:00:00. > :00:00.News, and looked at some of the stories making the front pages in
:00:00. > :00:13.The Papers. From us on Sportsday, good night.
:00:14. > :00:16.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:17. > :00:20.With me are Kate McCann, Senior Political Correspondent
:00:21. > :00:23.at the Telegraph, and James Lyons, Deputy Political Editor
:00:24. > :00:33.Tomorrow's front pages: Starting with:
:00:34. > :00:36.The Guardian has further revelations from the Panama Papers -
:00:37. > :00:37.focussing its attention particularly on senior members
:00:38. > :00:42.The Times has the story we've been covering tonight -
:00:43. > :00:45.how 27 million households are to receive a leaflet setting out
:00:46. > :00:51.the government's arguments for staying in the EU.
:00:52. > :00:54.And the Metro headlines the same story, saying ?9 million
:00:55. > :01:00.And the Telegraph too leads with the EU leaflet,
:01:01. > :01:04.adding that the move has sparked a cabinet row.
:01:05. > :01:06.Donald Trump is on the front on the Independent -
:01:07. > :01:11.who suffered a setback in the Wisconsin primary.
:01:12. > :01:15.The Financial Times leads with the collapse
:01:16. > :01:18.of the planned merger between two major drug companies.
:01:19. > :01:20.New Day reports on a row over whether women should
:01:21. > :01:34.serve in the front line of the armed forces.
:01:35. > :01:41.Kate, take us to the Guardian. That is where they are focusing the
:01:42. > :01:47.Panama Papers coverage tomorrow. I cannot think of an area yet where we
:01:48. > :01:53.haven't had some of these revelations touched. We have had
:01:54. > :01:58.football, celebrity and politics. China's censors have been blocking
:01:59. > :02:03.CNN saying that some of their CNN saying that some of their
:02:04. > :02:08.reporting has been blocked in China. It doesn't look like there is much
:02:09. > :02:11.of an appetite to do anything about it. It highlights one of the issues
:02:12. > :02:16.with this story. It's difficult to with this story. It's difficult to
:02:17. > :02:20.do anything about these kinds of tax schemes on a global scale because a
:02:21. > :02:24.lot of it depends on pressure on national governments to take some
:02:25. > :02:30.action. That's what David Cameron is under pressure to do, but in China
:02:31. > :02:36.it doesn't look like it's a similar situation. The scale of the Chinese
:02:37. > :02:41.connection to Mossack Fonseca is sizeable. The Guardian reports there
:02:42. > :02:50.are eight members of what they term the politburo's culpability, who
:02:51. > :02:56.have family members caught up in this. You can see why, if you look
:02:57. > :02:59.at what has happened in Iceland, why they would censor this. You could
:03:00. > :03:07.imagine the kind of reaction this would get. Various members of the
:03:08. > :03:11.so-called red nobility, and one of them was the granddaughter of one of
:03:12. > :03:17.the Chinese leaders who had companies set up in her name in 2010
:03:18. > :03:22.when she was studying at Stanford University. There's clearly
:03:23. > :03:27.something peculiar going on. And all of this at a time when Xi Jinping is
:03:28. > :03:34.trying to crack down on behaviour that could embarrass the Communist
:03:35. > :03:38.Party. That could mean pretending it's not happening. It could mean
:03:39. > :03:43.doing something about it, but I guess we will see what that does
:03:44. > :03:48.mean in reality. It comes back to this idea of the reason why so many
:03:49. > :03:53.people in so many different walks of life are allowed to get away with
:03:54. > :03:57.it. It's the people at the very top who are the people who would be
:03:58. > :04:03.cracking down on it. What's the incentive if you are making money
:04:04. > :04:08.out of it? There are hints of more inside the Guardian. We only have
:04:09. > :04:15.the front page. James, take us to the Times. This is the pro-EU postal
:04:16. > :04:19.delivery we are all going to get, courtesy of the government. I am
:04:20. > :04:23.sure we will all be waiting expectantly? 14 pages for people to
:04:24. > :04:28.Peru is before they make their decision. This was mooted months ago
:04:29. > :04:33.that the government were preparing this. At the time, they said they
:04:34. > :04:38.were thinking about it. Now they have announced they will be spending
:04:39. > :04:43.the best part of ?10 million on it, at a time when money is supposedly
:04:44. > :04:49.tight. I'm not particularly surprised by this. It echoes what
:04:50. > :04:54.happened with the Labour government in 1975. It has caused predictable
:04:55. > :05:03.outrage from the likes of Boris Johnson. When you have Leave and
:05:04. > :05:08.Remain at some point in the future, once each one is made official, once
