:00:18. > :00:20.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
:00:21. > :00:22.With me are the journalist Yasmin Alibhai Brown
:00:23. > :00:24.and Ben Riley-Smith, political correspondent
:00:25. > :00:30.Tomorrow's front pages, then, starting with...
:00:31. > :00:36.The Independent. It says Theresa May has been warned her plans for
:00:37. > :00:41.grammar schools will push pure dosh poorer pupils further behind their
:00:42. > :00:44.peers. The Daily Telegraph said British troops prosecuted for
:00:45. > :00:48.alleged abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan may have their pay
:00:49. > :00:52.docked to pay legal expenses. The gardening so is prominent Labour MPs
:00:53. > :00:56.will reject a turn to the front bench if Jeremy Corbyn wins the
:00:57. > :01:00.party leadership battle and fails to agree elections to the Shadow
:01:01. > :01:04.Cabinet. The Daily Express insists the EU will give Britain a good deal
:01:05. > :01:10.in Brexit negotiations because millions of jobs are at stake. The
:01:11. > :01:16.Times report on the hacking at Yahoo which compromised 500 million
:01:17. > :01:21.accounts. Great British Bake Off on the front of the Metro as it is on
:01:22. > :01:26.the mirror. It says the BBC is likely to start rival programme to
:01:27. > :01:34.Channel 4's. We will certainly get into that later. Let's begin with
:01:35. > :01:38.the front page of the Guardian. Mr Corbyn are widely expected to win
:01:39. > :01:43.the leadership contest on Saturday and he has to begin the process of
:01:44. > :01:49.rebuilding and filling the front bench. Yes, but I think this is a
:01:50. > :01:53.very, very extraordinary political moment and I don't think I ever
:01:54. > :01:57.remember a political party being in this position because for the
:01:58. > :02:06.political classes, they focus just on the MPs. But out there, the
:02:07. > :02:11.support he has built up, Jeremy Corbyn, is truly impressive. And you
:02:12. > :02:17.cannot ignore their voices. They are people who had given up on politics
:02:18. > :02:21.and who have come back into it. It is a dilemma which, I don't know how
:02:22. > :02:25.you would resolve it, it is like the Church of England and gay marriage,
:02:26. > :02:32.maybe a split is inevitable in some form. The problem he has is that so
:02:33. > :02:37.many talented politicians on the left drifting away to be Mayor in
:02:38. > :02:42.Manchester or to be on select committees, anything but to be on
:02:43. > :02:46.the front bench with him. You cannot ignore those hundreds of thousands
:02:47. > :02:48.of supporters in the country and you cannot ignore the MPs who have been
:02:49. > :02:54.voted by millions of people to represent them. The Guardian piece
:02:55. > :02:58.is good and they have mentioned the Summer and the hectic moment when 60
:02:59. > :03:04.Pulis frontbenchers walked out and they went through those names and
:03:05. > :03:07.said, have you had talks with Jeremy Corbyn to come back? A lot of the
:03:08. > :03:16.big names are not ready to come back. Stella Creasy, Callow -- Kerry
:03:17. > :03:21.McCarthy, and people like Hilary Benn looking for big Parliamentary
:03:22. > :03:25.rolls. Although he has won this big parliamentary mandate, he may get a
:03:26. > :03:30.dozen people returning but he has 60 rolls to fill and how are they going
:03:31. > :03:36.to fulfil the function of an opposition? I think the MPs also
:03:37. > :03:41.have to grow up. You cannot have a process. You could criticise the
:03:42. > :03:48.process initiated by Ed Miliband for ?3 50, you had this power to elect
:03:49. > :03:52.the leader of the party. But you cannot have a process which was
:03:53. > :03:58.validated by the NEC and just because you don't like the result,
:03:59. > :04:05.behave and sulk for quite a long time. They have got to put some
:04:06. > :04:09.majority into what they do next. The trouble is if you cannot bring the
:04:10. > :04:14.party together, you get what we see on the front of the Daily Mirror,
:04:15. > :04:19.that is senior figures from the sidelines. Yvette Cooper makes a
:04:20. > :04:22.fair point, many would think. Extraordinary for a Labour
:04:23. > :04:29.supporting paper to write at the top, Labour is now the nasty party.
