:00:00. > :00:00.and gunshots, how Leonardo DiCaprio survived the Oscar Durie. We get the
:00:00. > :00:00.reviews on The Revenant and the other top releases in the Film
:00:07. > :00:13.Review. Hello and welcome to our look
:00:14. > :00:20.at the morning's papers. With me are the journalist
:00:21. > :00:22.Rachel Shabi, and Tim Stanley, The Express leads with Britain's
:00:23. > :00:31.future in the EU, citing new research that suggests
:00:32. > :00:33.growing support for Britain to leave The Telegraph's main headline
:00:34. > :00:36.concerns GP waiting lists. It says 10 million patients are
:00:37. > :00:39.struggling to get appointments, with record numbers having to wait
:00:40. > :00:41.more than a week. The Times headlines David Cameron's
:00:42. > :00:44.plans to integrate Muslim women into mainstream society, including
:00:45. > :00:47.English classes for new migrants. The Guardian covers plans by the NHS
:00:48. > :00:50.to launch its own sugar tax The Daily Mail leads with mounting
:00:51. > :00:53.pressure on Scotland Yard to apologise to ex
:00:54. > :00:56.army chief Lord Bramall after child The Metro's top story is speculation
:00:57. > :01:05.over delays to the relaunch of The Sun has more on Jeremy Corbyn's
:01:06. > :01:09.desire to remove nuclear war heads The Independent covers
:01:10. > :01:16.Saudi Arabia's stock market crash, after the lifting
:01:17. > :01:32.of sanctions clears the way for Iran We are surprised he Iran deal hasn't
:01:33. > :01:40.featured more widely on the front pages, but anyway. We start with a
:01:41. > :01:47.Sun. Off his warhead, with Jerry Corbyn stuffed inside a missile with
:01:48. > :01:57.his hat on. Do a Falklands deal and start talks with IS fiends. The
:01:58. > :02:02.nuclear bid is interesting. Jeromy Corbyn has a problem. He would like
:02:03. > :02:06.to get rid of Trident. He has playwrights saying he shouldn't do
:02:07. > :02:10.it on principle and union saying he shouldn't do it because of jobs --
:02:11. > :02:18.Blairights. And others are saying he should come out floating in a
:02:19. > :02:24.halfway house modelled on what Japan does, apparently, whereby you retain
:02:25. > :02:27.nuclear capability - in a sense that you can fire a nuclear weapon if you
:02:28. > :02:32.want to, but you don't have their weapons, so you have the weapon
:02:33. > :02:35.system but not the weaponry. In that way you are part of the nuclear
:02:36. > :02:41.umbrella without being a nuclear power. Could you find yourself in
:02:42. > :02:54.this artistic insight has a marine quickly? Where is the closest one?
:02:55. > :03:03.-- could you find yourself a ballistic missile. He talked about a
:03:04. > :03:09.lot of domestic policy. Wealth inequality, NHS, this is what the
:03:10. > :03:12.Sun ends up with. And then they complain he does not talk about
:03:13. > :03:20.domestic policy. It is always something that has been likely to
:03:21. > :03:26.crop up. Absolutely. The nuclear issue. I am looking at the other
:03:27. > :03:30.things. They are trying to cover a lot of bases. John Prescott
:03:31. > :03:35.complained that they were focusing on things out of the past. They are
:03:36. > :03:41.focused on lots of things. Jeromy Corbyn is out of the 80s. Trying to
:03:42. > :03:47.apply a 1980s policies to today, having a conversation with Argentina
:03:48. > :03:52.about handing back the Falklands... He didn't say, let's talk about
:03:53. > :03:56.Islamic State. It is the point about the Trident, it isn't an 80s
:03:57. > :04:02.conversation, it is a 2016 conversation. Trident is not an
:04:03. > :04:07.effective defence measure. All but officials will say that. In the face
:04:08. > :04:12.of the biggest threat, international terrorism, Trident is no use. It is
:04:13. > :04:16.a really good idea to have this review. And to look at whether there
:04:17. > :04:24.is better ways to spend the money. How does the Telegraph look at it?
