:00:17. > :00:24.Hello, welcome to our look ahead to all of the papers, I will be with
:00:25. > :00:28.Claire Coen, the women's editor for the Telegraph, and Charlie Wells.
:00:29. > :00:33.The features editor. We will start with the Metro and its front page
:00:34. > :00:38.splashes gongs for gold, the paper says that the Prime Minister is
:00:39. > :00:42.poised to the Olympic heroes with a debut job on us. The Financial Times
:00:43. > :00:47.leads with what is called a post Brexit pledge not to allow Britain's
:00:48. > :00:52.exit to drive European project into reverse. The Daily Telegraph quotes
:00:53. > :00:56.a new report from the student of Cancer research saying that, and
:00:57. > :01:01.replacement therapy triples the risk of breast cancer. The Daily Express
:01:02. > :01:03.says that cause duties border security in Europe have sparked
:01:04. > :01:22.fury. And women are still far adrift when it and promotion compare to
:01:23. > :01:24.men. The paper quotes the stewed for fiscal studies that says that on
:01:25. > :01:27.average women and 18% less than average. The Daily Mail leads on
:01:28. > :01:29.what it calls the rising toll of patients seriously hurt in blunders
:01:30. > :01:32.by the NHS. And the Times says that China has taken control of North Sea
:01:33. > :01:37.oil drilling, it calls their rigs strategic weapons. Talking about the
:01:38. > :01:48.Olympics. Far more elevated. Gongs for gold, made to honour Olympic
:01:49. > :01:53.heroes. Sir Mo, Daimler. Yes. Shows no sign of abating, Olympic fever,
:01:54. > :01:59.we're told that they will rip up guidelines and honour the triumph.
:02:00. > :02:03.We will become the first home country to perform so well. It
:02:04. > :02:07.deserves to be celebrated, and I wonder whether this will be seen as
:02:08. > :02:11.an extra incentive for young athletes coming up, that they might
:02:12. > :02:17.get a gong at the end of it all. I'm sure that there will no doubt be
:02:18. > :02:22.some curmudgeons saying, that the golden system is flawed and has lost
:02:23. > :02:27.its meaning. And also a very nice detail, on the front of the Metro,
:02:28. > :02:34.saying there will be recognition of support teams behind the medallists.
:02:35. > :02:39.Coaches, nutritionists. The backroom staff have not had much recognition
:02:40. > :02:44.so that is really nice. So what is the problem then, and the stylist of
:02:45. > :02:50.Mr Hobsbawm, potentially being put forward with a gong -- Mr Osborne.
:02:51. > :02:58.Perhaps there was not a problem. I'm sure many would disagree. Each one
:02:59. > :03:04.of these gongs apparently costs, each one of these medals cost ?4.1
:03:05. > :03:09.million apparently. That is expensive, not the question has
:03:10. > :03:12.been, funding Olympic development. What the UK has certainly seen is
:03:13. > :03:19.that when you pour re-sources into the athletic training, there seems
:03:20. > :03:24.to be a benefit. A clear benefit. But no one seems to mind really, out
:03:25. > :03:30.in the wider public because while we have all got the feel-good factor,
:03:31. > :03:35.secondly it is not public money taken in taxes, it is national
:03:36. > :03:43.lottery money that we have all volunteered by scratching cards. It
:03:44. > :03:48.doesn't feel as if we had been scanned in this? It has not been
:03:49. > :03:51.taken from our pockets in the same way, and in the last few turbulent
:03:52. > :03:55.weeks we definitely need this to bring the country back together and
:03:56. > :03:59.everybody is feeling really up about it. It is a feel-good factor for the
:04:00. > :04:06.nation so why not award the people who made it happen. Exactly, one of
:04:07. > :04:11.the gold medallists in the four by 100 relay, for the night estates in
:04:12. > :04:15.swimming was a certain Ryan Lochte. He has been a naughty boy by his own
:04:16. > :04:19.admission. He was not as candid as he should have been about a
:04:20. > :04:25.so-called robbery. Now his sponsors are fleeing for the hills? Writes so
:04:26. > :04:30.this story certainly picking up steam, Americans pay a lot of
:04:31. > :04:34.attention to corporate sponsors, and a lot of attention to the
:04:35. > :04:37.commercials at the Olympics. As a child I am talking about the
:04:38. > :04:43.competitions but also about the commercials that flooded the
:04:44. > :05:03.airwaves. So here, we have got a major former sponsor, like
:05:04. > :05:07.Ralph Lauren, Speedo, saying that they can no longer back him, because
:05:08. > :05:09.his behaviour is not necessarily in line with their brands. It seems
:05:10. > :05:11.like it will cost him about $1 million. It is going to be
:05:12. > :05:14.expensive. America ended at the top of the medals table and usually
:05:15. > :05:17.does, usually more than the Russians or the Chinese. Is this the kind of
:05:18. > :05:19.incident that could take the gloss off it? Yes there has been stories
:05:20. > :05:22.about how this is overshadowing a lot of positive news stories about
:05:23. > :05:24.certain athletes that have broken milestones. What we also know is
:05:25. > :05:28.that the limb picks is about soft power. It is about countries
:05:29. > :05:35.projecting positive narratives about their people, and right now, the
:05:36. > :05:45.US's soft power is tarnished a little bit with this story. It would
:05:46. > :05:50.be great to focus on somebody, instead, we are focusing on an
:05:51. > :05:55.athlete, and his misbehaviour. Wasn't he trying to become a reality
:05:56. > :06:03.TV star? A lot of Olympic athletes will go on to try and lay their
:06:04. > :06:07.success. But Americans pay a lot of attention to these large
:06:08. > :06:11.corporations, and it could put them at risk. And I think Americans are
:06:12. > :06:16.less forgiving, Ryan Lochte was saying that he was intoxicated and
:06:17. > :06:21.he can't remember what happened. He was immature. It wasn't as candid in
:06:22. > :06:27.his own words stop and we might be more forgiving than Americans.
