:00:00. > :00:00.The bathtub goes double for! A successful night for the BBC at the
:00:00. > :00:13.Baftas, winning more than half the awards. Best entertainment show for
:00:14. > :00:16.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:17. > :00:19.With me are the broadcaster Lynn Faulds Wood and
:00:20. > :00:36.Front pages, then. The Metro previews the speech being made by
:00:37. > :00:41.David Cameron tomorrow in which he is expected to say that a vote to
:00:42. > :00:46.remain in the EU keeps Britain safe and secure. The Telegraph has chosen
:00:47. > :00:51.stronger words, calling the speedy Churchillian. The Mail describes the
:00:52. > :00:56.speech as an extra reinvention by David Cameron. A similar theme in
:00:57. > :01:01.the Times. The photo is of Mark Rylance, who won best actor at the
:01:02. > :01:04.Baftas. The Financial Times reflects on the blows exchanged by George
:01:05. > :01:10.Osborne and Michael Gove in the referendum debate. The Guardian
:01:11. > :01:14.reports on a mother's anger at a caution being handed to a
:01:15. > :01:18.perpetrator of revenge porn. Plans to crack down on health tourism is
:01:19. > :01:26.in the Express. I'd say he's being called nationwide because of the
:01:27. > :01:29.sunny weather. Let's begin with the Telegraph and this rather strong
:01:30. > :01:36.headline, camera leaving EU could bring war. Britain will pay high
:01:37. > :01:41.cost and risk conflict Europe, says PM in Churchillian speech. I am
:01:42. > :01:44.looking forward to three hours after he gives his speech because
:01:45. > :01:50.apparently Boris Johnson, who has written a biography of Churchill and
:01:51. > :01:55.who is the arch Brexit let's get out person, he will be speaking, so it
:01:56. > :02:01.will be very interesting what his take on Churchill is. Cameron Percy
:02:02. > :02:11.recruiting, this is project fear with knobs on. -- Cameron's take.
:02:12. > :02:18.Not only are they talking about war, this is warning of genocide as well.
:02:19. > :02:22.Genocide. This will be David Cameron's speech. We have only just
:02:23. > :02:26.finished a set of elections. We thought we might have 24 hours
:02:27. > :02:31.before we got stuck into the referendum. But it is a sunny day
:02:32. > :02:40.today. We quite like some nice stories. We will get to the Baftas
:02:41. > :02:44.later. James, both sides, the Leave and Remain, are ramping things up.
:02:45. > :02:50.It isn't just one side or the other that is using more and more
:02:51. > :02:53.rhetoric. It is like mutually assured destruction! I never thought
:02:54. > :03:02.I would say this, but I agree with David Cameron. What about war and
:03:03. > :03:06.genocide? The threat to breaking up the EU could be catastrophic to this
:03:07. > :03:09.continent. Something that Angela Merkel said last year, when she
:03:10. > :03:13.wanted to keep grease inside the tent, she said, as a country that
:03:14. > :03:17.has been responsible for the greatest catastrophe of the 20th
:03:18. > :03:21.century, we are keen to keep Europe together because this is the longest
:03:22. > :03:28.period in 1000 years when there has not been a war on the European
:03:29. > :03:35.continent. Hold on, the Balkans, which was 13, 16 years ago. Forgive
:03:36. > :03:40.me for saying, didn't we have to be having this referendum in the first
:03:41. > :03:46.place? Wasn't it to appease the Tories and the right-wingers? We've
:03:47. > :03:51.got another five to six weeks... The Balkan countries weren't inside the
:03:52. > :03:56.EU at the time. And that club have remained very stable since 1960, the
:03:57. > :04:00.Treaty of Rome. But the whole idea of why we are having the referendum,
:04:01. > :04:08.there is a one word answer and it is Ukip. Ukip 14.5 billion folks at
:04:09. > :04:13.last year's general election and Cameron was terrified many of his
:04:14. > :04:20.backbench MPs would migrate Ukip and would tear the Tory party apart. --
:04:21. > :04:27.14.5 million people. To give them some solace, he said there would be
:04:28. > :04:32.a referendum. Let's move on. How are they going to work together after
:04:33. > :04:37.this? Financial Times, Britain would quit single market after vote to
:04:38. > :04:41.leave EU, Michael Gove admits. George Osborne and Michael Gove
:04:42. > :04:49.trading verbal blows over whether it would be damaging, James, to
:04:50. > :04:57.Britain's trade if we were not inside the single market. Yes, he
:04:58. > :05:01.has been accusing those who want to remain of project fear. This seems
:05:02. > :05:05.like he wants to wrap up his own sense of fear. It is interesting
:05:06. > :05:09.that many business leaders have knocked down what he had to say
:05:10. > :05:12.today. The head of UK production at Siemens said it is staggering to
