:00:13. > :00:15.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
:00:16. > :00:22.With me are the journalist and features writer
:00:23. > :00:26.and the broadcaster Julia Hartley-Brewer.
:00:27. > :00:33.The Times says the Home Secretary is preparing to launch an inquiry
:00:34. > :00:35.into the clashes between miners and police in 1984, which became
:00:36. > :00:41.Thousands of men are undergoing needless treatment for prostate
:00:42. > :00:48.cancer, according to claims reported in the Telegraph.
:00:49. > :00:51.The FT has an image from the Falklands War, marking
:00:52. > :00:53.the new agreement reached between Britain and Argentina
:00:54. > :00:56.The Metro reports on a survey claiming that NHS patients
:00:57. > :01:01.are receiving limited access to drugs and surgery.
:01:02. > :01:04.The Guardian says the BBC has been forced to reveal the salaries
:01:05. > :01:11.of those it pays more than ?150,000 a year.
:01:12. > :01:13.Images of people texting while driving are the Mirror's front
:01:14. > :01:20.page - it calls for the deadly phone epidemic to end.
:01:21. > :01:23.And the Mail has also launched a campaign on the issue,
:01:24. > :01:32.saying a fifth of drivers admit using their phones while driving.
:01:33. > :01:41.So, let us begin. Let us begin with the Guardian. The president of the
:01:42. > :01:46.European Commission condemns attacks on Polish people in the United
:01:47. > :01:53.Kingdom. Was he right to raise this issue? I do not think so. He raised
:01:54. > :01:55.a lot, the EU army, not being raised by the Guardian, interestingly. How
:01:56. > :02:00.they were all prepared for Brexit and the like. He was condemning the
:02:01. > :02:04.attack on to Polish men in Parliament Essex, a horrific attack,
:02:05. > :02:09.no doubt about that. Arrests have been made. But he linked it very
:02:10. > :02:13.much with the Brexit for. There have been incidents which we believe will
:02:14. > :02:16.be related to Brexit, but let's all stop pretending there were no
:02:17. > :02:22.violent attacks and no racism on British streets before June 23. This
:02:23. > :02:26.case is still live. People have been charged with this. The police have
:02:27. > :02:30.been very clear, motive is currently unknown. I think it is outrageous
:02:31. > :02:33.for the European Commission President to pronounce that on the
:02:34. > :02:38.cause of a crime that has not even gone to court. I thought we had
:02:39. > :02:44.injuries for that. I do not think it is outrageous. I think he has struck
:02:45. > :02:49.on something, there, and the latest figures show a 40% rise in hate
:02:50. > :02:55.crimes since the... In reporting of hate crimes. But that is still
:02:56. > :02:59.arise. People have been encouraged to report them. There may have been
:03:00. > :03:02.an increase but people have been encouraged to report them. Their
:03:03. > :03:06.mother has been a rise in reporting them. Maybe it is not his place but
:03:07. > :03:10.I do not think he cares so much about the sensibilities of out what
:03:11. > :03:13.he is saying is received in Britain any more. But he has talked about
:03:14. > :03:19.the galloping populism that has been created by fragmentation and, as a
:03:20. > :03:24.bleeding heart liberal, I do have sympathy with that. I think that
:03:25. > :03:27.there is some sort of sense that anger and frustration has been
:03:28. > :03:32.enfranchised by the Brexit vote and you may think I am over reading it,
:03:33. > :03:35.but I talked to a gay couple the other day who said that they do not
:03:36. > :03:39.walk down the street hand-in-hand since the 24th of June because they
:03:40. > :03:47.are worried. They are friends of mine and I thought that is terrible,
:03:48. > :03:50.that they feel scared that somebody might abuse them in some way.
