:00:00. > :00:00.Coming up, song, dance and romance in La La Land. Could this be one of
:00:00. > :00:00.the big Oscar winners? We will get Mark Kermode's verdict in the Film
:00:07. > :00:14.Review. Hello and welcome to our look ahead
:00:15. > :00:18.to what the papers will be With me are Rowena Mason,
:00:19. > :00:22.deputy political editor for the Guardian, and Jim Waterson,
:00:23. > :00:24.political editor of BuzzFeed. Tomorrow's front pages:
:00:25. > :00:29.The Financial Times focuses on the Government's approach
:00:30. > :00:32.to Brexit, ahead of the speech It says ministers are adopting
:00:33. > :00:45.an increasingly pragmatic stance. The Daily Express says Mrs May's
:00:46. > :00:48.vision will completely free Britain, once and for all,
:00:49. > :00:50.from Brussels rule. The Metro highlights
:00:51. > :00:51.the Chancellor's suggestion that Britain could become a tax haven
:00:52. > :00:54.if it is denied access The Times says US President-elect
:00:55. > :00:58.Donald Trump will offer Britain a trade deal within weeks of taking
:00:59. > :01:01.office, to help make Brexit The Telegraph has the same story,
:01:02. > :01:08.adding that Trump plans to invite Theresa May to the White House
:01:09. > :01:11.as soon as he is sworn in. The Guardian reports on the warning
:01:12. > :01:15.by the outgoing head of the CIA that Mr Trump must adopt
:01:16. > :01:17.a more careful approach The Daily Mirror reports that
:01:18. > :01:23.Jeremy Hunt will earn millions of pounds from the sale
:01:24. > :01:26.of an education website he co-owns, although he can't take the money
:01:27. > :01:30.at the moment as a serving Health And the Daily Mail has the story
:01:31. > :01:50.of a Nigerian woman who flew So let us begin. Let's go to this
:01:51. > :01:54.story in the Times. Quite an extraordinary story, an
:01:55. > :01:58.extraordinary front page it makes. A couple of people doing interviews
:01:59. > :02:05.and one familiar name, Michael Gove, who used to work for the Times at
:02:06. > :02:11.the leading Brexiteer, and someone called Oliver Wright. It is a
:02:12. > :02:15.remarkable interview, and you see Michael Gove quite obviously
:02:16. > :02:18.blurring the boundaries between journalists, politicians and
:02:19. > :02:24.campaigner. In the top line that the Times has picked out is that Donald
:02:25. > :02:28.Trump has said that he wants to do a fair trade deal with the UK almost
:02:29. > :02:35.as soon as he takes office, and that will help make Brexit a great thing.
:02:36. > :02:38.That is a really, really interesting line for a domestic audience, but
:02:39. > :02:43.possibly even more than that globally is this confirmation that
:02:44. > :02:48.he will try to seek nuclear weapons reduction deal with Russia's
:02:49. > :02:52.President Putin, in return for lifting US sanctions. That is a
:02:53. > :02:57.really significant diplomatic development, if he manages to pull
:02:58. > :03:02.that off. What we get here is such a spread of things. You mentioned two,
:03:03. > :03:06.there are more in this piece. There are so many that you can't put them
:03:07. > :03:13.all on the front page of the newspaper. There is the fact that he
:03:14. > :03:18.wants his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to find peace in the Middle East. He
:03:19. > :03:22.basically dismisses NATO as a spent force and wonders what its purpose
:03:23. > :03:26.is, along with the purpose of the EU. In the space of one hour-long
:03:27. > :03:31.conversation with Michael Gove he sets off several diplomatic problems
:03:32. > :03:35.which will now take a very long time for people to decode. I do sometimes
:03:36. > :03:40.wonder whether he is actually going to follow through on some of things
:03:41. > :03:44.that he says. When you see him saying I feel this way, is there in
:03:45. > :03:49.any thought behind it, is it calculated, or is it something that
:03:50. > :03:53.has just come into his head at this particular moment in time? He is
:03:54. > :03:56.pretty rude about Angela Merkel, saying she made a catastrophic
:03:57. > :04:01.mistake when she let 1 million migrants into Germany, but he goes
:04:02. > :04:08.on talking about her in warmer terms. Yes, slightly contradictory,
:04:09. > :04:12.as we have come to expect from Mr Trump. He says that Angela Merkel
:04:13. > :04:16.made a catastrophic mistake by leading refugees into Europe and he
:04:17. > :04:19.goes on to make some predictions about how this could cause the
:04:20. > :04:24.disintegration of the EU, and then he says he is going to start off by
:04:25. > :04:28.trusting her, even though that might not last very long. A little sting
:04:29. > :04:32.in the tail of that one. The same with Putin. He is saying he wants to
:04:33. > :04:38.do this deal with him, and then saying he will trust him for now,
:04:39. > :04:42.but potentially not forever. All the newspapers are going to scramble to
:04:43. > :04:48.catch up with this, of course. And the Telegraph has to give the Times
:04:49. > :04:53.the credit, but they point out the line about making Brexit a great
