:53.large city, so it has touched a lot of Peruvians. What do you make of Le
:04:54. > :04:59.Figaro? So many British papers focus on the investigations, the reactions
:05:00. > :05:04.-- Parisians. We will get on to the British papers at the moment, Le
:05:05. > :05:11.Figaro very much focusing on the grief. Indeed, it is a very
:05:12. > :05:15.passionate editorial, it has to be said, and a very belligerent
:05:16. > :05:20.headline. The nation at war. It goes into how France was lured into this
:05:21. > :05:23.false sense of security after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, and now with
:05:24. > :05:27.these attacks happening again on a much wider scale, basically the
:05:28. > :05:34.editorial argues that France have to wake up, and they paint a picture, a
:05:35. > :05:39.very dramatic picture, of a clash of civilisations, basically, between us
:05:40. > :05:45.and them. The abomination of the so-called Islamic State, and the
:05:46. > :05:48.defence of French values and western values. And they argue that if we
:05:49. > :05:56.are to defeat those evils, we are not going to achieve that with
:05:57. > :06:00.slogans, tweets, marches in central Paris, or confronting them with
:06:01. > :06:06.secular values. We have to be... You know, a bit more belligerent than
:06:07. > :06:09.that. So already, French newspapers, less than 24 hours after the
:06:10. > :06:13.attacks, very different to last time, we are starting to ask very
:06:14. > :06:18.provocative questions about where do we go. Is it worth it? Should we
:06:19. > :06:22.continue to get more involved? What are the politicians discussing right
:06:23. > :06:32.now? Liberation has a very striking front page. Very powerful, very
:06:33. > :06:41.stark. No text at all. And it is black. The editorial is interesting
:06:42. > :06:46.in several respects in Le Figaro. It uses war. It takes Francois Hollande
:06:47. > :06:53.at his word and says we are going to make war. It has a rather chilling
:06:54. > :06:57.line, this army of criminals, which we now know that commanders are
:06:58. > :07:01.abroad and we must attack them. Interestingly, its international
:07:02. > :07:07.edition emanates from Paris as well. The New York Times has been
:07:08. > :07:10.taking up much the same line. Very strange reporting in the afternoon
:07:11. > :07:14.edition today. I have been looking at an online saying, now is the time
:07:15. > :07:21.to really get serious about the attack on Islamic State in Syria, in
:07:22. > :07:28.Iraq, I have just been on Channel Five live arguing with the former
:07:29. > :07:33.director of the CIA, saying go in and bash them, that is the way we
:07:34. > :07:39.have been weak about the air operation and I made the point vet
:07:40. > :07:44.to him, which I make in this, in military terms this is saying there
:07:45. > :07:53.is a centre of gravity, if you pull it apart the whole thing falls
:07:54. > :07:58.apart. You can hit Islamic State in Mosul, in Raqqa, and that's it. What
:07:59. > :08:04.we have learnt from this and the weak's events, the terrible attacks
:08:05. > :08:11.in Baghdad, on soft targets in Beirut. It isn't as easy as that, it
:08:12. > :08:14.isn't as easy as taking out two or three capitals, provincial centres
:08:15. > :08:19.on the ground. Although they are an important part of the story, as we
:08:20. > :08:23.will discover. What do you think people in Paris want to see? Do they
:08:24. > :08:27.want to see Liberation with the roses they are and the very black
:08:28. > :08:30.and respectful front page, or do they want to hear from the
:08:31. > :08:34.politicians? What are they discussing, what are they going to
:08:35. > :08:39.do about this? I don't think they want to hear from the politicians. I
:08:40. > :08:44.think they are sort of terrified about when... And it surely will,
:08:45. > :08:49.this issue will get politicised. For now, the politicians are rallying
:08:50. > :08:51.together. Francois Hollande is going to be addressing Parliament on
:08:52. > :08:57.Monday. Everyone is making the right noises but this will surely become
