:00:00. > :00:00.He swept aside Australian John Millman in straight
:00:00. > :00:18.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:19. > :00:21.With me are Anne Ashworth, Assistant Editor of The Times,
:00:22. > :00:27.and Kevin Schofield, Editor of Politics Home.
:00:28. > :00:29.The Observer leads with the Conservative leadership race,
:00:30. > :00:32.saying the final choice will be between Home Secretary Theresa May
:00:33. > :00:42.The Sunday Express front page is devoted to the Queen's call
:00:43. > :00:45.for calm reflection in the wake of the vote to leave
:00:46. > :00:49.The Sunday Telegraph has with an interview with Conservative
:00:50. > :00:52.leadership candidate Andrea Leadsom, in which she claims she can be
:00:53. > :00:58.The Mail on Sunday headline accuses Andrea Leadsom of hypocrisy
:00:59. > :01:03.The Sunday Post claims that medics are planning to emigrate as a result
:01:04. > :01:09.The Sunday Mirror front page has a tribute to Caroline Aherne,
:01:10. > :01:13.the comedy actress and writer who passed away earlier today.
:01:14. > :01:16.And it's back to the race to be the new Prime Minister on the front
:01:17. > :01:27.of the Sunday Times, the paper says senior Tories
:01:28. > :01:30.are uniting to stop Theresa May being installed in the top job
:01:31. > :01:41.Let's begin with the Sunday Times. This is an interesting suggestion
:01:42. > :01:44.that although we have only had elections that involve a party
:01:45. > :01:52.members, this time we might not have won. There seems to be a bit of a
:01:53. > :01:58.clamour for Theresa May to be installed as the new Tory leader and
:01:59. > :02:03.Prime Minister, and clearly that was to happen, if she was appointed by
:02:04. > :02:08.acclamation, then it could happen quite quickly and David Cameron
:02:09. > :02:13.would be out the door. But there is a backlash to that idea, despite the
:02:14. > :02:17.fact that she seems to have by far the most support among the
:02:18. > :02:22.Parliamentary Conservative party, her rivals unsurprisingly are saying
:02:23. > :02:25.no, we won't step aside, there must be a contest. Primarily there needs
:02:26. > :02:35.to be a contest that when Mrs May, who was a remain Sam Payne, and a
:02:36. > :02:42.Brexit photo, either Andrea Leadsom or Michael Gove. It is an
:02:43. > :02:49.extraordinary drama, and they say they don't want a rerun of how
:02:50. > :02:53.Gordon Brown replaced Tony Blair in 2007. The consequences weren't good.
:02:54. > :02:58.So they want to see it done in full and fair contest. If Mrs May is
:02:59. > :03:02.anointed as the leader they are even talking about a judicial review. Has
:03:03. > :03:06.that ever happened before in the Conservative party or any other? Not
:03:07. > :03:11.as far as I can remember, but nothing would surprise you about how
:03:12. > :03:16.the world is behaving right now. There are plenty of judicial
:03:17. > :03:19.reviews, particularly on Labour, whether Jeremy Corbyn would be on
:03:20. > :03:28.the shortlist of candidates if there was a challenge. I'm sure we will
:03:29. > :03:34.get to that eventually, but as I say, unsurprisingly Andrea Leadsom
:03:35. > :03:39.is saying, I will not stand aside, and Michael Gove likewise. He is
:03:40. > :03:47.insistent that the next leader of the Tory party must be someone who
:03:48. > :03:50.campaign for Brexit. If it was a remain, they would not have the
:03:51. > :03:54.moral authority, he says. The country has spoken, they want to
:03:55. > :04:00.leave, and it would make sense for somebody who believes in it to lead
:04:01. > :04:04.the country. That would be down to Michael Gove, Liam Fox and Andrea
