:00:00. > :00:00.Belgium next week, who has been denied the chance to represent his
:00:00. > :00:20.adopted country. Hello and welcome to
:00:21. > :00:23.our look ahead to what the papers With me are Tom Bergin,
:00:24. > :00:27.Business correspondent at Reuters and Journalist Lucy Cavendish,
:00:28. > :00:29.who writes for the Times. Images
:00:30. > :00:34.from the England versus France friendly at Wembley is the choice
:00:35. > :00:37.of many of the front pages, the The Telegraph chooses another image
:00:38. > :00:42.from that match and mentions the security fears that caused the
:00:43. > :00:47.evacuation of the Hannover stadium. Another picture from Wembley
:00:48. > :00:50.on the front of the i but the main story is about David Cameron's
:00:51. > :00:53.decision to press for another vote The Financial Times looks at
:00:54. > :00:59.Russian President Vladimir Putin's instruction to his naval commanders
:01:00. > :01:03.off the coast of Syria to establish contact with French forces
:01:04. > :01:12.and "work with them like allies". But its main story focuses
:01:13. > :01:27.on Barclays and allegations it The Guardian looks at the airstrikes
:01:28. > :01:29.against Islamic State, saying the Paris attacks have spurred
:01:30. > :01:35.international efforts to crush the organisation. The Mirror says
:01:36. > :01:39.freedom is the winner after tonight's football match in London.
:01:40. > :01:44.The Daily Mail features a picture of a police officer at Wembley, whom it
:01:45. > :01:50.likens to the film character RoboCop. And, The Times says
:01:51. > :01:55.international airstrikes against Islamic State mark the closest
:01:56. > :02:00.relationship between Russia and the West for more than a decade.
:02:01. > :02:07.Let's begin with The Times. Like so many papers it has a picture from
:02:08. > :02:12.Wembley, but the headline, united against terror. Who exactly is
:02:13. > :02:17.united? They are using the picture obviously to show the fact that the
:02:18. > :02:21.football match has brought people together, and the French national
:02:22. > :02:23.anthem has been sung. It was a moving experience for everyone, and
:02:24. > :02:28.I think it has pulled people together. But more than that, what
:02:29. > :02:31.they are saying is that Putin is now coming on board because of what
:02:32. > :02:36.happened with the bomb on the aeroplane, and that actually they
:02:37. > :02:41.will join in with Europe against Islamic State, and whatever that
:02:42. > :02:46.means, which obviously will become a bit more clear when David Cameron
:02:47. > :02:52.presented to the Commons and they decide whether they will say yes or
:02:53. > :02:56.no to airstrikes Syria. It is all happening very quickly, it is all
:02:57. > :03:02.quite complicated and it feels quite panicky, really, I think. There are
:03:03. > :03:10.people on the run from Paris, there are cells in Belgium, and there is a
:03:11. > :03:13.feeling of shock, I think. It is very interesting, Tom, and we will
:03:14. > :03:22.see that over the course of looking through the papers, but all the
:03:23. > :03:25.papers essentially have the same story, and the tone is to some
:03:26. > :03:37.extent reflected in the headline somewhat up it. Yes, and the Sun is
:03:38. > :03:45.upbeat as well, saying that the match going on shows that terrorists
:03:46. > :03:50.will not win. Making those comments, we are hostages to
:03:51. > :03:57.fortune. Actually, does that mean that terrorists win because the
:03:58. > :04:04.match was called off in Germany? We can't use the usual cliches we
:04:05. > :04:07.sometimes use around these things. It is a situation now where there is
:04:08. > :04:12.a heightened state, if the package is found people will panic. Will
:04:13. > :04:17.that change and fade as time goes on, it is impossible to know? It is
:04:18. > :04:23.interesting the Sun has dedicated front and back pages to this story.
:04:24. > :04:31.I think they have got it right, you can really get the feeling of it,
:04:32. > :04:40.David Cameron and Prince William were both there, so it was quite
:04:41. > :04:48.risky. It is an ageing image -- in amazing image. Here we have this
:04:49. > :04:51.picture of the female RoboCop, I think this is someone who made an
:04:52. > :04:57.appearance at Wembley this evening. This is quite incredible, I was so
:04:58. > :05:06.shocked. She does look like a robot, and she has gloves on and armour,
:05:07. > :05:11.and she seems to have a lot of guns and you can barely see who she is.