:08:58. > :08:59.politicised. When we first started getting reports that there was a
:09:00. > :09:05.Syrian passport discovered on the scene, you know, there was alarm
:09:06. > :09:13.among some of my French colleagues, of Algerian origin, because does
:09:14. > :09:17.this mean that Marine Le Pen... Is the next target going to be the
:09:18. > :09:27.migrants now? I just want to get your reaction to the Mail on Sunday
:09:28. > :09:31.here in the UK. It's focus is very much on how the Islamic extremists
:09:32. > :09:36.got into Paris, how they got there, and their headline is Paris jihadis
:09:37. > :09:41.got in as fake refugees. What is the strength of feeling about the
:09:42. > :09:46.migrant crisis? About Borders? Of course, it is difficult. Because if
:09:47. > :09:49.you are going to protect your borders, you do at the Islamic
:09:50. > :09:54.extremists want you to do, and lose your freedom. I am large the French
:09:55. > :09:59.are committed to the European Union and to the spirit of the European
:10:00. > :10:03.Union, and you know, they did not take to David Cameron's speech last
:10:04. > :10:08.week very well. There is really a sense of shock. Mind you, there is a
:10:09. > :10:15.state of emergency in Paris right now, which we haven't seen for a
:10:16. > :10:20.decade. Not much really being said, as far as I can tell, on the
:10:21. > :10:25.borders. People just seem to take it as a given. That security measures
:10:26. > :10:32.have to be tightened. We were already in a state of alert after
:10:33. > :10:37.the Charlie Hebdo attacks and people seem to be accepting that security
:10:38. > :10:41.is going to be tight right now. Did you see many headlines like that
:10:42. > :10:44.even before the attacks? Were their reports about how dangerous the
:10:45. > :10:49.migrant crisis could be for security? Well, that depends on
:10:50. > :10:56.which paper you read. Liberation certainly not all stop a bit like
:10:57. > :10:59.here. We do know, and the Daily Mail goes into this, that we have heard
:11:00. > :11:05.from Greece saying that they believe it is highly likely at least one of
:11:06. > :11:10.the gunmen could have got into France via Greece. We do know that a
:11:11. > :11:16.Syrian passport was left near the bodies of one of the gunmen. I think
:11:17. > :11:18.that kind of story was always going to be inevitable, that you have a
:11:19. > :11:24.link between what is to be inevitable, that you have a
:11:25. > :11:27.link between what -- what has happened in Paris and the wider
:11:28. > :11:35.political situation, across Europe as it were. So... But they are
:11:36. > :11:39.conflicting reports about what the Greeks are actually saying. It is
:11:40. > :11:43.all apparently still based on claims, and if I may put it that
:11:44. > :11:52.way, the probability, the conclusion is not that conclusive. One of the
:11:53. > :11:58.inside headlines, secret cargo, jihadis bound for Britain as well.
:11:59. > :12:08.But if you read the text on the other papers, like the Sunday Times,
:12:09. > :12:15.one of the leaders came from the district from which the Kuwachi
:12:16. > :12:18.brothers came. There is something Indigenous about this. It is
:12:19. > :12:23.interesting that the papers get into the entrails of this. This is a
:12:24. > :12:28.very, very difficult and extremely complex case. It is both domestic
:12:29. > :12:34.and global. It does have referenced. In one of the best pieces I have
:12:35. > :12:36.read by a friend which just came up, I'm sure there are other interesting
:12:37. > :12:43.and insightful pieces which I haven't yet scanned is Patrick
:12:44. > :12:48.Cockburn's excellent piece in the Independent. It says what is old and
:12:49. > :12:56.what is new about it. Very simply, he makes the point... We are in
:12:57. > :13:01.total agreement, he said what is new about this is the sophistication of
:13:02. > :13:12.the mounting of the attack. This was kamikaze attack rather like mom by,
:13:13. > :13:16.the attack on the hotel district in 2008 -- Mumbai. The attackers were
