:00:14. > :00:16.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:17. > :00:20.With me are the Political Commentator, Jo Phillips
:00:21. > :00:21.and Benedicte Paviot, who's the UK Correspondent
:00:22. > :00:33.Who Kindly brought me creme caramel for pudding. Jo didn't bring me
:00:34. > :00:37.anything. But she can think about that for next time!
:00:38. > :00:39.The Sunday Express says the Portuguese detective who led
:00:40. > :00:41.attempts to find Madeline McCann will release a new book
:00:42. > :00:43.on the investigation, bringing fresh anguish
:00:44. > :00:46.The Sunday Mail says the BBC will be forbidden
:00:47. > :00:49.to schedule prime time programmes at the same time as its rivals,
:00:50. > :00:53.The Sunday Telegraph also leads with the BBC's Royal Charter,
:00:54. > :00:54.saying the corporation will face more checks
:00:55. > :01:15.That is where we will start, with some BBC navel gazing. Rules to end
:01:16. > :01:21.ITV clash. This is supposedly to give competitors a better, an easier
:01:22. > :01:26.time of it? Yes, this is obviously a well-timed leak ahead of the White
:01:27. > :01:32.Paper on the BBC. Which is due out on May 12th. In which it is expected
:01:33. > :01:39.to renew royal chart hear the runs out this year for eleven years, but
:01:40. > :01:43.in return there are all these, the Mail, you would think there is
:01:44. > :01:49.nothing else going on in the world, there are four pages. I don't know
:01:50. > :02:02.about navel-gazing, but it is BBC bashing. In the daily mail? No? The
:02:03. > :02:06.BBC will be banned from showing popular programmes like Strictly
:02:07. > :02:10.against The Voice. They will have to find another time to show it. If it
:02:11. > :02:16.is that popular, people will watch it. Yes, it is about giving the
:02:17. > :02:21.commercial broadcasters much more, it is about the BBC being perceived
:02:22. > :02:28.to use the licence payers' funding to have an unfair advantage over its
:02:29. > :02:39.rivals. But the licence fee is a privilege and many say it is out of
:02:40. > :02:44.date when we are used to paying for things. If the BBC wants to keep the
:02:45. > :02:50.licence fee, the terms should change. Yes, but you don't then
:02:51. > :02:58.mutilate unfairly, which a lot of these leaked measures seem to be
:02:59. > :03:03.about. But the BBC shouldn't be "aggressively broadcasting or
:03:04. > :03:08.trailing its programmes" so much. Any broadcaster, any company worth
:03:09. > :03:18.their salt will promote things that they have developed. There is even a
:03:19. > :03:26.battle of the bongs, centring on the 10pm news, ITV has invested heavily
:03:27. > :03:30.in a revamp of its News at ten and according to the Mail on Sunday it
:03:31. > :03:40.wants the BBC to move its programme to an earlier slot. A A long time
:03:41. > :03:46.ago the BBC did the 9 o'clock news. In France it is the 8 o'clock news.
:03:47. > :03:56.You either stay in to watch it or go out. The 9 o'clock news was popular.
:03:57. > :04:01.Maybe there is an appetite for it. There a peculiarity, the BBC's
:04:02. > :04:07.programmes shouldn't be too popular or they could be poached. And the
:04:08. > :04:17.quality will be checked. But checked by who? Are we going back to the
:04:18. > :04:22.days of Mary white house. The BBC has programmes for all peoples. Some
:04:23. > :04:27.are duff, some are amazing. But people with watch two programmes at
:04:28. > :04:33.once, because they can record one. It is astonishing what technology
:04:34. > :04:41.does. Nit mail of tuned there is -- in the Mail on Sunday, Mr
:04:42. > :04:45.Whittingdale, who has endured weeks of embarrassing things about his
:04:46. > :04:52.private life is expected to tell the BBC to come clean. An interesting
:04:53. > :05:00.impression from Mr Whittingdale. To come clean about what it pays its
:05:01. > :05:06.presenters. So we won't find the exact pay cheque of every presenter.
:05:07. > :05:18.If that has to happen, who am I to stand in its way. That is enough of
:05:19. > :05:23.BBC chat. Now The Telegraph, PM's Academy deal. We have heard every
:05:24. > :05:28.state school needs to be an Academy. Not everyone is happy. But there are
:05:29. > :05:35.deals for people who don't like it in Conservative constituencies.