:06:28. > :06:35.Rulli? Yes we hold them to a very high standard, the drinking. But it
:06:36. > :06:40.is not what he did but the life. Yes it is the cover-up, always the
:06:41. > :06:46.cover-up. European leaders talking about an EU army. You can argue that
:06:47. > :06:52.they are trying to cover up the cracks in the European Union after
:06:53. > :06:58.Brexit? They are insisting that they are not disheartened. It is going to
:06:59. > :07:05.be fine. You have got this impactful picture of them striding, in a James
:07:06. > :07:09.Bond thing, very choreographed. As the Daily Telegraph says. But the
:07:10. > :07:13.story is about plans for the EU army, which is something that we
:07:14. > :07:15.keep on hearing about time and again, apparently they are going to
:07:16. > :07:19.accelerate his plan in the wake of the British departure. The
:07:20. > :07:23.suggestion is that Britain was something of a stumbling block. And
:07:24. > :07:27.they are talking about sharing intelligence, sharing defence for
:07:28. > :07:33.sis. This is not the end of Europe's. Not at all. Is this the
:07:34. > :07:38.kind of thing, that would have the Pentagon thinking wow, or oh my god.
:07:39. > :07:44.Yes, what is interesting, is it is talking about this European army
:07:45. > :07:49.risks undermining Nato's role as the primary European defence block. So
:07:50. > :08:02.what would the relationship be? It is a tricking one. Daschle tricky
:08:03. > :08:09.one. Onto HRT risks. HRT triples the risk of breast cancer. Is it a
:08:10. > :08:13.reputable study? We hear those studies about HRT, mired in
:08:14. > :08:18.confusion and controversy, since being the 80s or the 90s miracle
:08:19. > :08:22.drug that was supposed to help menopausal women feed a lot better.
:08:23. > :08:27.This is a reputable is buddy from the astute of Cancer research, under
:08:28. > :08:31.powers and women over 40 years. There is node and nine that it is
:08:32. > :08:35.comprehensive. They are saying that women who use it are three times
:08:36. > :08:40.more likely to develop breast cancer, they say that the risks of
:08:41. > :08:44.illness, taking the drug had been previously understated. That comes
:08:45. > :08:49.in contrast to nice changing their guidelines at the end of last year,
:08:50. > :08:53.saying that women need not suffer in silence and more doctors should be
:08:54. > :08:57.prescribing this. It is a major study but I feel that the confusion
:08:58. > :09:02.around it is going to continue and it is hard to say that it is
:09:03. > :09:05.absolutely safe. Like a lot of things in the medical sphere,
:09:06. > :09:09.difficult to know what the truth is, and what you can believe and not
:09:10. > :09:15.believe. It is really important to read past the headline, we see that
:09:16. > :09:22.scary word in the headline, and then be go on to read, about individual
:09:23. > :09:28.choice. And about, how the symptoms of menopause can be "Hellish" for
:09:29. > :09:33.women. So perhaps there are benefits of this drug that outweigh the
:09:34. > :09:36.potential risks. That highlights how difficult medical decisions are,
:09:37. > :09:44.they are not necessarily black or white. There is a lot of talk about
:09:45. > :09:50.Ethan, you may have family risk. By dating this gives people the answers
:09:51. > :09:57.they are looking for. Talking about medicine. Patients is the hurt in
:09:58. > :10:01.NHS blunders? Right, a lot of medical experts saying that blunders
:10:02. > :10:06.are a sign of health care system is under strain. We have been reading
:10:07. > :10:11.time and again about the NHS, I think from a journalistic
:10:12. > :10:17.perspective, we should keep in mind, this story, compares figures to the
:10:18. > :10:22.current year, two 2005. Why we are looking at that particular year. We
:10:23. > :10:28.also see some figures compared to 2014, why are we looking at those
:10:29. > :10:32.particular years. It says that the patient treated by the HS, 90
:10:33. > :10:39.minutes following a serious medical blunder. More than 6000 incidents
:10:40. > :10:43.involving accidental cuts, punches, perforations or haemorrhages? It
:10:44. > :10:48.sounds pretty grim, critics of Jeremy Hunt's seven-day NHS will use
:10:49. > :10:56.this as ammunition and talk about poor training levels and inadequate
:10:57. > :11:02.staff. NHS statisticians comparing NHS figures with other NHS figures,
:11:03. > :11:07.it is hard to pick it. I think more detail is needed really. The quality
:11:08. > :11:14.drive fails to barge the wage gap for higher educated women over two
:11:15. > :11:21.decades. This problem has persisted, despite efforts at cutting the gap.
