:00:00. > :00:11.We'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers in a moment.
:00:12. > :00:15.First, the headlines: The US Presidential candidate
:00:16. > :00:20.Hillary Clinton has demanded full details of the latest email
:00:21. > :00:22.investigation by the FBI into whether they contained
:00:23. > :00:28.Her Republican rival, Donald Trump, called the news the biggest
:00:29. > :00:35.French President Francois Hollande has called on Britain
:00:36. > :00:38.to take its share of the remaining child migrants who are still
:00:39. > :00:41.in Calais, after the camp known as the Jungle was
:00:42. > :00:48.MPs calling for action on mobile phone coverage say it's unacceptable
:00:49. > :00:50.that visitors to Britain often get better coverage than
:00:51. > :00:58.A report said 17 million customers had poor reception at home.
:00:59. > :01:00.The Royal Clarence in Exeter, described as England's oldest hotel,
:01:01. > :01:05.has collapsed after a devastating fire.
:01:06. > :01:08.More than 100 firefighters tackled the blaze at the 300 year
:01:09. > :01:27.Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be
:01:28. > :01:33.With me are Mihir Bose, columnist at the London
:01:34. > :01:35.Evening Standard, and the Assistant Editor of the Times,
:01:36. > :01:44.The Observer leads with reaction to the FBI reviewing
:01:45. > :01:45.its investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails,
:01:46. > :01:47.with senior Democrats accusing the bureau's head
:01:48. > :01:53.of compromising its political neutrality.
:01:54. > :01:57.That story's also featured on the front
:01:58. > :02:00.of the Sunday Times, which claims that Hillary Clinton's
:02:01. > :02:04.The Mail on Sunday criticises the BBC for a show
:02:05. > :02:07.featuring a transgender story-line, which it says is available
:02:08. > :02:11.A novel solution for the country's housing crisis is unveiled
:02:12. > :02:14.on the front page of the Sunday Telegraph.
:02:15. > :02:17.It says the government is to offer help to build
:02:18. > :02:26.While the People carries an interview with the mother
:02:27. > :02:30.of murdered toddler Jamie Bulger, who says she's living in fear
:02:31. > :02:47.Let's now begin our review and we are starting with the story, the
:02:48. > :02:54.October surprise! The only story, Clinton and those e-mails. Why, what
:02:55. > :02:57.actually in them, are they any difference to the e-mails that were
:02:58. > :03:04.already investigated and why is James Comey apparently going on?
:03:05. > :03:09.Because of course it is supposed to be politically independent, the FBI.
:03:10. > :03:14.We are already hearing that he is a Republican. Also, the way he has
:03:15. > :03:18.presented it has allowed Donald Trump to say that there must have
:03:19. > :03:23.been a terrible offence for the FBI to reopen the enquiry. This is just
:03:24. > :03:29.a preliminary look. We don't even know, unless he knows what's in the
:03:30. > :03:35.e-mails, we don't know. The problem for Clinton is that she has this if
:03:36. > :03:40.you like problem of trust. American people, even though some of them are
:03:41. > :03:45.voting for her, don't actually like her or believe in her. This story
:03:46. > :03:49.opens up that count. So far, what we've had since the revelations of
:03:50. > :03:54.the way Trump behaved and his comments about women and so on, the
:03:55. > :04:05.focus has always been on the macro. Revelations coming out, one after
:04:06. > :04:12.the other. -- being on Trump. This laptop on which the e-mails were
:04:13. > :04:19.held was the laptop of Antony Wiener and we only know about him because
:04:20. > :04:25.of his misdeeds. And he seems to have shared his laptop with his
:04:26. > :04:29.wife. That's why it was seized, as a result of an investigation into
:04:30. > :04:39.another offence. Of course we don't know what these e-mails have. This
:04:40. > :04:43.is one of the elements of the story that's been brought out, in terms of
:04:44. > :04:48.the FBI. Why have they come out with this now when even they don't know
:04:49. > :04:53.what is included and the head of the FBI was told not to go ahead with
:04:54. > :04:57.this. The attorney general, to whom he is supposedly answerable, told
:04:58. > :05:03.him not to do this and it seems as if, I've been reading some stuff out
:05:04. > :05:07.of America tonight, the agents at the FBI themselves hadn't actually
:05:08. > :05:12.examined the e-mails. There is no time to do this before the elections