:04:25. > :04:32.Be careful what you say. LAUGHS. Why, what will happen? Deal with it
:04:33. > :04:38.in an elusive manner... Jeromy Corbyn's the idea, the deterrent
:04:39. > :04:44.with no ability to deter is like the army without rifles. They are having
:04:45. > :04:50.a review, they are at the beginning of this review. This is one idea. I
:04:51. > :04:54.am sure there will be more. The reason it was flagged is because it
:04:55. > :04:59.is a way to look at not making a lot of people redundant. One thing of
:05:00. > :05:06.concern with losing Trident is it will cause unemployment. That is the
:05:07. > :05:09.reason they have looked at this compromise arrangement. I am sure
:05:10. > :05:18.there will be of other things come up in this review. That quote is
:05:19. > :05:24.from John Woodcock, Labour MP, from where Trident is found, so it is a
:05:25. > :05:29.jobs issue for him. The lingering plus for the idea of keeping Trident
:05:30. > :05:34.is maintaining Britain's prestige in the world. That is why we are at on
:05:35. > :05:39.the Security Council, that is why we are at the heart of Nato. We have to
:05:40. > :05:49.move on. We have a lot to move on with. The Times - half of UK
:05:50. > :05:56.universities curbing free speech. The Times has information from Spite
:05:57. > :06:01.magazine. It has totalled up the numbers of universities which have
:06:02. > :06:07.asked publications to be shut down. It comes out with some striking
:06:08. > :06:10.figures at universities, curtailing free speech among students. I think
:06:11. > :06:16.it is down to students becoming consumers. When you introduce
:06:17. > :06:20.tuition fees, asking people to pay for their education through the
:06:21. > :06:26.roof, they start to look at their education in a different way. They
:06:27. > :06:30.feel, I live here, it is very expensive, and I don't want that
:06:31. > :06:33.newsletter around where I live, I don't want that person coming to
:06:34. > :06:39.speak at the place which I take to be at. I think at the root of this
:06:40. > :06:44.conflict is the fact we have changed the nature of higher education with
:06:45. > :06:48.commercialisation. Isn't it about universities being cautious that
:06:49. > :06:53.they cannot know for sure who is coming into their campus and what
:06:54. > :06:58.they will say? Whenever you talk to people... This is just one example.
:06:59. > :07:03.When you talk to people trying to counter radicalisation, what they
:07:04. > :07:06.say is you cannot drive this conversation underground, otherwise
:07:07. > :07:13.you can't challenge it. Have people say it out loud, in the open, to
:07:14. > :07:19.demolish the argument. What I worry about is people won't be - if you
:07:20. > :07:24.are not exposed to this dissenting voice, how can you learn to form
:07:25. > :07:29.rational arguments against them? It is coming from left-wing activist
:07:30. > :07:32.students, it is coming from those students making these demands.
:07:33. > :07:38.Crucially, it is coming from the government, and prevent Mac strategy
:07:39. > :07:43.encourages the closing down of society -- Prevent. It is asking the
:07:44. > :07:48.government, proactive ways to stop free speech. This is not entirely
:07:49. > :07:54.the fault of left-wing students. Nor universities. It is the fruit of
:07:55. > :08:02.government policy. Pressure on Scotland Yard boss after ex- army
:08:03. > :08:06.chief cleared of abuse. Lord Bramall was accused of sexual abuse by
:08:07. > :08:11.someone. The police took it seriously, as they were right to do.
:08:12. > :08:16.The result was his home was raided by 20 policemen. His wife, who has
:08:17. > :08:21.Alzheimer's, witness to this and was very disturbed by it. The police
:08:22. > :08:25.kept the investigation for over a year and finally they have said that
:08:26. > :08:30.at the end of the investigation, because of insufficient evidence...
:08:31. > :08:36.Some people say what they should do is plainly say they have ended it
:08:37. > :08:41.because it is not a fair allegation. It is incorrect. And that the police
:08:42. > :08:46.should give an apology. One of the things an officer did was described
:08:47. > :08:50.the allegations made as credible and true, which is very unusual for the
:08:51. > :08:57.police to do. One suspects they are responding after the fact to the
:08:58. > :09:08.Jimmy Savile thing. In all of this, the victim is Lord Bramall. Let us
:09:09. > :09:13.move on to the Express - Britain is ready to leave the EU on the back of
:09:14. > :09:20.another survey. The opinion poll, which we know are not always right.
