:00:17. > :00:28.Hello, welcome to our look ahead to what The Papers will be bringing us.
:00:29. > :00:32.Welcome to you both. Thank you for coming in. Tomorrow's front pages
:00:33. > :00:40.then. Make a start with the Times. It leads with the allegations of
:00:41. > :00:46.anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. Says Labour frontbenchers are
:00:47. > :00:51.threatening to resign. The I paper quotes Diane Abbott. The Telegraph
:00:52. > :00:57.high lights a survey from doctors which says thousands of patients are
:00:58. > :01:03.issued with do not resuscitate without their families realising.
:01:04. > :01:08.The finance shall time with a crackdown on executive pay. The Mail
:01:09. > :01:12.claims a British Army interpreter has killed himself after being
:01:13. > :01:17.refused asylum in the UK. The Daily Express says a heatwave is on the
:01:18. > :01:21.way after a bank holiday wash out, naturally. The Guardian leads with a
:01:22. > :01:25.warning about the increasing availability of synthetic drugs in
:01:26. > :01:29.prisons. The mirror leads on sats tests in primary schools. It says
:01:30. > :01:32.parents will pull six-year-olds out of test as part of a nationwide
:01:33. > :01:37.protest. We will start with the FT and the
:01:38. > :01:41.issue of executive pay, which a lot of people have said has got out of
:01:42. > :01:49.control, is too high. Norway might be coming to the rescue. The wealth
:01:50. > :01:53.fund is set to launch crackdown on high pay, $870 billion investor on
:01:54. > :02:00.the look out for a target. First of all, what do we mean by this wealth
:02:01. > :02:04.fund? It is called a sovereign fund? This is where Norway is huge oil
:02:05. > :02:09.wealth ends up. It sits there, and they have done it in a kind of
:02:10. > :02:15.fascinating way. They own little bit, 1.3% on average of every lived
:02:16. > :02:18.company on the planet, which gives them a kind of unprecedented
:02:19. > :02:22.influence, potentially which they have never wielded before, they are
:02:23. > :02:25.emplying they are looking round, and they are looking for a company whose
:02:26. > :02:32.executives they will start pressuring, over executive pay. Why
:02:33. > :02:37.now? Well, executive pay has as the article says, has increased scrutiny
:02:38. > :02:40.over the last two years. And now it is, this is a whole new level of
:02:41. > :02:45.corporate governance, where you know, they are going to step up and
:02:46. > :02:50.say and point fingers and say your level of executive pay is
:02:51. > :02:55.unacceptable, so it is enforcement of good corporate governance to be
:02:56. > :02:59.fair. We don't like what the company is doing, then we have a right to
:03:00. > :03:05.point fingers and say this is wrong, and so, you know, the problem is
:03:06. > :03:09.with Norway, is that they, Norway Scandinavian countries are
:03:10. > :03:13.well-known for the kind of the small gap between the top levels of the
:03:14. > :03:18.organisation and the bottom levels, and so, what is worrying for them is
:03:19. > :03:21.that you know, they don't want to be enforcing their national policy on,
:03:22. > :03:25.they want to be seen as enforcing their national policy on, you know,
:03:26. > :03:28.all of the listed companies of the world, but on the other hand, we
:03:29. > :03:34.know that executive pay has got out of hand. They regard it now as a
:03:35. > :03:38.global issue, it seems. It is. Let us not forget they own chunks of
:03:39. > :03:41.these companies so they don't want necessarily to be what they
:03:42. > :03:46.presumably feel is over paying. But they want to target. They do. Lots
:03:47. > :03:58.of companies round the world will be worrying they could be it If I was a
:03:59. > :04:04.CEO I would hope the other 8099 ones were in their sights not me. We know
:04:05. > :04:08.it is not BT. The FT points out they voted in favour of that, so now for
:04:09. > :04:13.them to flip the script a bit and say, we are going to be targeting
:04:14. > :04:17.company, it will be interesting to see who Che choose first and how
:04:18. > :04:22.they will attract publicity. Haven't row got to get the shareholders
:04:23. > :04:25.round you? Depends on the corporate, depends on their voting structures
:04:26. > :04:29.and things and the like it would be good to bring everyone else onboard
:04:30. > :04:36.round them. They don't have to. They don't. Let us look at the Telegraph.
