:00:00. > :00:00.bring forward further proposals we can take country unilaterally to
:00:00. > :00:18.strengthen the sovereignty of Britain's great institutions.
:00:19. > :00:21.Hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the
:00:22. > :00:24.papers will be bringing us tomorrow. Slightly later than usual tonight
:00:25. > :00:33.And the fact that the papers have been changing their front pages,
:00:34. > :00:35.some of them as we speak. We now have a selection of what will be on
:00:36. > :00:37.the news stands tomorrow. With me are the Times columnist
:00:38. > :00:40.Jenni Russell, and the media commentator for Forbes.com,
:00:41. > :00:51.Neil Midgley. We'll start with the Times. David
:00:52. > :00:54.Cameron. Ahead on the EU vote. How would you characterise the mood on
:00:55. > :01:00.Downing Street? I think the mood is jubilant. It looked as though it was
:01:01. > :01:04.falling away from them. They were devastated by the reaction to
:01:05. > :01:08.Cameron's initial deal because almost every single newspaper front
:01:09. > :01:12.page criticised it. They are extremely downcast and taking it
:01:13. > :01:19.back. Another thing they have a deal which has headlines they can sell to
:01:20. > :01:24.the country, special status in Europe, we don't have to be part of
:01:25. > :01:28.what we don't want, protection for the city of London, we can't be
:01:29. > :01:31.bullied by the rest of Europe, and we don't have to be part of ever
:01:32. > :01:36.closer union. I think they are feeling confident that most of the
:01:37. > :01:39.population don't care about the details, they think the Prime
:01:40. > :01:51.Minister has given us a Britain they want. I imagine they will have a
:01:52. > :01:57.better weekend then if David Cameron had caved in Brussels tonight. Or is
:01:58. > :02:02.everyone is refused to cave. It seems we don't know the detail. It
:02:03. > :02:06.seems Cameron effectively put his foot down at teatime tonight and
:02:07. > :02:13.said no, I will not give any more. Presumably doing that calculation
:02:14. > :02:18.that if you came back with a terrible deal and indeed a deal that
:02:19. > :02:22.was much watered-down from the draft that had been circulated a couple of
:02:23. > :02:26.weeks ago, he would not have been able to sell it to his friends in
:02:27. > :02:33.the Cabinet let alone the Eurosceptics in the Cabinet, let
:02:34. > :02:37.alone the rest of the country. If we look at the FT weekend, which hangs
:02:38. > :02:41.around for two days, so they have to think more strategically, they say
:02:42. > :02:46.Cameron wins Brussels reforms. It will different to the other
:02:47. > :02:51.countries, and Donald Tusk, if you do the initiation on their behalf.
:02:52. > :02:55.People seem to have got a deal they can live with. Even the Eastern
:02:56. > :03:00.European countries who did not want any kind of welfare reforms. By the
:03:01. > :03:10.way, nobody understands what the welfare reforms are. I think I sort
:03:11. > :03:14.of do. Poland's Europe Minister was twitching before we came on air
:03:15. > :03:17.there was something about if people have less than four years just
:03:18. > :03:21.before the end of the seven-year break, we still don't know what
:03:22. > :03:29.happens to them. In the great scheme of things, Jenni was talking about
:03:30. > :03:37.these yes we can phrases David Cameron is using. It is the phrases
:03:38. > :03:40.that counts. We now have a special relationship, we are the special
:03:41. > :03:46.country. We will have special status in Europe. If only Jose Mourinho,
:03:47. > :03:54.the special one, was British. It is meaningless. Even if Cameron had got
:03:55. > :03:59.rid of all of the welfare payments to EU migrants, which he hasn't,
:04:00. > :04:04.only a very small portion of them, that is about ?500 million a year
:04:05. > :04:15.out of an overall government spending of ?700 billion. You are
:04:16. > :04:19.talking about half of 1000th. I probably got a decimal point wrong
:04:20. > :04:29.there, but for every ?1000 to pay in tax, you might get alb. -- account
:04:30. > :04:36.back. I don't think those sorts of changes make any practical
:04:37. > :04:41.difference at all. The whole thing was about symbolism. It is about
:04:42. > :04:44.people feeling they don't want to be drawn closer to Europe, and it is a
:04:45. > :04:48.genuine achievement that we are now accepted from being part of ever
:04:49. > :04:55.closer union. Which is being what the European Union has always been
:04:56. > :04:59.about. Look at the Independent. The EU deal is done is the headline. We
:05:00. > :05:04.then have above it a big shout to do with the refugee crisis, because
:05:05. > :05:08.migration is the other thing they are talking about, is concerned that
:05:09. > :05:12.maybe Greece might actually be excluded from the Schengen area as
:05:13. > :05:17.it was felt to be doing enough to stop illegal migrants. There are big
:05:18. > :05:20.it issues that this deal doesn't address, and some of the new
