:00:11. > :00:13.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers
:00:14. > :00:16.With me are political commentator Jo Phillips
:00:17. > :00:19.and Nigel Nelson, political editor of the Sunday Mirror
:00:20. > :00:29.Good evening to you both. Let's have a quick look through the front
:00:30. > :00:30.pages. The Telegraph calls
:00:31. > :00:32.the Rio Games Britain's greatest The paper's main story
:00:33. > :00:36.is a crackdown on cosmetic surgeons who will be named and shamed
:00:37. > :00:40.for poor practice. The Observer leads with a call
:00:41. > :00:44.from the London Mayor to Labour Party members telling
:00:45. > :00:46.them to back Owen Smith Sadiq Khan says Jeremy Corbyn has
:00:47. > :00:52.been a disaster for the party. Nicola Adams's gold
:00:53. > :00:54.medal win is pictured The paper reports on warnings
:00:55. > :00:59.that Rio may be Team GB's last great games,
:01:00. > :01:04.if economic problems force a cut The Mail on Sunday says Theresa May
:01:05. > :01:09.has been dragged into a party scandal involving
:01:10. > :01:29.allegations of bullying. Jo, let's start, a terrific Olympic
:01:30. > :01:33.games altogether and this lady whose name will be bandied about a lot
:01:34. > :01:41.now, Nicola Adams, didn't she do well? And wasn't that a lovely clip
:01:42. > :01:49.we just heard? The whole thing for me has been this joy of people who
:01:50. > :01:53.were not household names a few weeks ago but the real reward for all
:01:54. > :02:00.their hard work, they have all been so brilliant, beaming brightly with
:02:01. > :02:11.great pride. She shrieked and hot about! As you would. So here we are,
:02:12. > :02:18.we got 65 in 2012, 29 gold medals and we are at the moment on 63, with
:02:19. > :02:25.26 cold, another five or six we could win overnight. It is
:02:26. > :02:34.extraordinary. The Sunday Telegraph, there we are, the US, Great Britain.
:02:35. > :02:39.China has over a billion people and there is Britain doing as well as
:02:40. > :02:45.they are. I didn't start these games with any great enthusiasm, it seemed
:02:46. > :02:51.what could top London? So I felt I would tune in every so often but
:02:52. > :02:56.suddenly it captured you and the fact that Team GB has done so
:02:57. > :03:02.incredibly well, amazing to everybody, not least some of the
:03:03. > :03:09.Team GB people who obviously weren't expecting this kind of result. It's
:03:10. > :03:16.a bit awkward for newspaper people because of the timing. The timing is
:03:17. > :03:21.hopeless. We're a bit behind but are a long way behind. But what we have
:03:22. > :03:26.been doing, last Sunday we brought out a 3M addition on Sunday morning
:03:27. > :03:32.of the Sunday Mirror, so we are trying to keep as much of the news
:03:33. > :03:36.that is going on in the papers, there was a team staying up until
:03:37. > :03:44.late last night to get it all in. Were you watching it all? Bits and
:03:45. > :03:51.pieces but it felt like Rio, there were problems with the building and
:03:52. > :03:54.the Zika virus, it almost appeared suddenly and this waterfall of
:03:55. > :04:01.extraordinary... There was no build-up. It seemed to suddenly
:04:02. > :04:08.happen. The Olympics will be in a couple of weeks, really? It's been
:04:09. > :04:11.brilliant. We will talk more about the Olympics but stay with the
:04:12. > :04:19.Sunday Telegraph for something different here. Cosmetic clinics, a
:04:20. > :04:30.story that has been rattling around but now they will be named and
:04:31. > :04:33.shamed for bot operations. And regulated, because it seems these
:04:34. > :04:41.clinics do not have to be regulated but now the idea is the Care Quality
:04:42. > :04:45.Commission will come in and give a star rating like a hotel, so if you
:04:46. > :04:50.want cosmetic surgery you can choose a clinic which is outstanding, good,
:04:51. > :04:56.requires improvement for inadequate. One assumes you would avoid
:04:57. > :05:02.inadequate ones, but what is astonishing is this has not happened
:05:03. > :05:10.before. Hospitals and standard medical treatment get it. I was
:05:11. > :05:16.surprised, there was a survey from the British Association of aesthetic