:04:54. > :04:58.thing. A great thing for who is what I want to know. Some of the guys on
:04:59. > :05:01.the US side I talked to recently said they are slightly less positive
:05:02. > :05:05.about the deal Britain will get from the trade deal with the US. They
:05:06. > :05:11.said everything will be on the table, things like pharma and
:05:12. > :05:15.agriculture, which were big, big things went Ttip was going through,
:05:16. > :05:19.ultimately scuppered by Mr Trump. They say Britain is going to really
:05:20. > :05:22.struggle with this one but journalistically what is interesting
:05:23. > :05:27.is that the Telegraph recognised that the Times front page is so good
:05:28. > :05:30.that they basically have to run it in full. Newspapers hate doing that
:05:31. > :05:34.unless they really have to. The other thing about the trade deal is
:05:35. > :05:37.that Obama said we would be at the back of the queue, so for reporters
:05:38. > :05:41.in newspapers like the Telegraph, this is a vindication of their point
:05:42. > :05:45.of view, the point of view from the Leave campaign is that Brexit would
:05:46. > :05:50.lead to trade deal and we would not miss out as a country. Very quickly,
:05:51. > :05:55.it is such a bizarre situation we're in, 12 months ago Donald Trump was
:05:56. > :05:59.not ahead in the polls on the primaries, he was still seen as joke
:06:00. > :06:02.candidate, David Cameron was secure as Prime Minister and going around
:06:03. > :06:06.Europe getting a renegotiated deal and the EU referendum was a long way
:06:07. > :06:12.off. It is absolutely mad. We stick with Brexit, let's go to the Daily
:06:13. > :06:16.Express but this is very much a domestic situation. Who starts us
:06:17. > :06:21.off? Theresa May due to make a big statement on Tuesday, everybody
:06:22. > :06:26.hoping for as I said before flashed on the bones of this thing. What has
:06:27. > :06:31.the express got to say? The Daily Express are probably the most pro-
:06:32. > :06:35.Brexit newspaper and its headline is thumbs up for Theresa May's Brexit
:06:36. > :06:39.plans. That is a signal that Brexiteers are going to be very
:06:40. > :06:43.pleased with what she has got to say, which we think is going to be
:06:44. > :06:47.that she wants to... She wants a clean Brexit. In order to achieve
:06:48. > :06:51.immigration controls she is willing to take us out of the single market,
:06:52. > :06:57.and we think also out of the customs union. At the same time we still
:06:58. > :07:00.want access to the single market. So we have also seen this weekend
:07:01. > :07:04.Philip Hammond, the Chancellor, out there saying well, unless you give
:07:05. > :07:10.us some access to the single market we would be prepared to potentially
:07:11. > :07:16.change economic model. That is code for cutting taxes, something which
:07:17. > :07:21.might frighten the rest of the EU. Encouraging them to come to the UK
:07:22. > :07:24.rather than other parts of Europe, absolutely. Interesting. I think the
:07:25. > :07:28.thing with the Express which intrigues me at the moment is that
:07:29. > :07:33.at the moment Theresa May has all the pro- Brexit newspapers behind
:07:34. > :07:37.them, the media on the whole are behind her, and she will keep that
:07:38. > :07:42.as long as she can keep proving that she is getting a proper Brexit. The
:07:43. > :07:45.moment the editors of the express and the Daily Mail start to see some
:07:46. > :07:50.give or some compromise, you could see the tone change. There'll be a
:07:51. > :07:54.lot of media influence in terms of what she is willing to compromise on
:07:55. > :08:01.and how hard she is going push it. That phrase Brexit means Brexit, do
:08:02. > :08:05.you think she will avoid that on Tuesday? I think she will need to
:08:06. > :08:09.give us a little bit more, but I think single market membership is
:08:10. > :08:13.probably for the chop. The Guardian, and it is your newspaper so you
:08:14. > :08:17.should probably tell us about this. This goes back to Donald Trump but a
:08:18. > :08:22.domestic thing for the Americans. This is the CIA getting involved.
:08:23. > :08:31.What are they say? This is the departing director of the CIA, John
:08:32. > :08:35.Brennan, who has issued a message to Donald Trump saying he should be
:08:36. > :08:39.more circumspect when tweeting, often in the early hours of the
:08:40. > :08:43.morning, his thoughts on anything and everything. Whether Donald Trump
:08:44. > :08:49.will listen to this chap remains to be seen. I think it incredibly
:08:50. > :08:54.unlikely. Intelligence agents are not exactly his favourite people. Is
:08:55. > :08:58.the outgoing? I think he is still in the job at the moment. Donald Trump
:08:59. > :09:02.in the Times interview in another section said he loves his Twitter
:09:03. > :09:06.account because as soon as he tweets anything all of the TV stations and
:09:07. > :09:13.the media rush to cover it. This headline reminds me of those
:09:14. > :09:19.careless talk costs lives posters from World War Two. Doesn't cost Mr
:09:20. > :09:24.Trump anything from his supporters. They go on loving him just the same.