:05:21. > :05:22.sceptics have suggested that might be what the campaign ends up being
:05:23. > :05:36.about. Nobody has any idea how to deal with
:05:37. > :05:39.the people pouring into Europe. Those remaining in Europe say we
:05:40. > :05:44.much more at risk of migrants coming to Britain if we leave Europe. At
:05:45. > :05:49.the moment we've got the French policing the French ports. Cameron
:05:50. > :05:54.is perfectly right when he says that if we left the EU, and the French
:05:55. > :05:58.thought they would no longer guard the Borders for you, then we would
:05:59. > :06:02.have masses of people in little boats coming across the Channel,
:06:03. > :06:12.just as they are now across the Mediterranean, to try to land in
:06:13. > :06:19.Britain. I am far from an outer. I am out but not an outer. What the
:06:20. > :06:26.distinction? Let's not go into that. The French thing with the border, is
:06:27. > :06:29.a a bilateral agreement? It is. They might think if you don't want to be
:06:30. > :06:35.part of our club and co-operate with us, why should we do things with
:06:36. > :06:39.you. You might be right about that but the migration we can't stop at
:06:40. > :06:45.the moment we could at least have some control over. That is distinct
:06:46. > :06:51.from the huge number of migrants who are now entering Europe... This is
:06:52. > :06:53.where we get interesting tomorrow, how the campaign starts to open up
:06:54. > :07:02.beyond the terms of the renegotiation. And what other areas
:07:03. > :07:06.will emerge. David Davis, who was David Cameron's challenger or co-
:07:07. > :07:12.candidate for the leadership back in 2005, was out and about tonight. He
:07:13. > :07:18.is an outer. He was saying that none of these things make any
:07:19. > :07:22.difference, in that Cameron's initial bid as he went around his
:07:23. > :07:25.European Tour was far too low a Dias had to come further down from that
:07:26. > :07:31.and we've ended up with the crumbs from the table. Once the shouting
:07:32. > :07:36.has died there might still be a warm feeling in Downing Street, that
:07:37. > :07:44.they've landed a deal which they were able to sell on the night, even
:07:45. > :07:50.if the last gets tarnished in the coming days. -- the gloss gets
:07:51. > :07:53.tarnished. But whether this deal will make any difference to the gut
:07:54. > :07:58.instinct of the British voter remains very much to be seen. I
:07:59. > :08:06.agree. That's the key point. All of this argument has been beside the
:08:07. > :08:09.point. The discussion has to be about the questions regarding where
:08:10. > :08:15.we see ourselves in the world. I we better off as an isolated island,
:08:16. > :08:21.not in alliance with 27 allies? -- are we better. Possibly losing
:08:22. > :08:29.Scotland. Do we want to make our own little deals? Or do we want... We
:08:30. > :08:33.will be a lot smaller if we lose Scotland. We can't trade freely with
:08:34. > :08:42.Europe. A lot of companies would want to stay here... But there's no
:08:43. > :08:44.danger of that, is there? If you want to retain free trade with
:08:45. > :08:49.Europe then we have to retain the free movement of people. It had just
:08:50. > :08:52.the same question about European migrants coming into Britain as we
:08:53. > :08:57.have had now. The question has to be whether we feel more safe and secure
:08:58. > :09:00.and longer as part of the group of countries who have fundamentally
:09:01. > :09:06.similar values, who can act together against Russia, ISIS and climate
:09:07. > :09:11.change, or not. Moving onto the Telegraph front page. They decided
:09:12. > :09:17.they would commit themselves to there being a deal. This came before
:09:18. > :09:21.the deal was done. Not the most flattering picture of David Cameron.
:09:22. > :09:28.And not the most encouraging headline. They talk about David
:09:29. > :09:36.Cameron looking very tired, as he has all day. Michael talking about
:09:37. > :09:44.Cameron's eyes bulging, saying he looked like a delirious snail, which
:09:45. > :09:47.is perhaps a little unkind. I've never looked at a delirious snail
:09:48. > :09:56.before! When you look at the high resolution of poorer Cameron's tired
:09:57. > :10:03.face... Can I point out that if he had arrived looking freshfaced and
:10:04. > :10:09.as if he looked the past -- looked like he spent the past couple of
:10:10. > :10:15.weeks in a health farm... I think this is actually a man who has had
:10:16. > :10:20.sleepless nights and not on us -- enough time to exercise. I have been
:10:21. > :10:26.battling for Britain. It hasn't kept Michael Gove on side. How big a deal
:10:27. > :10:30.is that? Do you get a sense that we will see more people than we have
:10:31. > :10:35.currently predicted, saying they are prepared to back a Brexit? Now that
:10:36. > :10:38.this deal has been done? We will get more people in the sense that as
:10:39. > :10:41.soon as the deal was announced the Cabinet ministers are free to go.
