:00:18. > :00:23.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing
:00:24. > :00:26.us tomorrow. Without either columnist for the mirror and Tim
:00:27. > :00:31.Stanley of the Daily Telegraph. We will start with the Financial Times,
:00:32. > :00:34.reporting on fears that a global collapse in Government borrowing
:00:35. > :00:41.costs is sending British pensions into a funding crisis. The eye
:00:42. > :00:43.pictures Joe Clarke winning gold at the Solomon real. Britain's
:00:44. > :00:48.gold-medal winners are on the top of the Metro as well above the story
:00:49. > :00:51.about a judge was verbally abused by a man and she sent to jail. The
:00:52. > :00:57.Times says Britain's Tony Spiner ended new Hinkley point sea power
:00:58. > :01:03.tasting deal as facing nuclear espionage charges in America. The
:01:04. > :01:06.Telegraph says Scotland Yard is investigating allegations that a
:01:07. > :01:09.British tennis player was to liberally poisoned while competing
:01:10. > :01:13.last month's Wimbledon Championships. The Guardian says
:01:14. > :01:16.Jeremy Corbyn and his deputy Tom Watson are locked in a dispute about
:01:17. > :01:23.whether the party risks being taken over by hard left activists driven
:01:24. > :01:25.out in the 1980s. We will start with the Financial Times. Sutherland
:01:26. > :01:31.strike called off by Eurostar walk-outs fresh to bring fresh
:01:32. > :01:35.travel row. Not a good period for anyone who was to get on a train. It
:01:36. > :01:41.will not be for about 20 years. This isn't, I'm sorry, this isn't a
:01:42. > :01:44.one-off thing that is happening right now, someone has had a big
:01:45. > :01:47.idea and the union has said they do not like it, this is a technology
:01:48. > :01:50.issue. It is almost inevitable that at some point in the future you will
:01:51. > :01:55.have trains operated either by nobody at all or by somebody in a
:01:56. > :01:57.control room a long way away and at the moment we're talking about
:01:58. > :02:02.having trains operated entirely by one person at the front of the
:02:03. > :02:05.train, who drives the trench at the doors, uses CCTV to look around the
:02:06. > :02:08.train and see who is on and off. They have to handle all the
:02:09. > :02:11.problems. There are flaws in that plan and there are good things about
:02:12. > :02:17.it. That is what the argument about. The RMT, who generally run the door
:02:18. > :02:24.side of things, don't want that to happen. The union who runs the
:02:25. > :02:28.driver Kate of things is ambivalent. Both sides are saying that it will
:02:29. > :02:33.not cost jobs now but maybe well in the future. This will go on for a
:02:34. > :02:40.long time. It is a fundamental issue. Indeed. The upshot of this is
:02:41. > :02:46.passenger misery. I used to live in Brighton and I had to take the
:02:47. > :02:50.infamous other line. Hell on wheels, literally. When the wheels were
:02:51. > :02:54.moving! Famously there was one train that literally has never in its
:02:55. > :02:57.entire time of operation ever been on time. Extraordinary. The problem
:02:58. > :03:04.is there's not enough tracks to support all the passengers who want
:03:05. > :03:08.to travel on it. It's a thin corridor that goes from London to
:03:09. > :03:11.Brighton and through Gatwick. An extraordinary amount of pressure on
:03:12. > :03:15.that one line, not enough track, therefore not enough stock. The
:03:16. > :03:19.train said to be short. That is why there is some new bottlenecks and
:03:20. > :03:26.delays in that area. There have been repeated promises to invest in it,
:03:27. > :03:30.particularly Gatwick may be expanding. If it were expanding, the
:03:31. > :03:33.pressure on that line will be enormous. They are saying we need to
:03:34. > :03:36.create new technologies and cut costs and have faster and better
:03:37. > :03:41.moving trains but the staff do not want to see in Pak... The trains on
:03:42. > :03:47.Server now are very old and short and have not had investment on the
:03:48. > :03:57.line for a very long time -- sunburn. If we go to the times, real
