:00:19. > :00:27.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing
:00:28. > :00:32.tomorrow. Deputy opinion editor of accounting, Harker. Welcome.
:00:33. > :00:38.Westminster correspondent for the press and Journal, Lindsay Watling.
:00:39. > :00:42.The Times leads with a warning from health experts against going ahead
:00:43. > :00:49.with the rear Olympics over fears of the spread of the Zika virus. The
:00:50. > :00:53.Daily Mail leads on pensions prospect of the youth vote. The
:00:54. > :00:58.express says the Prime Minister has no real fears that the Dutch economy
:00:59. > :01:04.if there is a vote to leave. -- fears for the British economy.
:01:05. > :01:08.Lloyds bank is poised to make its first acquisition since been dealt
:01:09. > :01:14.out by the taxpayer according to the Financial Times. And older drivers
:01:15. > :01:17.should we allow to carry on until 75 without renewing their licence,
:01:18. > :01:20.according to an official report, on the front of the Telegraph. The
:01:21. > :01:26.Guardian continues the debate on legal highs with the warning of the
:01:27. > :01:31.dangers of black-market drugs. Finally, the Mirror, accusations of
:01:32. > :01:46.the wife of Johnny Depp, that he assaulted her with a phone. Let's
:01:47. > :01:49.start with the Daily Mail. No disagreement on whether staying in
:01:50. > :01:56.or leaving the EU would be better for us. Why staying in Europe will
:01:57. > :02:02.harm your pension, the experts now saying that staying in could harm
:02:03. > :02:08.your pension. More confusion, as we have been warned about today. One
:02:09. > :02:14.day we're being told if we leave your will be at risk, tomorrow we
:02:15. > :02:19.are then told exactly the opposite. So how do people make up their mind?
:02:20. > :02:27.This is essentially a response to what the government put out
:02:28. > :02:36.yesterday, just before purdah, suggesting an exit with -- would
:02:37. > :02:41.affect pensions. But experts are mentioned three times without
:02:42. > :02:45.actually been named. We can assume they are not significant voices
:02:46. > :02:53.otherwise they would be named. But it is such an obvious rebuttal
:02:54. > :02:59.because they even have a word in underlined, as if you did not
:03:00. > :03:03.present the significance. -- appreciate. The government has put
:03:04. > :03:12.out its line, the Daily Mail feels it must do a rapid rebuttal. Can I
:03:13. > :03:17.move onto the next story? I am not quite ready, you from the Guardian,
:03:18. > :03:30.so we know where your loyalties life. Our economics editor is
:03:31. > :03:36.borderline exit. Is he? Excuse me, I've just tried to find a keyboard.
:03:37. > :03:40.There are left-wing voices for the exit, we just hear the right-wing
:03:41. > :03:42.one about immigration. But the left-wing case is about a remote
:03:43. > :03:50.body which basically supports business people, improves life only
:03:51. > :03:56.for major corporations, doing not a lot for me people. So there is a
:03:57. > :04:01.strong left-wing case also. We will move on, as you don't like to stay
:04:02. > :04:04.with that. Leave or remain, no wonder we are all confused. It is
:04:05. > :04:08.not just pensions on which we had different views. It is pretty much
:04:09. > :04:13.every aspect of what it will mean to stay off to go. The reason I want to
:04:14. > :04:26.move on is this encapsulates the holder them. -- the whole dilemma of
:04:27. > :04:29.information and misinformation. A committee criticised both sides
:04:30. > :04:38.today over the figures they use. Claims from the Leave camp that
:04:39. > :04:46.leaving would save ?350 million per week, they said was deeply
:04:47. > :04:51.problematic. And the Remain camp, also making claims about how we
:04:52. > :04:57.would be worse off if we leave, both been criticised for bogus claims. No
:04:58. > :05:03.wonder people find it difficult to drill down the facts, they are all
:05:04. > :05:06.disputed. In this debate the facts are almost irrelevant. People will
:05:07. > :05:12.just believe the facts they want to believe. If 5000 top economists say
:05:13. > :05:16.it will be terrible to leave the EU, then if you are so minded, then half
:05:17. > :05:22.a dozen saying something different will sway your view. And I think
:05:23. > :05:29.people have a view that they either believe in the EU, or they don't. It
:05:30. > :05:32.is more of a gut instinct. You either believe that immigration is a
:05:33. > :05:36.good or a bad thing, and that will sway your view. You believe it is
:05:37. > :05:42.right that it is part of a global organisation which has kept the
:05:43. > :05:45.peace and encouraged links, forming links with other countries and
:05:46. > :05:56.nations, and that will sway you. But the actual fact, it is all fantasy,
:05:57. > :06:01.you have got... It might not be. One sidles a, it is wonderful if we
:06:02. > :06:06.leave, the other says, it will be an absolute disaster. Both sides are
:06:07. > :06:10.just exaggerating wildly. But some people cannot even find big
:06:11. > :06:15.reaction. They don't even know what reaction they should trust. Should
:06:16. > :06:19.it be the heart of the head? What other people are saying that they
:06:20. > :06:23.don't know which way to vote, even now, they could go into the ballot
:06:24. > :06:28.booth on the day and just have to take a guess.