:03:51. > :03:52.Brexit had nothing to do with race, or certainly not sexuality or
:03:53. > :03:56.anything like that. But it is weird that it has only sold as anger. For
:03:57. > :04:00.me, genuinely, and I am sure people will disagree with me on the remain
:04:01. > :04:03.side, I genuinely believe... If you took all of the issues over are and
:04:04. > :04:10.xenophobia, they were all raised by the remain calm, not leaders. What
:04:11. > :04:13.about Nigel Farage and his poster. I do not think that was about race. If
:04:14. > :04:19.you think that poster was the reason why this was happening... No, but it
:04:20. > :04:22.was emblematic of the message. I think what the president is talking
:04:23. > :04:26.about, this has come about by having, for instance, an open door
:04:27. > :04:29.policy to refugees. It is the political classes ignoring ordinary
:04:30. > :04:34.people's concerns over issues like immigration, nothing to do with
:04:35. > :04:38.race, immigration for the other largely wet countries, it is that
:04:39. > :04:42.that has created this problem, not anything else. -- largely white
:04:43. > :04:49.countries. James, as a bleeding heart liberal... Gives me more! The
:04:50. > :04:53.BBC has been forced to reveal salaries and stars names. Is this a
:04:54. > :04:57.good idea? I do not necessarily think it is because the BBC is
:04:58. > :05:02.calling it a poacher's Charter and I do think it will expose some of
:05:03. > :05:05.their great talent to being nabbed by opponents. ITV will look at the
:05:06. > :05:09.salaries that some of these names are getting and some of the big
:05:10. > :05:13.names, like Gary Lineker and Chris Evans may be getting as much as 5
:05:14. > :05:18.million quid a year, we do not know, it has not yet been revealed, but
:05:19. > :05:22.ITV or sky, who have pots of money, will say, great, if we offer them
:05:23. > :05:26.5.1 million, we can get them. I think that it does jeopardise the
:05:27. > :05:31.BBC bus back position as a broadcaster which wants the best
:05:32. > :05:36.talent. -- the BBC's position. That might be a problem. Everyone in the
:05:37. > :05:40.business knows roughly what these people are earning. If I wanted to,
:05:41. > :05:44.I could find out what virtually every big star in the BBC,
:05:45. > :05:47.certainly, people stay at the BBC for different reasons. More
:05:48. > :05:51.security, pension plan rather good, better than it is elsewhere. I think
:05:52. > :05:54.we have got it right now. It is a bit embarrassing for a lot of
:05:55. > :05:58.people. I don't have an issue with people you are very talented who
:05:59. > :06:05.people want to watch and listen to being paid well. There are a lot of
:06:06. > :06:09.names here, Jeremy Vine, Fiona Bruce, these people... Nick
:06:10. > :06:12.Robinson, you can pay him ?5 million per year, still worth it if you ask
:06:13. > :06:18.me. But the British public will make up their own mind. That is one of an
:06:19. > :06:23.episode British bake off. Sorry, year. James, you are determined to
:06:24. > :06:31.bring the bake off back into it. That has got me upset. Let's move on
:06:32. > :06:37.to the Financial Times. The headline Theresa May tipped to get Hinckley
:06:38. > :06:41.green light as decision day looms for ?18 billion project. Just before
:06:42. > :06:43.we come to that, we have had a lemon from our political editor saying
:06:44. > :06:46.that the French and Chinese governments have been informed that
:06:47. > :06:51.the government will approve the Hinkley point deal, but with
:06:52. > :06:54.conditions. They expect the deal will be announced tomorrow but there
:06:55. > :06:59.has not yet been any official confirmation. The Times is basically
:07:00. > :07:03.saying that the French claim that it has been approved, that of their
:07:04. > :07:07.headline. So, this has been back and forward, James, has it not, but now
:07:08. > :07:10.it seems to be back on? It is funny, because Theresa May seems to have
:07:11. > :07:14.made a point of contradicting everything that David Cameron said
:07:15. > :07:21.since she has come in. Some people are suggesting that is one reason he
:07:22. > :07:24.has resigned as an MP. But economic is politics, is it not? In the
:07:25. > :07:26.post-Brexit world, we have to be very careful about not offending
:07:27. > :07:31.potential trading partners, which China very much is. So is France. We
:07:32. > :07:35.have got to finish this to make sure that they are not offended by our
:07:36. > :07:39.suppose that worries about security and the high cost of the
:07:40. > :07:44.electricity. Theresa May has a more wary attitude to the Chinese. She
:07:45. > :07:48.apparently in cabinet expressed concerns of the former Chancellor
:07:49. > :07:54.George Osborne's urge to shimmy up to the Chinese and say yes to
:07:55. > :07:58.everything. Kowtowing, I think Colin it at the time. I think there are
:07:59. > :08:04.very big issues about allowing the Chinese to have any say whatsoever
:08:05. > :08:07.in our energy security. EDF only voted, the French firm that would
:08:08. > :08:11.have the largest part of this, the only voted very narrowly, the lost
:08:12. > :08:14.their finance director, they do not want the deal either. It is going to
:08:15. > :08:18.go-ahead but there will be provisions regarding security and
:08:19. > :08:22.the cost. Bear in mind, the deal we were going to sign would mean very
:08:23. > :08:27.high electricity prices in a very changing market. The key is going to
:08:28. > :08:31.be the conditions attached. That is true but the realpolitik is how else
:08:32. > :08:34.will we raise the money and if we want to build this power station,
:08:35. > :08:37.the Chinese may be the only game in town? We must also mention the
:08:38. > :08:42.cartoon in the Telegraph, which James Caan redoubt. As the only
:08:43. > :08:51.short-sighted person here! -- James Caan redoubt. Two people
:08:52. > :08:55.are watching past include point and one says to the other I hope you
:08:56. > :09:01.build a new nuclear power station, I am worried it will be turned into a
:09:02. > :09:03.grammar school. Completing two of the biggest stories at the moment
:09:04. > :09:06.and the most perfect way. Apparently David Cameron turned to that first
:09:07. > :09:10.thing every morning as Prime Minister, because it was his
:09:11. > :09:13.favourite thing. He manages to some of the biggest news stories and it
:09:14. > :09:20.was brilliant, funny way every morning. Incredible hatred. Let's
:09:21. > :09:27.turn to the time is now -- incredible hit rate. Let's turn to
:09:28. > :09:32.The Times. E-mails reveal Clinton's agreed. What is this all about by
:09:33. > :09:36.Julia? These are private e-mails that have been revealed but for the
:09:37. > :09:40.former US Secretary of State, Republican. Both parties, Democrats
:09:41. > :09:44.and Republicans, were desperate to get him on board to run as their
:09:45. > :09:48.vice presidential candidate but the story all today from him had been
:09:49. > :09:52.his criticism of Donald Trump, saying he was a disgrace, a very
:09:53. > :09:55.strong word. They don't have chosen to lead on this revelation that he
:09:56. > :10:03.believes that Hillary Clinton is greedy. I have to say, there is not
:10:04. > :10:08.really any news in either of these. Weekend of Newell Stores! And the
:10:09. > :10:15.Pope is Catholic, he writes that somewhere as well. Do you think this
:10:16. > :10:18.will do her any harm? I think the feedback, the momentum, is very much
:10:19. > :10:21.against Hillary Clinton at the moment, since that shocking image.