:03:58. > :04:03.striker spent ?7 million on its own times. Yes, rather than on members
:04:04. > :04:09.benefits. It rakes in more times -- five times more members fees a dozen
:04:10. > :04:17.benefits. The Secretary is ?126,000 in pay and benefits. On the one
:04:18. > :04:23.hand, there's is interesting for any proprietor who is stuck trying to
:04:24. > :04:32.get to work and earn 30 grand, and you any grand. But unions exist not
:04:33. > :04:35.just to give members benefits but also amount to borrow money so they
:04:36. > :04:41.can deal with strike action. Unions provide help at work and pressure in
:04:42. > :04:46.legal advice and negotiations. In theory, if you're union isn't paying
:04:47. > :04:50.benefits out, that could be because your union is doing a great job, you
:04:51. > :04:55.do not have to receive the benefits. You are paying your subs for the
:04:56. > :04:58.union to do what you wanted to. Having said that, some people find
:04:59. > :05:02.this slightly hypocritical when I union says it is fighting a class
:05:03. > :05:06.war for the general interest of the workers and its staff are being paid
:05:07. > :05:09.six figures and on the other hand by supporting the interests of one
:05:10. > :05:13.group of workers, they are damaging the interest of another group of
:05:14. > :05:23.workers, those per-pupil trying to get to work. Like you to be. Well...
:05:24. > :05:28.We sit here and moan. Chinese Hinkley backer is accused of
:05:29. > :05:34.espionage. Yes, it is bound to happen, that someone who is behind
:05:35. > :05:38.the Hinkley plant bid from China, the funding 33% of this new build.
:05:39. > :05:42.It will be accused of espionage and spying. There was a story last year
:05:43. > :05:44.talking about that if they provide the computers that operate the
:05:45. > :05:48.Hinkley plant, they could write called into those computers that
:05:49. > :05:54.would enable them remotely to shut down Hinkley of the wanted to --
:05:55. > :06:00.code. It would reduce Britain's energy output. That is what Theresa
:06:01. > :06:05.May is worried about. She is worried it will cost billions of pounds
:06:06. > :06:11.more. Why did George Osborne like it? He is obsessed with China. No
:06:12. > :06:16.one is suggesting Theresa May does not love China. She is more
:06:17. > :06:21.cautious, she inherited the contract and said that she was to review it.
:06:22. > :06:25.It was claimed when she was Home Secretary she raised question about
:06:26. > :06:30.security. George Osborne's approach to trade was that Britain should be
:06:31. > :06:33.open to the world and there was an enthusiasm for being magnetic
:06:34. > :06:38.towards Chinese money. This premise has a different approach. Let's be
:06:39. > :06:40.cautious to watch that, which is not unreasonable, given the record of
:06:41. > :06:47.some of these Chinese companies when it comes to espionage. Will she say
:06:48. > :06:51.no to the deal? Don't be surprised. It is a bad deal. It is a bad deal
:06:52. > :06:54.with EDF and with the Chinese. They are made we are paying for
:06:55. > :06:57.electricity, what we should be spending our money on and how we
:06:58. > :07:03.will generate energy in the future. This is not the best way to spend
:07:04. > :07:08.it. Agreed, but what is on the table? What else? There is the
:07:09. > :07:12.possibility of investment in small micro nuclear generators which will
:07:13. > :07:15.be on every single town, that could be even more controversial when it
:07:16. > :07:20.comes to planning. The technology isn't quite ready. As of the legacy
:07:21. > :07:24.of the coalition Government and the Tories and to the extent the last
:07:25. > :07:30.days of labour. The body has put in place big legacy projects that would
:07:31. > :07:36.provide energy for 20 years down the line. They were too busy trying to
:07:37. > :07:38.reduce carbon emissions. Trying to do what was politically necessary
:07:39. > :07:43.now, not thinking about down the line when they were not in power,