:05:13. > :05:17.because one supposes that needs to be done properly. So it's a
:05:18. > :05:20.tremendous mess. What is one of the papers is reporting it is already
:05:21. > :05:27.narrowing the poll lead that Hillary had. If you read his letter it
:05:28. > :05:32.suggests something without actually saying it. Let's turn to the Sunday
:05:33. > :05:38.Times, which also leads with this story. The headline, that Hillary is
:05:39. > :05:41.at war with the FBI, it will be interesting to see whether James
:05:42. > :05:48.Coney does see out his ten year term. He was of course appointed by
:05:49. > :05:54.Barack Obama in 2013. They do talk about the polls as well on the front
:05:55. > :05:58.page of the Sunday Times. This also illustrates the unique collection we
:05:59. > :06:03.have in America. The next president of Hillary Clinton would be taking
:06:04. > :06:07.office having to do something about the FBI. I mean, that's not
:06:08. > :06:12.something that happened in the past. What would you think if you were one
:06:13. > :06:15.of the 20 million Americans who have already voted? They might be wanting
:06:16. > :06:22.to change their minds and those key swing states, will this be something
:06:23. > :06:25.where those people who feel this fundamental distaste at the
:06:26. > :06:32.Washington ruling class might think this is just another example of
:06:33. > :06:35.their poor behaviour, of their shadowy dealings, and decide Donald
:06:36. > :06:42.Trump, the man who says he is the anti- politician, decide to vote for
:06:43. > :06:45.him? It will be interesting to see what the polls do say, because
:06:46. > :06:49.although we have been pointing out that they are narrowing, this was
:06:50. > :06:55.before the story broke. So they are not really reflect evolver last 24
:06:56. > :06:58.hours, so we will see what happens. All this is when Hillary Clinton
:06:59. > :07:04.proves herself to be the commander in chief and shows such cool rap is
:07:05. > :07:07.that people admire her. Who knows? And the state vote might be
:07:08. > :07:13.different to the national vote. Staying with the Sunday Times.
:07:14. > :07:20.Putin. He isn't swimming or posing with tigers, IT soft power. He is
:07:21. > :07:27.becoming very close it seems to prominent groups in the Conservative
:07:28. > :07:33.Party. A group founded by Margaret Thatcher and another group, very
:07:34. > :07:40.historic. It seems the leaders of these groups have had visits funded
:07:41. > :07:46.by the Russians, to go to Crimea and basically they are saying, we
:07:47. > :07:50.shouldn't treat Putin as a pariah. Sanctions should be lifted. And it
:07:51. > :07:54.actually says the group has called for cooperation agreements with
:07:55. > :07:58.Russian intelligence. Do you think they should have accepted those
:07:59. > :08:02.troops in the first place? You would think there would be a big question
:08:03. > :08:11.mark. Why on earth should Hebe inviting them? He just wants to
:08:12. > :08:17.bring as many people as possible on his side. You just came back from
:08:18. > :08:23.Moscow, did he not invite you? No, no invitation. There was a lot of
:08:24. > :08:27.complaints about the sanctions, in those shops laden with goods and
:08:28. > :08:31.looking at these gorgeous cars, one can't quite see what impact they are
:08:32. > :08:37.having. Talking to people who come back from Russia, clearly Putin
:08:38. > :08:42.still has a lot of support in Russia. I suspect for the new few --
:08:43. > :08:52.the next few days or weeks we will see what's really behind this. What
:08:53. > :08:58.is the latest take on Brexit? This is a story which says that Michael
:08:59. > :09:04.Gove has co-founded a group with if you like the blessing of Boris
:09:05. > :09:08.Johnson. Really? They are still in mailing each other, who knows what
:09:09. > :09:14.the e-mails will be saying?! This group suggests there are 14
:09:15. > :09:18.countries with a total worth of 17 trillion who are willing to sign
:09:19. > :09:24.agreement with us and these countries are twice the size of the
:09:25. > :09:29.countries of the EU, that it trades with, provided we get out of not
:09:30. > :09:35.just the free movement but also the customs union. How significant is
:09:36. > :09:43.that? For me this raises one big question, be -- the Nissan deal. I
:09:44. > :09:51.would like to read what was pledged to Nissan in that letter, where they