:13:17. > :13:20.expendable. Once they got out of their vehicles, which is another
:13:21. > :13:25.story, exactly what vehicles did they get out of and all that, but to
:13:26. > :13:29.get all that gear into the right place at the right time with the
:13:30. > :13:35.reliability that somebody was going to do that dreadful stuff in the
:13:36. > :13:39.concert hall, this is the really interesting one, in the concert
:13:40. > :13:43.Hall, and going around the four restaurants and firing off a
:13:44. > :13:47.magazine or two each time, getting back in the car and then going on,
:13:48. > :13:53.tells you a hell of a lot about the lack of surveillance on Paris
:13:54. > :13:58.streets. And there is another almost made description which comes up in
:13:59. > :14:02.two or three of the papers of one of the attackers allegedly trying to
:14:03. > :14:10.get into the stadium when the match was already on, and more or less
:14:11. > :14:14.security on the gate says go away, they had spotted something. They had
:14:15. > :14:18.spotted the suicide vest, allegedly, and there were several accounts of
:14:19. > :14:23.this. He steps back, blows himself up, they hear it inside the stadium
:14:24. > :14:28.and the match goes on. It is very, very odd indeed. And then they
:14:29. > :14:34.hustle the President out of the stadium. Was he the target? It could
:14:35. > :14:39.have been so much worse. It is bad but it could have been so much
:14:40. > :14:42.worse. I'm not criticising the journalism, which has been
:14:43. > :14:46.excellent. You or I or three or four of us will have been only these
:14:47. > :14:50.rolling stories web hit after bit after bit on the canvas is very
:14:51. > :15:00.rich, and it is very complex -- where it after bit. And the
:15:01. > :15:04.Independent says we are struggling to nail down what is old and new
:15:05. > :15:09.about it but the man who actually nails it is Patrick, Patrick
:15:10. > :15:15.Cockburn says that the Islamic State is now going for soft targets. And
:15:16. > :15:19.the Independent not just asking what happened, but what happened next.
:15:20. > :15:24.That is what every one is talking about as well. Absolutely, and that
:15:25. > :15:28.is why I slightly disagree that the French don't want to hear about it
:15:29. > :15:33.from politicians. What the front page here is doing is putting on a
:15:34. > :15:37.very sombre front page the emphasis on grief and morning, and respect
:15:38. > :15:44.for the dead. But the next step is surely for the government to answer
:15:45. > :15:49.questions -- mourning. You know, how did that happen? Can we know more
:15:50. > :15:53.about it? And as it stands, the investigation remains very sketchy
:15:54. > :15:56.indeed. It is all based on claims, allegations, and at this stage I
:15:57. > :15:59.would be very suspicious about the kinds of things that are presented
:16:00. > :16:06.as facts, like the Syrian passport which seems to be planted next to a
:16:07. > :16:10.body. We have seen that in the case of the Charlie Hebdo attacks with
:16:11. > :16:13.the brothers, and one of the brothers had forgotten his identity
:16:14. > :16:15.card in the car. I think we have to take all these clues with a bit of
:16:16. > :16:29.caution. World leaders are now discussing
:16:30. > :16:33.military action against Islamic State. For many people in Paris
:16:34. > :16:37.tonight, they might not want more military action. They have already
:16:38. > :16:42.felt what that might lead to. But it might increase the feeling of a lot
:16:43. > :16:50.of people that we need to be more involved. Is that the kind of thing
:16:51. > :16:53.you are hearing in Paris? That there should be more military action that
:16:54. > :16:57.there should be? Frans is very active in the fight against the
:16:58. > :17:18.hardest groups, whether it is in North Africa... -- France. Whether
:17:19. > :17:24.it is Boko Haram... The French are used to be very robust military
:17:25. > :17:29.involvement. They are raising their eyebrows that a socialist president