:07:44. > :07:48.thinking about how people would cope. We should have been investing
:07:49. > :07:54.in tidal energy, which does not rely on the weather. I was going to say
:07:55. > :07:56.tidal energy does not rely on the weather, sunshine or wind, it is
:07:57. > :08:01.constant, it will always be there and you do not have two very
:08:02. > :08:06.radioactive stuff in the ground. It is amazing and we have put money
:08:07. > :08:13.into it. There you go, that is the future allegedly. Huffington Post,
:08:14. > :08:22.Jeremy Corbyn. We forgot to talk about it even though it is not a
:08:23. > :08:27.newspaper. Easy, Tiger. High on! Jeromy Corbyn is angry that Owen
:08:28. > :08:35.Smith has received an endorsement from GNB, the union. He said it is
:08:36. > :08:37.wrong. Some unescorted from within the coming campaign said this is due
:08:38. > :08:42.to right-wing elements. The must berate wing elements within the GMB,
:08:43. > :08:47.because according to the illustrious Huffington Post, a total of 60% of
:08:48. > :08:51.the union members voted to back Smith. That suggests there are a lot
:08:52. > :08:56.of right-wing elements full stop it should be added that the GNB
:08:57. > :08:59.apparently represents people who work on the Trident missile
:09:00. > :09:05.programme, so perhaps they have some interests. And Jeremy Corbin voted
:09:06. > :09:08.against that. The GNB endorsed Ed Miliband in 2010, generally regarded
:09:09. > :09:13.as the soft left candidate in that election. The idea that this is a
:09:14. > :09:17.union with a particular history of being Blairite or backing the right
:09:18. > :09:19.doesn't suggest that is true. Maybe there is some split with those
:09:20. > :09:24.people who have joined the party recently and have been disparaging
:09:25. > :09:27.about the new activist and those members of the trade union who may
:09:28. > :09:32.be more all school labour and more working class in the northern part
:09:33. > :09:37.of the country. Corbyn madness. As a writer for the daily miller, does
:09:38. > :09:40.this suggest that Jeromy Cobham will not fly away with the leadership
:09:41. > :09:44.contest in the way everybody expects? It suggests that if you
:09:45. > :09:48.ballot your members before you decide which person you are backing
:09:49. > :09:53.in the leadership contest then you may find that the average person on
:09:54. > :09:59.the street thinks Jeromy Corbyn will not be able to lead. Are you
:10:00. > :10:04.suggesting he balloted his members? Yes, and I might unite refused to. A
:10:05. > :10:07.Power Mac mirror survey found that 62% of all trade union members
:10:08. > :10:13.didn't want Jeromy Corbyn to lead the party in the general election.
:10:14. > :10:18.If you do not think he will win a premise the real contest, should he
:10:19. > :10:21.be leading the party now? But there are individual votes for this trade
:10:22. > :10:28.union members, they can only take as a guide what's the leadership says.
:10:29. > :10:36.That it, this could be irrelevant. Turnout is an issue. If you are not
:10:37. > :10:39.being able to effect to your union's stance on something, do you actually
:10:40. > :10:46.engage in the process? Things like that. It is interesting to think, we
:10:47. > :10:52.may see a return to the old dynamic of the unions and the centre-right
:10:53. > :10:55.labour or moderate Labour leadership being the one to oppose and block
:10:56. > :11:02.the left. That is traditionally what used to happen before the 1980s. It
:11:03. > :11:07.used to be that coalition kept the left. I will have to stop you there
:11:08. > :11:12.because we are going to go to Rio. Max Whitlock, there he is on the
:11:13. > :11:19.right, he is going to get bronze for the all-round gymnastics final. He
:11:20. > :11:26.is not the guy in a suit, is he? That is not Max Whitlock. Doesn't
:11:27. > :11:30.look like a gymnastics Mac the men's gymnastic team just missing out on
:11:31. > :11:41.the group medal a couple of days ago. But some success now for Team
:11:42. > :11:49.GB. In the gym with Max Whitlock. Let's dip into the commentary.
