:00:00. > :00:00.manager Louis van Gaal hits back at reports he is to leave the club
:00:00. > :00:16.again. That's all in Sportsday in 15 minutes. First, it is the papers.
:00:17. > :00:19.Welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us
:00:20. > :00:23.tomorrow. Settle down! With me are the Social Affairs
:00:24. > :00:25.Editor of the Guardian, Randeep Ramesh, and the Evening
:00:26. > :00:37.Standard columnist, Rosamund Urwin. Welcome both.
:00:38. > :00:43.It is Randeep's birthday today. Cake later. Let's start with the FT
:00:44. > :00:47.and Europe. Cameron eyes compromise over migrant benefit curbs. What
:00:48. > :00:52.compromise is this? It is an emergency brake in the system? Well,
:00:53. > :00:56.Cameron because he wants the EU referendum earlier rather than
:00:57. > :00:59.later, has decided to go with a half-baked deal according to the
:01:00. > :01:03.Euro-sceptics whereby he would take away benefits from some workers, but
:01:04. > :01:08.probably not enough to satisfy the right of his party. We have got
:01:09. > :01:12.Bernard Jenkins up in arms saying you only need an emergency brake if
:01:13. > :01:16.you have lost control. A famous Tory red flag. And I think that's going
:01:17. > :01:20.to be his problem. It is convincing the right that he is going to do
:01:21. > :01:24.enough to satisfy them and bring them on board. The idea is you would
:01:25. > :01:29.stop having to pay welfare payments to migrants if you are your welfare
:01:30. > :01:39.system was under exceptional strain which begs the question what does
:01:40. > :01:42.exceptional strain cons institute? What we have been, what one of the
:01:43. > :01:51.things that has come up repeatedly is when you look at European
:01:52. > :01:58.migrants to Britain, and a UCL economist did that research in 2014
:01:59. > :02:04.and they found actually EU migrants were, we benefited, the UK benefited
:02:05. > :02:08.?20 billion from them coming here rather than them taking this, put
:02:09. > :02:12.ago pressure on our benefit system. This is the other way around. It
:02:13. > :02:16.looked as if David Cameron wasn't going to get any compromises at all.
:02:17. > :02:25.He will argue, surely, it is quite significant. It is something to
:02:26. > :02:30.bring back to the table. What has he achieved? Well, he got some
:02:31. > :02:37.compromise, hasn't he? It was told he had to have if it was to be
:02:38. > :02:42.regarded as reforms. It only affects 20% of those coming to Britain from
:02:43. > :02:48.the EU. I know neither of you are convinced. Let's move on. The I, the
:02:49. > :02:57.Zika virus spreading ex-employee civil. That has gone from naught to
:02:58. > :03:02.very high. Mothers were reporting Zika a while ago and their doctors
:03:03. > :03:08.weren't interested and suddenly it is headline news. Suddenly we are
:03:09. > :03:13.hearing about it. My mother is a doctor and she has been going on
:03:14. > :03:19.about it for months. I hear it first from her and suddenly it is on the
:03:20. > :03:22.front pages months later. With one of the additional issues that Brazil
:03:23. > :03:25.faces, but they are warning it will spread across the Americas and there
:03:26. > :03:30.is only two parts of the Americas that don't have the mosquito which
:03:31. > :03:37.are Canada and Chile, so we are talking a whole, enormous area, this
:03:38. > :03:41.could spread across, but Brazil have got the Rio Olympics coming up
:03:42. > :03:46.later. It could scare people, couldn't it? But, they're saying
:03:47. > :03:52.they are trying to clear standing water, which is where, in urban
:03:53. > :03:56.areas in particular where the particular mosquitos congregate, it
:03:57. > :03:59.is an enormous job when you think of the size of the country of Brazil
:04:00. > :04:03.and the number of poor urban dwellings. The other thing is the
:04:04. > :04:08.vaccine is something, if they can ork out how this stuff works. There
:04:09. > :04:15.is not a cause or link, they suspect there is and the number of babies
:04:16. > :04:21.born with problems is 4,000. It is a small amount, but they are concerned
:04:22. > :04:24.that should that spread, the spread with mosquitos, you can see tens of
:04:25. > :04:29.thousands of babies affected. The Guardian, we like your front page
:04:30. > :04:38.tonight. It is an excellent newspaper. Tonight it is. EU to step
:04:39. > :04:44.in over Google tax deal row. George Osborne has been saying this ?130
:04:45. > :04:48.million in back tax from Google is a success, but the EU might not agree?