:05:17. > :05:21.plastic surgeons. I assume if you want something done privately like
:05:22. > :05:26.breast augmentation, you look up an advert and go to a clinic to have it
:05:27. > :05:31.done, but what surprised me in this article is that they mention laser
:05:32. > :05:37.eye clinics where you would have thought you would have to go through
:05:38. > :05:44.your doctor or ophthalmologists, you cannot just walk in and ask for
:05:45. > :05:49.laser eye surgery. I had a cataract sorted out but never laser eye
:05:50. > :05:55.surgery, but I would assume that was a process, it would have been if I
:05:56. > :05:59.had surgery, that goes through a doctor and it would start with the
:06:00. > :06:04.GP that you wouldn't just knock on the door and say, can you laser my
:06:05. > :06:12.eye? You didn't get as far as surgery. I just had a lens replaced,
:06:13. > :06:19.which is straightforward surgery. But how did you know the person you
:06:20. > :06:22.were dealing with? I have health insurance, I was referred to a
:06:23. > :06:28.consultant on their list, started off with a GP, I went through the
:06:29. > :06:33.normal systems on the basis of that, it wasn't a matter of flicking
:06:34. > :06:38.through a phone book and say that looks good, and it was at an eye
:06:39. > :06:44.hospital, so I thought I was probably in fairly good hands. You
:06:45. > :06:51.seem fine, but at the back of this the roster risk when it does go
:06:52. > :06:56.wrong, and if it does it can be catastrophic, not just for facial
:06:57. > :07:00.things but when it comes to size. There have been cases of people
:07:01. > :07:08.going abroad for cosmetic, in the true sense of cosmetic, for breast
:07:09. > :07:12.or bottom augmentation, where it has been very catastrophic and in some
:07:13. > :07:20.cases there have been severe outcomes from it, and things like
:07:21. > :07:24.liposuction, they all come under the heading of cosmetic surgery but if
:07:25. > :07:31.you're going to spend thousands on doing this privately, you
:07:32. > :07:36.wouldn't... All medical practices ought to be regulated, so the fact
:07:37. > :07:41.these haven't been, Jeremy Hunt says it's high time this was done and I
:07:42. > :07:47.wonder why prior Health Secretary 's have not done this. I suppose what
:07:48. > :07:54.you're saying is that they assume people that it is OK. But if you see
:07:55. > :08:01.one that has per on the front door you would not go in! Let's go back
:08:02. > :08:07.to the games, and the Independent have Nicola Adams on their front
:08:08. > :08:13.page, celebrating her victory, and also a story of Rio 2016, the last
:08:14. > :08:20.great aims for Britain. We have had one quite good, one amazing and what
:08:21. > :08:23.is this about? It's a bit incoherent because this is based on what
:08:24. > :08:32.appears to be an interview with Tessa Jowell, who was the Olympics
:08:33. > :08:37.Minister, and what she is quoted as saying is if in 2020 we are looking
:08:38. > :08:42.back at the Team GB that has not performed at the level it did in Rio
:08:43. > :08:50.for London, it will be fair to say Richard was one reason. That is the
:08:51. > :08:56.big words there. You think all right, but basically George Osborne
:08:57. > :09:02.in his last Autumn Statement in November pledged a 29% increase in
:09:03. > :09:08.funding for sport, that has yet to be confirmed as that commitment
:09:09. > :09:16.continuing under his successor, Philip Hammond. UK sport, the body
:09:17. > :09:21.that users were to spend about ?450 million per four-year cycle, are
:09:22. > :09:27.fearful but they haven't even got off the podium yet, let's not start
:09:28. > :09:32.talking it down, let's look at this and see where it's going. But if
:09:33. > :09:38.does go to the core of this, people save white or we suddenly doing so
:09:39. > :09:43.well, hosts tend to do better but then you go to Rio and what a
:09:44. > :09:50.surprise, we have done well, but funding has been crucial. At this .1
:09:51. > :09:54.ought to give John Major a pat on the back, who started the process,
:09:55. > :09:59.because without the lottery, a lot of athletes could not have got the