:17:30. > :17:34.like Francois Hollande seems so much more gung ho than his US and British
:17:35. > :17:40.counterparts on the Syrian tragedy. Like many people, they tend to think
:17:41. > :17:45.after all these years, what are we doing with the rebel partners that
:17:46. > :17:48.we have and that we cannot really trust? There is not really an
:17:49. > :17:53.appetite for military involvement but there is a numbers ending that
:17:54. > :17:59.France is a big player, a big military player, on the
:18:00. > :18:03.international stage. The Times Takes it back to how people are feeling
:18:04. > :18:10.and how they are reacting right now, while papers like the Telegraph
:18:11. > :18:17.lookahead. They have the names and images of the victims. 129 right
:18:18. > :18:26.now, with many more injured. What strikes me is how young some of
:18:27. > :18:35.those faces are. Only one of them confirmed as British so far. And
:18:36. > :18:41.this comes as no surprise. Because these areas are very useful areas --
:18:42. > :18:46.youthful areas, frequented by young people, and they have been described
:18:47. > :18:55.by commentators as areas frequented by liberal, open-minded young men
:18:56. > :19:01.and women, who effectively represent the opposite of what ISIS stands for
:19:02. > :19:09.and that is why there would have been a prime target. ISIS resents
:19:10. > :19:15.that kind of joie de vivre and what you would do on a Paris street. You
:19:16. > :19:21.think they were targeting young people anywhere in Paris? I would be
:19:22. > :19:31.very interested to hear about that. It seemed to be that the main effort
:19:32. > :19:38.was the star -- stadium. They knew the district very well. What do you
:19:39. > :19:58.think? I could not agree more. These were not obvious targets. You had to
:19:59. > :20:03.be a real Parisian. Soft targets. The stadium seemed a more obvious
:20:04. > :20:12.target and the parallels with the Mumbai attacks are very start here.
:20:13. > :20:17.-- stark. But this is not a 5-star hotel or the Westgate shopping mall
:20:18. > :20:21.in Nairobi, places where the super-rich capitalists hang around.
:20:22. > :20:25.This was just a young crowd. That is what makes it really shocking. It
:20:26. > :20:30.will give many people the sense that we are not safe anywhere. It is not
:20:31. > :20:35.just big events, it can be just having a drink with a friend. But it
:20:36. > :20:40.is also the timing. More questions than answers but it is something
:20:41. > :20:43.that we have to establish. Again, the only person I have seen
:20:44. > :20:48.mentioning it... This is multidimensional. There is something
:20:49. > :20:56.very conventional to what ISIS does. It actually declared an
:20:57. > :21:00.Islamic State. And it has territory. It has to hold that land
:21:01. > :21:09.and it has been losing a great deal of ground over the last two to three
:21:10. > :21:15.weeks. The blast Sinjar, which is vital to the communications and
:21:16. > :21:20.smuggling routes. Those are the routes you want to use if you are
:21:21. > :21:26.going to export oil. This is a body blow to them and there seems to be
:21:27. > :21:30.something going on saying let us have diverging reaction, so we have
:21:31. > :21:36.had this terrible attacks on civilians in Lebanon and Baghdad,
:21:37. > :21:44.which have not been given the full coverage that they deserve, and we
:21:45. > :21:50.had the bombing and now this. It is to show that they are all
:21:51. > :21:55.conquering. It is to show that they can hit soft targets wherever. And
:21:56. > :22:00.that is the terror side of it. It is kamikaze stuff and it is vulgar and
:22:01. > :22:04.indiscriminate. That is the horrible side of it that strikes. Because it
:22:05. > :22:11.is so irrational, it strikes intellectual terror. It is
:22:12. > :22:24.interesting that it is clearly a massive PR coup, if I can but put it
:22:25. > :22:30.bluntly. What Patrick is saying is that it reflects a sign of
:22:31. > :22:36.desperation. They are actually losing ground, being pushed back...