:06:29. > :06:33.The key thing is to look at different areas that are important
:06:34. > :06:38.to you, arguments for and against. Tom Hunter commissioned a book, last
:06:39. > :06:41.month, essentially lots of experts who came together and wrote
:06:42. > :06:46.different chapters on different sections of the judgment. It was a
:06:47. > :06:50.very balanced take. As close to an independent look as you will get.
:06:51. > :07:00.If you have got time to read it, quick. Finally, on the EU, for the
:07:01. > :07:06.moment, here is the Guardian. Delia Smith is having her say. Daily scare
:07:07. > :07:13.tactics beggar belief, they are not working, the debate is an unsavoury
:07:14. > :07:17.petty squabble, it is time to grow up. What I find is interesting is
:07:18. > :07:21.that even when both sides are criticised by the Treasury Select
:07:22. > :07:23.Committee for exaggerating claims, they then attacked each other for
:07:24. > :07:31.the criticism that each had received. It just did not stop.
:07:32. > :07:37.Everybody is just piling in. But I did think it is people adding up
:07:38. > :07:44.figures and saying, my ?137 a week that I might lose will swing it, or
:07:45. > :07:49.this pension argument the Daily Mail has on the front age, I think people
:07:50. > :07:53.feel it in a way that, you know, they either tolerate immigration or
:07:54. > :07:58.not, or they feel bonded to Europe and they feel, you know, like young
:07:59. > :08:02.people, especially, feel like they want to go to Europe as they think
:08:03. > :08:05.it will allow them to travel more, they conceded a future lying in
:08:06. > :08:11.travelling across the continent, and they like the idea of free movement.
:08:12. > :08:19.Those are the issues. Why is Delia Smith being asked for her opinion.
:08:20. > :08:23.Although she title to -- she is entitled to it as much as anybody.
:08:24. > :08:29.She sums up what many are thinking. People are fed up, you are talking
:08:30. > :08:35.about the fighting between the camps, there is even fighting within
:08:36. > :08:42.the Remain camp, with the SNP being told, have got to make a more case.
:08:43. > :08:47.All these exaggerating claims they are being told off for by the
:08:48. > :08:51.Treasury committee. In a nutshell that and actually type people are
:08:52. > :08:57.feeling and could feed into a lower turnout which is no good thing. I
:08:58. > :09:00.should mention that we had a bit of a tug of war at the Guardian over
:09:01. > :09:03.this piece, because she wrote it as a comment peacefully opinion
:09:04. > :09:08.section, my section, but they stole the front page. They were right to.