:05:12. > :05:15.On the one hand you think, I will feel very safe if I'm standing next
:05:16. > :05:20.to her, but on the other hand I thought, being a female, I wonder
:05:21. > :05:32.how long it took to get all that on. Just the practicalities of it,
:05:33. > :05:36.that must have taken sometime! I'm sure men are also wearing it, it is
:05:37. > :05:45.not just women, but the idea is that she looks very tough and
:05:46. > :05:51.invincible. Tom, according to the Mail she is part of a 130 strong
:05:52. > :05:57.Scotland Yard squad, which arrived in huge armoured vehicles to throw a
:05:58. > :06:02.ring of steel around fans. This was appeared to be necessary, and that
:06:03. > :06:09.is a sign of the world we're living in. Obviously the UK has a police
:06:10. > :06:16.force that doesn't use guns. Not any more we don't. It also means there
:06:17. > :06:23.is a huge cost, and the kind of measures that happened tonight, can
:06:24. > :06:26.this be a regular occurrence? There is a certain percentage of GDP we
:06:27. > :06:31.spend on security, quite a small one. There are plenty of countries
:06:32. > :06:38.where they spent 20 or 30% of their funds on such things. There is a
:06:39. > :06:42.real cost to changing where we live our life and living a life in the
:06:43. > :06:48.way we did tonight. Obviously this is a particular thing that happened
:06:49. > :06:52.tonight, this can't happen that every single event that ever
:06:53. > :06:56.happens, it is impossible. Obviously the PM and the heir to the throne
:06:57. > :07:06.were there, and you don't want anything happening. It is a sort of
:07:07. > :07:13.act of defiance in a way. I was mentioning at the beginning
:07:14. > :07:16.the contrast with The Times, this headline, continent on the edge as
:07:17. > :07:20.fear takes its grip. What did you make of this? This is quite an
:07:21. > :07:28.extreme one, obviously people are anxious. In terms of the total
:07:29. > :07:36.significance of the people and whether they should... The fact that
:07:37. > :07:40.there are couple of going around inspiring this level of panic around
:07:41. > :07:43.Europe, I'm not sure about that. Even if you catch these people, the
:07:44. > :07:47.infrastructure involved in this kind of attack is not so enormous that it
:07:48. > :07:53.can't be replicated relatively easily. That is probably the most
:07:54. > :08:00.fearful issue. A lot of people disagree about that. Security
:08:01. > :08:03.officials say it is extremely difficult to organise an attack like
:08:04. > :08:09.this, and it is unlikely to happen again quickly. I suppose you have a
:08:10. > :08:18.bomb attack on a plane and this attack in relatively short periods
:08:19. > :08:26.of time. The cancellation of the match in Hanover looks fearful from
:08:27. > :08:30.the outside. Once it starts, this fear that we are all a target it is
:08:31. > :08:35.very difficult to know how that will change and how people will feel
:08:36. > :08:42.safe. Moving on to the Guardian, and Tom you mentioned the reference to
:08:43. > :08:47.the Hunt possibly now in France or Belgium or across Europe for a
:08:48. > :08:54.second suspect. Tell us a bit about how they have approached the story.
:08:55. > :08:59.Obviously this is the issue about finding those responsible, that is a
:09:00. > :09:02.key part of the story. Many of the attackers died in the attack so
:09:03. > :09:08.there are relatively few people. It will be interesting if they can find
:09:09. > :09:14.these people to get more information about the infrastructure and
:09:15. > :09:18.architecture behind this attack. The hunt is on, there are concerns that
:09:19. > :09:24.may be one of the individuals may have gone back to Syria, so it is a
:09:25. > :09:26.highly uncertain situation. Interesting Lucy is the reminder
:09:27. > :09:33.here that one of the French football players, his cousin died in the
:09:34. > :09:40.Paris terror attack. It is very sad, and he says we must unite against an
:09:41. > :09:48.enemy that has no religion. On to the Financial Times, but they have
:09:49. > :09:54.made this their central focus. Vladimir Putin saying that France is
:09:55. > :09:58.an ally. I can see the point behind that because they have both been
:09:59. > :10:03.attacked, obviously in very different ways, but in terms of what
:10:04. > :10:07.is happening in Syria, they are both following a slightly different
:10:08. > :10:14.agenda, and how they are going to pull that agenda together and agree
:10:15. > :10:18.on an agenda is something... I have no idea how they are going to do
:10:19. > :10:21.that. It is interesting that they are saying that because obviously
:10:22. > :10:27.they are supporting very different factions. I'm not sure that there is
:10:28. > :10:33.a fraction... There are so many factions that yes, Putin is
:10:34. > :10:39.supporting Assad, but what everyone else is supporting a slightly
:10:40. > :10:51.opaque. Yes, they overlap on one subject, ISIL, but on the issue of a
:10:52. > :10:55.sad they are opposed. Underpinning a lot of the aim is politically around
:10:56. > :11:01.Syria and ISIS is that you can have a solution in Syria, and if you have
:11:02. > :11:04.stability it might be more difficult for them to operate. But there seems
:11:05. > :11:15.to be a different agenda on how you get there. You have the rhetoric
:11:16. > :11:21.that they have attacked us and we will destroy them, but I think that
:11:22. > :11:28.maybe then they will become un- Allied. On many of the front pages
:11:29. > :11:34.is Charlie Sheen, and his admission that he is HIV positive and was
:11:35. > :11:38.blackmailed to keep it a secret. This is quite a confusing story,
:11:39. > :11:42.because actually it looks like he spent about ?10 million on being
:11:43. > :11:46.blackmailed, and I was trying to think why he would spend ?10
:11:47. > :11:50.million. I imagine it is because he might have a lot of lawsuits
:11:51. > :11:54.following him now, if he has had unprotected sex with other women.
:11:55. > :12:03.They can potentially probably now sue him, so that is probably why he
:12:04. > :12:08.has not gone public until now. I imagine he went public because
:12:09. > :12:14.someone got wind of the story. It has been a difficult time, I
:12:15. > :12:18.imagine, and he has had a very difficult life, and this is where it
:12:19. > :12:23.has ended up. It'll be interesting to see how much sympathy there for
:12:24. > :12:32.him. Yes, there are some who are quite sympathetic, but some of the
:12:33. > :12:35.tabloids are already saying, raising issues about whether he was totally
:12:36. > :12:40.forthcoming about the women he has been with. There are potential
:12:41. > :12:47.criminal issues in a lot of jurisdictions, if you knowingly have
:12:48. > :12:50.sex with someone, you are open to manslaughter charges in some
:12:51. > :12:58.countries. It is a complex legal area. Time has caught up with us,
:12:59. > :13:02.sadly. Quite sombre tonight. That is the world we live in at the moment.
:13:03. > :13:04.Thank you both, it has been great to talk to you. Coming up next,
:13:05. > :13:07.Sportsday.