:00:16. > :00:29.Welcome to our look ahead to what The Papers are bringing. Let's have
:00:30. > :00:34.a look at the front pages. We will start with the Financial Times. It
:00:35. > :00:36.needs with Donald Trump promising a tax revolution. The former
:00:37. > :00:42.Conservative Cabinet minister has warned Theresa May to bring in tough
:00:43. > :00:46.border controls or face a vote of -- a voter backlash. Tom Daley and Dan
:00:47. > :00:53.Goodfellow are pictured following their medal win at the Olympics.
:00:54. > :00:56.Spanish police are cracking down on party was used by British tourists.
:00:57. > :01:02.The Telegraph says the biggest banks in Britain will be forced to offer
:01:03. > :01:05.customers a revolution in mobile banking. The Times says commuters
:01:06. > :01:11.are facing further chaos as unions prepared to step up their campaign
:01:12. > :01:14.against real companies. The Guardian says Jeremy Corbyn has consolidated
:01:15. > :01:19.his grip on the Labour Party after his victory at the High Court and in
:01:20. > :01:22.elections to the national executive committee of the party. The Mirror
:01:23. > :01:27.leads on a fresh police appeal over the murder of Stephen Lawrence.
:01:28. > :01:34.Finally, a former senior officer has condemned British police forces as a
:01:35. > :01:38.boys club according to the mail. We will start with the Guardian. Double
:01:39. > :01:43.victory leaves Corbyn scored an unassailable. He has won in the High
:01:44. > :01:49.Court and has a lot of his folk on the NEC, the ruling body of the
:01:50. > :01:52.Labour Party. It shows he is going full steam ahead with support from
:01:53. > :01:56.ordinary voters. We have the High Court saying those who signed up to
:01:57. > :02:01.become members of the Labour Party have a right to choose the leader.
:02:02. > :02:04.It is assumed the majority of those are Corbyn supporters because it
:02:05. > :02:08.came about after a campaign to set up fresh people, new Labour
:02:09. > :02:13.supporters in order to get Corbyn the numbers he needed to become the
:02:14. > :02:18.Labour leader. There was a campaign to get people to do against them to
:02:19. > :02:23.join. The assumption is it wasn't as strong. The High Court said this
:02:24. > :02:27.would be considered a breach of contract after the NEC said he would
:02:28. > :02:32.have to be a part of the Labour Party for six months at least in
:02:33. > :02:36.order to have the right to vote. It is details but it is important
:02:37. > :02:45.because it is indicative of the NEC being seen as out of touch. What is
:02:46. > :02:49.interesting is that there are now more Corbyn supporters as part of
:02:50. > :02:57.the NEC. That means that even if Jeremy Corbyn did lose in September,
:02:58. > :03:02.which no one seems to think he will, the Corbyn Brand will still be
:03:03. > :03:06.encrypted on the Labour Party. The NEC, it probably sounds like a
:03:07. > :03:13.random technical body, it is incredibly important. It is the 33
:03:14. > :03:16.person body at the top of the party. Every dispute has been decided in
:03:17. > :03:23.that group. When there is a division it is sorted by a show of hands.
:03:24. > :03:26.When it was how many MPs Gribbin needed to run for the leadership, it
:03:27. > :03:29.was that body who decided. At what point do we cut off the new members
:03:30. > :03:33.who appear to be motivated by Corbyn, it was fat body that
:03:34. > :03:36.decided. Every one of these contentious issues will now be
:03:37. > :03:42.decided by a body that we think predominately backs Corbyn. A huge
:03:43. > :03:48.win for him. Perhaps more important, when you think about the potential
:03:49. > :03:53.lasting legacy that Jeremy Corbyn could have on the Labour Party.
:03:54. > :03:58.Leaders come and go. The NEC comes and goes but not to the same extent.
:03:59. > :04:02.They will be able to ratify the a lot of the policies. When there was
:04:03. > :04:06.a coup after the EU referendum they said you cant go but we will track
:04:07. > :04:10.to enact policies. The moderates used that as a bargaining chip.
:04:11. > :04:15.Nobody thought they would. If you have a group of people at the top of
:04:16. > :04:19.the party who believe in these policies, giving power back to trade
:04:20. > :04:22.unions, nationalising railways, even if he is toppled in this race
:04:23. > :04:28.against when Smith or otherwise, that will carry on for far longer. I
:04:29. > :04:32.am thinking about MPs who put his name forward in the very beginning
:04:33. > :04:40.to run for the leadership. Siddique Khan, Frank Field, Margaret Beckett.
