:00:00. > :00:00.number one, David Goffin. We will show you how England beat Pakistan
:00:00. > :00:00.in the first T20 match of the series. That is in the next 15
:00:00. > :00:14.minutes. Hello and welcome to
:00:15. > :00:16.our look ahead to what the papers With me are
:00:17. > :00:27.Rowena Mason, Political Correspondent at the
:00:28. > :00:29.Guardian AND Craig Woodhouse, Chief Tomorrow's front pages,
:00:30. > :00:33.starting with... The Times leads
:00:34. > :00:36.on Labour's split over bombing It says Jeremy Corbyn's opposition
:00:37. > :00:39.has plunged him into the biggest The Telegraph also splashes
:00:40. > :00:42.on the turmoil in Labour over The Syria vote leads the Guardian
:00:43. > :00:47.too, they say Cameron is hopeful "Cameron's ready for war,
:00:48. > :00:56.but is Britain?" The question posed by the
:00:57. > :00:57.Daily Mirror. The Independent features
:00:58. > :00:59.the kneeling figure of a man condemned to death in Saudi
:01:00. > :01:03.Arabia, one of 50 who will be put In the Express, there's hope
:01:04. > :01:11.for sufferers of arthritis -- an injection to ease their agony could
:01:12. > :01:24.be on the way within five years. Net migration could lead to an out
:01:25. > :01:29.vote in the upcoming European union referendum.
:01:30. > :01:36.The House of Commons divided as the prime Minster make the case to bomb
:01:37. > :01:41.IS in Syria. What did you make of the KC made? A lot of the paper not
:01:42. > :01:47.looking at that, looking at what is going on in Labour? Interesting, ACU
:01:48. > :01:57.new facts David Cameron presented to the Commons. -- ACU. He took 100
:01:58. > :02:02.questions from MPs. One of the things people are most sceptical
:02:03. > :02:08.about is the idea there are 70,000 troops on the ground in Syria, that
:02:09. > :02:13.could move into the vacuum, that the UK and other coalition countries
:02:14. > :02:20.could get rid of Isis. Is there much evidence of that figure? How many
:02:21. > :02:23.troops could be available? In a tortuous briefing later on to
:02:24. > :02:27.journalists, we went around the houses. It has come from the joint
:02:28. > :02:32.intelligence committee. Downing Street is says it is not a figure
:02:33. > :02:38.the Prime Minister has picked out of the air. Not a dodgy dossier. It has
:02:39. > :02:42.come from the intelligence chiefs. They have put a slight caveat on it,
:02:43. > :02:49.saying around 75,000 ground troops in Syria, unfortunately nowhere near
:02:50. > :02:55.where Isis is controlling. In the south-west of the country. There is
:02:56. > :03:00.the issue of moving them around. The thing Downing Street was saying, as
:03:01. > :03:05.soon as we can get political transition, Assad going, we can use
:03:06. > :03:10.the full might of the Syrian army to help take on Isis, a lot more than
:03:11. > :03:20.75,000, that is what we call the Free Syrian Army. Looking at the
:03:21. > :03:26.independent, labour at war over air strikes. Talk of the biggest crisis
:03:27. > :03:29.of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, he has only been leader for five
:03:30. > :03:34.minutes. Certainly the biggest crisis since last week. On the day
:03:35. > :03:38.that the prime Minister comes to the House of Commons to make the case
:03:39. > :03:43.for Britain to go to war with another country, Labour have made
:03:44. > :03:51.it that he is writing to MPs about it that he is writing to MPs about
:03:52. > :03:56.something he really thinks? Why other set -- why is the Shadow
:03:57. > :04:00.Cabinet so upset? We know he thinks that, but they were to come to a
:04:01. > :04:05.whether the party votes for war. He whether the party votes for war. He
:04:06. > :04:09.is being clear about what he thinks. He would like to take the
:04:10. > :04:13.whole party, but it does not look like the Shadow Cabinet agrees.
:04:14. > :04:19.There is talk of that senior figures from the Labour Party resigning from
:04:20. > :04:23.the Shadow Cabinet. Up to half of them, I expect. The key issue is not
:04:24. > :04:30.whether they knew Jeremy Corbyn is not a fan of foreign intervention.
:04:31. > :04:35.He has been a member of Stop the Walk says he has been short
:04:36. > :04:41.trousers. Jamie Collins Edison to the David Cameron evidence, reflect,
:04:42. > :04:45.we will make a decision on Monday. He ambushes them on Thursday
:04:46. > :04:50.afternoon, saying I have listened, I will not speak to my CLP, neither
:04:51. > :04:54.will you, I don't want to do it any more. Complete breakdown of trust,
:04:55. > :05:00.which is at the heart of it. Interesting meeting on Monday.