:10:00. > :10:03.training they have and that is something that builds up over the
:10:04. > :10:08.years so it is because of that we are now where we are, so I agree
:10:09. > :10:15.with Jo, I am not sure where Tessa Jowell is going with this because I
:10:16. > :10:18.would assume lottery funding will be unaffected by Brexit. If funding on
:10:19. > :10:25.top of that does not go through there may be a problem, but were not
:10:26. > :10:29.even finished these games, there is a long way before Tokyo and on the
:10:30. > :10:35.basis of that lets see what happens next. It has been improved from this
:10:36. > :10:40.that if you put money into an elite sports where you are most likely to
:10:41. > :10:47.win Wessels, see what happens. You will get medals out. So there is a
:10:48. > :10:53.sense of the poor relation but I have I idea for funding the next
:10:54. > :10:56.Olympic Games, I think it's marvellous, if every premiership
:10:57. > :11:01.footballer Steve a weeks worth of their wages every month and put it
:11:02. > :11:05.in a park for the next four years, they wouldn't notice and we would
:11:06. > :11:13.have enough funding to support it. It's an idea! We did hear it here
:11:14. > :11:21.first. Let's go back to the gritty world, and your turn to start,
:11:22. > :11:30.Nigel. The Observer, and that is Sadiq Khan, the London mayor, a
:11:31. > :11:35.successful election he had, he tells Labour they have the wrong leader.
:11:36. > :11:40.Which is interesting because Sadiq Khan has been trying hard not to say
:11:41. > :11:44.who he will support in this leadership election, every time he
:11:45. > :11:52.is asked he has dodged it, and he is now chosen the Observer to psych,
:11:53. > :11:59.I'm an Owen Smith man, I endorse him, and he says Jeremy Corbyn is a
:12:00. > :12:04.disaster, he cannot organise a team, 80% of his MPs would trust him and
:12:05. > :12:08.he has to go. Curious that Sadiq Khan choose as this moment to do
:12:09. > :12:13.this and not earlier in the week when he was asked the question. He
:12:14. > :12:20.was interviewed by the BBC Two days ago. And he said he wouldn't answer
:12:21. > :12:26.it. We always suspected that said the town would be an Owen Smith
:12:27. > :12:30.occur, we know he was never keen on Jeremy Corbyn, during the London
:12:31. > :12:35.election he did his best to keep Jeremy Corbyn at arm's length and
:12:36. > :12:42.when he was elected to the job, there was that uncovered meeting
:12:43. > :12:49.between the two of them, so this does not come as a surprise. What
:12:50. > :12:54.Sarah -- what surprises me is the ferocity of the attack and the fact
:12:55. > :13:01.he pins it on what Corbyn did or did not say about Brexit. He has come
:13:02. > :13:06.out all guns blazing only two days after being pushed on the BBC on who
:13:07. > :13:12.he was supporting and I suspect the reality of dregs of jitters, even
:13:13. > :13:17.though the sky has not fallen on our heads yet, here is the Mayor of
:13:18. > :13:21.London dealing with investment and uncertainty, especially in the
:13:22. > :13:29.construction sector, and worries about London, he is thinking if only
:13:30. > :13:35.Jeremy had stood up and I sense a real personal anger in this that he
:13:36. > :13:39.didn't come out and he says just a couple of weeks before the Brexit
:13:40. > :13:46.referendum, people didn't know where the Labour Party stood, and I think
:13:47. > :13:52.this is almost support for Owen Smith but it also recognises that
:13:53. > :13:57.Jeremy Corbyn is going to win and that's the other point. That makes
:13:58. > :14:05.me wonder whether we could look ahead more, if we think Jeremy
:14:06. > :14:12.Corbyn will win, the Tories do well, Labour will need a new leader.
:14:13. > :14:18.Possibly Mr Khan. Am I being too cynical? If you work on his timing
:14:19. > :14:23.that his first term will end with the next election, it will depend on
:14:24. > :14:24.whether Mr Khan wants to go for his second term as London mayor.
:14:25. > :14:58.You'll both be back at 11:30pm for another look at the stories
:14:59. > :15:01.I'm David Eades and, from here in the world's newsroom,