:05:13. > :05:16.suggest we would be better off leaving the single market. The
:05:17. > :05:20.chairman of BT says it is critical to the economic safety of this
:05:21. > :05:25.country that we remain in the single market because it guarantees that we
:05:26. > :05:32.exist in a carriage free trade zone. Otherwise, we would be paying an
:05:33. > :05:36.absolute fortune. -- in a tariff free trade zone. Isn't it a nonsense
:05:37. > :05:41.to suggest that, if we were to be outside the single market, Germany
:05:42. > :05:46.would put off tariffs and so would we? They would cancel each other
:05:47. > :05:52.out, surely? America hasn't done badly on its own and Norway seems
:05:53. > :05:57.pretty rich... It has to pay European tariffs and it must have
:05:58. > :06:02.free movement of people. That is one of the options they apparently want
:06:03. > :06:08.for us. If we left the single market, we would be in a group with
:06:09. > :06:12.Albania and Serbia. There is a very small group of European countries
:06:13. > :06:16.outside the single market. The risk is that we wouldn't get special
:06:17. > :06:20.treatment because of who we are. The EU said there would be no special
:06:21. > :06:23.treatment for us if we let the single market. It may be that it
:06:24. > :06:27.echoes what Obama said, that we would go to the back of the queue
:06:28. > :06:33.for trade agreement in the future. Nobody knows for sure. It is a leap
:06:34. > :06:36.in the dark for both camps, you can list the pros and cons and you will
:06:37. > :06:41.find lots of things you like on either side. It is a mess. Difficult
:06:42. > :06:51.for people to work it out ahead of the vote. The Guardian, Corbyn faces
:06:52. > :06:55.Labour MPs as Khan calls for a new tone. Jeremy Corbyn has a job on his
:06:56. > :07:00.hands. Although he did better in the election than he might have done,
:07:01. > :07:06.there is still work to do to heal the rifts in the party. Absolutely,
:07:07. > :07:11.and it seems that the success of Sadiq Khan has highlighted the worry
:07:12. > :07:14.is that people within the Labour movement have about Jeremy Corbyn
:07:15. > :07:18.and, in fact, in a speech, Khan has said that we don't win elections by
:07:19. > :07:23.talking to people who already vote Labour. That is a key phrase. For
:07:24. > :07:27.all his faults, and he really fell out with the Labour movement in the
:07:28. > :07:30.end, Tony Blair realised that you cannot win number ten without the
:07:31. > :07:36.middle ground. It is the same in the US. President Reagan won with the
:07:37. > :07:39.so-called Reagan Democrats, because you can only win power if you can
:07:40. > :07:43.convince the people in the middle ground that you are competent and
:07:44. > :07:48.credible and I don't think that Corbyn has achieved that yet. I just
:07:49. > :07:53.had a wee problem with my microphone, but it is OK. A small
:07:54. > :07:58.person crept in and adjusted it. A lovely person! What I think is
:07:59. > :08:02.brilliant about what Cameron has done so far -- Khan has done so far,
:08:03. > :08:07.he has managed to bring everybody into the tent, first of all, a
:08:08. > :08:12.Muslim holding his swearing in in Southwark Cathedral with all faiths
:08:13. > :08:18.and non-faiths there. I have no faith. Today, or was it yesterday,
:08:19. > :08:22.he was at the Holocaust... Sorry, I had pneumonia, my brain has been
:08:23. > :08:27.tampered with. He was a Holocaust memorial. This guy is doing things
:08:28. > :08:31.so far beautifully. I hope he doesn't turn into an attack dog,
:08:32. > :08:34.because at the moment he is winning in the central ground with the
:08:35. > :08:41.Labour Party by the way he is behaving. Whether they can overcome
:08:42. > :08:45.the claims of anti-Semitism that are now being investigated as part of a
:08:46. > :08:51.wider look at racism in the party, that hasn't gone away yet, as it?
:08:52. > :08:56.Although this enquiry has started. That's true, and some people said
:08:57. > :08:59.that it damaged Khan's vote, that he would have had a bigger majority
:09:00. > :09:07.without. It could have been much higher, because Zac Goldsmith's
:09:08. > :09:13.tactics were miscalculated, with his ill judged attacks on Khan. My
:09:14. > :09:19.wonder is whether Khan can write this wave of popularity and bid for
:09:20. > :09:25.the leadership in the future. Small steps. Winning London is a good
:09:26. > :09:29.start. I think Zac Goldsmith was badly led. I have met him and
:09:30. > :09:36.thought, what a nice bloke. He is just a nice bloke, not a top
:09:37. > :09:43.thumping leader. How much say did he have in his campaign? Jemima Khan
:09:44. > :09:53.criticised his campaign in the end. Things get reported, so who knows?