:05:09. > :05:14.they both have the chance to do this, this clearly gives one side
:05:15. > :05:17.and advantage, doesn't it? Maybe I am being unduly cynical, but I am
:05:18. > :05:22.not really surprised that the government might be trying to put
:05:23. > :05:27.its hands on the scales on one side. I would say I would be intrigued to
:05:28. > :05:32.know how many of these booklets are going to go straight into the
:05:33. > :05:37.recycling all the bin, and how many will be read. We have a flavour of
:05:38. > :05:41.what they will be saying here. If the UK votes to leave the EU, the
:05:42. > :05:46.resulting economic shock will put pressure on the value of the pound,
:05:47. > :05:53.which would risk higher prices and damage living standards. The Metro
:05:54. > :05:59.leaves with this as well. What do you make of it? It has caused
:06:00. > :06:03.another row, because Leave campaigners are very angry about it.
:06:04. > :06:08.It might not be surprising the government wants to make their case
:06:09. > :06:13.in this way, they have an advantageous position that they are
:06:14. > :06:23.able to do so. The Remain campaign would be able to take advantage over
:06:24. > :06:31.all of ?30 million -- ?13 million. There is a significant difference in
:06:32. > :06:34.the resources available. There are questions there about whether it's
:06:35. > :06:38.all right for the money to be spent on both campaigns to be so
:06:39. > :06:44.different. Boris Johnson certainly doesn't think so, because he thinks
:06:45. > :06:52.it is undemocratic. He thinks it is a waste of taxpayers' money, and
:06:53. > :06:58.even suggesting that David Cameron has put this out to take himself off
:06:59. > :07:02.the front pages. This is the Prime Minister, the leader of the
:07:03. > :07:09.Conservative Party being criticised by his own very senior ministers and
:07:10. > :07:15.MPs. Downing Street say it is only 34p a copy. What can you get for
:07:16. > :07:21.that money? What do you make of this line? Downing Street says the move
:07:22. > :07:24.was a response to Downing Street commissioned polling indicating that
:07:25. > :07:31.the public wanted more information to make an informed choice. That is
:07:32. > :07:35.probably true. Lots of people in focus groups say, I want someone to
:07:36. > :07:44.give me the facts. But that's not what this is. I was listening to
:07:45. > :07:47.someone saying that what people want are the facts, but there are loads
:07:48. > :07:53.of facts out there. What people really want is someone to tell them
:07:54. > :07:57.what to do, frankly. I'm not sure this will make any difference. You
:07:58. > :08:04.mention taking David Cameron of the front page. It hasn't succeeded, if
:08:05. > :08:10.we look at the FT. This is referring back to a letter that the FT is
:08:11. > :08:16.talking about, which he wrote nearly three years ago. This is a story
:08:17. > :08:23.which appears to suggest that David Cameron intervened in an EU
:08:24. > :08:27.discussion about money held in trusts in relation to tax avoidance
:08:28. > :08:34.and clamping down on it. In the letter it self, there is an extract
:08:35. > :08:39.here, there is a comment from a government insider who says that in
:08:40. > :08:46.the negotiations they were able to secure a sensible way forward, to
:08:47. > :08:53.ensure tax consequences. Ownership had to be reported to the HMRC. The
:08:54. > :08:57.poor who have money, but not a huge amount, who'd leave their money in a
:08:58. > :09:04.trust to avoid some taxes when they died, that they walked to be allowed
:09:05. > :09:08.to bypass these tax avoidance rules. All of this is relevant in the light
:09:09. > :09:18.of the Panama painters and what has emerged about David Cameron's late
:09:19. > :09:20.father. -- Panama Papers. The first point is the shocking figures
:09:21. > :09:29.contained within the story from the FT, which says that Britain is now
:09:30. > :09:31.the strongest European rival to Switzerland for wealth management,
:09:32. > :09:40.administering 1.2 trillion of assets. The second point is what
:09:41. > :09:43.this all does for David Cameron's credibility in the EU debate. We
:09:44. > :09:50.know he will not fight another election. These allegations
:09:51. > :09:56.surrounding him are difficult for the Tory brand, and particularly for
:09:57. > :10:01.him personally. But he isn't fighting an election. He has to make
:10:02. > :10:06.a convincing case in terms of the referendum. If you are criticised
:10:07. > :10:11.for being part of an out of touch International elite, it really
:10:12. > :10:16.doesn't help. Now two more stories. Let's reflect on the fact that the
:10:17. > :10:28.Independent has a large photo of Donald Trump on the front, asking,
:10:29. > :10:31.can America finally dumped from? -- can America finally dumped from?