:05:36. > :05:40.Although the Telegraph gives its main story to the BBC, sorry, but
:05:41. > :05:50.telling it like it is, there is a paragraph about what the Telegraph
:05:51. > :05:54.called the Prime Minister's deal for rebel and concessions to win over
:05:55. > :05:59.Tory rebels, because they are threatening to kill off his school
:06:00. > :06:07.reforms. But what this paragraph or two or three also tells us is that
:06:08. > :06:12.after Mrs Morgan got heckled, the teachers were so cross they're
:06:13. > :06:18.considering industrial action. We spoke to a head teacher who said she
:06:19. > :06:25.may close her school for a day. And this is is a moderate union, the
:06:26. > :06:30.head teachers' union. So there is a lot of anger. There was a report
:06:31. > :06:36.that schools run by local authorities are doing better than
:06:37. > :06:41.academies. The real rebellions is coming from rural areas, if small
:06:42. > :06:49.schools are not supported by the local authority, they will close.
:06:50. > :06:56.That is of course a lot of Tory MPs. The Sunday telegraph has a story
:06:57. > :07:03.about the anti-Semitism row deepening and Ken Livingstone saying
:07:04. > :07:08.he was sorry if he upset anyone with his comments about you could have
:07:09. > :07:13.predicted where the story would go, the Sunday Telegraph said it has
:07:14. > :07:20.found more examples of anti-Cem Tim. I would have that so, it has had
:07:21. > :07:28.four reporters and there is a full report and an editorial comment, but
:07:29. > :07:36.all we can see on the dossier is one Labour council leader, unknown,
:07:37. > :07:41.unnamed, sharing an anti-Semitic post and Jeremy Corbyn questioning
:07:42. > :07:47.why an anti-Jewish mural should be removed. But the timing couldn't be
:07:48. > :07:52.worse with the local elections and the mayoral elections and Labour
:07:53. > :07:56.being predicted to lose a lot of seats and Ken Livingstone has done
:07:57. > :08:01.it again. You wonder what the impact will be. Which groups will support
:08:02. > :08:07.Labour in spite of this and which will say this is beyond the pale
:08:08. > :08:14.you're not getting my vote? We will find out next Thursday. Speaking to
:08:15. > :08:21.a Labour MP that I will choose not to name that I met professionally
:08:22. > :08:26.last night I will say she... Was concerned about the impact and was
:08:27. > :08:31.planning to go out campaigning in other constituency. This is what
:08:32. > :08:37.people are talking to this MP about on the the doorstep? Or did she not
:08:38. > :08:43.say. I did not get to that. It was, there is a real fear that this will
:08:44. > :08:50.mean that it has turned people off voting Labour. We should mention
:08:51. > :08:57.that in this small story in the Sunday Telegraph, which deserved
:08:58. > :09:06.more front-page analysis, Sarah Pickles, the Government's Special
:09:07. > :09:09.Envoy for post holocaust issues said Jeremy Corbyn has legitimised a
:09:10. > :09:14.strain of anti-Semitism that has been lurking in the shadows of left
:09:15. > :09:19.for some time. Of course, it has been rumbling on. But I have to pick
:09:20. > :09:23.up Ken Livingstone on what he said, I have heard this so many times,
:09:24. > :09:28.particularly in this continualliry and this -- country and this
:09:29. > :09:33.phrasing when you say something outrageous a week before your party,
:09:34. > :09:37.a man who was London mayor twice, that is extraordinary, the first
:09:38. > :09:44.time as an independent candidate. You say if I have caused offence I'm
:09:45. > :09:51.sorry, I think think need to be called out on they're not offering
:09:52. > :10:00.an apology at all. They're saying what whoever was offended, it is
:10:01. > :10:06.that problem. It is hi style. - his style. In the fend it is not about
:10:07. > :10:11.the deed, but you respond to it and there will be people, including many
:10:12. > :10:16.Labour MPs throwing their head in their hands thinking why on earth
:10:17. > :10:22.didn't Jeremy Corbyn deal with this? There is an investigation and an
:10:23. > :10:27.inquiry. So let's see how quickly they come up with something and what