:09:21. > :09:28.Yes. This has to be thought of couched. Dot a 6% surge in favour of
:09:29. > :09:34.quitting the EU -- this has to be sought of couched... Put down to the
:09:35. > :09:42.migration crisis, terrorism and the attacks on Cologne. We have to couch
:09:43. > :09:47.it with even more caveats about opinion polls at, because with the
:09:48. > :09:51.EU people don't vote in the way that they necessarily say they will. A
:09:52. > :09:54.lot of people still don't know. There will be a lot of movement in
:09:55. > :10:00.this until the referendum, whenever it will be. And the Prime Minister
:10:01. > :10:05.hasn't made his case for it yet. When he comes out and says he wants
:10:06. > :10:08.to stay in - people say that - whatever he gets out of the
:10:09. > :10:16.negotiation, the figures will change. Is it fair, sensible,
:10:17. > :10:22.accurate, to conflate leaving the EU with issues of terrorism? No, of
:10:23. > :10:26.course not! As we were saying earlier, we are outside of
:10:27. > :10:37.Schengen. We have strict passport can -- controls. Others have to show
:10:38. > :10:39.their passport. We have cauterised some of the problems affecting
:10:40. > :10:44.European problems in the refugee crisis. We don't take as many
:10:45. > :10:49.migrants, for instance. Migrants don't cause terrorism. It is an
:10:50. > :10:55.unfortunate completion. The public think it is an issue. It is not. If
:10:56. > :10:59.the public thinks it, we should have a bigger debate and conversation
:11:00. > :11:05.about why they think it, because it is erroneous. We will look at the
:11:06. > :11:11.Telegraph. Millions wait longer to see a GP. 10 million. More than.
:11:12. > :11:16.They are trying to find an appointment but having to wait more
:11:17. > :11:21.than a week. For a long time we have talked about the hours GPs work. We
:11:22. > :11:31.need more GPs to work more hours. Yes. I mean, it is the usual
:11:32. > :11:40.depressing story about access to the NHS and seeing a GP. People are
:11:41. > :11:44.waiting far too long. 30% of those surveyed said that they were having
:11:45. > :11:47.problems getting an appointment. A lot of us can relate to that, trying
:11:48. > :11:55.to get an appointment with a surgery. It is not that the doctors
:11:56. > :12:00.are not aware of this - of course, they are - but if they spread
:12:01. > :12:04.themselves to be available on the weekends in the same set up, which
:12:05. > :12:08.is overstretched already, they will end up cutting back on services
:12:09. > :12:16.available on a daily basis. It is an issue of funding rather than
:12:17. > :12:22.available GPs. Good comment. I go to NHS walk-in centres. They are not
:12:23. > :12:28.available everywhere. I know that I sound like I have discovered
:12:29. > :12:32.something new. Amazing! There are growing numbers of practices where
:12:33. > :12:37.you can pay 40 quid to see a GP. That is a lot of money! A lot of
:12:38. > :12:43.professionals do it. Apparently, a lot of migrants do it. I am not
:12:44. > :12:47.saying it is a solution. We finish with page three of the Times.
:12:48. > :12:52.Behold, the great literary device. The idea that a chosen few writers
:12:53. > :13:01.racked up a fortune, and others struggle. The book market in this
:13:02. > :13:06.country - people say it is dying - has a problem, those that do well
:13:07. > :13:08.only a small number benefit a couple of authors. This research has
:13:09. > :13:15.discovered that the median income for writers is ?11,000, which is
:13:16. > :13:18.below the ?16,000 that the Joseph Rowntree foundation should be the
:13:19. > :13:23.normal wage. They have figures on how much people earn. Even these
:13:24. > :13:28.figures, I suspect, having just seen the story, are a bit misleading.
:13:29. > :13:33.When you list the sales of a book, that is not what the author is paid.
:13:34. > :13:39.They are paid 5-10% of each copy. And if it is an e-book, Hugh get
:13:40. > :13:44.nothing. It is effectively impossible to live as an author --
:13:45. > :13:49.you get nothing. It is like winning the lottery, writing a book that you
:13:50. > :13:53.can live off. This carries on from something we were talking about,
:13:54. > :13:57.Philip Pullman saying authors should not appear at literary festivals
:13:58. > :14:03.without being paid. That happens a lot. I am glad he has said that. The
:14:04. > :14:09.article talks about the fact that publishers are if they are making
:14:10. > :14:13.lots of money from top-rated writers, they are not using it to
:14:14. > :14:18.enable them to take risk with other writers -- publishers, if they are
:14:19. > :14:22.making lots of money... Publishers are playing it very safe and they
:14:23. > :14:28.are not taking risks or going for people who might be a little bit
:14:29. > :14:31.less mainstream. That of course is resulting in a very narrow and
:14:32. > :14:36.planned market as well as one that isn't very well funded. Let's all
:14:37. > :14:44.buy a book we wouldn't normally buy this week. There is the challenge.
:14:45. > :14:49.If you buy a book! Lovely to see you both. Thank you. That is the papers
:14:50. > :14:52.for tonight. Coming up next, the Film Review.