:11:22. > :11:25.It is pretty depressing reading, two studies out tomorrow, one is from
:11:26. > :11:31.the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Talking about women earning 18% less
:11:32. > :11:37.than men. Closing date pay gap which is stalling, and one from the CM
:11:38. > :11:42.icon that how male managers, are 40% more likely to be promoted than
:11:43. > :11:46.female managers. I think the main point for me to take out of it is
:11:47. > :11:51.the motherhood penalty, which is something that rumbles on and on. It
:11:52. > :11:57.is good to have cold stats to talk about this. Women, maternity
:11:58. > :12:04.discrimination essentially, for women aged 26 to 35, the gender pay
:12:05. > :12:09.gap is 6% but when you get to 36, he jumps to 20%, women going off to
:12:10. > :12:15.maternity leave, and suddenly, they find that they come back and they
:12:16. > :12:19.are sidelined. I think it is 54,000 women a year RS to make it to be
:12:20. > :12:24.squeezed out of work through maternity leave. -- are estimated.
:12:25. > :12:31.And there is not a lot of transparency. Is that the problem,
:12:32. > :12:38.no transparency, sexist bosses who whatever? There are a number of
:12:39. > :12:43.factors, what we are seeing is time. Overcoming, centuries of inequality,
:12:44. > :12:47.takes a long time. Something that is interesting is that we are starting
:12:48. > :12:52.to see the narrative shift towards the upper echelons, women who are
:12:53. > :12:56.highly educated. The Wall Street Journal had a story about corporate
:12:57. > :13:04.boards, talking about more diversity, so that is an interesting
:13:05. > :13:09.change, in the debate. Overturning centuries of patriarchal system in
:13:10. > :13:13.20 years? But it is interesting, you say sex but I think a lot of it is
:13:14. > :13:17.more than sexism, a male boss might think that a woman wants a less
:13:18. > :13:26.challenging role, when they come back from maternity leave. Right we
:13:27. > :13:32.are gay to be purely sex is now, we are going to talk about -- we are
:13:33. > :13:38.going to be purely sexist now, we are going to talk about Poldark.
:13:39. > :13:44.Within 15 minutes he's bearing his chest apparently. Let us see it, why
:13:45. > :13:54.not. We haven't got the picture. Oh no! This is going to be acquired
:13:55. > :13:59.viewing for a lot of people over the next few weeks. It is quite
:14:00. > :14:03.interesting because between the first series and the second series,
:14:04. > :14:11.quite a few people have been po-faced. Aidan Turner, his co-stars
:14:12. > :14:16.have said. We have got our act together, there it is. They have
:14:17. > :14:22.said that all of the focus on his top list shots is sexist. In the
:14:23. > :14:28.first years they didn't know how big a deal this was going to be, they're
:14:29. > :14:32.coming into the second series with a knowing hive. I don't think it is
:14:33. > :14:36.any car incident is that within 15 minutes we will see his chest. But
:14:37. > :14:41.all I can say is that as a male, seeing that image, if I didn't have
:14:42. > :14:48.my kind of chest I would not be wearing my seat right now. Bad is it
:14:49. > :14:53.for the papers, don't forget, all the front pages are online -- that
:14:54. > :15:00.is it. It is all there for you, seven days a week. You can see us
:15:01. > :15:06.there too, with each edition of the papers being posted shortly after we
:15:07. > :15:07.finish. So thanks again, thanks to you. Much more at the top of the
:15:08. > :15:23.tower. -- the tower. A warm night for many of us turning
:15:24. > :15:24.misty and murky, and over the next