:00:00. > :00:00.reversed his decision to miss this year's River Lee -- Sports
:00:00. > :00:13.Personality of the Year. That is in 15 minutes.
:00:14. > :00:17.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:18. > :00:20.With me are Benedicte Paviot, a journalist from France
:00:21. > :00:30.24 and deputy editor of The Guardian Paul Johnson.
:00:31. > :00:39.We will start with the Independent. It leads with more calls to distance
:00:40. > :00:47.itself from stop the War coalition. The Express has said scientists have
:00:48. > :00:53.found a way of discovering cancer. The Metro starts with a petition to
:00:54. > :00:58.ban Donald Trump from Britain. The Micra crisis could push Britain out
:00:59. > :01:03.of Europe, was David Cameron. The Guardian reports on the word culture
:01:04. > :01:06.at the company, sports direct. The FT says in America the prevailing
:01:07. > :01:10.view that the middle class is being crushed is helping to feed some of
:01:11. > :01:16.the popular anger that has boosted the candidacy of Donald Trump. The
:01:17. > :01:21.time says the influx of refugees in Germany has passed the 1 million
:01:22. > :01:26.mark, keeping pressure on European leaders. The male browse our public
:01:27. > :01:31.sector bureaucrats who it accuses of covering up greed, incompetence and
:01:32. > :01:39.corruption. Where going to start with the Financial Times. We have
:01:40. > :01:43.been hearing a lot over the last two or three election cycle is about how
:01:44. > :01:51.the great middle class of America, the working Americans are squeezed
:01:52. > :01:55.and contracting further down. They're not having as much spending
:01:56. > :02:03.power, jobs are insecure, there is a problem there and it is appealing to
:02:04. > :02:06.the Pope a late Donald Trump. This is a interesting lead article by the
:02:07. > :02:13.Financial Times where they give us a lot of data and saying that the
:02:14. > :02:22.middle-class is now being to 50% of the population as opposed to four
:02:23. > :02:27.decades ago, 61%. It is the poor and rich that are increasing which is
:02:28. > :02:31.quite interesting because we were discussing his previously. You have
:02:32. > :02:35.come back from New York and there the debates was about attributing Mr
:02:36. > :02:41.Trump's success to blue-collar workers. Blue-collar, nonreligious
:02:42. > :02:47.workers. This takes it a lot further. They talk about the numbers
:02:48. > :02:51.of middle class in America. It has been pushed both ways. The super
:02:52. > :02:55.rich, or the rich have been pushed up and there is an exceedingly large
:02:56. > :03:03.number of poorer citizens as well. It is a really interesting piece.
:03:04. > :03:10.Much of this is forced in a way by the increasing incredulity of a lot
:03:11. > :03:14.of people at the trump campaign. Can this man say nothing at all, but
:03:15. > :03:21.will not come out of the race? It appears he is unbeatable. His timing
:03:22. > :03:27.is when his polls go down, he comes up with something controversial. He
:03:28. > :03:34.is way ahead in the polls. This sort of level back in 2008, Hillary
:03:35. > :03:42.Clinton was 20 points ahead. We had Giuliani ahead. In 2012, News green
:03:43. > :03:59.critter was 13 points ahead. Early days. He is building on his fame.
:04:00. > :04:05.Let's go to the Metro. A huge backing for a petition after the
:04:06. > :04:11.tycoon's muslin server stop what is interesting here is it is 300,000, I
:04:12. > :04:20.tell you what, it has gone up even more. I was reporting of it earlier.