:04:41. > :04:45.She called herself a moron for doing so. This is actually their biggest
:04:46. > :04:51.nightmare. Bigger than Jeremy Corbyn winning the leadership. It is
:04:52. > :04:56.long-lasting and it will also eventually gets elected to be MPs in
:04:57. > :04:59.the longer term. Look at the fact that nearly three quarters of
:05:00. > :05:03.sitting Labour MPs had a vote of no-confidence against Jeremy Corbyn,
:05:04. > :05:10.that will change with time in terms of the longer policies. , the party
:05:11. > :05:13.conference that will come up in September, there will be a
:05:14. > :05:18.completely different tone. If Corbyn can hold on until September, which
:05:19. > :05:22.it looks like he will, he will be flying high unless something
:05:23. > :05:28.unforeseen happens. The person a lot of Labour MPs Liam is Ed Miliband
:05:29. > :05:32.because he was the one who brought in membership changes that allowed
:05:33. > :05:37.people to sign up. Having said that, what is it, four or 500,000 new
:05:38. > :05:43.members. Five times bigger than the Conservative Party. The NEC could
:05:44. > :05:49.appeal this ruling. It is expected they will. Even as soon as Thursday.
:05:50. > :05:53.That hasn't been finalised. Interesting times. Interesting times
:05:54. > :06:01.in America as well. The Republicans put forward a new candidate as far
:06:02. > :06:04.as the White House is concerned. There are many people on the right
:06:05. > :06:08.who do not like Mr Trump as well as many people on the left and now they
:06:09. > :06:13.hope they have a new standard-bearer. Those on the right,
:06:14. > :06:18.that is. Traditionally, a third candidate doesn't help the case in
:06:19. > :06:21.terms of winning, that he could be someone who breaks Trump making it
:06:22. > :06:28.through to the White House. This is a 40-year-old ex-CIA spy. He has
:06:29. > :06:33.done everything from work at Goldman Sachs to be a Mormon missionary
:06:34. > :06:37.somewhere around the world. He has spent time at Capitol Hill. He
:06:38. > :06:43.embodies different American institutions. He is being supported
:06:44. > :06:46.by a group of businessmen who are close to Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney
:06:47. > :06:51.previously ran for president and there was talk he might stand
:06:52. > :06:55.against Trump. He decided not to. He could be facilitating this because
:06:56. > :06:58.he is an unknown name. Evan McMillan, most people have not heard
:06:59. > :07:04.of the sky before this announcement. It is quite interesting. Now we have
:07:05. > :07:09.to look at the mechanics of politics in the US because this isn't the
:07:10. > :07:12.time when someone can stand and have electoral colleges. They would take
:07:13. > :07:16.on as a serious candidates that we will have the sea, unless the
:07:17. > :07:19.Republicans make a huge change and accept him as their candidate, which
:07:20. > :07:24.would take a lot of heavy lifting, we aren't sure how much chancy
:07:25. > :07:28.stance. He is not only charging Trump, he is challenging Clinton and
:07:29. > :07:37.he says neither one represent us. He is young, a fresh name. For those
:07:38. > :07:38.people think they are of the establishment, he is not
:07:39. > :07:42.establishment in terms of his reputation but he is in terms of
:07:43. > :07:47.where he comes from. Is he hoping to usurp Donald Trump were run as an
:07:48. > :07:52.independent? I understand he will be an independent. He says he doesn't
:07:53. > :07:55.want Trump were Clinton. What is significant, picking out the jobs he
:07:56. > :08:00.has, it would tick the boxes for what Republicans believe in.
:08:01. > :08:04.Religion, national security. He cannot win because over half of the
:08:05. > :08:07.state will not take any more nominees. What you Kunduz influence
:08:08. > :08:15.the race by sucking away voters from Donald Trump. This effect is Trump.
:08:16. > :08:19.UK pick one state in particular, Utah, with his Mormon background, if
:08:20. > :08:24.he does well in Utah or Rob Donald Trump from when Utah, that alone
:08:25. > :08:30.could have a huge impact. The Financial Times. China warns that UK
:08:31. > :08:35.religions are poised at a crucial juncture. More developments on what
:08:36. > :08:44.happened a couple of weeks ago at Hinkley Point. Everyone thought this
:08:45. > :08:49.was dead set. Theresa May recently in number ten said she wants to look
:08:50. > :08:54.across these details before sending it off. The interesting point from a
:08:55. > :08:59.diplomatic point of view is that China had a stake in this. George
:09:00. > :09:04.Osborne put a lot of effort into going to China, building relations
:09:05. > :09:07.and sent it is a new power. Theresa May deliberately or inadvertently
:09:08. > :09:13.has raised questions about this and tomorrow the FDR sent the new
:09:14. > :09:19.Chinese ambassador in the UK is saying that China - UK relationship
:09:20. > :09:25.is at a crucial juncture. The UK will keep its door open to China.
:09:26. > :09:30.That is a threat. It is an implied threat. If you plotted there will be
:09:31. > :09:34.consequences. You say Theresa May has decided to sign off on this. She
:09:35. > :09:40.was queasy by all accounts as secretary about this stuff with
:09:41. > :09:46.Chinese. She was and the FT here is saying her teeth edge chief of staff
:09:47. > :09:49.has been critical of China publicly and he is saying giving them
:09:50. > :09:53.investments in such a critical infrastructure position in the UK
:09:54. > :09:58.could allow them to have influence on how computers work and so forth.
