:00:00. > :00:15.Don't forget the Olympic coverage begins today on BBC One at 1pm.
:00:16. > :00:18.Hello and welcome to our Sunday morning edition of The Papers.
:00:19. > :00:20.With me are Political Commentator Vincent Moss, and Prashant Rao,
:00:21. > :00:22.Deputy Europe Business Editor from the International
:00:23. > :00:32.The first day of Olympic action features on most of the front pages.
:00:33. > :00:34.The Telegraph has an image of British swimmer Adam Peaty
:00:35. > :00:36.who has broken the world record in the 100m breaststroke.
:00:37. > :00:39.And it's lead story says the Prime Minister will launch
:00:40. > :00:46.The Observer also has a photograph of swimmer Adam Peaty but leads
:00:47. > :00:49.on a warning from scientists that a key climate target may be missed.
:00:50. > :00:52.The Sunday Times says the Rio Olympics has been rocked
:00:53. > :00:55.by a new doping scandal involving a Kenyan official.
:00:56. > :00:58.The Independent speculates that the Russian team
:00:59. > :01:00.will be completely banned from the Paralympics -
:01:01. > :01:06.a decision we are expecting this afternoon.
:01:07. > :01:09.And it carries a picture of a Syrian refugee competing in Rio.
:01:10. > :01:11.The Sunday Express leads on fracking, reporting that
:01:12. > :01:14.according to a consultation due out tomorrow as much as ?10,000 could be
:01:15. > :01:19.And the Mail on Sunday has the same story, saying the Prime Minister
:01:20. > :01:21.is planning cash pay-outs to families, marking
:01:22. > :01:29.a departure in approach from the previous government.
:01:30. > :01:38.So let's begin with fracking. The mail on Sunday has, will you hit the
:01:39. > :01:49.frat pot? Stunning pay-out to families in fracking areas. And it
:01:50. > :01:59.has Theresa May's cash pay-outs. This is an interesting story. It's a
:02:00. > :02:03.great headline, "Frackpot". It's important for Theresa May to be
:02:04. > :02:07.spelling out what she's doing an energy policy particularly with the
:02:08. > :02:12.hiatus of Hinkley Point and the nuclear drive. What's happened is
:02:13. > :02:17.the government are trying to spell out that to try and ease some of the
:02:18. > :02:22.residential fears of people who live near the sites, not the dangers but
:02:23. > :02:30.this anti-nimbyism view, instead of the money going to councils, it
:02:31. > :02:35.could go direct to householders. David Cameron said in 2014 it would
:02:36. > :02:39.go to community projects, Theresa May said instead it will go directly
:02:40. > :02:43.to households. If you live near one of the sites you could get up to
:02:44. > :02:51.?13,000, says The Mail. Inside The Mail it looks that certain areas
:02:52. > :02:55.such as Manchester where you may only get ?1000, it really is a
:02:56. > :02:59.postcode lottery. It reminds us that we have got a new government. We are
:03:00. > :03:08.finding out new things and new policies. Exactly. This is Theresa
:03:09. > :03:12.May's theoretically going to make this policy announcement soon. We
:03:13. > :03:15.are learning things about how we'd would have lent in a leadership
:03:16. > :03:22.election but we didn't have a leadership election for the Tory
:03:23. > :03:25.party. She sent a lot of time at the Home Office but that was a focused
:03:26. > :03:31.portfolio. It's interesting to find out things now. The United States is
:03:32. > :03:37.obviously a much bigger country but is there the same kind of green
:03:38. > :03:46.anti-fracking protests, and does paying money to local people help
:03:47. > :03:52.ameliorate that? To a certain extent it does. The Mail refers to this
:03:53. > :03:59.about the fact that in the United States, it has changed the debate on
:04:00. > :04:06.fracking. There are also environmental concerns about
:04:07. > :04:09.providing money to households, which lessens the opposition. It has
:04:10. > :04:13.changed the debate in the United States where fracking is a bigger
:04:14. > :04:23.provider of energy. Let's move on to The Sunday Telegraph. It's got May
:04:24. > :04:26.to lift ban on grammar schools to promote social mobility, that is
:04:27. > :04:30.their take on the story. This has been talked about, the Conservatives
:04:31. > :04:33.have said this for a long time. The catch is, if you have selection
