:00:00. > :00:19.Hello and welcome to our look-ahead to what the papers will be
:00:20. > :00:22.With me are the political commentator Jo Phillips
:00:23. > :00:32.and the Sunday Mirror's political editor, Nigel Nelson.
:00:33. > :00:36.Let's have a look at some of the front pages before we discuss them
:00:37. > :00:39.in detail. The Observer leads with a warning
:00:40. > :00:42.about the health of the NHS - top bosses saying it's
:00:43. > :00:45.on the brink of collapse. Meanwhile, British
:00:46. > :00:46.traditions are under threat A government review will point
:00:47. > :00:50.the finger at growing ethnic Own your own home for ?900
:00:51. > :00:56.because of the Help to Buy scheme - that's the main headline
:00:57. > :00:58.on the Sunday Express. The Sunday Mirror continues
:00:59. > :01:00.its reports of claims Last week, Mr Vaz referred
:01:01. > :01:06.the allegations to his solicitors. Plans for new grammar schools
:01:07. > :01:09.are being drawn up by councils following yesterday's announcement
:01:10. > :01:11.by the Prime Minister - that's the front page
:01:12. > :01:13.of the Sunday Times. While the Independent
:01:14. > :01:16.dedicates its front page The ceasefire is due to come
:01:17. > :01:34.into effect on Monday. So, shall we start with the Sunday
:01:35. > :01:38.Times? The councils opening new grammar schools offering thousands
:01:39. > :01:51.of places. It is almost as if they saw it coming. These are five
:01:52. > :02:02.councils where there is already selective education. This is not
:02:03. > :02:09.surprising that some councils. This, I think, will prove to be a missed
:02:10. > :02:16.fort and miss timed move by Theresa May. She, like I, are grammar goals
:02:17. > :02:20.but there is a great danger that we look back at those of us who
:02:21. > :02:26.benefited many years ago with a nostalgia that is not appropriate
:02:27. > :02:31.for schools today. What is wrong with grammar schools? There is
:02:32. > :02:36.nothing wrong with them. It is how you get into them. Yes, the
:02:37. > :02:42.selection process. It is increasingly hard to get into them.
:02:43. > :02:46.All children should have access to good schools and good teachers, it
:02:47. > :02:50.should not depend on where you live and whether or not you can afford
:02:51. > :02:58.tutoring. It is about social mobility. Yes. And there has always
:02:59. > :03:03.been a divide between grammar school kids and the others. There was
:03:04. > :03:11.always the thing that the rich kids went to private schools and
:03:12. > :03:16.everybody else went to the second very model. Things have changed
:03:17. > :03:28.since then. It is not just the social scene, is it? Schools in the
:03:29. > :03:32.deprived areas do not always have good education. And there are people
:03:33. > :03:38.like me who go to pieces in the exam hall. I am not against the idea of
:03:39. > :03:41.grammar schools but what I am against is the fact that they have
:03:42. > :03:49.announced this without consideration. So Theresa May has
:03:50. > :03:54.come up with an idea that selection is not merely at 11, it can also be
:03:55. > :03:59.at 13 or 16, I do not think that is appropriate either. If there could
:04:00. > :04:02.in assessment process that was continual that would decide which
:04:03. > :04:07.schools would benefit from which children, that would be different.
:04:08. > :04:12.She needs a detailed plan about how this may work. At the moment it does
:04:13. > :04:16.not seem as if she could get it through the two houses, certainly
:04:17. > :04:23.the house of of Lords. Many comprehensive schools rise to the
:04:24. > :04:26.challenge, don't they? If there is a grammar school down the road, the
:04:27. > :04:32.comprehensive really goes for it. There is no reason it cannot work
:04:33. > :04:37.but we don't know how it will work. She has bounced into it, we feel,
:04:38. > :04:41.because there was a leak earlier in the week. I imagine what she planned
:04:42. > :04:46.to do was to use party conferencing in a couple of weeks time and then
:04:47. > :04:52.float the idea without having to go into too much detail. Suddenly now
:04:53. > :05:01.she needs to put flesh on this idea. Like you say, even as a modern high
:05:02. > :05:04.schools raise their grades, private schools expect a huge boost because
:05:05. > :05:11.if there will be more grammar schools, there will be a process of
:05:12. > :05:15.those who can afford it... It does not do anything for social mobility
:05:16. > :05:24.today. It may have done 20 or 30 years ago. I think or intention is
:05:25. > :05:28.very clear and she has launched a scathing attack on public schools
:05:29. > :05:51.which is another knife in the back to the old It -- eaten attendees.
:05:52. > :05:55.This has come from the NHS chiefs. Yes, it comes from providers and
:05:56. > :06:01.they speak for hospital trust and chief executives. It is a familiar
:06:02. > :06:06.litany now that they are running out of money and cannot meet targets
:06:07. > :06:12.without some major influx of cash in the Autumn statement. It does seem
:06:13. > :06:17.that we are getting to a point where we are going to have to start really
:06:18. > :06:20.thinking about radical solutions for the NHS because we really can't
:06:21. > :06:25.afford to keep it going. So either we will need to pay an awful lot
:06:26. > :06:30.more in tax for it, it is clear that the amount of money that is being
:06:31. > :06:35.put in is not enough so either through taxation or the idea of
:06:36. > :06:39.charging for certain services. I was interviewing a hospital on BBC radio
:06:40. > :06:47.the other week that had started crowd funding. Just to raise funds.