:10:28. > :10:32.the new rules will be to deal with any provocative statements. Now The
:10:33. > :10:44.Independent and we have one of their typical pronlt pages -- front-pages,
:10:45. > :10:50.of course they're online. A burning message to ivory poachers, a huge
:10:51. > :10:58.amount of ivory set alight to end poaching of ivory. How sensible is
:10:59. > :11:08.it to get rid of something valuable and could it make... Other elephants
:11:09. > :11:16.more vulnerable to poaching? When you said symbolic, that is what this
:11:17. > :11:20.is about, a gesture, it is shocking and Independent fantastic
:11:21. > :11:28.photograph, and we have seen the coverage, but it will raise
:11:29. > :11:32.questions as you have done, won't it make people think it is more
:11:33. > :11:38.valuable. Why not raise money wit. And put to it conservation. It could
:11:39. > :11:41.encourage more poaching, because the value will rise. Some
:11:42. > :11:49.conservationists are saying it is a PR stunt. Now the back page of the
:11:50. > :11:58.Sunday Telegraph. This is not a stunt. A miracle. A fabulous
:11:59. > :12:04.photograph in my opinion, a title, my kingdom for a title. I grew up on
:12:05. > :12:09.the hill where Richard III lost his crown and Henry was crowned the
:12:10. > :12:16.first Tudor king. But that is decide the point. But some context. There
:12:17. > :12:21.he is with the Leicester scarf, Jamie Vardy, who won't be playing,
:12:22. > :12:35.although he has done well for the city, Leicester City, he is banned.
:12:36. > :12:41.Sitting on tenterhooks. You can get a Vardy cino. Oliver Brown, it is
:12:42. > :12:48.lovely, and describes the atmosphere and I don't think there is a
:12:49. > :12:51.football fan in this country who isn't hoping, well maybe Manchester
:12:52. > :12:56.United, but hoping that Leicester do it. Because it is what the FA Cup
:12:57. > :13:00.should be. And there have been so many horrible scandals and so much
:13:01. > :13:06.money sloshing around and we have had Fifa and all of this stuff that
:13:07. > :13:10.has soured it. It is a story of a great team, fabulous manager, who
:13:11. > :13:15.has put a lot of the others in the shade and actually on the brink of
:13:16. > :13:22.history. Some generous comments on social media as well from people who
:13:23. > :13:29.support other teams, but want Leicester to do well. Yes what is
:13:30. > :13:33.interesting, I love, I agree with you, Oliver Brown's story is great,
:13:34. > :13:41.there are crews from all over the world and a man who belongs to the
:13:42. > :13:45.Gujaraty community who says for the first time, he travels a lot and he
:13:46. > :13:50.says, usually he has to explain where Leicester is and that is no
:13:51. > :13:55.longer true. It is great, because it is not just a big national story,
:13:56. > :14:00.but it has become an international story. We should mention also as
:14:01. > :14:04.well as your connection with Richard III they're saying that Richard III
:14:05. > :14:13.might have something to do with the success of Leicester. Because it is
:14:14. > :14:20.since his re-Interment that this good luck on March 26th actually,
:14:21. > :14:24.that this good luck and this... Success has been coming to
:14:25. > :14:29.Leicester. Who knows? They were in the relegation zone. They were. An
:14:30. > :14:35.extraordinary run at the end of last season that kept them just... They
:14:36. > :14:40.had the luck of being the one-hit wonders and they have done it.
:14:41. > :14:46.Unstoppable so far as Oliver Brown says. If they win tomorrow, when
:14:47. > :14:52.they win tomorrow... Let's hope so. Do we feel a film come on. I think
:14:53. > :15:00.there must be. Quickly, we are going to look at the Sunday Express and
:15:01. > :15:08.the real katd and the natural -- Kate and the natural cover girl on
:15:09. > :15:14.the 100th edition of Vogue. I thought it was more interesting they
:15:15. > :15:19.used a 100-year-old model and... You're not referring to Kate. No,
:15:20. > :15:29.but she is a cover girl. Like Diana was. That is it for this hour. But
:15:30. > :15:32.because it is a Saturday, Jo and Benedicte Paviot will be back later.
:15:33. > :15:36.Coming up reporters.