:04:34. > :04:39.there is always winners and losers. Some people go to excellent grammar
:04:40. > :04:43.schools, under the old system some people went to secondary moderns
:04:44. > :04:48.which weren't very good. A lot of this is about investment. The world
:04:49. > :04:53.has changed, it is a hugely popular issue among conservatives grass
:04:54. > :04:57.roots. We live in a different world to when these schools were hugely
:04:58. > :05:01.popular and very successful, certainly by those who benefited by
:05:02. > :05:05.them. In areas like Kent where you have a lot of these schools,
:05:06. > :05:10.families move into the area inflating house prices, they also
:05:11. > :05:15.get private tutors to make sure they pass the relevant exams. There is an
:05:16. > :05:18.argument that to expand grammar schools now we'll just entrenched
:05:19. > :05:23.that elitist role rather than benefit the people who most need it
:05:24. > :05:28.which are bright children from disadvantaged families. Unless there
:05:29. > :05:32.is an element that guarantees people from less well-off backgrounds can
:05:33. > :05:36.go to the schools I think it's hugely problematic. Theresa May as a
:05:37. > :05:42.very small majority, is hugely popular amongst Conservative MPs,
:05:43. > :05:46.but whether in fact she would need a new law and whether a majority of 12
:05:47. > :05:50.would be enough to get that through Parliament is a big question. One of
:05:51. > :05:54.the arguments in favour of grammar schools is that for those lucky
:05:55. > :05:58.enough to go to them, they are an engine of social mobility. They have
:05:59. > :06:02.helped people get on, get into parliament and even become Prime
:06:03. > :06:07.Minister. Theresa May went to a grammar school. She alluded to this
:06:08. > :06:11.in her first speech, she talked about trying to help the less well
:06:12. > :06:16.off, consideration for people to move them up the social chain. It is
:06:17. > :06:20.interesting now we are learning about Theresa May bits and bobs
:06:21. > :06:24.about what she believes in which is kind of interesting how it's coming
:06:25. > :06:31.out. It is. One story which fascinates people around the world,
:06:32. > :06:35.a good take on this is inside The Sunday Telegraph. Trump's Beek of
:06:36. > :06:43.calamities may finally be his downfall, I wouldn't hold my breath
:06:44. > :06:47.to be honest -- trump's week of calamities. He still seems to be the
:06:48. > :06:51.Republican nominee, what do you make of that Prashant? It is dangerous to
:06:52. > :06:55.suggest this might be the week that is the end of Donald Trump. That may
:06:56. > :07:01.have been last week, the week before or the week before that. Or next
:07:02. > :07:05.week. It's so hard to tell. What further calamities can befall his
:07:06. > :07:13.campaign, we don't know but he still soldiers on. It's amazing. These
:07:14. > :07:17.ones are just in a nutshell, he didn't endorse the leading
:07:18. > :07:19.Republican in the country, the Speaker of the House of
:07:20. > :07:22.Representatives for real election. He did endorse him, then there were
:07:23. > :07:31.comments he made about the family of a Muslim service man killed in
:07:32. > :07:34.action. Along with the comments it is the intransigence in the face of
:07:35. > :07:41.the opposition to the comments and the refusal to back down. When
:07:42. > :07:44.you... When you put it in a list of things that have happened, it is
:07:45. > :07:49.kind of remarkable. There was a great list I read which is Donald
:07:50. > :07:55.Trump got into a feud with a crying baby. It's got incredible at this
:07:56. > :07:59.point. Politicians are supposed to kiss babies! LAUGHTER The Telegraph
:08:00. > :08:06.talks about women in his top teen comedy any person he mentions is his
:08:07. > :08:11.daughter Ivanka and he didn't seem to be aware of Russia had taken over
:08:12. > :08:15.the Crimean peninsula. He said Russia wouldn't be invading the
:08:16. > :08:19.Ukraine any time soon! Apart from the fact as journalists this is the
:08:20. > :08:22.gift that keeps on giving, Gerald Ford years ago when talking about
:08:23. > :08:28.Poland and not knowing it was a member of the Warsaw Pact, that
:08:29. > :08:32.seemed to finish him. He is the Energizer Bunny, he keeps going.