:10:32. > :10:40.This is after his defeat in Wisconsin. Looking at his polling in
:10:41. > :10:45.New York, the next battle ground, he's polling at 50%. I'm not
:10:46. > :10:50.convinced the wheels have come off yet. And he is good at bouncing
:10:51. > :10:58.back. You would be a brave individual to write him off. The
:10:59. > :11:03.Republican convention, if it happens and he still doesn't have the
:11:04. > :11:09.majority he needs, all bets are off. It is a fascinating race. An
:11:10. > :11:14.absolute roller-coaster. I was reading a profile of Ted Cruz at the
:11:15. > :11:19.weekend. It is quoting his former colleague's roommate saying he would
:11:20. > :11:30.rather have absolutely anybody else as a room mate -- as president
:11:31. > :11:35.rather than Ted Cruz. He is not popular among Republicans either,
:11:36. > :11:42.Ted Cruz. If it isn't Trump, it will be Kruse. At it will Cruz. He does
:11:43. > :11:47.have some views that do not chime with a lot of people in America. And
:11:48. > :11:59.lots of views that do chime with them. Ted Cruz is, if used shine a
:12:00. > :12:04.spotlight on him and his views, is he any better? A story that caught
:12:05. > :12:08.your eye. This is an Aston Villa supporter on the front of the Daily
:12:09. > :12:14.Telegraph who wants Leicester City to win the league. I thought he was
:12:15. > :12:22.having a David Cameron moment and getting confused about his team!
:12:23. > :12:26.Prince William has announced he is absolutely dying for Leicester to
:12:27. > :12:34.win the league. He is an Aston Villa fan. He said he saw a road sign and
:12:35. > :12:41.it confused him! He says that he made the remarks in a speech to mark
:12:42. > :12:48.the ten years that Prince William has spent as president of the
:12:49. > :12:53.Football Association. He goes on to say that Princess Charlotte has just
:12:54. > :12:57.started kicking a ball as well. It seems only yesterday we were seeing
:12:58. > :13:03.pictures of him as a toddler, and now he's done ten years at the top
:13:04. > :13:08.of the FA! I would also like Leicester to win the league. Thank
:13:09. > :13:17.you both very much. These front pages have come in while we have
:13:18. > :13:23.been on the air. The government vote and leafleting story. The Sun has a
:13:24. > :13:28.story about police in India hunting a gang believed to be plotting an
:13:29. > :13:33.attack days before the royal visit there. The Daily Express,
:13:34. > :13:36.significant rises in type two diabetes world wide.
:13:37. > :13:39.Don't forget all the front pages are online on the BBC News website
:13:40. > :13:44.where you can read a detailed review of the papers.
:13:45. > :13:55.It's all there for you - seven days a week.
:13:56. > :13:57.Each night's edition of The Papers is being posted
:13:58. > :14:01.on the page shortly after we've finished.