:09:54. > :10:01.What, journalists would miss -- journalists would misreport? The
:10:02. > :10:04.Daily Telegraph, high drama at Baftas over BBC reform. Sheridan
:10:05. > :10:10.Smith in the photo. There were some fairly strong words for the Culture
:10:11. > :10:15.Secretary, John Whittingdale, over his forthcoming BBC reforms, with
:10:16. > :10:19.the white paper coming out. Neither of us work for the BBC and the
:10:20. > :10:25.wonderful thing about the Baftas was how much rich stuff there was there.
:10:26. > :10:33.As started on the BBC 30 years ago, at the same time as the man who went
:10:34. > :10:39.on to do glorious things like Wolf Hall, and he spoke out, saying, this
:10:40. > :10:43.is a wonderful brand and you mustn't tamper with it. There is a huge
:10:44. > :10:49.sense of support for what he said. We don't work for the BBC, and we
:10:50. > :10:54.can say this. After the NHS, the BBC is this country's greatest
:10:55. > :10:58.achievement. In my work, I meet lots of foreign journalists and they
:10:59. > :11:03.cannot believe the amount that some newspapers slack off the BBC. They
:11:04. > :11:09.said, you can't believe how lucky you are to have the BBC. I do work
:11:10. > :11:14.for the BBC, currently. There is criticism that the BBC has got too
:11:15. > :11:19.big, that its scale and scope needs looking at, that it is being to
:11:20. > :11:23.competitive and aggressive commercially... But look at the
:11:24. > :11:30.quality of the product at the Baftas, and that was only some of
:11:31. > :11:34.the stuff. The first ever award for Strictly Come Dancing, which, if
:11:35. > :11:37.reports are to be believed, John Whittingdale wants to move to a less
:11:38. > :11:44.popular slot because it is doing too well. My personal favourite, Mary
:11:45. > :11:49.Berry. She is on the front page of the Guardian, who was the winner of
:11:50. > :11:54.Great British Bake Off recently. Both of them looking glamorous on
:11:55. > :11:59.the red carpet. They won the best features programme. Wonderful news
:12:00. > :12:08.for everybody who is getting older, because there is Mary Berry, looking
:12:09. > :12:15.brilliant. She is with Mary nightingale, who tweeted, Mary,
:12:16. > :12:19.Mary. She thought, they recognise me, and she looked around and it was
:12:20. > :12:23.Mary Berry. If there was a vote tomorrow for president and Mary
:12:24. > :12:30.Berry was standing, it would be a landslide. Sent her to America and
:12:31. > :12:36.they might find a use for her! The New York Times, we don't often
:12:37. > :12:41.feature it, but we have tonight. Trump takes over. This is the
:12:42. > :12:44.concern in the Republican Party that they have got a presidential
:12:45. > :12:49.candidate that not everybody is happy with. This is fascinating. I
:12:50. > :12:55.had dinner with a friend from New York and he is beside himself with
:12:56. > :12:58.worry. A year ago, nobody said Trump, he was 17 favourite, nobody
:12:59. > :13:05.said he could get the nomination. Now we is going to get it and he is
:13:06. > :13:09.going to reach 1237 delegates and be crowned at the convention. My
:13:10. > :13:14.friend, a liberal New Yorker, is terrified that he could possibly
:13:15. > :13:18.beat Hillary. The big story is that if success is tearing the
:13:19. > :13:23.Republicans apart. Paul Ryan, the speaker, has refused to endorse him.
:13:24. > :13:28.The two living Republican presidents have refused to endorse him. I am
:13:29. > :13:32.delighted by that, but I think it is bad for democracy if your party is
:13:33. > :13:38.being destroyed by one maverick with extremely outrageous views. He is a
:13:39. > :13:46.celebrity. We live in an age... I'm glad I haven't peaked yet, like Mary
:13:47. > :13:50.Berry. We live in an age where his celebrity and his ability to say
:13:51. > :13:55.whatever he likes, that is what people are enjoying in him. They are
:13:56. > :14:00.fed up with the old politicians. He speaks to a lot of people. Millions
:14:01. > :14:04.of them, actually. The party is falling apart at the seams. Right
:14:05. > :14:14.now, nobody knows what is going to happen. That's democracy. If Brexit
:14:15. > :14:17.wins, Boris, being this huge television personality... Steady on!
:14:18. > :14:24.I haven't got time to put this right and offer opposing views. We are
:14:25. > :14:29.playing the music. Will you stop? You are arguing against democracy!
:14:30. > :14:34.Give us until 11:30pm and I will come up with something. Coming up
:14:35. > :14:35.next, Meet The