:09:52. > :09:55.were obviously given assurances that they would be able to continue to do
:09:56. > :10:02.business exactly as before. If we have this kind of complete Brexit,
:10:03. > :10:07.total Brexit, one can't work out how those agreements that are obviously
:10:08. > :10:14.going to be made with Nissan and other companies could possibly be in
:10:15. > :10:19.the lamented. As you say, we need those letters to be revealed. You
:10:20. > :10:25.are right. When we have this hard Brexit, when we leave the customs
:10:26. > :10:29.union... Where would we go? The point they are making is we can do
:10:30. > :10:33.trade deals with China, with India, other countries, more favourably
:10:34. > :10:39.than what we get with the EU. A lot of our trade deals are witty 28
:10:40. > :10:42.countries at the moment. Do you think we would have an easier go of
:10:43. > :10:47.it with Canada, because they struggle with the EU? This is all
:10:48. > :10:50.within the realm of context. I find it surprising that the countries
:10:51. > :10:56.with which we could be trading with don't seem to be named. This figure
:10:57. > :11:01.of 17 trillion, where is that from? I am always suspicious of a figure
:11:02. > :11:04.like that. And I don't think we take into account that countries like
:11:05. > :11:08.China and India have their own agenda. Even countries like
:11:09. > :11:12.Australia have moved on from what they were 30 or 40 years ago. So
:11:13. > :11:16.they have their own agenda and why they would be willing to trade with
:11:17. > :11:20.us, certainly. But why that trade would be better than what we have
:11:21. > :11:24.with the EU is very debatable. Again, so many questions with
:11:25. > :11:29.Brexit. We are waiting for the button to be pressed. We are going
:11:30. > :11:33.to stay with the Telegraph. I am going to direct this straight to
:11:34. > :11:39.you, because there are many people who wouldn't know what a modern
:11:40. > :11:45.prefab is. What is an old prefab? Looking at that headline you think,
:11:46. > :11:50.I don't know about that. The post-war housing solution, that's
:11:51. > :11:56.what they were. We now use the word modular, which means factory made
:11:57. > :12:01.and it works for the Swedes. 80% of homes in Sweden are modular built,
:12:02. > :12:08.prefab. They are better than jerry-built? Yes, and in America it
:12:09. > :12:13.is popular. It is quicker, it don't need much scaffolding and we need to
:12:14. > :12:18.start tilting homes very quickly. We need about 250,000 new homes every
:12:19. > :12:22.year and at best we built about 120,000 at present. So we've got to
:12:23. > :12:28.change the way we build. Remember, there have been some big government
:12:29. > :12:33.pledges made on this and people are waiting for them to deliver. I have
:12:34. > :12:38.one question for you, since you are an expert. Will we have better phone
:12:39. > :12:48.reception with this prefabs than we have at the moment? I think that
:12:49. > :12:52.would mean a great many more masts that people are happy to have at the
:12:53. > :12:57.moment. Getting back to the Observer. Theresa May. She is
:12:58. > :13:03.managing families set to be worse off. This is not what she was
:13:04. > :13:06.promising. This is another question raised about Theresa May. You will
:13:07. > :13:11.remember all of the things she said outside Downing Street, after she
:13:12. > :13:15.became Prime Minister. About how she would help families who were finding
:13:16. > :13:21.it very difficult to manage and things like that. This story is
:13:22. > :13:24.saying that unless film -- Philip Hammond's statement reverses some of
:13:25. > :13:28.the decisions taken by George Osborne in his budget, these
:13:29. > :13:34.families will be worse off. There have been lots of cuts and they give
:13:35. > :13:41.a figure, but a couple with two children, living at the living wage
:13:42. > :13:46.level, will be ?2000 worse off by 2020. The cost of living is rising
:13:47. > :13:50.and if you are a low income families spend much more of your income on
:13:51. > :13:54.food and those price rises are going to start coming through in the
:13:55. > :14:00.markets. We are already seeing them. It is not just Marmite, it is other
:14:01. > :14:06.stuff. We have been warned. It has been a pleasure. Thank you very
:14:07. > :14:12.much. That was The Papers. Coming up on BBC News, The Film Review and of
:14:13. > :14:15.course plenty more on the website. Have a lovely evening.