:00:17. > :00:19.Hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be
:00:20. > :00:22.With me are the broadcaster Lynn Faulds Wood and
:00:23. > :00:30.Welcome to both of you. A look at the front pages first, an we
:00:31. > :00:36.Saturday with the Metro which has Mel and Sue on their front-page as
:00:37. > :00:42.the pair announce their departure from the great brick babe off. The
:00:43. > :00:47.FT says plans are being drawn up by GCHQ to create a great British
:00:48. > :00:52.firewall to come pat cyber attacks. The eye looks at what it calls David
:00:53. > :00:56.Cameron's toxic legacy in Libya. The Telegraph leads with the decision by
:00:57. > :01:00.the chairman of the BBC to step down as the head of the corporation's
:01:01. > :01:04.governing body. The Express says that MPs won't be
:01:05. > :01:10.allowing to block the UK's exist from the EU. The times is with that
:01:11. > :01:16.influential committee of MPs that will blame David Cameron for the
:01:17. > :01:20.rise of so-called Islamic State. And The Mail says the foreign aid budget
:01:21. > :01:25.is to be overhauled. Let us look at some of those. Let us start with The
:01:26. > :01:30.Times story. Cameron being blamed for the Rice of IS. This is an
:01:31. > :01:35.inquiry into the inquiry into events in Libya. It sounds harsh to point
:01:36. > :01:41.the finger at David Cameron, he just stepped down as an MP but he is
:01:42. > :01:45.being accused of one of the biggest political and military boobs in
:01:46. > :01:48.recent history, save for Iraq, lots of the criticism appears to be the
:01:49. > :01:54.same. There is some intelligence, you rushed in and made it worse, so
:01:55. > :02:00.says the Foreign Affairs Select Committee. It is a 49 page report.
:02:01. > :02:07.It has taken time to cobble it together. I can do that in about an
:02:08. > :02:11.hour now. Ever Every bullet point said he it has failed to do this and
:02:12. > :02:17.that, they dashed in too quickly, for example one of the critics is
:02:18. > :02:22.the chief of the defence staff, general Lord Richards who at the
:02:23. > :02:26.time disassociated himself from it. For you Chief of Staff, defence
:02:27. > :02:33.staff to say don't do this back in 2011, that is damning in itself.
:02:34. > :02:37.Then he failed to identify that there were Islamist extremists among
:02:38. > :02:43.the rebels we were supporting. We all know there are, I mean it is the
:02:44. > :02:47.same we can look at Syria, a lot of the anti-Assad groups are of the
:02:48. > :02:51.extremist persuasion. One of the points here, and it does make
:02:52. > :02:57.reference to this, in The Times piece, he allowed an operation
:02:58. > :03:00.designed to protect civilians and the original incentive was events in
:03:01. > :03:03.Benghazi when he as Nicolas Sarkozy identified there might be a
:03:04. > :03:06.significant attack on a lot of people if they didn't do something
:03:07. > :03:11.but it is what they didn't plan for afterwards. And they overstated the
:03:12. > :03:17.dangers at the time as well according to this. This is really a
:03:18. > :03:22.very damning report the reason it is open season on Cameron is because he
:03:23. > :03:26.was in charge at the time. You would always say that. We said it about
:03:27. > :03:32.Blair. That was the other point the Select Committee made, they said
:03:33. > :03:37.they should have exploited Tony Blair's friendship with Colonel
:03:38. > :03:40.Gaddafi. Tony Blair is probably thinking fantastic, shush about the
:03:41. > :03:45.dictators now. He probably tried his best to cool tensions. Do you think
:03:46. > :03:50.he knew a report as damning as this was coming out and that is one of
:03:51. > :03:54.the reasons he went so quickly. No, at the end of the day for someone
:03:55. > :04:00.like David Cameron, 74,000 as an MPs wage would be nice for many of us,
:04:01. > :04:05.for David Cameron... You are a cynic. Cynic. I I have seen them
:04:06. > :04:10.work. Let us see if cynicism continues with regards to the Metro.