:11:50. > :12:21.Executive committee member of the International gymnastics Federation.
:12:22. > :12:29.Bronze medal list, representing Great Britain,.
:12:30. > :12:44.CHEERING Max Whitlock.
:12:45. > :12:52.OK, Max Whitlock about to get his medal there. He got two four years
:12:53. > :13:01.ago, to bronzes and now he gets another one for the all-round
:13:02. > :13:06.gymnastics final. He was actually in contention with another Brit. He is
:13:07. > :13:12.the one who gets metal round his neck. And a handshake. And a little
:13:13. > :13:18.something or other. What did you just get then as well as the medal?
:13:19. > :13:25.Who knows? Jim and membership? A snow globe? The weather has been
:13:26. > :13:30.absolutely appalling down in Rio, more like rather in Rio today. No
:13:31. > :13:33.disrespect to Rotherham, by the way. Let's move on to the Daily
:13:34. > :13:38.Telegraph. We have only got two minutes, forget the Telegraph.
:13:39. > :13:43.Sorry, mate. It ain't happening. Let's go to the Financial Times.
:13:44. > :13:52.Donald Trump. It's the Donald Trump. Now, Tim, you believe the press has
:13:53. > :13:57.blown this out of proportion. You have this for 25 seconds. His
:13:58. > :14:01.comments yesterday concerning the second Amendment. You may argument
:14:02. > :14:05.Delyn X argue he is guilty of a lack of clarity but what he is not guilty
:14:06. > :14:09.of is suggesting anyone should Hillary Clinton. He very obviously
:14:10. > :14:13.said, if you read the entire transcript is, Hillary went at once
:14:14. > :14:17.to rewrite the concert using, someone should stop her, I guess the
:14:18. > :14:21.second Amendment is people may do that, he meant that the NRA will
:14:22. > :14:25.lobby her. If you are going to beat him on anything, beat him on the
:14:26. > :14:29.many things that he said had been dreadful but not something he did
:14:30. > :14:32.not say. If you address gun toting Americans and said a lady over there
:14:33. > :14:36.was a take your guns away, what are you going to do about it, lads? They
:14:37. > :14:39.will probably suggest shooting her, especially if they are a bit
:14:40. > :14:48.bonkers, was quite a lot of them are. Same happened with Henry the
:14:49. > :14:51.second when he said he will rid me of this priest? And they went down
:14:52. > :14:56.and slaughtered Thomas Becket. He had to do a pilgrimage and apologise
:14:57. > :15:01.and the whole world party at murdered Thomas Becket. I do not
:15:02. > :15:07.think Donald Trump has heard of Becket. In 2008, Hillary Clinton
:15:08. > :15:10.said Barack Obama could get shot before the June California primary.
:15:11. > :15:13.People say stupid things before the course of a primary, pinning down on
:15:14. > :15:18.the things they actually said, not on what they didn't say. If they add
:15:19. > :15:20.that lacking in clarity, he should not be giving people instructions
:15:21. > :15:27.about where to fly their warplanes and things like that. "Go And bomb
:15:28. > :15:33.over there somewhere." No, I meant the other place! You're going to be
:15:34. > :15:35.back in 30 minutes to look more of the stories. Many thanks for that.
:15:36. > :15:43.Thanks Matt Whitlock for interrupting eyewear Papers. Stay
:15:44. > :15:46.with us, all of the papers are online. You can read a detailed
:15:47. > :15:50.review of all the newspapers and you can see as there as well. Each
:15:51. > :15:54.night's edition of the papers will be posted on the page shortly after
:15:55. > :15:58.we have finished. Thank you and thank you for watching. You will be
:15:59. > :15:59.back at 1115. Let's look at the