:04:05. > :04:09.Leadsom. Theresa May seems to be likely to be the figure who could
:04:10. > :04:14.unite the party, is that not in the greater interest of the Conservative
:04:15. > :04:18.party, to have a central figure with huge experience in government, and
:04:19. > :04:21.who also has that popular touch? Remember Theresa May and
:04:22. > :04:28.Hillsborough? You could see the woman really felt for those
:04:29. > :04:35.families. She might be quite a price, and I think they would be
:04:36. > :04:39.wrong to underestimate her. Let's talk about the other candidate we
:04:40. > :04:43.have been talking about. We have done quite a lot of stories about
:04:44. > :04:49.Andrea Leadsom. She says she might be the new Thatcher. Is that what
:04:50. > :04:55.the Tories want? Maybe, they do have a vast yearning, don't they? Even
:04:56. > :05:05.perhaps the ones who don't remember her in government. Andrea Leadsom is
:05:06. > :05:11.saying, this is how I need to present myself. I am glamorous,
:05:12. > :05:14.kind, but I have a steely determination. It is the idea of the
:05:15. > :05:19.elegant woman who can bring consensus that knows exactly when to
:05:20. > :05:24.play it tough. It is all a little bit... Are not necessarily
:05:25. > :05:33.convinced. Remember it was not that long ago that Lady Thatcher was a
:05:34. > :05:41.booby -- bogey woman in the Conservative party. Presumably this
:05:42. > :05:49.is plain to the activists, isn't it? If it does go beyond the MPs. It is
:05:50. > :05:54.a clear pitch to the grassroots. Presumably they won't have some of
:05:55. > :06:01.the activists that Theresa May... That they were regarded as the nasty
:06:02. > :06:05.party. She is not universally popular out in the country as far as
:06:06. > :06:10.the membership is concerned. There was certainly a belief up until this
:06:11. > :06:15.week that if Boris Johnson had gotten down to the last two he would
:06:16. > :06:23.have beaten Theresa May quite easily among the activists. Clearly most
:06:24. > :06:28.activists would have voted for an insert so they seem more likely to
:06:29. > :06:31.support a lead supporting candidate. People in offices can feel a certain
:06:32. > :06:35.rivalry, but there is nothing like the competitiveness and the
:06:36. > :06:41.viciousness between people in Parliament. I think a lot of people,
:06:42. > :06:46.if we say we are a nation that feels very separate from the Westminster
:06:47. > :06:51.machine, is this not going to exacerbate those feelings of total
:06:52. > :06:57.alienation from the political scene? Look how badly they are behaving! We
:06:58. > :07:02.hear as journalists around the corridors of power, we hear them
:07:03. > :07:08.back biting, as it is usually done behind closed doors. This is the
:07:09. > :07:13.first time we have seen it just out there. And it was similar during the
:07:14. > :07:18.televised Brexit debate, with some of Amber Rudd's lines against Boris
:07:19. > :07:23.Johnson think pretty below the belt. They were party colleagues, but on
:07:24. > :07:30.this issue they were really divided. They said repeatedly that won't have
:07:31. > :07:35.referendums out of the way would come together, but it has been
:07:36. > :07:39.anything but. It is getting nasty by the day. Speaking of which, let's
:07:40. > :07:43.move on to the Mail on Sunday, because just as the Telegraph inks
:07:44. > :07:47.Andrea Leadsom will be the new Thatcher, the Mail on Sunday has
:07:48. > :07:51.found that she may not necessarily found that she may not necessarily
:07:52. > :08:00.be the dyed in the wool eurosceptic has which she has betrayed herself.