:04:11. > :04:15.Going going scone. I can't imagine what that is about! Love the
:04:16. > :04:18.headline. This is every small child's favourite goalkeeper. What
:04:19. > :04:24.is the fastest cake in the world? Scone. Are you saying tabloid
:04:25. > :04:29.journalists are like children? No, there is a similar appeal. What is
:04:30. > :04:35.full of a, I love the fun people are having with this, apart from Mel and
:04:36. > :04:40.Sue who have both quit. And Bake Off crumbles as Mel and Sue quit on the
:04:41. > :04:46.Met toe, they, they are saying we are not going to go to Channel 4. I
:04:47. > :04:51.saw earlier on on this very channel that Michael Grade who was programme
:04:52. > :04:56.controller was saying that this is a disastrous thing for Channel 4 to
:04:57. > :05:00.have done. Is it really, the BBC is damned if it does, damned if it
:05:01. > :05:05.doesn't. My Twitter feed will be filled with people you are on the
:05:06. > :05:10.BBC, talking a the BBC. But the reason the BBC, this is my view are
:05:11. > :05:14.damned is because ?75 million is a lot of money, constantly criticised
:05:15. > :05:19.for spending license fee payers money, now the BBC are going to be
:05:20. > :05:25.criticised for not spending enough, how do you win that? Because it was
:05:26. > :05:30.the top problem and people loved it. You are talking to a rt rower who
:05:31. > :05:35.has been axed from places myself, people don't love us as much as we
:05:36. > :05:38.think they do. They will cook scones on Channel 4, how does the license
:05:39. > :05:41.payer miss out? They don't, they switch the channel and the BBC has
:05:42. > :05:45.an excellent opportunity to do something that work, maybe Top Gear.
:05:46. > :05:49.I don't work for the BBC now, a long time I did, Watchdog and so on, we
:05:50. > :05:53.are both independent spirits now. You can't influence this? I
:05:54. > :05:58.unfortunately I can't. We could pitch to the BBC bosses, the idea we
:05:59. > :06:02.can make omelettes. It was a beautifully produced show, and I
:06:03. > :06:06.think the BBC developed it into the stunning success it became. The
:06:07. > :06:10.biggest show. 15 million watching the final is incredible. And will it
:06:11. > :06:14.do as well on Channel 4? I don't know. Let us continue with the BBC
:06:15. > :06:19.briefly because the Daily Telegraph leads with the fact that Theresa May
:06:20. > :06:23.as they say, forces the BBC Trust chief to step down, think this is
:06:24. > :06:28.Rhona fair head, who has been head of the BBC Trust and will not carry
:06:29. > :06:32.on in the role when this body changes. This was David Cameron
:06:33. > :06:37.again, they were having a go at. He said to her, you can stay on, as
:06:38. > :06:40.long as you like and Theresa May has come in and said no, I want it done
:06:41. > :06:45.differently, we will have a different system and we will have a
:06:46. > :06:53.different governing body, it will be a powerful new governing board,
:06:54. > :06:58.although feel when I worked for the BBC we had powerful governing boards
:06:59. > :07:04.coming along like buses, I don't know whether someone has fallen out
:07:05. > :07:10.with Rhona. She probably sees something like how do you solve a
:07:11. > :07:13.problem like Teresa. She is pointing the finger a bit at David Cameron.
:07:14. > :07:20.She wants to show that things have changed. Distance. Shaun, there is
:07:21. > :07:26.another story I know both of you have had a look at. Mother less
:07:27. > :07:31.babies on the way, created from skin cells after scientists discovered a
:07:32. > :07:36.method of creating offspring without the need for a female egg. We need
:07:37. > :07:41.women in society to keep us men under control. There have been
:07:42. > :07:47.experimented on mice where there have been generations I think three
:07:48. > :07:52.generations, of mice created. I am a woman helping you with this. ?
