:00:00. > :00:00.winning more than half the awards including best drama for
:00:00. > :00:17.Wolf Hall and best entertainment show for Strictly Come Dancing.
:00:18. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers
:00:20. > :00:33.With this are Lynn Faulds Wood and James Rampton from the Independent.
:00:34. > :00:36.The Metro previews the speech being made by David Cameron tomorrow,
:00:37. > :00:39.in which he's expected to say a vote to remain in the EU keeps
:00:40. > :00:42.The Telegraph has chosen stronger words to
:00:43. > :00:44.describe the Prime Minister's speech, calling it Churchillian.
:00:45. > :00:46.And the Mail describes the speech
:00:47. > :00:47.as an extraordinary intervention by David Cameron.
:00:48. > :00:50.A similar theme in the Times and the photo is
:00:51. > :00:53.of Mark Rylance, who won best actor at this evening's TV Baftas.
:00:54. > :00:55.The Financial Times reflects
:00:56. > :00:58.on the verbal blows exchanged between George Osborne and Michael
:00:59. > :01:02.The Guardian reports on a mother's anger that
:01:03. > :01:07.just a caution was handed down to a perpetrator of revenge-porn.
:01:08. > :01:11.Plans to crackdown on so-called health tourism is
:01:12. > :01:15.And the Daily Star forecasts sickies being pulled
:01:16. > :01:21.nationwide because of the sunny weather.
:01:22. > :01:33.But around this table. Let's look at the Daily Mail, shall we. EU vote,
:01:34. > :01:42.the PE warns of war and genocide, -- the PM. Extraordinary, because of
:01:43. > :01:45.the tone of it or... ? They are worried about the tone. In the
:01:46. > :01:50.comment section they are saying, is it too much to hope the PM will tone
:01:51. > :01:53.down the rhetoric and start to treat the electorate like adults? I
:01:54. > :01:56.understand what they are saying, at his tone is very apocalyptic, but I
:01:57. > :02:03.never thought I would say this on air, I agree with him, that the past
:02:04. > :02:07.1000 years, continental Europe has been in turmoil and conflict, and
:02:08. > :02:12.since the formation of the EU, the members of that club have never had
:02:13. > :02:15.a war. That is the longest time in history of Europe. I know Angela
:02:16. > :02:20.Merkel, the German Chancellor, leaves very strongly that European
:02:21. > :02:25.unity is dedicated on the EU, that it rings us together and we are not
:02:26. > :02:28.going to fall out. It is almost visceral thing about staying
:02:29. > :02:32.together, and you are not going to fight each other if you are
:02:33. > :02:37.together, and I think the athlete Lee has a good point, David Cameron.
:02:38. > :02:41.-- he absolutely. How is the leave campaign going to counter this?
:02:42. > :02:46.Trouble at the moment is you have the leave campaign coming up with
:02:47. > :02:50.something that is quite a good idea, and some things that are not a good
:02:51. > :02:55.idea. The pros and cons are mixed up. Tomorrow the leaders will be
:02:56. > :03:00.coming out and saying, we will all be fine, the only war we have had
:03:01. > :03:06.was just outside Europe, which was when Yugoslavia broke up. And that
:03:07. > :03:13.was a 16 or 17 years ago. The rest of the time we have not had wars.