:04:30. > :04:34.Yes, that phrase resonates, Theresa May used it at the Tory conference
:04:35. > :04:39.to describe the Tories and that is a worrying state of affairs. She is
:04:40. > :04:48.talking about the guerrilla army of a lot of voters. Who use social
:04:49. > :04:53.media in a most hideous way. This is not the official policy of anybody
:04:54. > :04:58.in whichever side of the power structure you want to look at. What
:04:59. > :05:02.they haven't done and I think this is what Yvette Cooper is saying,
:05:03. > :05:09.they should have clamped down on this a long time ago and they chose
:05:10. > :05:13.not to. And maybe they thought this was quite good, I don't know. Yes,
:05:14. > :05:18.the heart of her argument is that you need to be proactive to stop
:05:19. > :05:22.this. This will go to the National conference tomorrow. It is
:05:23. > :05:28.patrolling and also the leader himself for not taking the task
:05:29. > :05:32.people and she raises one example close to home, Labour supporters who
:05:33. > :05:37.booed elliptical editor Laura Kuenssberg when she tried to raise a
:05:38. > :05:42.question. I was that the debate and there was a lot of booing when her
:05:43. > :05:47.name was called. And eventually, he told them to calm down but did not
:05:48. > :05:51.immediately become proactive and tell them. Yvette Cooper is saying
:05:52. > :05:56.to be proactive, not just warm words. She says, you need to
:05:57. > :05:59.criticise your supporters when they undermine Labour values as well as
:06:00. > :06:04.going after your supporters -- opponents. He says he totally
:06:05. > :06:09.condemns abuse but she says, but more things into place to clamp
:06:10. > :06:16.down. And they have put in new rules. They should expel members.
:06:17. > :06:20.That is the driving of the wedge between them! You have to do
:06:21. > :06:26.something, you cannot tolerate this. It will keep happening. The Daily
:06:27. > :06:33.Telegraph, your paper. The paper is reading this evening with something
:06:34. > :06:36.activating the MOD and the Army and that is legal cases, historical
:06:37. > :06:43.allegations of abuse in Iraq and investigations. It is the third or
:06:44. > :06:47.fourth time it has been on our front pages, we and our leaders care about
:06:48. > :06:55.it and the Daily Mail has it on the front page today. There is a body
:06:56. > :06:59.about the rock historic allegations -- Iraq. There are allegations of
:07:00. > :07:02.war crimes which need to be dealt with seriously and looked at and it
:07:03. > :07:07.needs to be determined whether cases get brought against the troops. Six
:07:08. > :07:13.or seven years from the beginning of Iraq and when this body was taken
:07:14. > :07:18.up, our paper feels the troops being seemingly held to account, people
:07:19. > :07:23.have stepped far beyond the line in what they are doing. This is just an
:07:24. > :07:27.example. All those cases brought by the lawyers get legal aid for the
:07:28. > :07:33.coverage. Here, the troops have to pay from their own pocket, over
:07:34. > :07:41.?12,000 and if it is over ?30,000,... Is it right lawyers get
:07:42. > :07:51.this? I think the focus on the initiative side. That is not enough.
:07:52. > :07:55.It is not just administrative, people face bankruptcy. What I find
:07:56. > :08:00.worrying, the US never signed up to the international court in The
:08:01. > :08:03.Hague. I thought that was wrong if it is an international court,
:08:04. > :08:11.everybody should have been there. The reason they didn't sign up is
:08:12. > :08:15.because they did not want soldiers in the wars we carry out is to be
:08:16. > :08:19.held accountable. There is something wrong there as well, you cannot just
:08:20. > :08:25.have Africans hold to it and the rest of us get away with it. And the
:08:26. > :08:31.second fingers, of course there are heroic soldiers and very good
:08:32. > :08:36.discipline -- second thing is. Not all soldiers, they are not heroes
:08:37. > :08:40.and we need to look at where this has gone. That is a valid point but
:08:41. > :08:46.one case held up today was a prosecution involving a Taliban
:08:47. > :08:49.roadside bomb held up for 100 days trying to blow up British soldiers
:08:50. > :08:54.and he did not like being held in custody. And it was not
:08:55. > :08:58.controversial to say that he admitted the digging a hole is to
:08:59. > :09:05.create a bomb. So you have the route that out, it is a balance. If we
:09:06. > :09:11.hold ourselves up as part of the Western Alliance where we follow
:09:12. > :09:14.rule of law, the rule of law has to apply to the nastiest people
:09:15. > :09:21.otherwise we just go around shooting them. What is the next step? To get
:09:22. > :09:25.the real tyrants in the world, even though this man wanted to kill us,
:09:26. > :09:30.we have to go through the process and do what we have two with it. I
:09:31. > :09:37.think that is the right thing to do. You are right, but there is a
:09:38. > :09:39.balance and some scurrilous allegations are getting through. I
:09:40. > :09:48.think this will get a lot of play tomorrow, on the times. 500 million
:09:49. > :09:57.web users, put that into context. That is jaw-dropping. In the world,
:09:58. > :10:04.they have had their internet history leaked. There are a lot of fake
:10:05. > :10:08.accounts and company accounts, but it shows how staggeringly available
:10:09. > :10:12.this information is. And that is Michelle Obama's passport which was
:10:13. > :10:20.released by this hacking team that had got in. It is terrifying the
:10:21. > :10:25.scale with which you can do this at the click of a couple of buttons.