:04:37. > :04:42.Families in dark as doctors let patients die. DNR notices left on up
:04:43. > :04:47.to 40,000 people each year without their relatives being told. We don't
:04:48. > :04:51.quite understand where the misunderstanding is coming from, do
:04:52. > :04:57.we? Who is imposing these notice, and who it is who doesn't know. You
:04:58. > :05:04.are right. For me, I would say it is unclear from the article who is
:05:05. > :05:07.actually issuing the DNR on these 40,000 people each year, without
:05:08. > :05:12.loved ones being told. So, what I have gathered from the article,
:05:13. > :05:16.though, is that it, no, I am not even going to lie. I have to be
:05:17. > :05:20.honest about this one. This article I find the title of it is
:05:21. > :05:25.inflammatory, I can't quite get my finger on who is making the
:05:26. > :05:28.decision, for, to issue the DNR, is it the doctor, the nurse, the
:05:29. > :05:33.family, is the family not saying anything? Is the patient deciding
:05:34. > :05:38.and not issuing instructions to the family? So I am not quite clear but
:05:39. > :05:42.it does seem inflammatory, I get scared as soon as I say doctors are
:05:43. > :05:48.doing something they are not telling me about. We don't know where it is
:05:49. > :05:52.coming from. What we can say is there is a reassessment happening in
:05:53. > :05:58.end of life issues because the Liverpool care path away as it was
:05:59. > :06:02.known has been discredited where food and water was withdrawn and it
:06:03. > :06:05.could be a distressing end for people. It has been established.
:06:06. > :06:08.That is is right. Could be a distressing end for people. It has
:06:09. > :06:12.been established. That is is right. This -- abolished. That comes from
:06:13. > :06:17.the Royal College of Physicians says one in five families was not
:06:18. > :06:20.informed a DNA order had been put in place, equivalent to 40,000
:06:21. > :06:25.patients. Exactly right, we don't know who is making the decisions.
:06:26. > :06:30.Authorities at one stage are cited at the decision makers here. But we
:06:31. > :06:35.are not sure. But what seems to be the case, is that the Royal College
:06:36. > :06:39.of Physicians have identified a problem in the system where families
:06:40. > :06:48.an patients, are not being consulted suchly. It seems -- sufficiently. It
:06:49. > :06:51.seeps tiply round end of life issues I is difficult for people to talk
:06:52. > :06:56.about. It is so distressing people shy away from talking about it. They
:06:57. > :07:01.shy away from talking about it. It is not just about the DNA. It
:07:02. > :07:07.discussing end of life situation where people are rushed into hop and
:07:08. > :07:11.dying in the corridors, locking at people who are terrified nurses who
:07:12. > :07:15.aren't able to do things because they have to follow -- follow a
:07:16. > :07:20.process and there are care homes who don't know about the nursing care
:07:21. > :07:24.and they panic and call 999. It feel like end of life care as a process
:07:25. > :07:33.is broken and we need the look closely at it. The Telegraph. Tips
:07:34. > :07:37.coming off the Menuhin ewe. A often there is is a discretionary service
:07:38. > :07:40.charge on your bill. People don't notice it, and discretionary means
:07:41. > :07:46.you don't have to paint but people do. It doesn't feel discretionary
:07:47. > :07:51.when it is there and you feel micely to cross it off. It is not a good
:07:52. > :07:57.way to end a meal. The Government is coming and saying this has to change
:07:58. > :08:02.on two levels. First of all, you can't slip this in, it has to be
:08:03. > :08:08.volleyball trair and discretionary, there is a second part, which is we
:08:09. > :08:13.are seeing that the waitering, the servers are no necessarily getting
:08:14. > :08:17.the tips and so, the Government is saying, look, there Meades to be
:08:18. > :08:21.transparency about who gets this. We were talking about that last summer,
:08:22. > :08:25.it emerged that some companies were creaming off the tips that customers
:08:26. > :08:30.thought went to their staff. Exactly. You flow know, this issue
:08:31. > :08:34.is so close to my heart. I put myself through school being a server
:08:35. > :08:40.and I, it is so confusing for customers. Between the card machine
:08:41. > :08:44.asking you if you want an extra tip, then on the bill there is a service
:08:45. > :08:48.charge, then there is the front of staff where you know, sop of the
:08:49. > :08:52.tips situations they want to split it between the front of house staff,
:08:53. > :08:56.the servers and the chefs in back, so there is a pool system. So
:08:57. > :09:02.frankly I don't know where my tip is going, whatever channel I use to