:22:37. > :22:42.In Iraq and Syria. So they come here and attack us on our home soil. They
:22:43. > :22:48.are losing its title as the premier jihadi flag bearer. That is what
:22:49. > :22:53.happened with the various affiliate of Al-Qaeda. They lose the brand
:22:54. > :22:58.leadership. There is something going on there. There is a really cruel
:22:59. > :23:03.and wicked mind behind this. I suspect in a lot of the modus
:23:04. > :23:12.operandi that there are one or two others really tough Chechens that
:23:13. > :23:17.have been behind the forces in where ISIS is in Iraq. They picked a
:23:18. > :23:23.concert hall. The Chechens like doing that. It is a confined space
:23:24. > :23:40.with very young people and it is an easy target. The Observer picks up
:23:41. > :23:45.on that. Police hunt for clues. By launching attacks like this, they
:23:46. > :23:54.expose themselves. They expose as to how they may do the next attack. It
:23:55. > :24:00.does leave clues. One very important thing about this attack is that
:24:01. > :24:05.France has seen lone wolf attacks. A Frenchman was arguably the first
:24:06. > :24:11.blowback of the Syrian conflict, targeting the Jewish museum in
:24:12. > :24:16.Brussels. This is very different. This is co-ordinated and the claim
:24:17. > :24:21.came very quickly, the very next day. It is also the first suicide
:24:22. > :24:26.attack. Going back to this business of the caliphate, I think that we
:24:27. > :24:34.are getting it wrong by saying just hours after our Kurdish allies
:24:35. > :24:36.entered Sinjar we have this very co-ordinated attack but almost
:24:37. > :24:40.seems... We don't use the word Central command. We used to use that
:24:41. > :24:44.term for Al-Qaeda. But it really shows that it does not matter what
:24:45. > :24:49.is happening in Syria and Iraq. And in a way, maybe you are right in
:24:50. > :24:53.that the aspiration will trigger these kinds of attacks. We saw with
:24:54. > :24:59.the Russian plane and the Beirut attacks on the Hezbollah
:25:00. > :25:04.neighbourhood, the global jihad, ISIS's global reach, is becoming
:25:05. > :25:07.much more sophisticated. For a year, we thought they were just
:25:08. > :25:12.concentrating on holding and administering territory. It has gone
:25:13. > :25:15.to a different game now. That is the key point. They are saying that
:25:16. > :25:20.they're not going to be focused on that. Sinjar is just the latest.
:25:21. > :25:24.They felt they were losing ground. There was pressure on the territory
:25:25. > :25:28.of the Islamic State. Now we're going to do something us because
:25:29. > :25:33.we're not a one trick pony and we're going to show that we can strike you
:25:34. > :25:37.where it really hurts. And there is still a military presence in Paris
:25:38. > :25:43.tonight but the Sunday Express suggests that in London the SAS is
:25:44. > :25:49.on our streets. Is that something that would worry you, knowing that
:25:50. > :25:55.there are plain armed soldiers protecting British cities? Or does
:25:56. > :25:59.it make you feel safer? We have heard the French President using the
:26:00. > :26:04.language of war, saying this was an act of war perpetrated against
:26:05. > :26:10.France and that France is determined to fight terrorism in a merciless
:26:11. > :26:17.fashion, and this has been echoed by his British counterpart, David
:26:18. > :26:21.Cameron, who is just doing the same, proving that he is being pragmatic
:26:22. > :26:26.about it. He does not want to be complacent about it. Obviously the
:26:27. > :26:29.British people are going to be scared about what is happening next
:26:30. > :26:33.door. It is only two hours away on the Euros da. And there are
:26:34. > :26:41.legitimate concerns about the British population. -- on the
:26:42. > :26:43.Eurostar. Britain went through that a few years ago and does not want to
:26:44. > :26:50.see a similar scenario unfold again on British soil, so what David
:26:51. > :26:54.Cameron is doing, effectively, his policy is now revolving on war and
:26:55. > :26:58.he is taking all the security measures he possibly can to reassure
:26:59. > :27:09.the British public. Many thanks to our guests. Our thoughts are with
:27:10. > :27:15.you all and your colleagues in Paris. Thank you for taking us
:27:16. > :27:16.through the papers. Our coverage continues on BBC News. Don't go
:27:17. > :27:30.away. Good evening. We have got some
:27:31. > :27:32.especially heavy rainfall around across north-western parts of the
:27:33. > :27:35.country. Is all down to tropical moisture delivered by ex-hurricane
:27:36. > :27:38.Kate. That is bringing all moisture delivered by ex-hurricane
:27:39. > :27:39.Kate. That is bringing all of this heavy rain across parts