:06:48. > :06:51.It would not matter how much money you poured into the NHS because
:06:52. > :06:55.there will be demand, the demand is insatiable. In a way it goes back to
:06:56. > :07:01.the grammar school thing, if you tackle something, schools are not
:07:02. > :07:07.the big issue. The NHS is and always is as we approach winter. The
:07:08. > :07:12.expectations of people is that they will be seen by a doctor, referred
:07:13. > :07:15.to a specialist and will walk out of the doctor surgery with a
:07:16. > :07:19.prescription and if they want an ambulance they will get one. We
:07:20. > :07:24.actually have, somebody, somewhere, some politician has to be brave
:07:25. > :07:32.enough to tackle that. Tackle our perceptions? I think it is more our
:07:33. > :07:34.sentimentality about it. The problem about discussing it with
:07:35. > :07:39.politicians, they recognise that there are certain things that must
:07:40. > :07:41.be done we do not go out there and say it because the moment a
:07:42. > :07:45.politician says anything about the yen hate S, the community
:07:46. > :07:50.misconstrue sit as an attack and they are dead in the water. And
:07:51. > :07:55.there is something strange about the British character... We are in love
:07:56. > :08:01.with the NHS. We are quite protective of it. The idea that it
:08:02. > :08:14.cannot change be it cannot use what is a 1948 model for a 20th -- 21st
:08:15. > :08:24.century servers. Steady on, steady on. Serious crime set to join the
:08:25. > :08:30.list of other hate crimes. This is misogyny in England and Laos. This
:08:31. > :08:35.is Nottingham where they have been trialling using misogyny under the
:08:36. > :08:41.definition of a hate crime. They have been doing an experiment there,
:08:42. > :08:45.police in Notting ham, they have had 20 investigations in two mums,
:08:46. > :08:51.investigating a case of misogyny every three days. They have
:08:52. > :08:53.specially trained officers targeting behaviour from unwanted physical
:08:54. > :08:58.approaches through the street harassment, and other forces are now
:08:59. > :09:04.looking at this. What we do not know is whether the investigations have
:09:05. > :09:07.led to any prosecutions or whether somebody has been told to behave
:09:08. > :09:12.better or where it is actually going. There are two things here.
:09:13. > :09:16.Many people listening to this and thinking well, there are other
:09:17. > :09:25.things that the police could be dealing with. There are also people
:09:26. > :09:29.on the other side which is more nuanced, which is where women,
:09:30. > :09:34.affected by misogyny, they feel more able to go to the police and that
:09:35. > :09:40.they are complaints will be taken seriously. And now that the BBC is
:09:41. > :09:47.talking about it, they will know that possible. The problem is that
:09:48. > :09:52.it was initially successful in Notting ham and other forces are
:09:53. > :09:58.looking for it. But what is the criteria for success? Hate crimes
:09:59. > :10:03.reported to them when it comes to women but is the same thing happened
:10:04. > :10:08.in disabled hate crime came in. I have some figures I was looking at
:10:09. > :10:12.this week that says disabled hate crime has gone up 40% in the last
:10:13. > :10:17.year. What does that mean? Does that mean that people hate disabled
:10:18. > :10:24.people more than they did the previous year or that police at
:10:25. > :10:30.catching more haters? Or that people are reporting it more. But what is
:10:31. > :10:36.the criteria for these crimes? We will find out, won't we. Let's move
:10:37. > :10:44.on to the Independent. This will be a big story. We can be forgiven for
:10:45. > :10:47.not feeling that this is a turning point, that is the question that the
:10:48. > :10:52.Independent asks when it comes to the ceasefire in Syria. The whole
:10:53. > :10:56.thing is that we do not know until it starts on Monday. He reported
:10:57. > :11:02.that more than 100 people have been killed today, and this has happened
:11:03. > :11:09.before. A wall becomes more deadly, I am told, in the hours before a
:11:10. > :11:11.ceasefire. Yes, the final spasms of somebody tries to grab more
:11:12. > :11:16.Territorian before the ceasefire begins. The idea of the Russians and
:11:17. > :11:21.the Americans coming together, that could reduce the violence. The
:11:22. > :11:28.problem is whether it works out. At the moment, the South feels more
:11:29. > :11:33.say. As far as the Americans are concerned that aside and not stay
:11:34. > :11:39.there, he must go. The Russians and the Americans need to agree about
:11:40. > :11:53.what happens to a side. It is an interesting deal, part rivals, and
:11:54. > :11:57.part allies. Russia are close Assad. It will put pressure on the
:11:58. > :12:07.Americans to use their pressure on Turkey and Saudi Arabia. We call it
:12:08. > :12:14.a coalition... Hull it is not. It is but it is not. It is a group of
:12:15. > :12:20.countries. There are so many factions here. What is happening in
:12:21. > :12:24.Syria is an absolute microcosm of everything in the Middle East with
:12:25. > :12:28.so many things. And the knock-on to the neighbouring countries and
:12:29. > :12:35.tribes, be it Kurdish, Sony or Shi'ite Muslims, the most important
:12:36. > :12:42.thing is that if there is a ceasefire then humanitarian aid can
:12:43. > :12:47.get through. Quickly, we only have 40 seconds, let's squeeze in the
:12:48. > :12:51.Sunday Telegraph. Political correctness eating a threat to
:12:52. > :12:58.Christmas. This is an annual story, isn't it? It is a little different.
:12:59. > :13:02.The headline overdoes it but the head of integration has come out
:13:03. > :13:11.with a report on to how integration should work. She says how could
:13:12. > :13:20.anybody object to calling a Christmas tree a Christmas tree. It
:13:21. > :13:25.was political correctness. She wants us to look at the issue of
:13:26. > :13:29.integration and basically, no-one could take offence at the phrase
:13:30. > :13:36.Christmas tree so let's try to be more sensible. And it was a
:13:37. > :13:41.year-long study. Excellent salary will run again next Christmas. Thank
:13:42. > :13:46.you for taking a through the papers and thank you to you for joining us.
:13:47. > :13:49.Next up we have a review of films.