:09:03. > :09:06.issue it. But I do know that the servers aren't getting it. Their
:09:07. > :09:09.wages aren't enough. I am glad they are looking at it. It St not fair
:09:10. > :09:15.and it is not transparent to the customers where their money is
:09:16. > :09:18.going. Let us look at the Times. Corbyn faces front bench exodus over
:09:19. > :09:24.anti-Semitism. This has been headline news all week. It could
:09:25. > :09:27.trigger resignations, yet more pressure for Jeremy Corbyn, various
:09:28. > :09:31.people coming to his rescue over the weekend saying no, everything is
:09:32. > :09:38.fine. We have this inquiry under way, it is a few bad apple But it is
:09:39. > :09:42.a smear campaign. I am not going to say it is a smear campaign but I
:09:43. > :09:47.would say it feels like we are looking for it. It feels like people
:09:48. > :09:53.are looking for MrCorbyn to misstep or to not do things in the way they
:09:54. > :09:58.want. It doesn't, there is something not right, he has made the claim or
:09:59. > :10:02.he has made the statement they are fighting anti-Semitism and racism in
:10:03. > :10:09.any form, and it is not tolerated within the Labour Party, and it is
:10:10. > :10:16.fantastic that Len McCluskey the Unite union chief, he say it is a
:10:17. > :10:20.smear campaign. Diane Abbott says it is a smear campaign, however, there
:10:21. > :10:26.are some things that I would say that MrCorbyn probably, you know, in
:10:27. > :10:31.some of the situations in regards to the calling the Hamas and Hezbollah
:10:32. > :10:34.friends, then I can see where the Israeli ambassador is like, wait,
:10:35. > :10:38.what is going on here, in light of everything that is happening at
:10:39. > :10:42.home, was this the right thing to do? Some of his associations of the
:10:43. > :10:46.past are being scrutinised again and the suggestion that this independent
:10:47. > :10:51.inquiry he has set up should have come a lot sooner. He should have
:10:52. > :10:57.been more emphatic about what ever steps he has chosen to take That is
:10:58. > :11:02.right. So much is about the time that is involved, the slowness, the
:11:03. > :11:07.Corbyn reacted, the other Labour MPs and grandee waps have been silenced
:11:08. > :11:11.so far have been ale slow in responding and there shouldn't be
:11:12. > :11:16.any delay in responding to racism, and it is something that shouldn't,
:11:17. > :11:21.you shouldn't have to spend 48-hours thinking about it. Yes, investigate
:11:22. > :11:25.it, and conduct inquiries, but when someone like Ken Livingstone has
:11:26. > :11:31.said what he said, what is the delay? I think that created a huge
:11:32. > :11:36.problem. Let us move on to The Mirror. Children aged six in school
:11:37. > :11:41.strikes it is not the children who are striking, but it is parents who
:11:42. > :11:46.want to pull their children out on mass from classes so they don't have
:11:47. > :11:51.to take these sat, because children are aware even at this age, of they
:11:52. > :11:55.are going to be tested and it is even if it doesn't matter to their
:11:56. > :12:02.parents, it matters to thele zoo, it matters to the children. They are,
:12:03. > :12:06.in The Mirror story we hear of very stressed out children, having
:12:07. > :12:09.nightmares and so the parents are taking matters into their own hands
:12:10. > :12:14.and taking them out of school tomorrow and taking them on
:12:15. > :12:18.educational trips. They could be fined ?120 for doing this, but the
:12:19. > :12:21.suspicion is that schools will look the other way.
:12:22. > :12:26.In the States do they bother testing kids so early? Yes, I think all
:12:27. > :12:31.round the world they do test children, you know, from the age of
:12:32. > :12:37.four, really, as soon as they enter into school system. But I think it
:12:38. > :12:40.is the onus that is placed on the results that put the enormous amount
:12:41. > :12:45.of pressure on the children, so you should be testing children, you
:12:46. > :12:49.should be making sure that you know, that the goals that we are setting
:12:50. > :12:53.for them, we have global standards as well as UK standards, that we
:12:54. > :12:56.should be meeting. However, what is happening here, we are translating
:12:57. > :13:00.the individual performance of a Chile into you know the performance
:13:01. > :13:04.of the school, the performance of our education system, and frankly we
:13:05. > :13:07.should be locking at children saying, Hay, let us teach you this,
:13:08. > :13:12.you haven't got it yet? Let us teach you some more. Children are allowed
:13:13. > :13:16.to be in that strait so they are not sleeping and they are
:13:17. > :13:21.seven-year-old. They feel like failures at seven. It is shocking.