:10:42. > :10:46.The interesting thing about that is it is pretty clear from the people
:10:47. > :10:51.around Michael Groves that -- Michael Groves that if the Cabinet
:10:52. > :10:59.assumed collective responsibility, he wouldn't have felt compelled to
:11:00. > :11:02.come out and say what he thought. But he genuinely believes Britain
:11:03. > :11:07.would be better as an independent nation and so he felt unable to
:11:08. > :11:12.carry on. Is he trying to have it both ways? We were also told that he
:11:13. > :11:19.won't be campaigning in a high-profile way. That I don't know
:11:20. > :11:27.about. So he isn't going to inhale, the bill Clinton analogy? It would
:11:28. > :11:33.be in -- interesting if that was the case. If you think what the
:11:34. > :11:41.Conservative government is doing, it is hard to... It is painful to have
:11:42. > :11:44.to say you will put it all at risk by going to the other side and
:11:45. > :11:50.saying the person I like and admire is also fundamentally wrong. It's a
:11:51. > :11:57.big night for Michael Gove and for newspapers. If I may be a newspaper
:11:58. > :12:01.nerd for a moment, you were saying that when we arrived tonight the
:12:02. > :12:06.Telegraph was the only paper that had a front-page going with the deal
:12:07. > :12:12.and the others were in their first editions, hedging. It hadn't even
:12:13. > :12:18.been formally announced. It shows you that on a fast moving Newsnight
:12:19. > :12:21.like this the changing role of newspapers and whether print is
:12:22. > :12:32.really the medium of the future. -- news night. If you are following
:12:33. > :12:35.this many would know instantly. Equally, what influence will things
:12:36. > :12:40.have on a night like this in about one month? Will the BBC still be
:12:41. > :12:49.picking up what the Independent is saying? Or a it start to fade?
:12:50. > :12:53.Obviously because of the work you do you have a different perspective on
:12:54. > :12:58.this. What is your sense of power key the websites are? Not just
:12:59. > :13:03.thinking about content, but actually the headline, the image, in a way
:13:04. > :13:09.that newspapers have traditionally done? And how durable that is? When
:13:10. > :13:11.you are writing for online you write the headlines in a completely
:13:12. > :13:14.different way than you do in the newspapers. When you write a
:13:15. > :13:22.headline on a newspaper you summarise the story as informatively
:13:23. > :13:25.as you can. Whereas with an online headline, which somebody will pick
:13:26. > :13:32.up on a search engine, you write it as cryptically as you can because
:13:33. > :13:35.you want to tease them into actually clicking on your story, instead of
:13:36. > :13:41.just getting the information they need from the seven words on Google.
:13:42. > :13:48.Five things you didn't know about sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll. They
:13:49. > :13:53.are all very important. Seven things we didn't know about Europe. What
:13:54. > :14:00.you do when you write online is what your readers or lack of readers are
:14:01. > :14:06.interested in. I know exactly how much traffic I get on my page. And
:14:07. > :14:11.how much effort you should make on that bit. Or do you just write about
:14:12. > :14:18.things people are already googling or do you write new things? When I
:14:19. > :14:26.write for the Telegraph, I can get 200 comments on a piece about the
:14:27. > :14:31.new Top Gear presenters but 70 comments on a piece about BBC Three,
:14:32. > :14:47.which shows you where the priorities R. -- priorities are. Just briefly.
:14:48. > :14:57.The IAP they're even has this in blue -- the i. The Mail takes us
:14:58. > :15:02.back to what we were talking about with the referendum campaign. This
:15:03. > :15:08.is in their judgement the real story. The Mail has prejudged the
:15:09. > :15:17.summit and decided that it hasn't worked. The PM's deal is picked to
:15:18. > :15:20.pieces, they say. So they got that wrong. And then they are talking
:15:21. > :15:24.about the fact that the head of Interpol, who is a Brit, has said
:15:25. > :15:28.that 5000 jihadis have entered Europe in the migrant search and
:15:29. > :15:34.they could be about to carry out attacks. Of course I have to say, if
:15:35. > :15:46.I was a jihadist living on the other side of the Mediterranean... This
:15:47. > :15:51.feeds into the politics, which is going to unfold over the weekend.
:15:52. > :15:57.Further down the story there are unnamed Tory MPs pointing out that
:15:58. > :16:00.the Prime Minister's deal does nothing to limit free movement
:16:01. > :16:05.across the EU and therefore it does nothing about this 5000 jihadis who
:16:06. > :16:11.might be on their way to new broadcasting house as we speak.
:16:12. > :16:14.That's not true. If you are migrant and you have been given refugee
:16:15. > :16:18.status in Germany, it will be five years before you get permission to
:16:19. > :16:24.move into the rest of the EU. So it is not true that if you arrive as a
:16:25. > :16:29.migrant in one part of Europe... The point about it, as Downing Street
:16:30. > :16:33.have said, is that we are not part of the Schengen agreement. We are in
:16:34. > :16:40.fact very protected from people coming into Britain. You can pick up
:16:41. > :16:46.on this but we are just going to see some pictures of David Cameron
:16:47. > :16:52.leaving Brussels with some relief. All I was going to say on a lighter
:16:53. > :16:58.note... There you go, he is smiling. They answer Eurosceptic. They are
:16:59. > :17:20.offering a free Monets print in the paper. -- on -- Monet. Thanks we
:17:21. > :17:23.much. It could be only four months away, as he didn't disagree when
:17:24. > :17:25.that was put to him. More news Abbottabad be our coming up. Now to
:17:26. > :17:38.the weather forecast. A weekend of weather contrasts
:17:39. > :17:47.across the UK, depending on which air mass you will be in. Some of us
:17:48. > :17:48.mild and some of us have snow. This is how it looks for the rest