:07:53. > :07:59.Listen, how would we ever be right? It is the idea of fertilising any
:08:00. > :08:03.part of the skin in place of female eggs, now, what could possibly go
:08:04. > :08:07.wrong? Well, for years we have been telling you guys that you are
:08:08. > :08:14.redundant, we don't need men, I think this is revenge where men are
:08:15. > :08:17.saying we don't need you. It has very little to go on, you made the
:08:18. > :08:22.point to me earlier about how these stories pop up, because people are
:08:23. > :08:27.looking for funding. Maybe, we don't know the circumstance, but the one
:08:28. > :08:31.that irtraits me... I was going to say cure for blindness and cancer, I
:08:32. > :08:36.remember working at another place, and it was the cancer conference in
:08:37. > :08:41.the State, I did six cancer stories in one week where people were
:08:42. > :08:45.talking about different cures, some of it was clever, but to a degree
:08:46. > :08:50.these guys sometimes want a bit more money to fund it. Did any of it
:08:51. > :08:57.happen? Look, I am not an oncologist. I ran the European
:08:58. > :09:01.cancer patient after I had bowel cancer, and if I had a pound for
:09:02. > :09:06.every breakthrough ever in cancer I wouldn't be sitting here, I would be
:09:07. > :09:10.off on a round-the-world trip. We will squeeze two more in the we can.
:09:11. > :09:19.The Financial Times is where we are taking them from. GCHQ plans a great
:09:20. > :09:25.big firewall. Let me at this one. It is as transparent adds glass window
:09:26. > :09:30.that has been polished. It is GC. Q, they do amazing work and they keep
:09:31. > :09:34.us safe, I am a huge fan of them. However in this instance there is
:09:35. > :09:37.the notion of putting a Chinese-style filter on our internet
:09:38. > :09:45.traffic. Of course, I am not doubting there is truth to the angle
:09:46. > :09:51.that is being spun here, the idea it stops malware getting to people's
:09:52. > :09:55.computers. By the same token, it also gets rid of as they call
:09:56. > :10:03.offensive content. This is censorship to the extreme. On that,
:10:04. > :10:08.and Lynn you might want to come meant on this, people would be be
:10:09. > :10:14.able to opt out. It is very thin on detail and it was only a story in
:10:15. > :10:21.the Financial Times, I think the trouble with this story, for
:10:22. > :10:24.example, there is a chap Kieron Martin the GCHQ Director General, he
:10:25. > :10:29.said we are doing well in Britain, we are doing twice as many finding
:10:30. > :10:35.signer incidents as we did last year. We found 200 a month. There is
:10:36. > :10:40.thousands a month that you are probably missing, because they are
:10:41. > :10:47.so clever, all the hackers there are out there, the ones that have hacked
:10:48. > :10:52.the the games in Rio and hacked our Olympic winners medical records, and
:10:53. > :10:56.found that a lot of them have been taking banned substances with their
:10:57. > :11:03.doctors' permission, the hackers can do anything now, and I am... Is it
:11:04. > :11:07.about hackers? Or people, people who want to have cyber incidents, can do
:11:08. > :11:15.anything. We have a minute left. Let us devote that minute to taxis. In
:11:16. > :11:22.London. Black cabs versus Uber. This is Saddique Khan or Mayer is trying
:11:23. > :11:26.to support black cabs because after all these poor guys and women have
:11:27. > :11:31.spent years doing the knowledge, and know every area of Greater London
:11:32. > :11:38.that is possible to know, and then clever, clever apps come along like
:11:39. > :11:42.uber-which are brilliant and we have so intrigued by them. Cabs come
:11:43. > :11:46.economically but the poor black cabs need support. Uber-are saying they
:11:47. > :11:51.are being discriminated against. I have only had one black cab refuse
:11:52. > :11:56.my guide dog-leg, I must have had 20 uber-drivers. Black cabs feel that
:11:57. > :11:59.uber-drivers are not paying attention to the regulation,
:12:00. > :12:03.uber-say we are for card thinking, join the rest of the world. On that
:12:04. > :12:09.note. I am going home in a black cab. You can go home which ever way.
:12:10. > :12:14.If I am going with uber-I love you guys. That is it for The Papers.
:12:15. > :12:17.Don't forget all the front pages are online on the BBC News website,
:12:18. > :12:19.where you can read a detailed review of the papers.
:12:20. > :12:22.It's all there for you - seven days a week.
:12:23. > :12:24.And you can see us there too, with each night's edition
:12:25. > :12:27.of The Papers being posted on the page shortly
:12:28. > :12:33.Thank you very much to my guests, and next it is Nick Miller who has
:12:34. > :12:35.the weather.