:13:22. > :13:28.Of course I do agree with testing per se, but I think that the problem
:13:29. > :13:32.is much deeper than just you know, having test, tests are a good thing
:13:33. > :13:35.and we should be teaching children how to take them but they shouldn't
:13:36. > :13:40.feel this pressure on them to perform. They should be just be
:13:41. > :13:45.tested. Let us move on and talk about football yet again. I was
:13:46. > :13:49.hoping to wear a blue frock tonight, to celebrate and to drape the table
:13:50. > :13:55.with a very large and vulgar flag that was blue and white but it is
:13:56. > :13:59.still wrapped up back at home. Because Leicester haven't quite done
:14:00. > :14:06.it. Here is the back page of the Guardian. It is all down to Spurs at
:14:07. > :14:09.Chelsea, and there will be a lot of Leicester porters urging Chelsea on
:14:10. > :14:14.tomorrow, which is probably a first for a lot of them. A very strange
:14:15. > :14:18.thing. It will be a bit anti-climactic if Leicester aren't
:14:19. > :14:25.on the pitch when they win the league, which could well happen
:14:26. > :14:29.tomorrow. But the thing I love in the Guardian story is Ranieri, he
:14:30. > :14:33.won't even by a were of it, because he is going off to visit his mother
:14:34. > :14:38.in Italy tomorrow, she is 96, and he is going to have lunch with her and
:14:39. > :14:44.he will be on the plane when the result comes in. So, presumably, I
:14:45. > :14:49.am going to guess the captain on that flight will let him know.
:14:50. > :14:53.Somebody might tip him off. How much has passed you by Melanie, as
:14:54. > :14:58.possibly not being the most ardent football fan. No, my brother is a
:14:59. > :15:04.Manchester United fan and the rest of my fan are Spurs fans, so, but
:15:05. > :15:07.what I love about this though, just the sheer sports story of the
:15:08. > :15:12.underdog, of the, you know, sometimes we get jaded with the
:15:13. > :15:18.stories of you know, high paid athletes and well funded teams, and
:15:19. > :15:21.Leicester is the story that can inspire any person who is inspired
:15:22. > :15:26.by competition and pure true sport for the love and fun of it. That is
:15:27. > :15:30.why even though yes, family please, I apologise, but I almost want to
:15:31. > :15:33.see them win and it would have been lovely to have that pitch moment
:15:34. > :15:38.where they can jump round. It will say so much for the sport. It could
:15:39. > :15:41.be they are sitting at home on or on a plane and they win it without
:15:42. > :15:46.having to kick a ball tomorrow. If that happen, you will see basically
:15:47. > :15:51.every person in Leicester end up at the King Power stadium and in the
:15:52. > :15:56.pubs and they may not sleep. But the issue s I think a lot of people dare
:15:57. > :16:01.not believe they are going to do it until it is there. Many a slip
:16:02. > :16:06.between cup and lip. That is right. This is not guaranteed. I mean they
:16:07. > :16:12.don't have a supereasy way into the end of the season, and Spurs are on
:16:13. > :16:17.fire. You just never know. It is one thing to win the title, last year,
:16:18. > :16:21.you might not realise this they were not far off relegation, so the turn
:16:22. > :16:24.round is more remarkable. But then next year you stay in the Premier
:16:25. > :16:28.League and all the money that brings and the attention, but you have the
:16:29. > :16:34.pressure, of not being quite the underdog you were. It is like Eddie
:16:35. > :16:39.Redmayne after his Oscar, we love an underdog over here, I want them to
:16:40. > :16:42.win. I want the see them flourish. And as a Liverpool supportersome Am
:16:43. > :16:49.a Liverpool supporter. You still want to see them win. It has been a
:16:50. > :16:54.long painful couple of decades. It has been 132 years for Leicester, so
:16:55. > :16:59.you have our sympathy. That is it for The Papers for this hour but
:17:00. > :17:07.Matt and Melanie will be back at 11.30 for another look at The
:17:08. > :17:13.Papers, if you have any comments, please do so,
:17:14. > :17:16.Coming up next, Meet the Author.