:10:22. > :10:26.Whoever took that footage of her being held into the car and
:10:27. > :10:29.collapsing on Sunday, at the 9/11 commemoration, was very eager light.
:10:30. > :10:34.But that could be a game changer in this. I predicted is not at the
:10:35. > :10:38.whole idea of Hillary Clinton as weak and in some way fallible, that
:10:39. > :10:43.Trump has been hammering for months, those images seemed to confirm that.
:10:44. > :10:47.All the conspiracy theories that have been doing the rounds. She has
:10:48. > :10:51.not been seen since. She is recovering. The most damning thing
:10:52. > :10:55.was Bill Clinton going on television to defender and seeing that she
:10:56. > :11:00.regularly, no, rarely has these problems before of dehydration. I
:11:01. > :11:03.managed to walk around not dehydrated and collapsing pretty
:11:04. > :11:08.much every day of my life. She has got no money, has she not? It also
:11:09. > :11:12.plays into the idea that she is secretive, because she was diagnosed
:11:13. > :11:16.on Friday with pneumonia and the only revealed that to the public
:11:17. > :11:23.when she collapsed on Sunday. Hours later. Two days later. There is that
:11:24. > :11:26.sense with the November questions about the Clinton foundation that
:11:27. > :11:29.she is covering something up. She has a sense of entitlement and I am
:11:30. > :11:33.annoyed to know things other people are not. That is a negative thing.
:11:34. > :11:43.Although, are we unrealistic of expecting people of any age, she is
:11:44. > :11:49.68 and Donald Trump is 70, the idea that you could do at 20 hour day
:11:50. > :11:51.seven days a week for a couple of years and not eventually get ill?
:11:52. > :11:54.And we discover in the Telegraph that Trump has perhaps a hit on the
:11:55. > :12:01.other issue as well. You should talk about this one. As somebody whose
:12:02. > :12:07.testosterone is of the skill... Yes, baby! Everybody thinks when I go
:12:08. > :12:11.past with desire. That is a fantasy of mine that has never been
:12:12. > :12:15.fulfilled! Let's get back on track. He said to Doctor Oz, a very
:12:16. > :12:21.well-known chat show host in the US, that he has high testosterone and
:12:22. > :12:27.that just, again, reinforces this idea that he is much. He got into
:12:28. > :12:31.that very childish playground row with Marco Rubio, who said he had
:12:32. > :12:35.small hands and what that means, and Donald Trump came out and said he
:12:36. > :12:39.had no problems in that department. How old is he? Why do we do not need
:12:40. > :12:46.to know that, James! I am reminding you! Media that plays well in middle
:12:47. > :12:50.America, but I find it repulsive. This is the story began most
:12:51. > :12:54.passionately about. In theatres, they want to introduce quieter
:12:55. > :12:57.versions of that. I do not have a problem of people eating in
:12:58. > :13:00.theatres, it has not been an issue, but in cinemas they have popcorn,
:13:01. > :13:07.popcorn is not loud enough, let's come up with nachos. How can you
:13:08. > :13:12.have quiet popcorn? Why not just not eat while you're at the theatre on
:13:13. > :13:18.the cinema? How about staying at home? If you're going to eat
:13:19. > :13:22.locally. I do not understand the idea of going into a darkened room
:13:23. > :13:26.to listen to other people eat. They have darkened restaurants, I do not
:13:27. > :13:32.understand those either. On that note... This is a discussion for a
:13:33. > :13:36.later! Don't forget, all the front pages are online on the BBC news
:13:37. > :13:40.website, where you can we a detailed review of the papers. It is all
:13:41. > :13:46.there for you seven days a week@BBC.co eight. You can see us
:13:47. > :13:49.thereto. With each night's edition posted shortly after we are
:13:50. > :13:52.finished. Thank you very much to my guests. Thank you for watching. Now
:13:53. > :14:05.we have the weather. Good evening. Fed up with the heat?
:14:06. > :14:09.There is cooler weather on the horizon. Today has been another
:14:10. > :14:11.remarkable mid-September date, with temperatures soaring in some places.
:14:12. > :14:13.East