:04:21. > :04:24.At that point it was 290,009 went on to try and top up the number and see
:04:25. > :04:32.what is going on and the website had crashed. This petition was only
:04:33. > :04:35.started on Tuesday so it is remarkable. It is gaining huge
:04:36. > :04:41.momentum. What I think is interesting is in America Donald
:04:42. > :04:46.Trump can get away with this because of the first Amendment. Whereas in
:04:47. > :04:54.European countries, including the UK or France, that's not a prospect
:04:55. > :05:02.because he could be, and somebody could complain about the fact it is
:05:03. > :05:07.the public order act of 1986 inciting, it is a person who uses
:05:08. > :05:10.insulting words or behaviour displays any written material which
:05:11. > :05:17.is threatening, abusive or insulting is guilty of an offence. Let's be
:05:18. > :05:24.clear, if he came here and we know George Osborne says they ask when to
:05:25. > :05:28.stop them, if he came here and he said Muslims should not be allowed
:05:29. > :05:34.to fly to America, that would be falling foul of the law. I'm not a
:05:35. > :05:36.lawyer. It looks like it could be. The official policy of the
:05:37. > :05:42.government is to say, we're not going to ban him. What this would do
:05:43. > :05:47.with the American relationship... It is very early days, we're not there
:05:48. > :05:54.yet. It would seem, yes, he could be accused of being a hate... The
:05:55. > :06:01.governments's position is that ban is affected when there is multiple
:06:02. > :06:03.conviction as race hate. These quotes are much more wounding. You
:06:04. > :06:13.have JK Rowling saying he is much worse than for the Mott. Jeb Bush
:06:14. > :06:18.saying he is unhinged. You've got Clive may be saying he is
:06:19. > :06:28.accompanied... We won't go into that! That Prime Minister actually
:06:29. > :06:32.says about a US presidential candidates, this is divisive. This
:06:33. > :06:41.is wrong. Also, interestingly, when Mr Trump didn't just say that he
:06:42. > :06:46.accused Britain, I think London and Britain -- Paris of having no-go
:06:47. > :06:53.areas. Let's say he wins the nomination. He then has two somehow
:06:54. > :06:56.claw his way back to the centre of American politics in order to gain
:06:57. > :07:01.the vast majority of people who are in the middle who haven't decided
:07:02. > :07:06.which way to go. How will he do that on this policy of saying, no Muslims
:07:07. > :07:10.should be allowed into the can 's Mac I don't think he can. He's
:07:11. > :07:19.insulted half the human race from start. He then insulted the New York
:07:20. > :07:35.Times reporter. The female presenter. The Mexicans. This is
:07:36. > :07:40.unbelievable. On it goes. If you are upsetting all those people how do
:07:41. > :07:46.you propose to unite these people if you get to the White House? What is
:07:47. > :07:51.he about? He can't believe he's got this far. People should look at him
:07:52. > :07:58.and go, you are fired. To make this kind of... This is not elevating the
:07:59. > :08:02.debate. As John Kerry were saying, this is not helping the image of
:08:03. > :08:06.America abroad. Everybody is entitled to hold certain views but
:08:07. > :08:12.to be singling out various, whether it is the female sex or all kinds of
:08:13. > :08:16.people, I don't think this is elevating the debate. It is a
:08:17. > :08:21.reflection on the other Republican candidates. They are not strong
:08:22. > :08:27.enough and making interesting enough that this man is getting all the
:08:28. > :08:40.media attention. Let's go to the Telegraph. The plan minister was EU
:08:41. > :08:46.migrant crisis may force this. David Cameron is in difficulty here. He
:08:47. > :08:55.will have difficulty getting a hearing in Brussels stop he could be
:08:56. > :09:02.left high and dry. There is end of the narrative here. That is a
:09:03. > :09:05.choreography that goes here. David Cameron needs a dispute in Brussels.
:09:06. > :09:12.He goes to Brussels, he looks outnumbered, he's involved in a huge
:09:13. > :09:15.row, he gains a partial victory, he comes back holding a bit of the deal
:09:16. > :09:26.that he's won with blood sweat and tears and on we go. We don't have an
:09:27. > :09:33.exit. The lycee Palace wants Britain to stay in, don't they? Will they
:09:34. > :09:35.give David Cameron want he wants? There is a small matter of a
:09:36. > :09:41.presidential election that will be watched carefully. They will not
:09:42. > :09:45.give everything. One of the lines and don't completely agree with in
:09:46. > :09:50.the excellent article of the Daily Telegraph is the fact that they
:09:51. > :09:53.think this appears to show that David Cameron is ruling out a
:09:54. > :10:01.referendum next year. I don't think that is the case. That is incorrect.
:10:02. > :10:05.I would not rule it out next year. Briefly, we are going to go to the
:10:06. > :10:16.Telegraph again. GCHQ Christmas code.
:10:17. > :10:20.GCHQ are going from under the shadows, they have a PR department
:10:21. > :10:28.now. We can talk to them and people have a civil relationship with them.
:10:29. > :10:35.There was needed peace in the FT this is part of the change. Because
:10:36. > :10:42.of the budget, the Palace attacks except, GCHQ was expecting to get
:10:43. > :10:47.1900 more agents in there. It is a very popular place for graduates in
:10:48. > :10:52.Arabic languages, Russian languages, computer studies. This is part of
:10:53. > :10:58.the PR thing. It's a code you have two crack in a Christmas Caryl. I
:10:59. > :11:08.can only one -- think of one man who can crack that and he is in Moscow.
:11:09. > :11:15.Edward Snowden! Thank you both. We will have a look is more stories in
:11:16. > :11:17.an hour's time. Stay with us on BBC News. It is time for the sport.