:04:49. > :04:53.Yeah, it is interesting. Because he hasn't been backed by David Cameron,
:04:54. > :04:57.Number Ten refused to repeat his massive success or major success
:04:58. > :05:02.claim and it is interesting that Europe has decided to take this on
:05:03. > :05:06.because you will see the Government hit by the Public Accounts Committee
:05:07. > :05:09.which will bring out the HMRC officials and ask them why they did
:05:10. > :05:16.the deal and the European Commission which has already in a couple of
:05:17. > :05:19.instances ruled on lawful state aid with a couple of countries. George
:05:20. > :05:22.Osborne finds himself in a difficult position with our allies. That's
:05:23. > :05:26.probably not where he wants to be given he wants to lead the Tory
:05:27. > :05:29.Party. The EU is investigating other arrangements that other companies
:05:30. > :05:33.have with other countries too? Yes, they have got a list here and you
:05:34. > :05:36.mentioned Fiat and there is a settlement between Starbucks and the
:05:37. > :05:40.Netherlands and one of the big things is we don't know enough
:05:41. > :05:44.details what is going on. The conversations go on in rooms, we
:05:45. > :05:48.never hear about what has been said between Government and the companies
:05:49. > :05:53.involved and there is no transparency about it and then yes,
:05:54. > :06:00.of course, they quote that effective tax rate that they believe Google
:06:01. > :06:06.ended up with about 3%. What would everyone want them to pay? A lot of
:06:07. > :06:12.people would say if they pay the full amount of Tory Party ration
:06:13. > :06:17.tax, it isn't the right amount? If a big company has a tax rate of 3%,
:06:18. > :06:21.they have sales of ?4.6 billion. They have ?1 billion in profit. We
:06:22. > :06:27.don't know what's tax and what's not, do we? In the public's mind, ?1
:06:28. > :06:32.billion worth of profit, a couple million a year, please, that's easy
:06:33. > :06:38.maths for the ordinary Joe. We don't know the detail. Let us look at The
:06:39. > :06:48.Telegraph, roads will not fall, this is an exclusive, the paper says,
:06:49. > :06:53.cash crisis forces Orial College who to defy students who wanted the
:06:54. > :06:57.controversial statue to topple. Donors said you are not having my
:06:58. > :07:06.money if you make a decision like this. Money really talks in this
:07:07. > :07:11.instance and the governing body of Oriel College has ruled it being
:07:12. > :07:14.taken out. They were supposed to have a consul station on it and what
:07:15. > :07:21.happened now is, well, what The Telegraph are saying is that they
:07:22. > :07:26.claim, the people who were going to donate, lots of these donations from
:07:27. > :07:30.wills and they are going to pull their dough nations and there is a
:07:31. > :07:36.?100 million gift, that can't be that many people that could be, who
:07:37. > :07:42.could be leaving that kind of sum in a will. A legacy to be in excess of
:07:43. > :07:46.?100 million and that's a staggering sum and as a result of this row over
:07:47. > :07:51.pulling down the statue, that could mean that that goes and that's why
:07:52. > :07:55.they have ruled it out. A group of student activists who didn't like
:07:56. > :08:02.the Cecil Rhodes figure being there, said it should be removed because he
:08:03. > :08:08.exemptified an imperialist and a racist. It roplted a wider
:08:09. > :08:15.discussion about free speech in -- prompted a wider discussion about
:08:16. > :08:19.free speech? It is whether the public, I suppose, should be
:08:20. > :08:24.colonized by people we don't particularly like. They talk about
:08:25. > :08:28.the prospective we have now? Do we impose or morality on the past? My
:08:29. > :08:34.feeling is, it depends what sort of organisation you want to be, a
:08:35. > :08:46.forward facing organisation perhaps wouldn't do this, but Oriel might
:08:47. > :08:53.like one foot in the past. The Express, Barbie gets a makeover
:08:54. > :09:00.and she is adding extra curves to broaden appeal to girlsful they are
:09:01. > :09:03.quite slinky. It is better. I did look up Barbie's proportions and
:09:04. > :09:07.this picture does seem to show this. Her waist is smaller than her head
:09:08. > :09:11.and she wouldn't have room for a full liver. She would only be able
:09:12. > :09:16.to fit half a liver and wouldn't have a full set of intestines. She
:09:17. > :09:20.wouldn't be a healthy woman and there is a claim she would have to
:09:21. > :09:29.walk around on all fours because were legs are so slim. What I'm
:09:30. > :09:37.holding out is for Ken. The thing that strikes me, no matter what
:09:38. > :09:43.their skin colour, they have Caucasian features. I'm glad she is
:09:44. > :09:54.catching up with reality, I suppose. Dad bod Ken, what would he look
:09:55. > :09:57.like? Moobs, mightn't he? Yes. You're struggling with this story.
:09:58. > :10:04.As somebody who works for the Guardian. I'm glad she is getting a
:10:05. > :10:13.PC makeover. I remember it well from Toy Story 3. I can't say much about
:10:14. > :10:17.Barbie's internal dimensions. She had 180 careers and she doing all
:10:18. > :10:25.those careers whilst walking around on all fours. Barbie's body was
:10:26. > :10:34.never designed to be realistic, she was designed for girls to easily
:10:35. > :10:37.dress and undress. We have had a statement from Oriel College saying
:10:38. > :10:41.they will not remove the statue or the plaque. You can see more on
:10:42. > :10:43.their website. We will be back with the papers
:10:44. > :10:45.again at 11.30pm. You'll both be back at 11.30pm
:10:46. > :10:51.for another look at the stories