:08:01. > :08:07.They found that she wants said, I'm going to nail my colours to the
:08:08. > :08:11.mast. I don't think the UK should leave the EU, I think it would be a
:08:12. > :08:15.disaster for our economy and would lead to a decade of economic and
:08:16. > :08:22.political uncertainty. That is a fairly forthright support of
:08:23. > :08:32.Britain... That was just three years ago. When we knew the referendum was
:08:33. > :08:42.coming. I said earlier the Remain Campaign should... She was not the
:08:43. > :08:47.person of political substance. It is only in the past week that anybody
:08:48. > :08:50.knows who she is. Some would say if you went out into the country a lot
:08:51. > :08:55.of people still wouldn't know who she is. She is going to be doing the
:08:56. > :09:01.rounds tomorrow. I think she is on one of the Sunday shows. I think she
:09:02. > :09:06.might be on Andrew Marr's show. She will have a good time there. If she
:09:07. > :09:12.is watching the paper review, at least she can be tipped off and will
:09:13. > :09:19.be able to work on her story. Michael Gove is on the front of the
:09:20. > :09:25.Mail on Sunday. His sister says he is a political psychopath. She was
:09:26. > :09:35.full remain, but there is family loyalty, which is much stronger than
:09:36. > :09:43.political loyalty. The Sun, Boris won't answer my calls. I can't say I
:09:44. > :09:48.blame him, given what has happened. It says here, I have tried to ring
:09:49. > :09:55.him and explain what I did, but he is not picking up his phone. Kenny
:09:56. > :09:58.bee that surprised? He admits in an interview that on Wednesday night,
:09:59. > :10:07.the night before the Dagar happened, he was still trying to drum up
:10:08. > :10:11.support for Boris's launch, which was the following day. He says, and
:10:12. > :10:16.I don't quite believe this, that they were at a Tory sum of all the
:10:17. > :10:21.night before and a few things went on that made him realise actually
:10:22. > :10:27.Boris isn't the man to lead the country. He went home and slept on
:10:28. > :10:32.it and woke up in the morning spoke to his wife and said that is what
:10:33. > :10:41.I'm going do. Then by 9am he had not only declared that basically
:10:42. > :10:46.eviscerated Boris Johnson. You can't really expect him to pick up the
:10:47. > :10:50.phone after that. I'm going to say something in Michael Gove's support.
:10:51. > :10:54.He is an incredibly polite man. He has good manners and Isla is
:10:55. > :11:02.courteous. He would be capable of writing a very strong 5000 word
:11:03. > :11:11.piece on why he should stand, very quickly and very... He made quite an
:11:12. > :11:17.emotional speech. Very personal. I think Boris is in the middle of a
:11:18. > :11:21.dark night of his soul. He is sitting surrounded by the debris of
:11:22. > :11:25.his career. I'm sure he is not necessarily talking to anybody, I
:11:26. > :11:30.hope he is having some nice snacks, maybe watching the tennis, and is
:11:31. > :11:35.taking time out. I think the last thing on his mind is speaking to
:11:36. > :11:39.Michael Gove. Is intriguing to think that we were sitting here a week ago
:11:40. > :11:43.reviewing papers that were talking about Boris throwing his hat in the
:11:44. > :11:50.ring and being the leading light, and the likely winner. And it has
:11:51. > :11:53.gone, it has vanished. The speed at which political development has
:11:54. > :11:57.moved this past week has been astonishing. I am going to jump to
:11:58. > :12:03.the Sunday Mirror, because speaking of sleeping a long time in politics,
:12:04. > :12:13.copyright Harold Wilson, who was born 100 years ago today, and
:12:14. > :12:17.someone who tends to be forgotten. It is hard to believe that Harold
:12:18. > :12:24.Wilson would have ever had quite the experience Jeremy Corbyn is in
:12:25. > :12:32.during this week. It is incredible. I doubt if there has ever been
:12:33. > :12:37.Labour leader who having lost the support of three quarters of his MPs
:12:38. > :12:45.had continued to plough on. It is incredible really. McDonald in 1921,
:12:46. > :12:49.who had 14 MPs. He had just announced he was going off to form a
:12:50. > :12:54.coalition with the Tories, so we might call those special
:12:55. > :12:57.circumstances. Something I happened to look up this week, I was
:12:58. > :13:04.thinking, there must be a precedent. It was the only one I could find.