:03:14. > :03:19.The project of the EU was supposed to be stopping, they are bringing
:03:20. > :03:24.war veterans, these people did not fight for us to leave Europe, and
:03:25. > :03:33.there are some war veterans who have actually come out to support David
:03:34. > :03:37.Cameron and the remainder is, -- the remaining campaign, and saying this
:03:38. > :03:43.has been jeopardised. The front pages saying it is not the EU that
:03:44. > :03:47.has kept peace, it is Nato. That is a wider alliance. There is that, but
:03:48. > :03:51.there is the symbolic valley of being in a club together, which
:03:52. > :03:55.means that you are not going to be fighting like rats in a sack. I also
:03:56. > :03:59.think that the many other strong point made by the remain campaign
:04:00. > :04:04.today in response to what Michael Gove said this morning, he is
:04:05. > :04:08.suggesting that if we leave the EU we will also leave the single
:04:09. > :04:13.market, and I am not an economic expert, but I think that the UK
:04:14. > :04:20.chief executive of Siemens went -- may well be. He suggested that was
:04:21. > :04:24.staggering, and the head of BT said the same thing. There is lots of
:04:25. > :04:28.evidence that this fire that Michael Gove has taken about how we would
:04:29. > :04:33.easily be able to have tariff free trade -- tariff free trade, like
:04:34. > :04:36.Albania and Serbia, I think that is nonsense. This is the time is that
:04:37. > :04:47.you are talking about. You are doing my job to me. -- the Times. " Brexit
:04:48. > :04:51.will raise risk of war", that is the headline. Outside of their official
:04:52. > :04:55.roles, some business leaders speaking in a personal capacity,
:04:56. > :05:02.have poured cold water on this idea. Tomorrow we have this big
:05:03. > :05:05.speech by David Cameron, he is going to be invoking Churchill, and three
:05:06. > :05:11.hours after his speech, Boris Johnson is coming out with a speech,
:05:12. > :05:15.and he wrote an autobiography of Churchill, so he will be invoking a
:05:16. > :05:19.different Churchill, from the one that David Cameron... It is just
:05:20. > :05:25.becoming so confusing. We have 45 days yet to go, we have war and
:05:26. > :05:32.genocide in tomorrow's papers, what will happen after that? It is just
:05:33. > :05:39.going to be... The latest poll which was done for good morning Britain,
:05:40. > :05:43.so it must be true was 42% for remaining, 42% believing, and there
:05:44. > :05:48.was another 19% or something, is that the correct maths? That is very
:05:49. > :05:52.much in the margin of error. That is too close to call. Nobody knows what
:05:53. > :05:57.will happen, and we know what the polls were like last year in the
:05:58. > :06:06.general election. If they keep raving this up anything could
:06:07. > :06:15.happen. Calm, tells -- Sadiq Khan tells Jeremy Coleman, labour needs a
:06:16. > :06:22.bigger tents. Is that idea that they cannot appeal to that court reliable
:06:23. > :06:29.vote, they will never get elected? Gerry Corbyn is -- Djere Neade grow
:06:30. > :06:35.one, is supposed to appeal to that left wing, he has done this in a
:06:36. > :06:42.very each big tent way, so to speak, two days he seems to has appealed to
:06:43. > :06:48.most, having in his swearing-in ceremony at Southwark Cathedral with
:06:49. > :06:53.all faiths present, and today at the Holocaust memorial, he does seem to
:06:54. > :06:56.be trying to bring everybody in, and what he is basically saying is that
:06:57. > :07:02.Jeremy Corbyn has been too left-wing, and that he has to widen
:07:03. > :07:06.his tent. I agree, that Sadiq Khan has played a blinder since he won
:07:07. > :07:10.the election, and something else he said today, we do not win elections
:07:11. > :07:18.by talking to people who already vote Labour. Tony Blair knew that in
:07:19. > :07:24.1997, you only win number 10 by winning the middle ground. It is the
:07:25. > :07:30.same in America, Ronald Reagan won the White House by ringing the
:07:31. > :07:35.Reagan Democrats, you can only win if you have a broad appeal. You have
:07:36. > :07:39.to wonder how vulnerable Jeremy Corbyn is now, having got through
:07:40. > :07:45.the elections in a better way, than many people thought. I think he is
:07:46. > :07:50.vulnerable at the moment. Trouble with Scotland, for example, which we
:07:51. > :07:59.lost, the SNP is left-leaning, that is why Labour has lost its vote,
:08:00. > :08:03.particularly to them, and the Tory candidate, she sounds like a great
:08:04. > :08:08.character, and the public loved characters. But she did not mention
:08:09. > :08:14.the word Conservative. She became a proper opposition to the SNP. What
:08:15. > :08:19.Jeremy Corbyn has to do in England, he has to get the 13% swing, so he
:08:20. > :08:27.has to bring a lot of Tories into the tent as well. I would like to
:08:28. > :08:43.move on. We will stay with the Independent, but move on to the
:08:44. > :08:50.Baftas. The director of Wolff Paul, who won best drama, saying BBC faces
:08:51. > :08:58.life as a state broadcaster like North Korea. He came out fighting