:09:59. > :10:01.She has the people around her now saying hang on, we have to take this
:10:02. > :10:06.more seriously. It is interesting the Chinese ambassador told to write
:10:07. > :10:10.an opinion piece in the Financial Times to say very directly what he
:10:11. > :10:15.thinks of this and what the Chinese think of this. It is a veiled
:10:16. > :10:21.threat. It says our relationship will be impacted by this. We'll
:10:22. > :10:26.Theresa May look as if she is caving in to pressure if she agrees to
:10:27. > :10:30.this? Maybe a little. Water and immersing his would we rather the
:10:31. > :10:34.premise to have signed off within weeks of offers this multi-million
:10:35. > :10:40.dollar package that will last for years, possibly up to a decade. When
:10:41. > :10:48.it cost spirals, people will ask why she signed off on it without looking
:10:49. > :10:55.at it. For her to say it is not decided that is not to say it is
:10:56. > :10:59.definitely decided against. The Telegraph. Dogs put down needlessly.
:11:00. > :11:04.Thousands of dangerous dogs apparently been put down needlessly.
:11:05. > :11:08.This is an interesting story. It is for the anniversary of this
:11:09. > :11:13.legislation that came out 25 years ago and it is a review that the
:11:14. > :11:17.RSPCA has called for and said that thousands of dogs are being put to
:11:18. > :11:21.sleep because there are four breeds of dogs that are banned in the UK
:11:22. > :11:26.and if they are seen and considered dangerous they are being put down.
:11:27. > :11:31.What is interesting is that 21 of the 30 people killed in the UK by a
:11:32. > :11:37.dog since 1991 have not been killed by any of those four breeds of dog.
:11:38. > :11:42.It is not being successful in protecting the public and what the
:11:43. > :11:45.RSPCA is saying is we should be looking at the owners and they have
:11:46. > :11:52.the ultimate responsibility, rather than saying we will ban four breeds
:11:53. > :11:59.of dog. What the review is saying we need to review the legislation.
:12:00. > :12:03.Something has got to be changed, doesn't it? If the wrong animals are
:12:04. > :12:10.being put down? I didn't realise how many were being killed. 336 over the
:12:11. > :12:15.last two years. Battersea dogs destroyed 91 animals in the past 12
:12:16. > :12:19.months. When it comes to guns or other things, do you clamp down on
:12:20. > :12:25.what is doing the damage were on the people causing it? That seems to be
:12:26. > :12:29.a convincing case to say we need to do more upstream to stop these
:12:30. > :12:33.people creating the conditions whereby these dogs become dangerous.
:12:34. > :12:39.There are sanctions on owners as well? There must be. For the owner
:12:40. > :12:44.of a dog that attacks someone, that must be a sanction. There is a
:12:45. > :12:50.sanction on them but the ultimate section is coming to the dog because
:12:51. > :12:53.they are being put down. It is seen as an imbalance, especially for...
:12:54. > :12:57.The owners of these dogs did not care as much about the dog.
:12:58. > :13:10.Therefore, the little sanction they get is imbalanced. Onto the matter.
:13:11. > :13:16.The Olympics. The only delivers. Tom and down like a medal. The
:13:17. > :13:22.synchronised diving. It is incredible. Phenomenal watching
:13:23. > :13:27.them. It came down to the last of 36 dives. It was incredibly close with
:13:28. > :13:30.third and fourth and they pulled off a stunning dive, went to the side of
:13:31. > :13:37.the approved, they were cooked with tension and got a good result. Part
:13:38. > :13:43.of this celebration that toppled into the water. The crowd went wild
:13:44. > :13:47.and it added to the day when Britain picked up some medals. Team GB
:13:48. > :13:54.aren't doing too badly. Not bad at all. Tom Bailey came fourth in the
:13:55. > :13:58.London Olympics so good redemption there. They have only been training
:13:59. > :14:02.together for about a year so it is quite a feat to pull off that they
:14:03. > :14:06.have been training for a year. Everyone is waiting for his dive
:14:07. > :14:14.which should happen in about ten days or so. I was at my local
:14:15. > :14:18.swimming pool and it was packed, absolutely packed and it is not
:14:19. > :14:24.usually doubtful. Adam Peaty and the success of Team GB has had so far
:14:25. > :14:30.has given a bit of impetus to get out there and do some swimming. It
:14:31. > :14:35.is fantastic. When you see Britain winning medals. I didn't realise how
:14:36. > :14:47.historic Tom Bailey's historic -- achievements are. He has won 50% of
:14:48. > :14:49.the adults in this category. We haven't had somebody doing
:14:50. > :14:56.incredibly well in this sport for a generation at least. Brilliant. You
:14:57. > :15:00.will be back in about half an hour or so. We will have a second look at
:15:01. > :15:05.The Papers. Stick with us for that. Much more coming up. All the front
:15:06. > :15:06.pages or online on the BBC News website where you can read a review
:15:07. > :15:37.of The Papers. It doesn't suit everyone but if you
:15:38. > :15:38.are a warm weather fan, I have