:05:01. > :05:05.Staying with the independent, extraordinary image, mass executions
:05:06. > :05:10.in Saudi Arabia. Will Britain protest? Picture a man waiting to be
:05:11. > :05:16.executed in Saudi Arabia. Images like this are unbelievable. The
:05:17. > :05:24.question is, what will Britain do about it, given the trade
:05:25. > :05:29.Britain's relationship with Saudi Arabia has been in the spotlight the
:05:30. > :05:33.bit more than usual recently. One of the arguments Jeremy Corbyn is
:05:34. > :05:38.making, we need to look very closely at whether Saudi individuals are
:05:39. > :05:43.helping to fund jihadists. The Liberal Democrats have been saying
:05:44. > :05:51.that. A case of a British person in Saudi, who got a reprieve, but was
:05:52. > :05:58.potentially going to be flogged. Several cases of bloggers, that
:05:59. > :06:05.Britain has protested about. David Cameron
:06:06. > :06:05.Saudis. In cases like this, you have to wonder
:06:06. > :06:14.effect. Should we be doing as much business with estate that has a
:06:15. > :06:19.human rights record like this? Largest business, a key military
:06:20. > :06:25.ally, and will continue to be so, in our fight against Islamic State.
:06:26. > :06:30.Sometimes unfortunately the world is not an ideal place as
:06:31. > :06:35.would like, as Jeremy Corbin would like. You have two pick your allies,
:06:36. > :06:42.and work out if it is better to fight a worse evil. Let's look at
:06:43. > :06:47.the FT. A migrant behind a fence in northern Greece. Stemming the flow
:06:48. > :06:52.of the migrants to the EU, or risk the fate of the Northern Gerry Roman
:06:53. > :07:02.Empire. This is the Dutch prime minister making this morning. -- the
:07:03. > :07:05.fate of the Roman Empire. He is a big friend of Nick Clegg, you would
:07:06. > :07:09.think he was a centrist. This reflects serious concerns in Europe,
:07:10. > :07:19.about the sheer number of people coming to Europe from the crisis in
:07:20. > :07:26.Syria. This is linked to one and the same thing. At the heart of the
:07:27. > :07:33.European project, easy come, easy go where freedom of movement. That has
:07:34. > :07:37.led to fairly weak external borders, people paying the price, as we see
:07:38. > :07:45.now. If the Schengen fails, why would the single currency, Cropper?
:07:46. > :07:52.Not explained in the article. -- come a cropper. He is making a point
:07:53. > :07:58.about the European single currency, the central tenant of the European
:07:59. > :08:03.Union. In a wider way, the whole project could be at risk if freedom
:08:04. > :08:08.of movement is undermined. The language seems pretty extreme, I'm
:08:09. > :08:13.not sure it will herald a new dark ages like after the Roman Empire. He
:08:14. > :08:24.has chosen that language to make a point about how strongly he feels.
:08:25. > :08:27.What with the parasitical city the? Europe like the Roman Empire, it
:08:28. > :08:33.would strike terror into the hearts of Tory Eurosceptics. People in
:08:34. > :08:37.Europe think it is as great as the Roman Empire. It is a collection of
:08:38. > :08:45.28 sovereign states, they would be perfectly OK on their own, with Bill
:08:46. > :08:51.Cash and his friends say. Osborne's at hit poor families hard. You have
:08:52. > :08:59.written this. It is quite complicated. At the heart of it, two
:09:00. > :09:03.respected economic think tank, the Resolution Foundation and the
:09:04. > :09:09.Institute for Fiscal Studies, they are saying effectively, although the
:09:10. > :09:13.cuts to tax credits have been reversed, when tax credits are faded
:09:14. > :09:19.out, and the universal credit comes in, actually in work benefits
:09:20. > :09:24.entitlements, for new claimants, they will be lower than the current
:09:25. > :09:31.system. In that sense, effectively, new claimants will lose a large
:09:32. > :09:37.amount of money, around ?1000 a year by 2020. Not quite as good a story
:09:38. > :09:41.as it seemed to some people when you have the Autumn Statement? That
:09:42. > :09:52.depends. What this is saying, 16 edge of pounds -- 16 edge of pounds
:09:53. > :09:57.-- ?1600 worse off than the current system. George Osborne has said the
:09:58. > :10:02.current system is unsustainable, and it comes as no surprise that some
:10:03. > :10:05.people will lose out. Buy to let Russia as people try to beat the
:10:06. > :10:09.stamp duty increase. This is if you are buying a second property, you
:10:10. > :10:14.will have to pay more to the Exchequer over it. Whether it does
:10:15. > :10:19.force people to rush to beat the April deadline, we don't know?
:10:20. > :10:23.Highly likely, if you are a vandal sitting on a massive lot of cash,
:10:24. > :10:27.you want to expand your Empire, you have got rich by not giving your
:10:28. > :10:33.money away, why not snap up what is available? My heart bleeds for them,
:10:34. > :10:41.paying an extra 3% to take up extra housing stock. A good move by the
:10:42. > :10:44.Chancellor. It has annoyed a few well-heeled people. The economic
:10:45. > :10:53.forecast said it could depress property prices. Amen to that. For
:10:54. > :10:56.most people trying to get a house. It could affect the housing market,
:10:57. > :11:03.when the gunmen get involved? Possibly. It is quite a short window
:11:04. > :11:09.of time, in which people will potentially, rush to buy to let
:11:10. > :11:15.houses. Any effect will probably be short lived. Stampede over in four
:11:16. > :11:20.months. Stand clear. We will be back at 11:30pm, hopefully having a bit
:11:21. > :11:35.longer to talk about the front pages. Coming up next, it is time
:11:36. > :11:36.for debris. --