:08:59. > :09:05.for the BBC. He was accorded a standing ovation. He said John
:09:06. > :09:09.Whittingdale's suggest that you should move popular programmes like
:09:10. > :09:14.strictly come dancing, it was they were too popular, is absolutely
:09:15. > :09:21.ludicrous. Peter Kosminsky said, quite rightly, that the BBC would
:09:22. > :09:25.face life as a straight broadcaster -- state broadcaster like North
:09:26. > :09:29.Korea. The BBC is the greatest thing this country has ever done after the
:09:30. > :09:32.NHS, I speak to a lot of foreign journalists and my work, and they
:09:33. > :09:36.are completely gobsmacked that some papers in this country attack it so
:09:37. > :09:41.much, it is one of our great glories of democracy. Which other
:09:42. > :09:44.broadcaster in the world, would have brought about the downfall of its
:09:45. > :09:50.director-general by interviewing him on one of its own programmes. It is
:09:51. > :09:53.extraordinary. For some people the BBC has been too commercially
:09:54. > :09:56.aggressive at times, to the detriment of its competitors, when
:09:57. > :10:01.it has the advantage and the privileged position of receiving the
:10:02. > :10:04.licence fee. It is not perfect. I have worked over the years
:10:05. > :10:08.intermittently at the BBC, I do work for an outfit so I can say what they
:10:09. > :10:14.like, but it has done plenty of wonderful things. Peter Kosminsky
:10:15. > :10:24.joined the BBC around the same time I started popping up on BBC
:10:25. > :10:30.breakfast. Peter is a classic example of somebody who got his
:10:31. > :10:35.first rake, and he has done so many admired programmes, not all for the
:10:36. > :10:42.BBC, will fall happens to be. He has a broader view of its place. --
:10:43. > :10:49.Wolff Hall. He is also no supporter of the labour government. He made
:10:50. > :10:56.the film, the government, years ago, which was about the way the Labour
:10:57. > :11:00.Party behaved around Calais and the Hutton enquiry. He is very much a
:11:01. > :11:05.mutual person, -- neutral person. He needs to be respected even more in
:11:06. > :11:11.his position. Let's look at the Guardian. Another BBC programme that
:11:12. > :11:18.won the features award, this time Appetite for Success, a little
:11:19. > :11:24.mention for the great British break off when, -- take off winner. Did
:11:25. > :11:29.you ever think you would see that picture in the paper, Mary Berry
:11:30. > :11:34.always looks superb, and is leading one of the best watched programmes
:11:35. > :11:41.in the whole country, and the thing that they are missing when they have
:11:42. > :11:44.a look at the BBC, there is a lot of these programmes, a lot of people
:11:45. > :11:49.are baking now, they are dancing out, because strictly come dancing
:11:50. > :11:56.is... It may be spurious to say so, but lots of commentators said that
:11:57. > :12:03.Nadia Hussein's victory allowed more people to understand, what people
:12:04. > :12:07.like Nadia and her background were like, then documentaries. She was
:12:08. > :12:11.presented as a human being, a delightful human being, which is the
:12:12. > :12:18.great thing that television can do, it can open at up into other worlds
:12:19. > :12:32.which we could not otherwise enter. We will wait and see. Hands off,
:12:33. > :12:36.Whittingdale! We have to move on. Quickly, before I get in trouble.
:12:37. > :12:44.There will be a lot of people who agree with John Whittingdale.
:12:45. > :12:50.International New York Times,, the Republican Party in two mines about
:12:51. > :13:00.whether Donald Trump really should be their presidential candidate, as
:13:01. > :13:06.he is. I am so full of news about the Baftas, I can't find it. It does
:13:07. > :13:10.not matter what Trump does, the public loved him because he is the
:13:11. > :13:13.celebrity and he speaks his mind, and they are sick of stereotypical
:13:14. > :13:18.politicians. That is part of the reason, and the Republican Party
:13:19. > :13:22.is, in the greatest disarray has ever been in, there is resilient
:13:23. > :13:28.programme in Scotland, the land of my fathers, there was a horrific, he
:13:29. > :13:32.took the Scottish government to the cleaners over a golf course that he
:13:33. > :13:37.set up in an area of natural beauty, an important scientific beauty site,
:13:38. > :13:45.and he skinned them, and Alex summoned -- Alex Salmond said that
:13:46. > :13:48.on television. As a liberal person I am delighted he is going to get the
:13:49. > :13:52.rubber to nomination, because even Republicans will vote Hillary
:13:53. > :13:59.Clinton. The Republican nomination. Some will. There was a supporter of
:14:00. > :14:02.John McCain who was the previous Republican candidate who said he
:14:03. > :14:06.would vote for Clinton. There will be lots of people who we talk about,
:14:07. > :14:14.the middle ground, who will go to Clinton, and is absolutely at will
:14:15. > :14:22.not get in. Oh dear. Allegedly. Let's finish there. Thank you so
:14:23. > :14:25.much, James, thank you. Coming up next it is the film review.