:13:05. > :13:15.Unimpressed, and surprised there was a precedent. There is something like
:13:16. > :13:22.62 vacancies in his Shadow Cabinet, and there is no one left. I am led
:13:23. > :13:25.to believe that now the rebels have stopped hanging on for him to
:13:26. > :13:31.resign, rather than wanting to directly challenge. He has come out
:13:32. > :13:36.fighting. What is the thrust of it? He is going to reach out. He is
:13:37. > :13:44.going to try to bring unity to his party. I wonder whether the fishes
:13:45. > :13:49.that too deep, and when we saw those people who had placed their trust in
:13:50. > :13:55.him, their evident sadness at how badly wrong it had gone, and they
:13:56. > :14:00.want to be a party in power. Nobody is in Parliament to be a protest
:14:01. > :14:09.group. You want to be a party able to take power and assume it, and
:14:10. > :14:13.currently, dare I say, the Tories will be hoping this continues then
:14:14. > :14:14.they will have a snap election and there will be another Tory
:14:15. > :14:24.government. Sports pages in the Telegraph, will
:14:25. > :14:29.have to rattle through them. Do the England football story for us first.
:14:30. > :14:35.I am declaring an interest in being Scottish, so why not in a great
:14:36. > :14:40.position to criticise England, but the FA chief executive has said the
:14:41. > :14:42.next manager will be paid by results. You can have a little
:14:43. > :14:53.giggle at that, he might not get paid very well. You can see why.
:14:54. > :14:56.Fabio Capello, Roy Hodgson is on a small fortune, they have spent
:14:57. > :15:08.millions and billions to achieve nothing. When you get there, Wales
:15:09. > :15:12.have obviously... Why would you bother to want to be in England
:15:13. > :15:16.manager? There are an awful lot of people who have already made a great
:15:17. > :15:21.deal of money out of football and what an amazing victory that would
:15:22. > :15:23.be to lead the England team. But are they going to get this guy from
:15:24. > :15:33.Wales? Isn't he a shoe in for the job? I don't see him being a Welsh
:15:34. > :15:38.manager or going to England. Also, there is another interesting
:15:39. > :15:43.question here, does this apply anywhere else? As any other person
:15:44. > :15:50.in these kinds of jobs get paid on results? You get no basic whatsoever
:15:51. > :15:56.and you just hope to win? It used to be before there was so much money in
:15:57. > :16:01.football that the players remind on them -- relied on their win bonuses.
:16:02. > :16:06.You could argue it was better than. Now they are on ?100,000 per week
:16:07. > :16:14.regardless of whether they win, lose or draw. One man who has had a very
:16:15. > :16:21.rotten day. It is the twilight of the gods, isn't it? No Djokovic at
:16:22. > :16:25.Wimbledon, no Boris in number ten. What next? All the certainties have
:16:26. > :16:31.gone! Leicester winning the Premier League. 2016 has been the year of
:16:32. > :16:36.the upset. Even the upset in the football tonight. I've always
:16:37. > :16:43.thought the Germans couldn't win it against the Italians, look what
:16:44. > :16:47.happens! The Germans also missed a few penalties tonight, and they
:16:48. > :16:51.haven't missed penalty since 1982. Everything we thought we believe and
:16:52. > :16:59.new. Is it all down to Brexit? Is it that we are all... All about in
:17:00. > :17:03.innate years are going, and because everyone else is like that we don't
:17:04. > :17:08.notice it, but everything has been upset. Everything will be blamed on
:17:09. > :17:11.Brexit. Everything that goes wrong will be blamed on that for at least
:17:12. > :17:18.another 18 months, I would say. A terrifying prospect. I will remember
:17:19. > :17:19.that when I drop or later a glass at home over the weekend. Thank you
:17:20. > :17:31.both.