:08:33. > :08:37.There is a view in the world now that, I don't care what the papers
:08:38. > :08:41.say or the BBC says, we've got our view and if we like them, there's
:08:42. > :08:47.nothing you can say, it's all a conspiracy, and I'm sure he didn't
:08:48. > :08:54.mean that! If you like Donald Trump they really like Donald Trump in the
:08:55. > :09:05.United States. He has still got a huge residual support. On that note,
:09:06. > :09:10.let's move on to the Olympics. Adam Peaty, it's great that he beat his
:09:11. > :09:14.own world record. He hasn't won the medal yet, we hate later today he
:09:15. > :09:21.might. Endless fascination with this. -- we hope later today he
:09:22. > :09:25.might. It's great what he's done. From my perspective, because of all
:09:26. > :09:30.the things happening in Rio and around the world it's not as
:09:31. > :09:33.enthusiastic a time to be excited about the Olympics. The
:09:34. > :09:37.infrastructure problems, the chaos in Brazilian politics and the
:09:38. > :09:43.craziness in the world generally, I feel like this Olympics is not the
:09:44. > :09:50.kind of... Let me go on the others. The Observer has got "Russia faces
:09:51. > :09:56.ban from the Paralympics" and The Sunday Times has got an excellent
:09:57. > :10:01.story, Rio Olympics rocked by new doping scandal. That's part of it.
:10:02. > :10:05.The Olympics brand, however much we enjoyed the Games, we want to see
:10:06. > :10:10.athletes compete fairly and we wanted to be clean. We get endless
:10:11. > :10:15.stories, The Sunday Times has great journalism on this. So many people
:10:16. > :10:21.cheat but we can't take on face value but the winners are the best?
:10:22. > :10:26.That is a problem. One of the any ways around that is to see a massive
:10:27. > :10:29.expansion of testing and where everyone who wins a medal gets
:10:30. > :10:33.tested immediately so you know all the winners are clean. The Sunday
:10:34. > :10:40.Times has returned a lot of great work on this in the past and it's
:10:41. > :10:45.gone to a Kenyan official called Major Michael Rotich, a sting when
:10:46. > :10:50.they have asked him if he would introduce us to people who can get
:10:51. > :10:56.surround doping rules. Apparently for ?10,000 he said he would do
:10:57. > :10:59.that. He he was only playing along but it looks like serious
:11:00. > :11:05.allegations and a huge potential for corruption. One of the problems the
:11:06. > :11:08.paper 's face is because of the time difference, we four hours ahead,
:11:09. > :11:12.it's difficult for them to look current on the Olympics in the way
:11:13. > :11:17.the BBC can. Because the deadlines of papers tend to be temp Yemen on a
:11:18. > :11:24.Saturday night, maybe midnight. A lot of the big events happen at 2am.
:11:25. > :11:27.A lot of the Sunday papers have lots of big pieces on the opening
:11:28. > :11:34.ceremony which seems like a long time ago! It seems like ancient
:11:35. > :11:43.history! Wythall sport now, with Lance Armstrong and cycling, with
:11:44. > :11:48.Fifa, and now we've got this. We want sport to be clean and we want
:11:49. > :11:53.to believe in something good. The Sunday Times has an editorial, 2016
:11:54. > :11:56.the year of the doping Olympics. What is normally a really wonderful
:11:57. > :12:03.sporting event where everyone gets very excited and lots of emotional
:12:04. > :12:06.things happen, it doesn't feel like this is going to happen this year.
:12:07. > :12:12.It feels like everything will be a bit tainted by the idea that are
:12:13. > :12:16.these guys clean. Especially when you know a lot of them aren't clean
:12:17. > :12:21.and what they have to give up in order to do this, is extraordinary.
:12:22. > :12:26.The dedication of someone like Peaty to set a world record is
:12:27. > :12:30.extraordinary. Equally extraordinary is the idea he just gave a thumbs
:12:31. > :12:35.up. He clearly expects to do a lot better than this and probably break
:12:36. > :12:43.the world record again. His family sounded incredibly grounded. His
:12:44. > :12:48.father said Sheffield was the furthest he's been, and suddenly
:12:49. > :12:55.he's in Rio watching his son. We tend to judge this through the prism
:12:56. > :13:01.of British success. British people do really well, fantastic. If they
:13:02. > :13:02.do less well, I suspect will be less interested! LAUGHTER Fingers crossed
:13:03. > :13:04.for Adam Peaty. Thanks to Vincent Moss
:13:05. > :13:07.and Prashant Rao. Just a reminder we take a look
:13:08. > :13:10.at tomorrows front pages every evening at 10:30 and 11:30
:13:11. > :13:15.here on BBC News.