:10:26. > :10:31.How did they do it? We don't know who did it. With all this
:10:32. > :10:35.information... I do not want to say but there are allegations. They are
:10:36. > :10:40.saying it is state-sponsored which would be the most interesting. That
:10:41. > :10:46.is why I think we will hear more about it. There it is a story at the
:10:47. > :10:53.top of the times, the number of wretched unions, people married,
:10:54. > :10:58.doubled. People living in deeply unhappy relationships. I am really
:10:59. > :11:05.sad about this, we are living in times with more equality between men
:11:06. > :11:12.and women, really quite good modern relationships and apparently, this
:11:13. > :11:23.is happening. And it is happening, the figures are completely reliable.
:11:24. > :11:31.One in 20 is extremely unhappy. Double the proportion in 2010. Is
:11:32. > :11:35.this because life is so expensive? Getting divorced is expensive? You
:11:36. > :11:40.get tied into big mortgages? There is a line of explanation from
:11:41. > :11:44.experts. They said many couples who come together for financial reasons
:11:45. > :11:48.and the recession have become less forgiving of each other's faults, so
:11:49. > :11:53.it is the burden of the recession. What about the unhappy relationship
:11:54. > :11:58.between the BBC and Channel 4 at the moment and the moving of the Great
:11:59. > :12:02.British break of the Channel four. Mary Berry today has decided to
:12:03. > :12:09.stick with the BBC and now we have this story saying the BBC might well
:12:10. > :12:17.bring Mary, Mel and Sue back together. I just want to say three
:12:18. > :12:25.women! They did the right thing. The bloke followed the money! Right,
:12:26. > :12:32.well, yes! They say Nordea may go to Channel 4. I would have the revised
:12:33. > :12:38.my theory. You could be her agent and Ascot prize. Should Channel 4 be
:12:39. > :12:40.buying these programmes from the BBC? Michael grade and John
:12:41. > :12:46.Whittingdale have said it should not be happening. I do not have a
:12:47. > :12:54.particular issue with private companies taking over. Channel 4 is
:12:55. > :13:02.not quite, it is an in between. I find it phenomenal the contract...
:13:03. > :13:06.How in the contract negotiations did they not secure the most important
:13:07. > :13:12.element which is the stars presenting it? They did not consult
:13:13. > :13:16.the stars, from what I hear. Our media commentators said earlier that
:13:17. > :13:20.apparently, there are instances where you sign a big contract and
:13:21. > :13:25.the Thai people in. ITV had looked at buying the programme, but could
:13:26. > :13:35.not be guaranteed the presenters and backed out. I just think, well done,
:13:36. > :13:39.macro to. Well done, Mel and Sue. Could you watch it on Channel 4
:13:40. > :13:43.without the three ladies? Mary Berry says she thinks the British public
:13:44. > :13:46.something not quite right about something not quite right about
:13:47. > :13:53.taking a show that was nurtured by the BBC. Even if it is the same
:13:54. > :14:01.tent? No, no. That is all they have got now. We women have really high
:14:02. > :14:04.morals! Yes, I don't know what the tent manufacturers say about that,
:14:05. > :14:10.if they are going or not! Lets hope they have a deal on the tent!
:14:11. > :14:16.Don't forget - all the front pages are online on the BBC News website,
:14:17. > :14:18.where you can read a detailed review of the papers.
:14:19. > :14:21.It's all there for you, seven days a week, at bbc.co.uk/papers.
:14:22. > :14:24.And you can see us there too, with each night's edition
:14:25. > :14:31.of The Papers being posted on the page shortly
:14:32. > :14:32.Full weather forecast coming up next.