:09:09. > :09:14.We hear from politicians of the time but this is a different voice. It
:09:15. > :09:24.meant that my headline did not make it into the paper. And did you know
:09:25. > :09:31.what the headline was? Let's be having EU! The main picture on the
:09:32. > :09:38.times, President Obama embracing a The main picture on the times,
:09:39. > :09:53.President Obama embracing a Hiroshima survivor. No apology, but
:09:54. > :09:57.nobody expected one. I think what it symbolises, his breakdown of race in
:09:58. > :10:02.the USA, he can do things that US presidents have not done. Embracing
:10:03. > :10:08.links with Cuba. And going there and embracing a Hiroshima survivor, an
:10:09. > :10:12.incredible image, somebody who survived an atomic bomb, and the
:10:13. > :10:18.president going there. People tend to do apologies. Japan has
:10:19. > :10:23.apologised for what it did, it sort of apologised, Britain has
:10:24. > :10:28.apologised for slavery, things like that, but it describes strange that
:10:29. > :10:31.the US will not apologise. But then again, this is very difficult, it
:10:32. > :10:38.was a tactical decision, there is still a justification for it in some
:10:39. > :10:40.people's mind. And the talk of a visit for Pearl Harbor, there is
:10:41. > :10:47.talk of a real appetite for it amongst Americans... There is a
:10:48. > :10:51.symmetry to it. But Barack Obama is able to do this because he is coming
:10:52. > :10:55.to the end. Politically it would be difficult for him to apologise. I
:10:56. > :11:00.was reading today something from a survivor who was saying that, in
:11:01. > :11:03.fact, Japan was not entirely innocent on all this either. They
:11:04. > :11:10.have things to apologise for as well. China have been saying that,
:11:11. > :11:16.very much so. Another story on the front of the times, move the real
:11:17. > :11:20.Olympics over virus fears. The number of medical experts writing to
:11:21. > :11:27.the WHO saying postponed, move it, do something, because of Zika. Just
:11:28. > :11:32.this month the IOC said there was no need to delay, no real threat. Now
:11:33. > :11:37.just a few weeks later we have an open letter to the WHO saying, yes
:11:38. > :11:42.we do. It is frightening, really. Because we are a matter of months
:11:43. > :11:48.from it. Logistically, could then be? Maybe back in London again. I
:11:49. > :11:53.don't know. There was a suggestion. Logistically it would be difficult.
:11:54. > :11:58.For the people of Brazil it is a real shame if there is a threat to
:11:59. > :12:01.health I guess there is no decision. They're going through similar
:12:02. > :12:05.problems, and impeachment process against the president of the moment.
:12:06. > :12:11.What the scientists are saying is they expect 500,000 foreign tourists
:12:12. > :12:14.from all over the world and what they worry about is the virus then
:12:15. > :12:18.spreading to other parts of the world as the tourist and competitors
:12:19. > :12:24.leave. Even if you're just a carrier of it. Especially if it goes to
:12:25. > :12:28.poorer parts of the world, Africa, Asia, without the facilities to keep
:12:29. > :12:35.it in check. But people travel to Brazil anyway. I guess it is just
:12:36. > :12:39.these numbers. They have tried to kill off the mosquitoes and the
:12:40. > :12:42.numbers have gone up. Daily Telegraph, Jeremy Corbyn misses a
:12:43. > :12:55.memorial to go on holiday. Missing out on commemorations for the battle
:12:56. > :12:58.of Jutland. It was a battle between the German and British grand fleets,
:12:59. > :13:02.the only major naval clash of the First World War, and slightly
:13:03. > :13:06.interesting because both sides claimed victory. The British lost
:13:07. > :13:10.more ships and sailors but the Germans never ventured out into the
:13:11. > :13:18.North Sea again. So a strategic victory. And Jeremy Corbyn has
:13:19. > :13:23.decided not to go. Obviously he should go because it is a symbol,
:13:24. > :13:28.you Britain, and, to commemorate it, and to support our servicemen. But I
:13:29. > :13:34.can understand he is a man of peace. He is anti-war. And the amount of
:13:35. > :13:40.military anniversaries that he has to go to, First World War, Second
:13:41. > :13:43.World War, all manner of... Argentina, Iraq, Falklands, you name
:13:44. > :13:48.it, we have similar military anniversaries around. We seem to be
:13:49. > :13:57.constantly remembering... Shouldn't we? Indeed. This detracts from the
:13:58. > :14:01.actual story, the commemorations, it is suddenly all about Jeremy:. David
:14:02. > :14:04.Cameron will be there. The German president. Members of the Royal
:14:05. > :14:10.family. Essentially it is everyone but Jeremy. I think the fact that,
:14:11. > :14:12.you know, this is what we are talking about now, it detracts from
:14:13. > :14:19.the importance of the commemorations themselves. We have rolling
:14:20. > :14:27.commemorations. People did. I know it is important. Absolutely, it is a
:14:28. > :14:31.major commemoration. But there are lots of military commemorations that
:14:32. > :14:37.this country does, almost... Because people did. He is missing this to go
:14:38. > :14:46.on a holiday. Perhaps you could change his plans. Changes
:14:47. > :14:56.destination. Financial Times, this is one for Joseph, a fresh critique
:14:57. > :15:04.of the new liberal agenda from the IMF. It is not a tabloid headline.