:09:25. > :09:28.No, his team don't necessarily know what he is going to send out, he
:09:29. > :09:33.still has a mobile phone which he just stands out tweet, his random
:09:34. > :09:36.thoughts, he wakes up and sends out stuff that changes diplomatic
:09:37. > :09:42.positions and moves markets, no one in his team even has cited. Your
:09:43. > :09:47.organisation, in the modern way of disseminating news, is nice and
:09:48. > :09:52.small. A few words, you say it, it is irresistible. As a cynical
:09:53. > :09:58.product, it is absolutely brilliant. Everyone wants to hear about it, it
:09:59. > :10:02.is funny, rude, it gives you an emotional reaction, his tweets.
:10:03. > :10:07.Every is talking about them, whether they are on his side or not --
:10:08. > :10:12.everybody is talking about them. You can dominate the news cycle by
:10:13. > :10:23.sending out 140 characters when he wakes up. Brennan is stepping down
:10:24. > :10:27.so he can say things. He refers to Trump 's tweets about Nazi Germany.
:10:28. > :10:31.The insults are pretty nasty, aren't they? Yes, and he was pretty upset
:10:32. > :10:37.at the time about this controversial dossier that said various salacious
:10:38. > :10:40.things about Donald Trump that were supposedly written by a former
:10:41. > :10:47.British intelligence officer. And that caused a huge scandal last
:10:48. > :10:50.week. So I think it would have been a very emotional reaction to the
:10:51. > :10:55.things which were said about him in that dossier. Let's go on now to
:10:56. > :10:59.something which isn't about Donald Trump or Brexit, not directly,
:11:00. > :11:04.anyway. The Daily Mail, health tourism which is a subject they go
:11:05. > :11:06.for a big way. What is this particular story about? It is all
:11:07. > :11:10.about... Through Freedom of Information requests they have
:11:11. > :11:17.looked for the costs of maternity care for mothers who have flown into
:11:18. > :11:21.Britain or in some way ended up in Britain, despite being foreign
:11:22. > :11:26.nationals, and then gone back home having not paid their bills because,
:11:27. > :11:30.you know, they are not entitled to NHS care and yet they have left the
:11:31. > :11:35.hospitals with bills. The thing that intrigues me with this is that it is
:11:36. > :11:39.quite hard to argue on an individual case about the details on it, and it
:11:40. > :11:43.is also very hard to know, in isolation it is hard to justify.
:11:44. > :11:48.There are often circumstances... This is about one particular case of
:11:49. > :11:53.the ?350,000 bill, the person is not named. We don't have a context
:11:54. > :11:56.all-white has happened although the Daily Mail is certainly putting a
:11:57. > :11:59.context with previous cases where mothers have seemingly flown in to
:12:00. > :12:05.take advantage of superior healthcare in some respect. And as
:12:06. > :12:09.the paper says inside it, this all comes as... Journalists love to link
:12:10. > :12:14.these things up, we do have the story today about cancer operations
:12:15. > :12:18.being postponed. So it has managed to be blended in with the state of
:12:19. > :12:23.health service, the crisis in the health service. The NHS is under
:12:24. > :12:27.what are saying is unprecedented pressure at the moment and it is a
:12:28. > :12:33.little bit strange to me that the Mail is highlighting this particular
:12:34. > :12:36.problem so much when there are a lot of other things causing greater
:12:37. > :12:44.pressure on the NHS. As identified by doctors, cuts to social care, the
:12:45. > :12:49.ageing population, to name but two. They do go on inside, it has to be
:12:50. > :12:53.said, to go through a lot of the other issues as well. What is quite
:12:54. > :13:03.clever, I think, to give the Daily Mail bit of credit, what it could
:13:04. > :13:07.pay for, ?350,000. A good example of journalist digging in.
:13:08. > :13:11.Journalistically, you can imagine people talking about this down at
:13:12. > :13:16.the pub. It is a really good talking story, so there is an element of
:13:17. > :13:21.that. It is more influential than talking about billions of pounds in
:13:22. > :13:26.cuts to social care. Very quickly, I can't resist this. I don't know if
:13:27. > :13:30.either of you are dog lovers, but there is a story on the Daily
:13:31. > :13:34.Telegraph, the Queen's new role as a helpful dog walker. I'm not sure
:13:35. > :13:38.whether it is a Telegraph scoop or whether they have managed to confirm
:13:39. > :13:42.somebody else's world exclusive, but what is saying is that Her Majesty
:13:43. > :13:49.has spent last two years quietly acting as a dog walker for her
:13:50. > :13:53.former gamekeeper. His late wife was known as the keeper of the corgis,
:13:54. > :13:57.and presumably she died and so the Queen has got into the dog walking
:13:58. > :14:01.business. Another little nugget in here is that she is considering
:14:02. > :14:05.taking on two more dogs, having said that the current ones would be her
:14:06. > :14:10.last. What a thing to do when you are 90 years old. In a world of
:14:11. > :14:13.chaos, Brexit, Donald Trump, the Queen is walking some dogs. It is
:14:14. > :14:16.reassuring. It is, I like it anyway.