:15:05. > :15:08.Essentially what it is saying is free-market economics and austerity
:15:09. > :15:13.combined are not very much. They are making the rich richer and the poor
:15:14. > :15:16.poorer. That is an old theme. As people have said for a long time.
:15:17. > :15:20.But what is significant about it as it is coming from the IMF, which has
:15:21. > :15:25.been pushing this agenda on the countries around the world for
:15:26. > :15:34.several years now. Decades. Any sign they will stop? What he said. There
:15:35. > :15:37.are signs of criticism, acknowledging that there has been a
:15:38. > :15:44.very damaging aspect to the policies the IMF has been pushing. Pull out
:15:45. > :15:48.then. A couple more on the Telegraph, keep driving until you
:15:49. > :15:51.are 75, pensioners must be spared the hassle of renewing their licence
:15:52. > :15:55.when they are in good health. But how do you know if they are in good
:15:56. > :15:59.health unless somebody checks? I like this idea because it should be
:16:00. > :16:05.about whether somebody is capable of driving still, not how old you are.
:16:06. > :16:10.It is a just to say... Some people are in their 20s or 30s when they
:16:11. > :16:16.cannot drive. Indeed, but to say you have to stop driving at 75 or have a
:16:17. > :16:19.checkup seems ages. But it is good because many older people are
:16:20. > :16:23.isolated and if you can get in your car and drive then you can go and do
:16:24. > :16:30.things, you are more likely to cause less money to the NHS. Older drivers
:16:31. > :16:35.are often safer. Certainly safer than kids under 25, that is sure.
:16:36. > :16:41.Obviously they still have an age limit, they are just raising it to
:16:42. > :16:47.75. But they are saying that once people reach 70 we need to start
:16:48. > :16:51.apply for a licence. A lot of people simply don't bother to renew. It has
:16:52. > :16:54.got to be a good thing and given that we need to retire later, work
:16:55. > :17:00.longer, all because we are told it would be healthier, then this is at
:17:01. > :17:04.least the plus side. The last story we will look at is the cheeky face
:17:05. > :17:12.of Chris Evans, who was on the front of the Daily Telegraph he says top
:17:13. > :17:19.tier will drop the offensive jokes. Who could he be referring to? No
:17:20. > :17:29.idea. I guess it is a good thing. With Jeremy Clarkson, if you'd is
:17:30. > :17:34.talking about him, we did have a lot of... Every few months a new
:17:35. > :17:39.controversy. He offended just about everyone in the world. Argentinians,
:17:40. > :17:43.Mexicans... For some people that was part of the appeal of the programme.
:17:44. > :17:50.Not personally, but a lot of people locked all the offensive jokes. But
:17:51. > :17:52.it was a programme about cars. Chris Evans says that have spread
:17:53. > :17:55.assessor's politically incorrect humour added nothing to the
:17:56. > :18:02.programme. Many viewers will disagree. You like to be edgy and to
:18:03. > :18:06.have humour. But sometimes the amount of offence caused when a
:18:07. > :18:09.bit... Obviously I think that his ego got out of hand. He felt he
:18:10. > :18:15.could not only insult people punch them also. And Chris Evans wants to
:18:16. > :18:19.chart his own path. You want to make his own thing. There was a recent
:18:20. > :18:23.episode where they filmed something and they were speeding past the
:18:24. > :18:31.Cenotaph and it had to be cut. A steep learning curve. Thank you
:18:32. > :18:52.both. That is all for the papers for tonight. Next, time for the weather.
:18:53. > :18:56.Another bank holiday weekend another less than straightforward forecast.
:18:57. > :18:59.There are still some complications but for most of us it is a weekend
:19:00. > :19:00.is half